%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : NUM738^1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.i4JViqrY7H true
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct 2 04:48:10 PM UTC 2025
% Result : Theorem 0.35s 0.84s
% Output : Refutation 0.35s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 21 ( 12 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 35 ( 0 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 95 ( 13 ~; 9 |; 0 &; 68 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 5 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 1 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 8 ( 7 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 0 ^; 18 !; 0 ?; 18 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(frac_type,type,
frac: $tType ).
thf(u_type,type,
u: frac ).
thf(y_type,type,
y: frac ).
thf(eq_type,type,
eq: frac > frac > $o ).
thf(moref_type,type,
moref: frac > frac > $o ).
thf(lessf_type,type,
lessf: frac > frac > $o ).
thf(z_type,type,
z: frac ).
thf(x_type,type,
x: frac ).
thf(satz43,axiom,
! [Xx: frac,Xy: frac] :
( ( lessf @ Xx @ Xy )
=> ( moref @ Xy @ Xx ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl5,plain,
! [X0: frac,X1: frac] :
( ( moref @ X0 @ X1 )
| ~ ( lessf @ X1 @ X0 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[satz43]) ).
thf(satz42,axiom,
! [Xx: frac,Xy: frac] :
( ( moref @ Xx @ Xy )
=> ( lessf @ Xy @ Xx ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl3,plain,
! [X0: frac,X1: frac] :
( ( lessf @ X0 @ X1 )
| ~ ( moref @ X1 @ X0 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[satz42]) ).
thf(e,axiom,
eq @ x @ z ).
thf(zip_derived_cl1,plain,
eq @ x @ z,
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[e]) ).
thf(f,axiom,
eq @ y @ u ).
thf(zip_derived_cl2,plain,
eq @ y @ u,
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[f]) ).
thf(satz44,axiom,
! [Xx: frac,Xy: frac,Xz: frac,Xu: frac] :
( ( moref @ Xx @ Xy )
=> ( ( eq @ Xx @ Xz )
=> ( ( eq @ Xy @ Xu )
=> ( moref @ Xz @ Xu ) ) ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl4,plain,
! [X0: frac,X1: frac,X2: frac,X3: frac] :
( ~ ( eq @ X0 @ X1 )
| ~ ( moref @ X0 @ X2 )
| ~ ( eq @ X2 @ X3 )
| ( moref @ X1 @ X3 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[satz44]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl11,plain,
! [X0: frac,X1: frac] :
( ( moref @ u @ X0 )
| ~ ( eq @ X1 @ X0 )
| ~ ( moref @ y @ X1 ) ),
inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl2,zip_derived_cl4]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl18,plain,
( ~ ( moref @ y @ x )
| ( moref @ u @ z ) ),
inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl1,zip_derived_cl11]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl34,plain,
( ( lessf @ z @ u )
| ~ ( moref @ y @ x ) ),
inference('sup+',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl3,zip_derived_cl18]) ).
thf(satz45,conjecture,
lessf @ z @ u ).
thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
~ ( lessf @ z @ u ),
inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[satz45]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl6,plain,
~ ( lessf @ z @ u ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl37,plain,
~ ( moref @ y @ x ),
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl34,zip_derived_cl6]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl41,plain,
~ ( lessf @ x @ y ),
inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl5,zip_derived_cl37]) ).
thf(l,axiom,
lessf @ x @ y ).
thf(zip_derived_cl0,plain,
lessf @ x @ y,
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[l]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl43,plain,
$false,
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl41,zip_derived_cl0]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.18 % Problem : NUM738^1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.12/0.19 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.i4JViqrY7H true
% 0.12/0.41 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.41 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.41 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.41 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.41 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.41 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.41 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.41 % DateTime : Wed Oct 1 16:48:53 EDT 2025
% 0.12/0.41 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.41 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.12/0.41 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.41 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.12/0.41 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.12/0.42 % Running in HO mode
% 0.31/0.69 % Total configuration time : 828
% 0.31/0.69 % Estimated wc time : 1656
% 0.31/0.69 % Estimated cpu time (8 cpus) : 207.0
% 0.35/0.79 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_c.s.sh running for 80s
% 0.35/0.80 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/35_full_unif4.sh running for 80s
% 0.35/0.80 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_c_ic.sh running for 80s
% 0.35/0.80 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/15_e_short1.sh running for 30s
% 0.35/0.81 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_b.comb.sh running for 70s
% 0.35/0.81 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_noforms.sh running for 90s
% 0.35/0.82 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/20_acsne_simpl.sh running for 40s
% 0.35/0.83 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/30_sp5.sh running for 60s
% 0.35/0.84 % Solved by lams/40_c.s.sh.
% 0.35/0.84 % done 19 iterations in 0.020s
% 0.35/0.84 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.35/0.84 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.35/0.84
% 0.35/0.84
% 0.35/0.84 % Terminating...
% 0.35/0.91 % Runner terminated.
% 0.35/0.92 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------