↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : NUM738^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 09:24:28 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.61s 1.32s
% Output   : Refutation 1.61s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   16
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   47 (  21 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  224 (  66 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  262 (  45   ~;  30   |;   0   &; 172   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  15  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   10 (   7 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   58 (   0   ^;  58   !;   0   ?;  58   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    frac: $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    frac: $tType ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    x: frac ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    y: frac ).

thf(func_def_3,type,
    z: frac ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    u: frac ).

thf(func_def_5,type,
    lessf: frac > frac > $o ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    eq: frac > frac > $o ).

thf(func_def_8,type,
    moref: frac > frac > $o ).

thf(f52,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f51,f36]) ).

thf(f36,plain,
    ( ( lessf @ x @ y )
    = $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f21]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ( ( lessf @ x @ y )
    = $true ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f20]) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    lessf @ x @ y,
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,axiom,
    lessf @ x @ y,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.SJlNybxacG/DTF2THF_20831.p',l) ).

thf(f51,plain,
    ( ( lessf @ x @ y )
   != $true ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f50]) ).

thf(f50,plain,
    ( ( ( lessf @ x @ y )
     != $true )
    | ( $true != $true ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f48,f37]) ).

thf(f37,plain,
    ( ( eq @ x @ z )
    = $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f19]) ).

thf(f19,plain,
    ( ( eq @ x @ z )
    = $true ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f18]) ).

thf(f18,plain,
    eq @ x @ z,
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,axiom,
    eq @ x @ z,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.SJlNybxacG/DTF2THF_20831.p',e) ).

thf(f48,plain,
    ! [X0: frac] :
      ( ( $true
       != ( eq @ X0 @ z ) )
      | ( ( lessf @ X0 @ y )
       != $true ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f47]) ).

thf(f47,plain,
    ! [X0: frac] :
      ( ( $true
       != ( eq @ X0 @ z ) )
      | ( $true != $true )
      | ( ( lessf @ X0 @ y )
       != $true ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f45,f32]) ).

thf(f32,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( ( ( moref @ X1 @ X0 )
        = $true )
      | ( ( lessf @ X0 @ X1 )
       != $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f30]) ).

thf(f30,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( ( ( lessf @ X0 @ X1 )
       != $true )
      | ( ( moref @ X1 @ X0 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f25]) ).

thf(f25,plain,
    ! [X1: frac,X0: frac] :
      ( ( ( lessf @ X1 @ X0 )
       != $true )
      | ( ( moref @ X0 @ X1 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f15]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ! [X1: frac,X0: frac] :
      ( ( ( lessf @ X1 @ X0 )
        = $true )
     => ( ( moref @ X0 @ X1 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f14]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( ( lessf @ X1 @ X0 )
     => ( moref @ X0 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f6]) ).

thf(f6,axiom,
    ! [X1: frac,X0: frac] :
      ( ( lessf @ X0 @ X1 )
     => ( moref @ X1 @ X0 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.SJlNybxacG/DTF2THF_20831.p',satz43) ).

thf(f45,plain,
    ! [X0: frac] :
      ( ( $true
       != ( moref @ y @ X0 ) )
      | ( $true
       != ( eq @ X0 @ z ) ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f44]) ).

thf(f44,plain,
    ! [X0: frac] :
      ( ( $true
       != ( eq @ X0 @ z ) )
      | ( $true
       != ( moref @ y @ X0 ) )
      | ( $true != $true ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f43,f35]) ).

thf(f35,plain,
    ( ( eq @ y @ u )
    = $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f11]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ( ( eq @ y @ u )
    = $true ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f10]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    eq @ y @ u,
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f3]) ).

thf(f3,axiom,
    eq @ y @ u,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.SJlNybxacG/DTF2THF_20831.p',f) ).

thf(f43,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( ( $true
       != ( eq @ X1 @ u ) )
      | ( ( moref @ X1 @ X0 )
       != $true )
      | ( $true
       != ( eq @ X0 @ z ) ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f42]) ).

thf(f42,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( ( ( moref @ X1 @ X0 )
       != $true )
      | ( $true
       != ( eq @ X0 @ z ) )
      | ( $true
       != ( eq @ X1 @ u ) )
      | ( $true != $true ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f39,f31]) ).

