↑ Up

Vampire---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---5.0.1
% Problem  : NUM739_8 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 12:16:45 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.44s 1.46s
% Output   : Refutation 3.44s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   34 (  11 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   70 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   77 (  41   ~;  26   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   9  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   41 (  41   !;   0   ?;  41   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(type_def_5,type,
    frac: $tType ).

tff(func_def_0,type,
    x: frac ).

tff(func_def_1,type,
    y: frac ).

tff(func_def_2,type,
    z: frac ).

tff(func_def_3,type,
    u: frac ).

tff(pred_def_1,type,
    moref: ( frac * frac ) > $o ).

tff(pred_def_2,type,
    eq: ( frac * frac ) > $o ).

tff(f1,axiom,
    ( ~ moref(x,y)
   => eq(x,y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m) ).

tff(f2,axiom,
    eq(x,z),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',e) ).

tff(f3,axiom,
    eq(y,u),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f) ).

tff(f5,axiom,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac,X2: frac] :
      ( eq(X0,X1)
     => ( eq(X1,X2)
       => eq(X0,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz39) ).

tff(f6,axiom,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( eq(X0,X1)
     => eq(X1,X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz38) ).

tff(f7,axiom,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac,X2: frac,X3: frac] :
      ( moref(X0,X1)
     => ( eq(X0,X2)
       => ( eq(X1,X3)
         => moref(X2,X3) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz44) ).

tff(f8,conjecture,
    ( ~ moref(z,u)
   => eq(z,u) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz46) ).

tff(f9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ~ moref(z,u)
     => eq(z,u) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f8]) ).

tff(f12,plain,
    ( ~ eq(z,u)
    & ~ moref(z,u) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

tff(f13,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac,X2: frac,X3: frac] :
      ( moref(X2,X3)
      | ~ eq(X1,X3)
      | ~ eq(X0,X2)
      | ~ moref(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

tff(f14,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac,X2: frac,X3: frac] :
      ( moref(X2,X3)
      | ~ eq(X1,X3)
      | ~ eq(X0,X2)
      | ~ moref(X0,X1) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f13]) ).

tff(f15,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( eq(X1,X0)
      | ~ eq(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

tff(f16,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac,X2: frac] :
      ( eq(X0,X2)
      | ~ eq(X1,X2)
      | ~ eq(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

tff(f17,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac,X2: frac] :
      ( eq(X0,X2)
      | ~ eq(X1,X2)
      | ~ eq(X0,X1) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f16]) ).

tff(f18,plain,
    ( eq(x,y)
    | moref(x,y) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

tff(f19,plain,
    ~ moref(z,u),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

tff(f20,plain,
    ~ eq(z,u),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

tff(f21,plain,
    ! [X2: frac,X3: frac,X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( moref(X2,X3)
      | ~ eq(X1,X3)
      | ~ eq(X0,X2)
      | ~ moref(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

tff(f22,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( eq(X1,X0)
      | ~ eq(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

tff(f23,plain,
    ! [X2: frac,X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( eq(X0,X2)
      | ~ eq(X1,X2)
      | ~ eq(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

tff(f24,plain,
    eq(x,z),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

tff(f25,plain,
    eq(y,u),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

tff(f26,plain,
    ( eq(x,y)
    | moref(x,y) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

tff(f29,plain,
    ! [X0: frac] :
      ( ~ eq(z,X0)
      | ~ eq(X0,u) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f23,f20]) ).

tff(f31,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( ~ eq(X1,z)
      | ~ eq(X0,u)
      | ~ moref(X1,X0) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f21,f19]) ).

tff(f33,plain,
    ! [X0: frac] :
      ( ~ eq(X0,u)
      | ~ eq(X0,z) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f29,f22]) ).

tff(f36,plain,
    ! [X0: frac] :
      ( ~ eq(X0,u)
      | ~ moref(x,X0) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f31,f24]) ).

tff(f39,plain,
    ~ eq(y,z),
    inference(resolution,[],[f33,f25]) ).

tff(f42,plain,
    ~ moref(x,y),
    inference(resolution,[],[f36,f25]) ).

