↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : NUM740^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 09:24:29 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.61s 1.32s
% Output   : Refutation 1.61s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   39 (   5 unt;   0 typ;   2 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  155 (  40 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  182 (  34   ~;  18   |;   1   &; 112   @)
%                                         (   2 <=>;  15  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   10 (   7 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   22 (   0   ^;  22   !;   0   ?;  22   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    frac: $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    frac: $tType ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    x: frac ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    y: frac ).

thf(func_def_3,type,
    moref: frac > frac > $o ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    eq: frac > frac > $o ).

thf(func_def_6,type,
    lessf: frac > frac > $o ).

thf(f44,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[status(thm)],[f35,f39,f43]) ).

thf(f43,plain,
    ~ spl0_1,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f42]) ).

thf(f42,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl0_1 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f41,f25]) ).

thf(f25,plain,
    ( ( lessf @ y @ x )
   != $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f19]) ).

thf(f19,plain,
    ( ( ( eq @ y @ x )
     != $true )
    & ( ( lessf @ y @ x )
     != $true ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f15]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ~ ( ( ( lessf @ y @ x )
       != $true )
     => ( ( eq @ y @ x )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f10]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ~ ( ( ( lessf @ y @ x )
       != $true )
     => ( ( eq @ y @ x )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f9]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ~ ( ~ ( lessf @ y @ x )
     => ( eq @ y @ x ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ~ ( lessf @ y @ x )
     => ( eq @ y @ x ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,conjecture,
    ( ~ ( lessf @ y @ x )
   => ( eq @ y @ x ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.eIC6VchqvY/DTF2THF_11147.p',satz48) ).

thf(f41,plain,
    ( ( ( lessf @ y @ x )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl0_1 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f40]) ).

thf(f40,plain,
    ( ( $true != $true )
    | ( ( lessf @ y @ x )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl0_1 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f22,f30]) ).

thf(f30,plain,
    ( ( ( moref @ x @ y )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl0_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f28]) ).

thf(f28,definition,
    ( spl0_1
  <=> ( ( moref @ x @ y )
      = $true ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f22,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( ( ( moref @ X0 @ X1 )
       != $true )
      | ( ( lessf @ X1 @ X0 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f21]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( ( ( moref @ X0 @ X1 )
       != $true )
      | ( ( lessf @ X1 @ X0 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f20]) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    ! [X1: frac,X0: frac] :
      ( ( $true
       != ( moref @ X1 @ X0 ) )
      | ( ( lessf @ X0 @ X1 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f8]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( moref @ X1 @ X0 ) )
     => ( ( lessf @ X0 @ X1 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f7]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( ( moref @ X1 @ X0 )
     => ( lessf @ X0 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f3]) ).

thf(f3,axiom,
    ! [X1: frac,X0: frac] :
      ( ( moref @ X0 @ X1 )
     => ( lessf @ X1 @ X0 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.eIC6VchqvY/DTF2THF_11147.p',satz42) ).

thf(f39,plain,
    ~ spl0_2,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f38]) ).

thf(f38,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl0_2 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f37,f26]) ).

thf(f26,plain,
    ( ( eq @ y @ x )
   != $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f19]) ).

thf(f37,plain,
    ( ( ( eq @ y @ x )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl0_2 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f36]) ).

thf(f36,plain,
    ( ( ( eq @ y @ x )
      = $true )
    | ( $true != $true )
    | ~ spl0_2 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f23,f34]) ).

thf(f34,plain,
    ( ( ( eq @ x @ y )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl0_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f32]) ).

thf(f32,definition,
    ( spl0_2
  <=> ( ( eq @ x @ y )
      = $true ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f23,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( ( ( eq @ X0 @ X1 )
       != $true )
      | ( ( eq @ X1 @ X0 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f18]) ).

thf(f18,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( ( ( eq @ X1 @ X0 )
        = $true )
      | ( ( eq @ X0 @ X1 )
       != $true ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f14]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( ( ( eq @ X0 @ X1 )
        = $true )
     => ( ( eq @ X1 @ X0 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f13]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( ( eq @ X0 @ X1 )
     => ( eq @ X1 @ X0 ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( ( eq @ X0 @ X1 )
     => ( eq @ X1 @ X0 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.eIC6VchqvY/DTF2THF_11147.p',satz38) ).

thf(f35,plain,
    ( spl0_1
    | spl0_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f24,f32,f28]) ).

