%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : NUM742^1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.qGIQq2eHHZ true
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct 2 04:48:11 PM UTC 2025
% Result : Theorem 0.53s 0.76s
% Output : Refutation 0.53s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 25 ( 12 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 49 ( 0 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 137 ( 17 ~; 17 |; 0 &; 96 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 7 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 5 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 1 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 6 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 28 ( 0 ^; 28 !; 0 ?; 28 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(frac_type,type,
frac: $tType ).
thf(lessf_type,type,
lessf: frac > frac > $o ).
thf(y_type,type,
y: frac ).
thf(eq_type,type,
eq: frac > frac > $o ).
thf(z_type,type,
z: frac ).
thf(x_type,type,
x: frac ).
thf(satz51a,conjecture,
lessf @ x @ z ).
thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
~ ( lessf @ x @ z ),
inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[satz51a]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl7,plain,
~ ( lessf @ x @ z ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(satz37,axiom,
! [Xx: frac] : ( eq @ Xx @ Xx ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl6,plain,
! [X0: frac] : ( eq @ X0 @ X0 ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[satz37]) ).
thf(k,axiom,
lessf @ y @ z ).
thf(zip_derived_cl1,plain,
lessf @ y @ z,
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[k]) ).
thf(l,axiom,
( ~ ( lessf @ x @ y )
=> ( eq @ x @ y ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl0,plain,
( ( eq @ x @ y )
| ( lessf @ x @ y ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[l]) ).
thf(satz38,axiom,
! [Xx: frac,Xy: frac] :
( ( eq @ Xx @ Xy )
=> ( eq @ Xy @ Xx ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl4,plain,
! [X0: frac,X1: frac] :
( ( eq @ X0 @ X1 )
| ~ ( eq @ X1 @ X0 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[satz38]) ).
thf(satz45,axiom,
! [Xx: frac,Xy: frac,Xz: frac,Xu: frac] :
( ( lessf @ Xx @ Xy )
=> ( ( eq @ Xx @ Xz )
=> ( ( eq @ Xy @ Xu )
=> ( lessf @ Xz @ Xu ) ) ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl3,plain,
! [X0: frac,X1: frac,X2: frac,X3: frac] :
( ~ ( eq @ X0 @ X1 )
| ~ ( lessf @ X0 @ X2 )
| ~ ( eq @ X2 @ X3 )
| ( lessf @ X1 @ X3 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[satz45]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl30,plain,
! [X0: frac,X1: frac,X2: frac,X3: frac] :
( ~ ( eq @ X0 @ X1 )
| ( lessf @ X0 @ X2 )
| ~ ( eq @ X3 @ X2 )
| ~ ( lessf @ X1 @ X3 ) ),
inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl4,zip_derived_cl3]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl92,plain,
! [X0: frac,X1: frac] :
( ( lessf @ x @ y )
| ~ ( lessf @ y @ X0 )
| ~ ( eq @ X0 @ X1 )
| ( lessf @ x @ X1 ) ),
inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl0,zip_derived_cl30]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl116,plain,
! [X0: frac] :
( ( lessf @ x @ X0 )
| ~ ( eq @ z @ X0 )
| ( lessf @ x @ y ) ),
inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl1,zip_derived_cl92]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl120,plain,
( ( lessf @ x @ y )
| ( lessf @ x @ z ) ),
inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl6,zip_derived_cl116]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl7_001,plain,
~ ( lessf @ x @ z ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl124,plain,
lessf @ x @ y,
inference(clc,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl120,zip_derived_cl7]) ).
thf(satz50,axiom,
! [Xx: frac,Xy: frac,Xz: frac] :
( ( lessf @ Xx @ Xy )
=> ( ( lessf @ Xy @ Xz )
=> ( lessf @ Xx @ Xz ) ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl5,plain,
! [X0: frac,X1: frac,X2: frac] :
( ~ ( lessf @ X0 @ X1 )
| ( lessf @ X0 @ X2 )
| ~ ( lessf @ X1 @ X2 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[satz50]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl125,plain,
! [X0: frac] :
( ~ ( lessf @ y @ X0 )
| ( lessf @ x @ X0 ) ),
inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl124,zip_derived_cl5]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl1_002,plain,
lessf @ y @ z,
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[k]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl127,plain,
lessf @ x @ z,
inference('sup+',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl125,zip_derived_cl1]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl139,plain,
$false,
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl7,zip_derived_cl127]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : NUM742^1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.13/0.14 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.qGIQq2eHHZ true
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Wed Oct 1 16:16:38 EDT 2025
% 0.20/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.35 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.20/0.35 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.35 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.20/0.36 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.20/0.36 % Running in HO mode
% 0.49/0.63 % Total configuration time : 828
% 0.49/0.63 % Estimated wc time : 1656
% 0.49/0.63 % Estimated cpu time (8 cpus) : 207.0
% 0.51/0.68 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_c.s.sh running for 80s
% 0.52/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/35_full_unif4.sh running for 80s
% 0.52/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_noforms.sh running for 90s
% 0.52/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_c_ic.sh running for 80s
% 0.52/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_b.comb.sh running for 70s
% 0.52/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/15_e_short1.sh running for 30s
% 0.52/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/20_acsne_simpl.sh running for 40s
% 0.52/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/30_sp5.sh running for 60s
% 0.53/0.76 % Solved by lams/40_c.s.sh.
% 0.53/0.76 % done 61 iterations in 0.059s
% 0.53/0.76 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.53/0.76 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.53/0.76
% 0.53/0.76
% 0.53/0.76 % Terminating...
% 0.53/0.84 % Runner terminated.
% 1.81/0.85 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------