thf(f31,plain,
    ! [X2: frac,X3: frac,X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( ( ( moref @ X1 @ X3 )
        = $true )
      | ( $true
       != ( eq @ X2 @ X3 ) )
      | ( ( eq @ X0 @ X1 )
       != $true )
      | ( ( moref @ X0 @ X2 )
       != $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f29]) ).

thf(f29,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac,X2: frac,X3: frac] :
      ( ( ( moref @ X1 @ X3 )
        = $true )
      | ( ( eq @ X0 @ X1 )
       != $true )
      | ( ( moref @ X0 @ X2 )
       != $true )
      | ( $true
       != ( eq @ X2 @ X3 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f27]) ).

thf(f27,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac,X3: frac,X2: frac] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( moref @ X1 @ X2 ) )
      | ( ( eq @ X0 @ X1 )
       != $true )
      | ( $true
       != ( moref @ X0 @ X3 ) )
      | ( ( eq @ X3 @ X2 )
       != $true ) ),
    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f26]) ).

thf(f26,plain,
    ! [X3: frac,X1: frac,X0: frac,X2: frac] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( moref @ X1 @ X2 ) )
      | ( ( eq @ X3 @ X2 )
       != $true )
      | ( ( eq @ X0 @ X1 )
       != $true )
      | ( $true
       != ( moref @ X0 @ X3 ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f23]) ).

thf(f23,plain,
    ! [X3: frac,X1: frac,X0: frac,X2: frac] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( moref @ X0 @ X3 ) )
     => ( ( ( eq @ X0 @ X1 )
          = $true )
       => ( ( ( eq @ X3 @ X2 )
            = $true )
         => ( $true
            = ( moref @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f22]) ).

thf(f22,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac,X2: frac,X3: frac] :
      ( ( moref @ X0 @ X3 )
     => ( ( eq @ X0 @ X1 )
       => ( ( eq @ X3 @ X2 )
         => ( moref @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,axiom,
    ! [X0: frac,X2: frac,X3: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( ( moref @ X0 @ X1 )
     => ( ( eq @ X0 @ X2 )
       => ( ( eq @ X1 @ X3 )
         => ( moref @ X2 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.SJlNybxacG/DTF2THF_20831.p',satz44) ).

thf(f39,plain,
    ( $true
   != ( moref @ u @ z ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f38]) ).

thf(f38,plain,
    ( ( $true != $true )
    | ( $true
     != ( moref @ u @ z ) ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f33,f34]) ).

thf(f34,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( ( ( lessf @ X1 @ X0 )
        = $true )
      | ( ( moref @ X0 @ X1 )
       != $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f28]) ).

thf(f28,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( ( ( moref @ X0 @ X1 )
       != $true )
      | ( ( lessf @ X1 @ X0 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f13]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( ( ( moref @ X0 @ X1 )
        = $true )
     => ( ( lessf @ X1 @ X0 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f12]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( ( moref @ X0 @ X1 )
     => ( lessf @ X1 @ X0 ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,axiom,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( ( moref @ X0 @ X1 )
     => ( lessf @ X1 @ X0 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.SJlNybxacG/DTF2THF_20831.p',satz42) ).

thf(f33,plain,
    ( ( lessf @ z @ u )
   != $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f24]) ).

thf(f24,plain,
    ( ( lessf @ z @ u )
   != $true ),
    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f17]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ( ( lessf @ z @ u )
   != $true ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f16]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ~ ( lessf @ z @ u ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f8]) ).

thf(f8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( lessf @ z @ u ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f7]) ).