thf(f24,plain,
    ( ( ( moref @ x @ y )
      = $true )
    | ( ( eq @ x @ y )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f17]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ( ( ( eq @ x @ y )
      = $true )
    | ( ( moref @ x @ y )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f16]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ( ( ( moref @ x @ y )
     != $true )
   => ( ( eq @ x @ y )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f12]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ( ( ( moref @ x @ y )
     != $true )
   => ( ( eq @ x @ y )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f11]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ( ~ ( moref @ x @ y )
   => ( eq @ x @ y ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,axiom,
    ( ~ ( moref @ x @ y )
   => ( eq @ x @ y ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.eIC6VchqvY/DTF2THF_11147.p',m) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : NUM740^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.11/0.14  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.17/0.35  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.35  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 11:12:42 EST 2026
% 0.17/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.35  Running /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.25/0.48  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.25/0.48  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.25/0.48  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/0.48  % File     : NUM740^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.25/0.48  % Domain   : Number Theory
% 0.25/0.48  % Problem  : Landau theorem 48
% 0.25/0.48  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.25/0.48  % English  : ~(lessf y x) -> eq y x
% 0.25/0.48  
% 0.25/0.48  % Refs     : [Lan30] Landau (1930), Grundlagen der Analysis
% 0.25/0.48  %          : [vBJ79] van Benthem Jutting (1979), Checking Landau's "Grundla
% 0.25/0.48  %          : [Bro09] Brown (2009), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.25/0.48  % Source   : [Bro09]
% 0.25/0.48  % Names    : satz48 [Lan30]
% 0.25/0.48  
% 0.25/0.48  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.25/0.48  %          : Without extensionality : Theorem
% 0.25/0.48  % Rating   : 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.25 v5.2.0, 0.00 v3.7.0
% 0.25/0.48  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   10 (   0 unt;   6 typ;   0 def)
% 0.25/0.48  %            Number of atoms       :    8 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.25/0.48  %            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   2 avg)
% 0.25/0.48  %            Number of connectives :   22 (   2   ~;   0   |;   0   &;  16   @)
% 0.25/0.48  %                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.25/0.48  %            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   6 avg)
% 0.25/0.48  %            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
% 0.25/0.48  %            Number of type conns  :    6 (   6   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.25/0.48  %            Number of symbols     :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.25/0.48  %            Number of variables   :    4 (   0   ^;   4   !;   0   ?;   4   :)
% 0.25/0.48  % SPC      : TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR
% 0.25/0.48  
% 0.25/0.48  % Comments : 
% 0.25/0.48  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/0.48  thf(frac_type,type,
% 0.25/0.48      frac: $tType ).
% 0.25/0.48  
% 0.25/0.48  thf(x,type,
% 0.25/0.48      x: frac ).
% 0.25/0.48  
% 0.25/0.48  thf(y,type,
% 0.25/0.48      y: frac ).
% 0.25/0.48  
% 0.25/0.48  thf(moref,type,
% 0.25/0.48      moref: frac > frac > $o ).
% 0.25/0.48  
% 0.25/0.48  thf(eq,type,
% 0.25/0.48      eq: frac > frac > $o ).
% 0.25/0.48  
% 0.25/0.48  thf(m,axiom,
% 0.25/0.48      ( ~ ( moref @ x @ y )
% 0.25/0.48     => ( eq @ x @ y ) ) ).
% 0.25/0.48  
% 0.25/0.48  thf(lessf,type,
% 0.25/0.48      lessf: frac > frac > $o ).
% 0.25/0.48  
% 0.25/0.48  thf(satz38,axiom,
% 0.25/0.48      ! [Xx: frac,Xy: frac] :
% 0.25/0.48        ( ( eq @ Xx @ Xy )
% 0.25/0.48       => ( eq @ Xy @ Xx ) ) ).
% 0.25/0.48  
% 0.25/0.48  thf(satz42,axiom,
% 0.25/0.48      ! [Xx: frac,Xy: frac] :
% 0.25/0.48        ( ( moref @ Xx @ Xy )
% 0.25/0.48       => ( lessf @ Xy @ Xx ) ) ).
% 0.25/0.48  
% 0.25/0.48  thf(satz48,conjecture,
% 0.25/0.48      ( ~ ( lessf @ y @ x )
% 0.25/0.48     => ( eq @ y @ x ) ) ).
% 0.25/0.48  
% 0.25/0.48  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/0.48  ------------------------
% 1.41/1.28  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.41/1.28  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.41/1.28  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 11:12:43 EST 2026
% 1.41/1.28  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.41/1.28  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.41/1.28  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.41/1.28  
% 1.41/1.28  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.eIC6VchqvY/DTF2DTF11147.p
% See solution above
% 1.41/1.28  ------------------------
% 1.41/1.29  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.41/1.29  thf(frac_type,type,
% 1.41/1.29      frac: $tType ).
% 1.41/1.29  
% 1.41/1.29  thf(x,type,
% 1.41/1.29      x: frac ).
% 1.41/1.29  
% 1.41/1.29  thf(y,type,
% 1.41/1.29      y: frac ).
% 1.41/1.29  
% 1.41/1.29  thf(moref,type,
% 1.41/1.29      moref: frac > frac > $o ).
% 1.41/1.29  
% 1.41/1.29  thf(eq,type,
% 1.41/1.29      eq: frac > frac > $o ).
% 1.41/1.29  
% 1.41/1.29  thf(m,axiom,
% 1.41/1.29      ( ~ ( moref @ x @ y )
% 1.41/1.29     => ( eq @ x @ y ) ) ).
% 1.41/1.29  
% 1.41/1.29  thf(lessf,type,
% 1.41/1.29      lessf: frac > frac > $o ).
% 1.41/1.29  
% 1.41/1.29  thf(satz38,axiom,
% 1.41/1.29      ! [Xx: frac,Xy: frac] :
% 1.41/1.29        ( ( eq @ Xx @ Xy )
% 1.41/1.29       => ( eq @ Xy @ Xx ) ) ).
% 1.41/1.29  
% 1.41/1.29  thf(satz42,axiom,
