↑ Up

Vampire-SAT---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---5.0.1
% Problem  : NUM738^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:19:25 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.08s 0.15s
% Output   : Refutation 0.08s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   16
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   46 (  23 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  203 (  59 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  225 (  30   ~;  24   |;   0   &; 156   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  15  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   11 (   8 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   50 (   0   ^;  50   !;   0   ?;  50   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    frac: $tType ).

thf(type_def_6,type,
    sTfun: ( $tType * $tType ) > $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    x: frac ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    y: frac ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    z: frac ).

thf(func_def_3,type,
    u: frac ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    lessf: frac > frac > $o ).

thf(func_def_6,type,
    eq: frac > frac > $o ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    moref: frac > frac > $o ).

thf(f1,axiom,
    lessf @ x @ y,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l) ).

thf(f2,axiom,
    eq @ x @ z,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',e) ).

thf(f3,axiom,
    eq @ y @ u,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f) ).

thf(f4,axiom,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( ( moref @ X0 @ X1 )
     => ( lessf @ X1 @ X0 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz42) ).

thf(f5,axiom,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac,X2: frac,X3: frac] :
      ( ( moref @ X0 @ X1 )
     => ( ( eq @ X0 @ X2 )
       => ( ( eq @ X1 @ X3 )
         => ( moref @ X2 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz44) ).

thf(f6,axiom,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( ( lessf @ X0 @ X1 )
     => ( moref @ X1 @ X0 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz43) ).

thf(f7,conjecture,
    lessf @ z @ u,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz45) ).

thf(f8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( lessf @ z @ u ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f7]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    lessf @ x @ y,
    inference(rectify,[],[f1]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( ( lessf @ x @ y )
    = $true ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f9]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    eq @ x @ z,
    inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ( ( eq @ x @ z )
    = $true ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f11]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    eq @ y @ u,
    inference(rectify,[],[f3]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ( ( eq @ y @ u )
    = $true ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f13]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( ( moref @ X0 @ X1 )
     => ( lessf @ X1 @ X0 ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f4]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( ( ( moref @ X0 @ X1 )
        = $true )
     => ( ( lessf @ X1 @ X0 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f15]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac,X2: frac,X3: frac] :
      ( ( moref @ X0 @ X1 )
     => ( ( eq @ X0 @ X2 )
       => ( ( eq @ X1 @ X3 )
         => ( moref @ X2 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f5]) ).

thf(f18,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac,X2: frac,X3: frac] :
      ( ( ( moref @ X0 @ X1 )
        = $true )
     => ( ( ( eq @ X0 @ X2 )
          = $true )
       => ( ( ( eq @ X1 @ X3 )
            = $true )
         => ( ( moref @ X2 @ X3 )
            = $true ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f17]) ).

thf(f19,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( ( lessf @ X0 @ X1 )
     => ( moref @ X1 @ X0 ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f6]) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( ( ( lessf @ X0 @ X1 )
        = $true )
     => ( ( moref @ X1 @ X0 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f19]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ~ ( lessf @ z @ u ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f8]) ).

thf(f22,plain,
    ( ( lessf @ z @ u )
   != $true ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f21]) ).

thf(f23,plain,
    ( ( lessf @ z @ u )
   != $true ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f22]) ).

thf(f24,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( ( ( lessf @ X1 @ X0 )
        = $true )
      | ( ( moref @ X0 @ X1 )
       != $true ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

thf(f25,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac,X2: frac,X3: frac] :
      ( ( ( moref @ X2 @ X3 )
        = $true )
      | ( ( eq @ X1 @ X3 )
       != $true )
      | ( ( eq @ X0 @ X2 )
       != $true )
      | ( ( moref @ X0 @ X1 )
       != $true ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

thf(f26,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac,X2: frac,X3: frac] :
      ( ( ( moref @ X2 @ X3 )
        = $true )
      | ( ( eq @ X1 @ X3 )
       != $true )
      | ( ( eq @ X0 @ X2 )
       != $true )
      | ( ( moref @ X0 @ X1 )
       != $true ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f25]) ).

thf(f27,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( ( ( moref @ X1 @ X0 )
        = $true )
      | ( ( lessf @ X0 @ X1 )
       != $true ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

thf(f28,plain,
    ( ( lessf @ x @ y )
    = $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

thf(f29,plain,
    ( ( eq @ x @ z )
    = $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

thf(f30,plain,
    ( ( eq @ y @ u )
    = $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

thf(f31,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( ( ( moref @ X0 @ X1 )
       != $true )
      | ( ( lessf @ X1 @ X0 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).

thf(f32,plain,
    ! [X2: frac,X3: frac,X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( ( ( moref @ X0 @ X1 )
       != $true )
      | ( ( eq @ X1 @ X3 )
       != $true )
      | ( ( eq @ X0 @ X2 )
       != $true )
      | ( ( moref @ X2 @ X3 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f26]) ).

thf(f33,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( ( ( lessf @ X0 @ X1 )
       != $true )
      | ( ( moref @ X1 @ X0 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f27]) ).