thf(f7,conjecture,
    lessf @ z @ u,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.SJlNybxacG/DTF2THF_20831.p',satz45) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : NUM738^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.16/0.34  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 11:12:27 EST 2026
% 0.16/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.34  Running /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.19/0.46  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.19/0.46  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.19/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.46  % File     : NUM738^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.19/0.46  % Domain   : Number Theory
% 0.19/0.46  % Problem  : Landau theorem 45
% 0.19/0.46  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.19/0.46  % English  : lessf z u
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  % Refs     : [Lan30] Landau (1930), Grundlagen der Analysis
% 0.19/0.46  %          : [vBJ79] van Benthem Jutting (1979), Checking Landau's "Grundla
% 0.19/0.46  %          : [Bro09] Brown (2009), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.19/0.46  % Source   : [Bro09]
% 0.19/0.46  % Names    : satz45 [Lan30]
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.19/0.46  %          : Without extensionality : Theorem
% 0.19/0.46  % Rating   : 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.25 v5.2.0, 0.00 v4.0.1, 0.33 v4.0.0, 0.00 v3.7.0
% 0.19/0.46  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (   4 unt;   8 typ;   0 def)
% 0.19/0.46  %            Number of atoms       :   12 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.19/0.46  %            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
% 0.19/0.46  %            Number of connectives :   29 (   0   ~;   0   |;   0   &;  24   @)
% 0.19/0.46  %                                         (   0 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.19/0.46  %            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   5 avg)
% 0.19/0.46  %            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
% 0.19/0.46  %            Number of type conns  :    6 (   6   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.19/0.46  %            Number of symbols     :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.19/0.46  %            Number of variables   :    8 (   0   ^;   8   !;   0   ?;   8   :)
% 0.19/0.46  % SPC      : TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  % Comments : 
% 0.19/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.46  thf(frac_type,type,
% 0.19/0.46      frac: $tType ).
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  thf(x,type,
% 0.19/0.46      x: frac ).
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  thf(y,type,
% 0.19/0.46      y: frac ).
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  thf(z,type,
% 0.19/0.46      z: frac ).
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  thf(u,type,
% 0.19/0.46      u: frac ).
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  thf(lessf,type,
% 0.19/0.46      lessf: frac > frac > $o ).
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  thf(l,axiom,
% 0.19/0.46      lessf @ x @ y ).
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  thf(eq,type,
% 0.19/0.46      eq: frac > frac > $o ).
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  thf(e,axiom,
% 0.19/0.46      eq @ x @ z ).
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  thf(f,axiom,
% 0.19/0.46      eq @ y @ u ).
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  thf(moref,type,
% 0.19/0.46      moref: frac > frac > $o ).
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  thf(satz42,axiom,
% 0.19/0.46      ! [Xx: frac,Xy: frac] :
% 0.19/0.46        ( ( moref @ Xx @ Xy )
% 0.19/0.46       => ( lessf @ Xy @ Xx ) ) ).
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  thf(satz44,axiom,
% 0.19/0.46      ! [Xx: frac,Xy: frac,Xz: frac,Xu: frac] :
% 0.19/0.46        ( ( moref @ Xx @ Xy )
% 0.19/0.46       => ( ( eq @ Xx @ Xz )
% 0.19/0.46         => ( ( eq @ Xy @ Xu )
% 0.19/0.46           => ( moref @ Xz @ Xu ) ) ) ) ).
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  thf(satz43,axiom,
% 0.19/0.46      ! [Xx: frac,Xy: frac] :
% 0.19/0.46        ( ( lessf @ Xx @ Xy )
% 0.19/0.46       => ( moref @ Xy @ Xx ) ) ).
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  thf(satz45,conjecture,
% 0.19/0.46      lessf @ z @ u ).
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.46  ------------------------
% 1.46/1.27  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.46/1.28  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.46/1.28  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 11:12:28 EST 2026
% 1.46/1.28  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.46/1.28  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.46/1.28  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.46/1.28  
% 1.46/1.28  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.SJlNybxacG/DTF2DTF20831.p
% See solution above
% 1.46/1.28  ------------------------
% 1.46/1.29  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.46/1.29  thf(frac_type,type,
% 1.46/1.29      frac: $tType ).
% 1.46/1.29  
% 1.46/1.29  thf(x,type,
% 1.46/1.29      x: frac ).
% 1.46/1.29  
% 1.46/1.29  thf(y,type,
% 1.46/1.29      y: frac ).
% 1.46/1.29  
% 1.46/1.29  thf(z,type,
% 1.46/1.29      z: frac ).
% 1.46/1.29  
% 1.46/1.29  thf(u,type,
% 1.46/1.29      u: frac ).
% 1.46/1.29  
% 1.46/1.29  thf(lessf,type,
% 1.46/1.29      lessf: frac > frac > $o ).