% 1.41/1.29      ! [Xx: frac,Xy: frac] :
% 1.41/1.29        ( ( moref @ Xx @ Xy )
% 1.41/1.29       => ( lessf @ Xy @ Xx ) ) ).
% 1.41/1.29  
% 1.41/1.29  thf(satz48,conjecture,
% 1.41/1.29      ( ~ ( lessf @ y @ x )
% 1.41/1.29     => ( eq @ y @ x ) ) ).
% 1.41/1.29  ------------------------
% 1.61/1.31  % (11244)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_11147 for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 1.61/1.31  % (11250)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_11147 for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 1.61/1.31  % (11245)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_11147 for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 1.61/1.31  % (11248)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_11147 for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 1.61/1.32  % (11250)First to succeed.
% 1.61/1.32  % (11248)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.61/1.32  % (11248)------------------------------
% 1.61/1.32  % (11248)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.61/1.32  % (11248)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.61/1.32  % (11248)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.61/1.32  
% 1.61/1.32  % (11248)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.61/1.32  % (11248)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 1.61/1.32  % (11248)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 1.61/1.32  % (11248)------------------------------
% 1.61/1.32  % (11248)------------------------------
% 1.61/1.32  % (11245)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.61/1.32  % (11245)------------------------------
% 1.61/1.32  % (11245)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.61/1.32  % (11245)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.61/1.32  % (11245)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.61/1.32  
% 1.61/1.32  % (11245)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.61/1.32  % (11245)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 1.61/1.32  % (11245)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 1.61/1.32  % (11245)------------------------------
% 1.61/1.32  % (11245)------------------------------
% 1.61/1.32  % (11249)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_11147 for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 1.61/1.32  % (11244)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 1.61/1.32  % (11250)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.61/1.32  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_11147
% 1.61/1.32  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_11147
% 1.61/1.32  thf(type_def_5, type, frac: $tType).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(func_def_0, type, frac: $tType).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(func_def_1, type, x: frac).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(func_def_2, type, y: frac).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(func_def_3, type, moref: frac > frac > $o).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(func_def_4, type, eq: frac > frac > $o).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(func_def_6, type, lessf: frac > frac > $o).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f44,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    $false),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[status(thm)],[f35,f39,f43])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f43,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ~spl0_1),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f42])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f42,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    $false | ~spl0_1),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f41,f25])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f25,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ((lessf @ y @ x) != $true)),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f19])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f19,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ((eq @ y @ x) != $true) & ((lessf @ y @ x) != $true)),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f15])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f15,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ~(((lessf @ y @ x) != $true) => ((eq @ y @ x) = $true))),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f10])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f10,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ~(~((lessf @ y @ x) = $true) => ((eq @ y @ x) = $true))),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f9])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f9,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ~(~(lessf @ y @ x) => (eq @ y @ x))),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f5,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.61/1.32    ~(~(lessf @ y @ x) => (eq @ y @ x))),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f4])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f4,conjecture,(
% 1.61/1.32    ~(lessf @ y @ x) => (eq @ y @ x)),
% 1.61/1.32    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.eIC6VchqvY/DTF2THF_11147.p',satz48)).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f41,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ((lessf @ y @ x) = $true) | ~spl0_1),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f40])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f40,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ($true != $true) | ((lessf @ y @ x) = $true) | ~spl0_1),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f22,f30])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f30,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ((moref @ x @ y) = $true) | ~spl0_1),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f28])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f28,definition,(
% 1.61/1.32    spl0_1 <=> ((moref @ x @ y) = $true)),