thf(f34,plain,
    ( ( lessf @ z @ u )
   != $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f23]) ).

thf(f53,plain,
    ( ( $true != $true )
    | ( $true
      = ( moref @ y @ x ) ) ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f33,f28]) ).

thf(f54,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( moref @ y @ x ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f53]) ).

thf(f83,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( ( $true != $true )
      | ( $true
       != ( eq @ x @ X0 ) )
      | ( $true
       != ( eq @ y @ X1 ) )
      | ( ( moref @ X1 @ X0 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f32,f54]) ).

thf(f87,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( ( $true
       != ( eq @ y @ X1 ) )
      | ( $true
       != ( eq @ x @ X0 ) )
      | ( ( moref @ X1 @ X0 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f83]) ).

thf(f90,plain,
    ! [X0: frac] :
      ( ( $true != $true )
      | ( $true
       != ( eq @ x @ X0 ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( moref @ u @ X0 ) ) ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f87,f30]) ).

thf(f91,plain,
    ! [X0: frac] :
      ( ( $true
       != ( eq @ x @ X0 ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( moref @ u @ X0 ) ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f90]) ).

thf(f94,plain,
    ( ( $true != $true )
    | ( $true
      = ( moref @ u @ z ) ) ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f91,f29]) ).

thf(f95,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( moref @ u @ z ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f94]) ).

thf(f100,plain,
    ( ( $true != $true )
    | ( ( lessf @ z @ u )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f31,f95]) ).

thf(f101,plain,
    ( ( lessf @ z @ u )
    = $true ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f100]) ).

thf(f107,plain,
    $true != $true,
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f34,f101]) ).

thf(f110,plain,
    $false,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f107]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01  % Problem  : NUM738^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.00/0.10  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.00/0.10  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.00/0.10  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.00/0.10  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.00/0.10  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.00/0.10  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.00/0.10  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.00/0.10  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 12:46:18 UTC 2026
% 0.00/0.10  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.00/0.10  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.08/0.12  Running first-order model finding
% 0.08/0.12  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc --intent sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.15  % (55513)Will run a generic schedule for satisfiability detection.
% 0.08/0.15  % (55519)% WARNING: option uhcvi not known.
% 0.08/0.15  % (55518)fmb+10_1_sas=cadical:bce=on:rp=on:random_seed=72119847_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/0Mi)
% 0.08/0.15  % (55519)dis+11_61:31_drc=ordering:lsd=5:bsr=unit_only:rp=on:newcnf=on:random_seed=2863571797:i=135531:add=off:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/135531Mi)
% 0.08/0.15  % (55522)ott+31_1_sil=16000:lcm=predicate:bce=on:newcnf=on:random_seed=2337948660:i=116_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/116Mi)
% 0.08/0.15  % (55520)dis+10_161_sil=256000:plsq=on:plsqr=61199697,1048576:gs=on:alpa=true:sac=on:slsq=on:cn=on:random_seed=667232950:i=88024:add=on:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/88024Mi)
% 0.08/0.15  % (55521)dis+10_1_sil=32000:sp=arity:random_seed=3857011180:i=103:fgj=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/103Mi)
% 0.08/0.15  % (55519)WARNING: Not using 'newcnf' as currently not compatible with higher-order inputs.
% 0.08/0.15  % (55522)WARNING: Not using 'newcnf' as currently not compatible with higher-order inputs.
% 0.08/0.15  % (55519)WARNING: Look ahead literal selection is not currently compatible with higher-order. Ignoring request to use
% 0.08/0.15  % Exception at run slice level
% 0.08/0.15  User error: Finite model building is currently not compatible with polymorphism or higher-order constructs% (55523)ott+1_1_to=lpo:sil=16000:sp=reverse_arity:erd=off:random_seed=2339499647:i=131_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/131Mi)
% 0.08/0.15  
% 0.08/0.15  % (55524)ott-3_16_to=lpo:sil=16000:sp=arity:fd=off:rp=on:random_seed=1868847563:i=159:bs=unit_only:nicw=on:fsr=off:amm=off_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/159Mi)
% 0.08/0.15  % (55524) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-55513-55524"...
% 0.08/0.15  % (55523) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-55513-55523"...
% 0.08/0.15  % (55521) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-55513-55521"...
% 0.08/0.15  % (55519) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-55513-55519"...
% 0.08/0.15  % (55524)...printing done.
% 0.08/0.15  % (55523)...printing done.
% 0.08/0.15  % (55520) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-55513-55520"...
% 0.08/0.15  % (55524)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.08/0.15  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.08/0.15  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.08/0.15  % (55524)------------------------------
% 0.08/0.15  % (55524)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.08/0.15  % (55524)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.08/0.15  % (55524)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.08/0.15  % (55524)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.08/0.15  % (55524)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.08/0.15  % (55524)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.08/0.15  % (55524)Instructions burned: 6 (million)
% 0.08/0.15  % (55513)Success in time 0.026 s
% 0.08/0.15  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------