% 1.46/1.29  
% 1.46/1.29  thf(l,axiom,
% 1.46/1.29      lessf @ x @ y ).
% 1.46/1.29  
% 1.46/1.29  thf(eq,type,
% 1.46/1.29      eq: frac > frac > $o ).
% 1.46/1.29  
% 1.46/1.29  thf(e,axiom,
% 1.46/1.29      eq @ x @ z ).
% 1.46/1.29  
% 1.46/1.29  thf(f,axiom,
% 1.46/1.29      eq @ y @ u ).
% 1.46/1.29  
% 1.46/1.29  thf(moref,type,
% 1.46/1.29      moref: frac > frac > $o ).
% 1.46/1.29  
% 1.46/1.29  thf(satz42,axiom,
% 1.46/1.29      ! [Xx: frac,Xy: frac] :
% 1.46/1.29        ( ( moref @ Xx @ Xy )
% 1.46/1.29       => ( lessf @ Xy @ Xx ) ) ).
% 1.46/1.29  
% 1.46/1.29  thf(satz44,axiom,
% 1.46/1.29      ! [Xx: frac,Xy: frac,Xz: frac,Xu: frac] :
% 1.46/1.29        ( ( moref @ Xx @ Xy )
% 1.46/1.29       => ( ( eq @ Xx @ Xz )
% 1.46/1.29         => ( ( eq @ Xy @ Xu )
% 1.46/1.29           => ( moref @ Xz @ Xu ) ) ) ) ).
% 1.46/1.29  
% 1.46/1.29  thf(satz43,axiom,
% 1.46/1.29      ! [Xx: frac,Xy: frac] :
% 1.46/1.29        ( ( lessf @ Xx @ Xy )
% 1.46/1.29       => ( moref @ Xy @ Xx ) ) ).
% 1.46/1.29  
% 1.46/1.29  thf(satz45,conjecture,
% 1.46/1.29      lessf @ z @ u ).
% 1.46/1.29  ------------------------
% 1.61/1.30  % (21024)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_20831 for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 1.61/1.30  % (21021)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_20831 for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 1.61/1.30  % (21024)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.61/1.30  % (21024)------------------------------
% 1.61/1.30  % (21024)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.61/1.30  % (21024)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.61/1.30  % (21024)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.61/1.30  
% 1.61/1.30  % (21024)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.61/1.30  % (21024)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 1.61/1.30  % (21024)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 1.61/1.30  % (21024)------------------------------
% 1.61/1.30  % (21024)------------------------------
% 1.61/1.30  % (21021)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.61/1.30  % (21021)------------------------------
% 1.61/1.30  % (21021)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.61/1.30  % (21021)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.61/1.30  % (21021)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.61/1.30  
% 1.61/1.30  % (21021)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.61/1.30  % (21021)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.61/1.30  % (21021)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 1.61/1.30  % (21021)------------------------------
% 1.61/1.30  % (21021)------------------------------
% 1.61/1.31  % (21020)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_20831 for (2999ds/183Mi)
% 1.61/1.31  % (21022)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_20831 for (2999ds/27Mi)
% 1.61/1.31  % (21023)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_20831 for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 1.61/1.31  % (21023)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.61/1.31  % (21023)------------------------------
% 1.61/1.31  % (21023)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.61/1.31  % (21023)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.61/1.31  % (21023)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.61/1.31  
% 1.61/1.31  % (21023)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 1.61/1.31  % (21023)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 1.61/1.31  % (21023)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.61/1.31  % (21023)------------------------------
% 1.61/1.31  % (21023)------------------------------
% 1.61/1.31  % (21020)First to succeed.
% 1.61/1.31  % (21022)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 1.61/1.31  % (21029)lrs+1002_1:1_cnfonf=lazy_not_be_gen:hud=14:prag=on:sp=weighted_frequency:tnu=1:i=37:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_20831 for (2999ds/37Mi)
% 1.61/1.32  % (21025)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_20831 for (2999ds/275Mi)
% 1.61/1.32  % (21020)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.61/1.32  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_20831
% 1.61/1.32  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_20831
% 1.61/1.32  thf(type_def_5, type, frac: $tType).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(func_def_0, type, frac: $tType).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(func_def_1, type, x: frac).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(func_def_2, type, y: frac).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(func_def_3, type, z: frac).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(func_def_4, type, u: frac).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(func_def_5, type, lessf: frac > frac > $o).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(func_def_7, type, eq: frac > frac > $o).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(func_def_8, type, moref: frac > frac > $o).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f52,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    $false),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f51,f36])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f36,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ((lessf @ x @ y) = $true)),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f21])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f21,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ((lessf @ x @ y) = $true)),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f20])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f20,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    (lessf @ x @ y)),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f1])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f1,axiom,(
