↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : NUM743^4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:16:59 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 8.82s 1.64s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.82s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   15
%            Number of leaves      :   20
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   79 (  46 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  394 (  39 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   24 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives : 1833 (  89   ~;  84   |;  11   &;1592   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  57  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   20 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    8 (   8   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   30 (  27 usr;   7 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  210 ( 165   ^;  45   !;   0   ?; 210   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_23,type,
    is_of: $i > ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(decl_24,type,
    all_of: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(decl_26,type,
    in: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_62,type,
    imp: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(decl_63,type,
    d_not: $o > $o ).

thf(decl_68,type,
    l_or: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(decl_73,type,
    l_some: $i > ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(decl_78,type,
    e_is: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_124,type,
    nat: $i ).

thf(decl_125,type,
    n_is: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_128,type,
    n_some: ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(decl_143,type,
    n_pl: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(decl_148,type,
    diffprop: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_149,type,
    d_29_ii: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_150,type,
    iii: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_163,type,
    n_ts: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(decl_190,type,
    frac: $i ).

thf(decl_192,type,
    num: $i > $i ).

thf(decl_193,type,
    den: $i > $i ).

thf(decl_194,type,
    n_eq: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_195,type,
    moref: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_196,type,
    lessf: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_197,type,
    moreq: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_198,type,
    lesseq: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_200,type,
    esk1_0: $i ).

thf(decl_201,type,
    esk2_0: $i ).

thf(decl_202,type,
    esk3_0: $i ).

thf(def_diffprop,axiom,
    ( diffprop
    = ( ^ [X1: $i,X207: $i,X4: $i] : ( n_is @ X1 @ ( n_pl @ X207 @ X4 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.BKpGnnHkjg/E---3.1_708140.p',def_diffprop) ).

thf(def_d_not,axiom,
    ( d_not
    = ( ^ [X76: $o] : ( imp @ X76 @ ~ $true ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.BKpGnnHkjg/E---3.1_708140.p',def_d_not) ).

thf(def_imp,axiom,
    ( imp
    = ( ^ [X74: $o,X75: $o] :
          ( X74
         => X75 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.BKpGnnHkjg/E---3.1_708140.p',def_imp) ).

thf(def_iii,axiom,
    ( iii
    = ( ^ [X1: $i,X211: $i] : ( n_some @ ( diffprop @ X211 @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.BKpGnnHkjg/E---3.1_708140.p',def_iii) ).

thf(def_n_is,axiom,
    ( n_is
    = ( e_is @ nat ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.BKpGnnHkjg/E---3.1_708140.p',def_n_is) ).

thf(def_l_or,axiom,
    ( l_or
    = ( ^ [X83: $o] : ( imp @ ( d_not @ X83 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.BKpGnnHkjg/E---3.1_708140.p',def_l_or) ).

thf(def_n_eq,axiom,
    ( n_eq
    = ( ^ [X1: $i,X436: $i] : ( n_is @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X1 ) @ ( den @ X436 ) ) @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X436 ) @ ( den @ X1 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.BKpGnnHkjg/E---3.1_708140.p',def_n_eq) ).

thf(def_lessf,axiom,
    ( lessf
    = ( ^ [X1: $i,X450: $i] : ( iii @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X1 ) @ ( den @ X450 ) ) @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X450 ) @ ( den @ X1 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.BKpGnnHkjg/E---3.1_708140.p',def_lessf) ).

thf(def_n_some,axiom,
    ( n_some
    = ( l_some @ nat ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.BKpGnnHkjg/E---3.1_708140.p',def_n_some) ).

thf(def_d_29_ii,axiom,
    ( d_29_ii
    = ( ^ [X1: $i,X210: $i] : ( n_some @ ( diffprop @ X1 @ X210 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.BKpGnnHkjg/E---3.1_708140.p',def_d_29_ii) ).

thf(def_lesseq,axiom,
    ( lesseq
    = ( ^ [X1: $i,X466: $i] : ( l_or @ ( lessf @ X1 @ X466 ) @ ( n_eq @ X1 @ X466 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.BKpGnnHkjg/E---3.1_708140.p',def_lesseq) ).

thf(def_all_of,axiom,
    ( all_of
    = ( ^ [X3: $i > $o,X2: $i > $o] :
        ! [X4: $i] :
          ( ( is_of @ X4 @ X3 )
         => ( X2 @ X4 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.BKpGnnHkjg/E---3.1_708140.p',def_all_of) ).