% 1.61/1.32    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f22,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ( ! [X0 : frac,X1 : frac] : (((moref @ X0 @ X1) != $true) | ((lessf @ X1 @ X0) = $true)) )),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f21])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f21,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ! [X0 : frac,X1 : frac] : (((moref @ X0 @ X1) != $true) | ((lessf @ X1 @ X0) = $true))),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f20])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f20,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ! [X1 : frac,X0 : frac] : (($true != (moref @ X1 @ X0)) | ((lessf @ X0 @ X1) = $true))),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f8])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f8,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ! [X0 : frac,X1 : frac] : (($true = (moref @ X1 @ X0)) => ((lessf @ X0 @ X1) = $true))),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f7])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f7,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ! [X0 : frac,X1 : frac] : ((moref @ X1 @ X0) => (lessf @ X0 @ X1))),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f3])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f3,axiom,(
% 1.61/1.32    ! [X1 : frac,X0 : frac] : ((moref @ X0 @ X1) => (lessf @ X1 @ X0))),
% 1.61/1.32    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.eIC6VchqvY/DTF2THF_11147.p',satz42)).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f39,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ~spl0_2),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f38])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f38,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    $false | ~spl0_2),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f37,f26])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f26,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ((eq @ y @ x) != $true)),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f19])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f37,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ((eq @ y @ x) = $true) | ~spl0_2),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f36])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f36,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ((eq @ y @ x) = $true) | ($true != $true) | ~spl0_2),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f23,f34])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f34,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ((eq @ x @ y) = $true) | ~spl0_2),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f32])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f32,definition,(
% 1.61/1.32    spl0_2 <=> ((eq @ x @ y) = $true)),
% 1.61/1.32    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f23,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ( ! [X0 : frac,X1 : frac] : (((eq @ X0 @ X1) != $true) | ((eq @ X1 @ X0) = $true)) )),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f18])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f18,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ! [X0 : frac,X1 : frac] : (((eq @ X1 @ X0) = $true) | ((eq @ X0 @ X1) != $true))),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f14])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f14,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ! [X0 : frac,X1 : frac] : (((eq @ X0 @ X1) = $true) => ((eq @ X1 @ X0) = $true))),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f13])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f13,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ! [X0 : frac,X1 : frac] : ((eq @ X0 @ X1) => (eq @ X1 @ X0))),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f2,axiom,(
% 1.61/1.32    ! [X0 : frac,X1 : frac] : ((eq @ X0 @ X1) => (eq @ X1 @ X0))),
% 1.61/1.32    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.eIC6VchqvY/DTF2THF_11147.p',satz38)).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f35,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    spl0_1 | spl0_2),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f24,f32,f28])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f24,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ((moref @ x @ y) = $true) | ((eq @ x @ y) = $true)),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f17])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f17,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ((eq @ x @ y) = $true) | ((moref @ x @ y) = $true)),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f16])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f16,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ((moref @ x @ y) != $true) => ((eq @ x @ y) = $true)),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f12])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f12,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ~((moref @ x @ y) = $true) => ((eq @ x @ y) = $true)),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f11])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f11,plain,(
% 1.61/1.32    ~(moref @ x @ y) => (eq @ x @ y)),
% 1.61/1.32    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f1])).
% 1.61/1.32  thf(f1,axiom,(
% 1.61/1.32    ~(moref @ x @ y) => (eq @ x @ y)),
% 1.61/1.32    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.eIC6VchqvY/DTF2THF_11147.p',m)).
% 1.61/1.32  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_11147
% 1.61/1.32  % (11250)------------------------------
% 1.61/1.32  % (11250)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.61/1.32  % (11250)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.61/1.32  
% 1.61/1.32  % (11250)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.61/1.32  % (11250)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 1.61/1.32  % (11250)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.61/1.32  % (11250)------------------------------
% 1.61/1.32  % (11250)------------------------------
% 1.61/1.32  % (11243)Success in time 0.023 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------