% 1.61/1.32    (lessf @ x @ y)),
% 1.61/1.32    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.SJlNybxacG/DTF2THF_20831.p',l)).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f51,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ((lessf @ x @ y) != $true)),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f50])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f50,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ((lessf @ x @ y) != $true) | ($true != $true)),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f48,f37])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f37,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ((eq @ x @ z) = $true)),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f19])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f19,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ((eq @ x @ z) = $true)),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f18])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f18,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    (eq @ x @ z)),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f2,axiom,(
% 1.61/1.32    (eq @ x @ z)),
% 1.61/1.32    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.SJlNybxacG/DTF2THF_20831.p',e)).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f48,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ( ! [X0 : frac] : (($true != (eq @ X0 @ z)) | ((lessf @ X0 @ y) != $true)) )),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f47])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f47,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ( ! [X0 : frac] : (($true != (eq @ X0 @ z)) | ($true != $true) | ((lessf @ X0 @ y) != $true)) )),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f45,f32])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f32,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ( ! [X0 : frac,X1 : frac] : (((moref @ X1 @ X0) = $true) | ((lessf @ X0 @ X1) != $true)) )),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f30])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f30,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ! [X0 : frac,X1 : frac] : (((lessf @ X0 @ X1) != $true) | ((moref @ X1 @ X0) = $true))),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f25])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f25,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ! [X1 : frac,X0 : frac] : (((lessf @ X1 @ X0) != $true) | ((moref @ X0 @ X1) = $true))),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f15])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f15,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ! [X1 : frac,X0 : frac] : (((lessf @ X1 @ X0) = $true) => ((moref @ X0 @ X1) = $true))),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f14])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f14,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ! [X0 : frac,X1 : frac] : ((lessf @ X1 @ X0) => (moref @ X0 @ X1))),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f6])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f6,axiom,(
% 1.61/1.32    ! [X1 : frac,X0 : frac] : ((lessf @ X0 @ X1) => (moref @ X1 @ X0))),
% 1.61/1.32    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.SJlNybxacG/DTF2THF_20831.p',satz43)).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f45,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ( ! [X0 : frac] : (($true != (moref @ y @ X0)) | ($true != (eq @ X0 @ z))) )),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f44])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f44,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ( ! [X0 : frac] : (($true != (eq @ X0 @ z)) | ($true != (moref @ y @ X0)) | ($true != $true)) )),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f43,f35])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f35,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ((eq @ y @ u) = $true)),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f11])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f11,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ((eq @ y @ u) = $true)),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f10])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f10,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    (eq @ y @ u)),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f3])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f3,axiom,(
% 1.61/1.32    (eq @ y @ u)),