thf(def_is_of,axiom,
    ( is_of
    = ( ^ [X1: $i,X2: $i > $o] : ( X2 @ X1 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.BKpGnnHkjg/E---3.1_708140.p',def_is_of) ).

thf(def_moref,axiom,
    ( moref
    = ( ^ [X1: $i,X449: $i] : ( d_29_ii @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X1 ) @ ( den @ X449 ) ) @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X449 ) @ ( den @ X1 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.BKpGnnHkjg/E---3.1_708140.p',def_moref) ).

thf(satz51b,conjecture,
    ( all_of
    @ ^ [X1: $i] : ( in @ X1 @ frac )
    @ ^ [X1: $i] :
        ( all_of
        @ ^ [X495: $i] : ( in @ X495 @ frac )
        @ ^ [X496: $i] :
            ( all_of
            @ ^ [X4: $i] : ( in @ X4 @ frac )
            @ ^ [X4: $i] :
                ( ( lessf @ X1 @ X496 )
               => ( ( lesseq @ X496 @ X4 )
                 => ( lessf @ X1 @ X4 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.BKpGnnHkjg/E---3.1_708140.p',satz51b) ).

thf(satz51a,axiom,
    ( all_of
    @ ^ [X1: $i] : ( in @ X1 @ frac )
    @ ^ [X1: $i] :
        ( all_of
        @ ^ [X493: $i] : ( in @ X493 @ frac )
        @ ^ [X494: $i] :
            ( all_of
            @ ^ [X4: $i] : ( in @ X4 @ frac )
            @ ^ [X4: $i] :
                ( ( lesseq @ X1 @ X494 )
               => ( ( lessf @ X494 @ X4 )
                 => ( lessf @ X1 @ X4 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.BKpGnnHkjg/E---3.1_708140.p',satz51a) ).

thf(def_moreq,axiom,
    ( moreq
    = ( ^ [X1: $i,X465: $i] : ( l_or @ ( moref @ X1 @ X465 ) @ ( n_eq @ X1 @ X465 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.BKpGnnHkjg/E---3.1_708140.p',def_moreq) ).

thf(satz41e,axiom,
    ( all_of
    @ ^ [X1: $i] : ( in @ X1 @ frac )
    @ ^ [X1: $i] :
        ( all_of
        @ ^ [X471: $i] : ( in @ X471 @ frac )
        @ ^ [X472: $i] :
            ( ( d_not @ ( moref @ X1 @ X472 ) )
           => ( lesseq @ X1 @ X472 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.BKpGnnHkjg/E---3.1_708140.p',satz41e) ).

thf(satz41c,axiom,
    ( all_of
    @ ^ [X1: $i] : ( in @ X1 @ frac )
    @ ^ [X1: $i] :
        ( all_of
        @ ^ [X467: $i] : ( in @ X467 @ frac )
        @ ^ [X468: $i] :
            ( ( moreq @ X1 @ X468 )
           => ( d_not @ ( lessf @ X1 @ X468 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.BKpGnnHkjg/E---3.1_708140.p',satz41c) ).

thf(satz38,axiom,
    ( all_of
    @ ^ [X1: $i] : ( in @ X1 @ frac )
    @ ^ [X1: $i] :
        ( all_of
        @ ^ [X437: $i] : ( in @ X437 @ frac )
        @ ^ [X438: $i] :
            ( ( n_eq @ X1 @ X438 )
           => ( n_eq @ X438 @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.BKpGnnHkjg/E---3.1_708140.p',satz38) ).

thf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( diffprop
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i,Z2: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ Z0 @ ( n_pl @ Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_diffprop]) ).

thf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( d_not
    = ( ^ [Z0: $o] :
          ( Z0
         => ~ $true ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_d_not]) ).

thf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( imp
    = ( ^ [Z0: $o,Z1: $o] :
          ( Z0
         => Z1 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_imp]) ).

thf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( iii
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] :
          ( l_some @ nat
          @ ^ [Z2: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ Z1 @ ( n_pl @ Z0 @ Z2 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_iii]) ).

thf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( diffprop
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i,Z2: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ Z0 @ ( n_pl @ Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,def_n_is]) ).

