↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : NUM743^1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Oct  3 07:57:13 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 3.57s 3.76s
% Output   : Proof 3.57s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : NUM743^1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Fri Oct  3 07:20:08 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 3.57/3.76  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.57/3.76  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.57/3.76  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (lessf x y) True
% 3.57/3.76  Clause #1 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (lessf y z) → eq y z) True
% 3.57/3.76  Clause #3 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (Xx Xy Xz Xu : frac), lessf Xx Xy → eq Xx Xz → eq Xy Xu → lessf Xz Xu) True
% 3.57/3.76  Clause #4 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (Xx : frac), eq Xx Xx) True
% 3.57/3.76  Clause #5 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (Xx Xy Xz : frac), lessf Xx Xy → lessf Xy Xz → lessf Xx Xz) True
% 3.57/3.76  Clause #6 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (lessf x z)) True
% 3.57/3.76  Clause #11 (by clausification #[1]): Or (Eq (Not (lessf y z)) False) (Eq (eq y z) True)
% 3.57/3.76  Clause #12 (by clausification #[11]): Or (Eq (eq y z) True) (Eq (lessf y z) True)
% 3.57/3.76  Clause #13 (by clausification #[4]): ∀ (a : frac), Eq (eq a a) True
% 3.57/3.76  Clause #14 (by clausification #[6]): Eq (lessf x z) False
% 3.57/3.76  Clause #15 (by clausification #[3]): ∀ (a : frac), Eq (∀ (Xy Xz Xu : frac), lessf a Xy → eq a Xz → eq Xy Xu → lessf Xz Xu) True
% 3.57/3.76  Clause #16 (by clausification #[15]): ∀ (a a_1 : frac), Eq (∀ (Xz Xu : frac), lessf a a_1 → eq a Xz → eq a_1 Xu → lessf Xz Xu) True
% 3.57/3.76  Clause #17 (by clausification #[16]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : frac), Eq (∀ (Xu : frac), lessf a a_1 → eq a a_2 → eq a_1 Xu → lessf a_2 Xu) True
% 3.57/3.76  Clause #18 (by clausification #[17]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 a_3 : frac), Eq (lessf a a_1 → eq a a_2 → eq a_1 a_3 → lessf a_2 a_3) True
% 3.57/3.76  Clause #19 (by clausification #[18]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 a_3 : frac), Or (Eq (lessf a a_1) False) (Eq (eq a a_2 → eq a_1 a_3 → lessf a_2 a_3) True)
% 3.57/3.76  Clause #20 (by clausification #[19]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 a_3 : frac), Or (Eq (lessf a a_1) False) (Or (Eq (eq a a_2) False) (Eq (eq a_1 a_3 → lessf a_2 a_3) True))
% 3.57/3.76  Clause #21 (by clausification #[20]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 a_3 : frac),
% 3.57/3.76    Or (Eq (lessf a a_1) False) (Or (Eq (eq a a_2) False) (Or (Eq (eq a_1 a_3) False) (Eq (lessf a_2 a_3) True)))
% 3.57/3.76  Clause #22 (by superposition #[21, 0]): ∀ (a a_1 : frac), Or (Eq (eq x a) False) (Or (Eq (eq y a_1) False) (Or (Eq (lessf a a_1) True) (Eq False True)))
% 3.57/3.76  Clause #23 (by clausification #[5]): ∀ (a : frac), Eq (∀ (Xy Xz : frac), lessf a Xy → lessf Xy Xz → lessf a Xz) True
% 3.57/3.76  Clause #24 (by clausification #[23]): ∀ (a a_1 : frac), Eq (∀ (Xz : frac), lessf a a_1 → lessf a_1 Xz → lessf a Xz) True
% 3.57/3.76  Clause #25 (by clausification #[24]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : frac), Eq (lessf a a_1 → lessf a_1 a_2 → lessf a a_2) True
% 3.57/3.76  Clause #26 (by clausification #[25]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : frac), Or (Eq (lessf a a_1) False) (Eq (lessf a_1 a_2 → lessf a a_2) True)
% 3.57/3.76  Clause #27 (by clausification #[26]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : frac), Or (Eq (lessf a a_1) False) (Or (Eq (lessf a_1 a_2) False) (Eq (lessf a a_2) True))
% 3.57/3.76  Clause #28 (by superposition #[27, 0]): ∀ (a : frac), Or (Eq (lessf y a) False) (Or (Eq (lessf x a) True) (Eq False True))
% 3.57/3.76  Clause #29 (by clausification #[28]): ∀ (a : frac), Or (Eq (lessf y a) False) (Eq (lessf x a) True)
% 3.57/3.76  Clause #30 (by clausification #[22]): ∀ (a a_1 : frac), Or (Eq (eq x a) False) (Or (Eq (eq y a_1) False) (Eq (lessf a a_1) True))
% 3.57/3.76  Clause #31 (by superposition #[30, 13]): ∀ (a : frac), Or (Eq (eq y a) False) (Or (Eq (lessf x a) True) (Eq False True))
% 3.57/3.76  Clause #32 (by clausification #[31]): ∀ (a : frac), Or (Eq (eq y a) False) (Eq (lessf x a) True)
% 3.57/3.76  Clause #33 (by superposition #[32, 12]): Or (Eq (lessf x z) True) (Or (Eq False True) (Eq (lessf y z) True))
% 3.57/3.76  Clause #35 (by clausification #[33]): Or (Eq (lessf x z) True) (Eq (lessf y z) True)
% 3.57/3.76  Clause #36 (by superposition #[35, 14]): Or (Eq (lessf y z) True) (Eq True False)
% 3.57/3.76  Clause #39 (by clausification #[36]): Eq (lessf y z) True
% 3.57/3.76  Clause #42 (by superposition #[39, 29]): Or (Eq True False) (Eq (lessf x z) True)
% 3.57/3.76  Clause #45 (by clausification #[42]): Eq (lessf x z) True
% 3.57/3.76  Clause #46 (by superposition #[45, 14]): Eq True False
% 3.57/3.76  Clause #49 (by clausification #[46]): False
% 3.57/3.76  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------