% 1.61/1.32    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.SJlNybxacG/DTF2THF_20831.p',f)).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f43,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ( ! [X0 : frac,X1 : frac] : (($true != (eq @ X1 @ u)) | ((moref @ X1 @ X0) != $true) | ($true != (eq @ X0 @ z))) )),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f42])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f42,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ( ! [X0 : frac,X1 : frac] : (((moref @ X1 @ X0) != $true) | ($true != (eq @ X0 @ z)) | ($true != (eq @ X1 @ u)) | ($true != $true)) )),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f39,f31])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f31,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ( ! [X2 : frac,X3 : frac,X0 : frac,X1 : frac] : (((moref @ X1 @ X3) = $true) | ($true != (eq @ X2 @ X3)) | ((eq @ X0 @ X1) != $true) | ((moref @ X0 @ X2) != $true)) )),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f29])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f29,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ! [X0 : frac,X1 : frac,X2 : frac,X3 : frac] : (((moref @ X1 @ X3) = $true) | ((eq @ X0 @ X1) != $true) | ((moref @ X0 @ X2) != $true) | ($true != (eq @ X2 @ X3)))),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f27])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f27,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ! [X0 : frac,X1 : frac,X3 : frac,X2 : frac] : (($true = (moref @ X1 @ X2)) | ((eq @ X0 @ X1) != $true) | ($true != (moref @ X0 @ X3)) | ((eq @ X3 @ X2) != $true))),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f26])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f26,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ! [X3 : frac,X1 : frac,X0 : frac,X2 : frac] : (((($true = (moref @ X1 @ X2)) | ((eq @ X3 @ X2) != $true)) | ((eq @ X0 @ X1) != $true)) | ($true != (moref @ X0 @ X3)))),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f23])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f23,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ! [X3 : frac,X1 : frac,X0 : frac,X2 : frac] : (($true = (moref @ X0 @ X3)) => (((eq @ X0 @ X1) = $true) => (((eq @ X3 @ X2) = $true) => ($true = (moref @ X1 @ X2)))))),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f22])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f22,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ! [X0 : frac,X1 : frac,X2 : frac,X3 : frac] : ((moref @ X0 @ X3) => ((eq @ X0 @ X1) => ((eq @ X3 @ X2) => (moref @ X1 @ X2))))),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f5,axiom,(
% 1.61/1.32    ! [X0 : frac,X2 : frac,X3 : frac,X1 : frac] : ((moref @ X0 @ X1) => ((eq @ X0 @ X2) => ((eq @ X1 @ X3) => (moref @ X2 @ X3))))),
% 1.61/1.32    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.SJlNybxacG/DTF2THF_20831.p',satz44)).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f39,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ($true != (moref @ u @ z))),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f38])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f38,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ($true != $true) | ($true != (moref @ u @ z))),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f33,f34])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f34,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ( ! [X0 : frac,X1 : frac] : (((lessf @ X1 @ X0) = $true) | ((moref @ X0 @ X1) != $true)) )),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f28])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f28,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ! [X0 : frac,X1 : frac] : (((moref @ X0 @ X1) != $true) | ((lessf @ X1 @ X0) = $true))),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f13])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f13,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ! [X0 : frac,X1 : frac] : (((moref @ X0 @ X1) = $true) => ((lessf @ X1 @ X0) = $true))),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f12])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f12,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ! [X0 : frac,X1 : frac] : ((moref @ X0 @ X1) => (lessf @ X1 @ X0))),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f4])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f4,axiom,(
% 1.61/1.32    ! [X0 : frac,X1 : frac] : ((moref @ X0 @ X1) => (lessf @ X1 @ X0))),
% 1.61/1.32    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.SJlNybxacG/DTF2THF_20831.p',satz42)).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f33,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ((lessf @ z @ u) != $true)),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f24])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f24,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ((lessf @ z @ u) != $true)),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f17])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f17,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ~((lessf @ z @ u) = $true)),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f16])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f16,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ~(lessf @ z @ u)),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f8])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f8,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.61/1.32    ~(lessf @ z @ u)),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f7])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f7,conjecture,(
% 1.61/1.32    (lessf @ z @ u)),
% 1.61/1.32    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.SJlNybxacG/DTF2THF_20831.p',satz45)).
% 1.61/1.32  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_20831
% 1.61/1.32  % (21020)------------------------------
% 1.61/1.32  % (21020)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.61/1.32  % (21020)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.61/1.32  
% 1.61/1.32  % (21020)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.61/1.32  % (21020)Time elapsed: 0.007 s
% 1.61/1.32  % (21020)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 1.61/1.32  % (21020)------------------------------
% 1.61/1.32  % (21020)------------------------------
% 1.61/1.32  % (21019)Success in time 0.022 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------