thf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( l_or
    = ( ^ [Z0: $o,Z1: $o] :
          ( ( Z0
           => ~ $true )
         => Z1 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_l_or]) ).

thf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( d_not
    = ( ^ [Z0: $o] :
          ( Z0
         => ~ $true ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

thf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( n_eq
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ Z0 ) @ ( den @ Z1 ) ) @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ Z1 ) @ ( den @ Z0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_n_eq]) ).

thf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( lessf
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] :
          ( l_some @ nat
          @ ^ [Z2: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ Z1 ) @ ( den @ Z0 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ Z0 ) @ ( den @ Z1 ) ) @ Z2 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_lessf]) ).

thf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( iii
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] :
          ( l_some @ nat
          @ ^ [Z2: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ Z1 @ ( n_pl @ Z0 @ Z2 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),def_n_some]) ).

thf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( d_29_ii
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] :
          ( l_some @ nat
          @ ^ [Z2: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ Z0 @ ( n_pl @ Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_d_29_ii]) ).

thf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( lesseq
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] :
          ( ( ( l_some @ nat
              @ ^ [Z2: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ Z1 ) @ ( den @ Z0 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ Z0 ) @ ( den @ Z1 ) ) @ Z2 ) ) )
           => ~ $true )
         => ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ Z0 ) @ ( den @ Z1 ) ) @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ Z1 ) @ ( den @ Z0 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_lesseq]) ).

thf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( l_or
    = ( ^ [Z0: $o,Z1: $o] :
          ( ( Z0
           => ~ $true )
         => Z1 ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_22]),c_0_26]) ).

thf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( n_eq
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ Z0 ) @ ( den @ Z1 ) ) @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ Z1 ) @ ( den @ Z0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,def_n_is]) ).

thf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( lessf
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] :
          ( l_some @ nat
          @ ^ [Z2: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ Z1 ) @ ( den @ Z0 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ Z0 ) @ ( den @ Z1 ) ) @ Z2 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).

thf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( all_of
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o] :
        ! [X4: $i] :
          ( ( Z0 @ X4 )
         => ( Z1 @ X4 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_all_of]) ).

thf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( is_of
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i > $o] : ( Z1 @ Z0 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_is_of]) ).

thf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( moref
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] :
          ( l_some @ nat
          @ ^ [Z2: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ Z0 ) @ ( den @ Z1 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ Z1 ) @ ( den @ Z0 ) ) @ Z2 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_moref]) ).

thf(c_0_38,plain,
    ( d_29_ii
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] :
          ( l_some @ nat
          @ ^ [Z2: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ Z0 @ ( n_pl @ Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_24]),def_n_some]) ).

thf(c_0_39,plain,
    ( lesseq
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] :
          ( ( ( l_some @ nat
              @ ^ [Z2: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ Z1 ) @ ( den @ Z0 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ Z0 ) @ ( den @ Z1 ) ) @ Z2 ) ) )
           => ~ $true )
         => ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ Z0 ) @ ( den @ Z1 ) ) @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ Z1 ) @ ( den @ Z0 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_33]),c_0_34]) ).

thf(c_0_40,plain,
    ( all_of
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o] :
        ! [X4: $i] :
          ( ( Z0 @ X4 )
         => ( Z1 @ X4 ) ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]) ).

thf(c_0_41,plain,
    ( moref
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] :
          ( l_some @ nat
          @ ^ [Z2: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ Z0 ) @ ( den @ Z1 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ Z1 ) @ ( den @ Z0 ) ) @ Z2 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]) ).

thf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( all_of
      @ ^ [X1: $i] : ( in @ X1 @ frac )
      @ ^ [X1: $i] :
          ( all_of
          @ ^ [X495: $i] : ( in @ X495 @ frac )
          @ ^ [X496: $i] :
              ( all_of
              @ ^ [X4: $i] : ( in @ X4 @ frac )
              @ ^ [X4: $i] :
                  ( ( lessf @ X1 @ X496 )
                 => ( ( lesseq @ X496 @ X4 )
                   => ( lessf @ X1 @ X4 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[satz51b]) ).