tff(f45,plain,
    ! [X0: frac] :
      ( ~ eq(y,X0)
      | ~ eq(X0,z) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f39,f23]) ).

tff(f65,plain,
    ! [X0: frac] :
      ( ~ eq(X0,z)
      | ~ eq(X0,y) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f45,f22]) ).

tff(f72,plain,
    ~ eq(x,y),
    inference(resolution,[],[f65,f24]) ).

tff(f79,plain,
    moref(x,y),
    inference(resolution,[],[f72,f26]) ).

tff(f82,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f79,f42]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : NUM739_8 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.38  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.39  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.39  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.39  % DateTime : Sun Sep 27 21:12:33 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.39  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.39  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.44/1.46  % (1784794)Detected formulas, will run a generic FOF schedule.
% 3.44/1.46  % (1784799)lrs+10_1_ncem=casc2026/models/loop8.pt:sil=128000:tgt=full:npcc=on:drc=off:sp=weighted_frequency:spb=goal:fd=preordered:foolp=on:random_seed=1064772839:i=141193_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/141193Mi)
% 3.44/1.46  % (1784802)lrs+1010_1_to=lpo:sil=32000:sos=on:spb=goal_then_units:bce=on:random_seed=1789977411:i=109:sd=1:ins=1:gsp=on:ss=axioms_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/109Mi)
% 3.44/1.46  % (1784803)dis-1010_2:3_sil=16000:sp=reverse_frequency:random_seed=2109559602:i=119:av=off:ss=axioms_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/119Mi)
% 3.44/1.46  % (1784800)lrs+11_1_ncem=casc2026/models/loop8.pt:sil=128000:npcc=on:lma=off:spb=units:urr=ec_only:bce=on:s2agt=64:updr=off:random_seed=1263330068:i=134677:sd=20:aac=none:nm=16:ss=included:sgt=10_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/134677Mi)
% 3.44/1.46  % (1784805)dis-21_1_sil=8000:lcm=predicate:random_seed=2172269337:st=5:avsq=on:i=129:avsqr=1,16:sd=3:aac=none:ep=RS:fsr=off:ss=included_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/129Mi)
% 3.44/1.46  % (1784801)lrs+1010_1_anc=all:sfv=off:to=kbo:ncem=casc2026/models/loop7.pt:sil=128000:npcc=on:prc=on:sos=all:bsr=unit_only:sac=on:random_seed=2134501760:i=141695:sd=1:nm=32:gsp=on:ss=included_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/141695Mi)
% 3.44/1.46  % (1784802)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 3.44/1.46  % (1784802)------------------------------
% 3.44/1.46  % (1784802)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit ea8961452 on 2026-07-16 15:14:34 +0200)
% 3.44/1.46  % (1784802)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 3.44/1.46  % (1784802)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 3.44/1.46  % (1784802)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 3.44/1.46  % (1784802)Time elapsed: 0.001 s
% 3.44/1.46  % (1784802)Peak memory usage: 88 MB
% 3.44/1.46  % (1784803)First to succeed.
% 3.44/1.46  % (1784803)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-1784794"
% 3.44/1.46  % (1784805)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 3.44/1.46  % (1784804)dis-1011_1_sil=16000:fde=unused:s2agt=70:random_seed=1959092356:s2a=on:i=139:gtg=position_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/139Mi)
% 3.44/1.46  % (1784804)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 3.44/1.46  % (1784802)------------------------------
% 3.44/1.46  % (1784802)------------------------------
% 3.44/1.46  % (1784803)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 3.44/1.46  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 3.44/1.46  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 3.44/1.46  % (1784803)------------------------------
% 3.44/1.46  % (1784803)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit ea8961452 on 2026-07-16 15:14:34 +0200)
% 3.44/1.46  % (1784803)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 3.44/1.46  % (1784803)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 3.44/1.46  % (1784803)Termination reason: Refutation
% 3.44/1.46  % (1784803)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 3.44/1.46  % (1784803)Peak memory usage: 88 MB
% 3.44/1.46  % (1784803)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 3.44/1.46  % (1784803)------------------------------
% 3.44/1.46  % (1784803)------------------------------
% 3.44/1.46  % (1784794)Success in time 0.407 s
% 3.44/1.46  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------