thf(c_0_43,plain,
    ! [X558: $i] :
      ( ( in @ X558 @ frac )
     => ! [X557: $i] :
          ( ( in @ X557 @ frac )
         => ! [X556: $i] :
              ( ( in @ X556 @ frac )
             => ( ( ( ( l_some @ nat
                      @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X557 ) @ ( den @ X558 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X558 ) @ ( den @ X557 ) ) @ Z0 ) ) )
                   => ~ $true )
                 => ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X558 ) @ ( den @ X557 ) ) @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X557 ) @ ( den @ X558 ) ) ) )
               => ( ( l_some @ nat
                    @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X556 ) @ ( den @ X557 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X557 ) @ ( den @ X556 ) ) @ Z0 ) ) )
                 => ( l_some @ nat
                    @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X556 ) @ ( den @ X558 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X558 ) @ ( den @ X556 ) ) @ Z0 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[satz51a]),c_0_39]),c_0_34]),c_0_40]) ).

thf(c_0_44,plain,
    ( moreq
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] :
          ( ( ( l_some @ nat
              @ ^ [Z2: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ Z0 ) @ ( den @ Z1 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ Z1 ) @ ( den @ Z0 ) ) @ Z2 ) ) )
           => ~ $true )
         => ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ Z0 ) @ ( den @ Z1 ) ) @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ Z1 ) @ ( den @ Z0 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_moreq]) ).

thf(c_0_45,plain,
    ! [X547: $i] :
      ( ( in @ X547 @ frac )
     => ! [X546: $i] :
          ( ( in @ X546 @ frac )
         => ( ( ( l_some @ nat
                @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X547 ) @ ( den @ X546 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X546 ) @ ( den @ X547 ) ) @ Z0 ) ) )
             => ~ $true )
           => ( ( ( l_some @ nat
                  @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X546 ) @ ( den @ X547 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X547 ) @ ( den @ X546 ) ) @ Z0 ) ) )
               => ~ $true )
             => ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X547 ) @ ( den @ X546 ) ) @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X546 ) @ ( den @ X547 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[satz41e]),c_0_26]),c_0_41]),c_0_39]),c_0_40]) ).

thf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X536: $i] :
        ( ( in @ X536 @ frac )
       => ! [X535: $i] :
            ( ( in @ X535 @ frac )
           => ! [X534: $i] :
                ( ( in @ X534 @ frac )
               => ( ( l_some @ nat
                    @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X535 ) @ ( den @ X536 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X536 ) @ ( den @ X535 ) ) @ Z0 ) ) )
                 => ( ( ( ( l_some @ nat
                          @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X534 ) @ ( den @ X535 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X535 ) @ ( den @ X534 ) ) @ Z0 ) ) )
                       => ~ $true )
                     => ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X535 ) @ ( den @ X534 ) ) @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X534 ) @ ( den @ X535 ) ) ) )
                   => ( l_some @ nat
                      @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X534 ) @ ( den @ X536 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X536 ) @ ( den @ X534 ) ) @ Z0 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_42]),c_0_39]),c_0_34]),c_0_40]) ).

thf(c_0_47,plain,
    ! [X927: $i,X928: $i,X929: $i] :
      ( ( ~ ( l_some @ nat
            @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X928 ) @ ( den @ X927 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X927 ) @ ( den @ X928 ) ) @ Z0 ) ) )
        | ~ $true
        | ~ ( l_some @ nat
            @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X929 ) @ ( den @ X928 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X928 ) @ ( den @ X929 ) ) @ Z0 ) ) )
        | ( l_some @ nat
          @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X929 ) @ ( den @ X927 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X927 ) @ ( den @ X929 ) ) @ Z0 ) ) )
        | ~ ( in @ X929 @ frac )
        | ~ ( in @ X928 @ frac )
        | ~ ( in @ X927 @ frac ) )
      & ( ~ ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X927 ) @ ( den @ X928 ) ) @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X928 ) @ ( den @ X927 ) ) )
        | ~ ( l_some @ nat
            @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X929 ) @ ( den @ X928 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X928 ) @ ( den @ X929 ) ) @ Z0 ) ) )
        | ( l_some @ nat
          @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X929 ) @ ( den @ X927 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X927 ) @ ( den @ X929 ) ) @ Z0 ) ) )
        | ~ ( in @ X929 @ frac )
        | ~ ( in @ X928 @ frac )
        | ~ ( in @ X927 @ frac ) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_43])])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_48,plain,
    ( moreq
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] :
          ( ( ( l_some @ nat
              @ ^ [Z2: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ Z0 ) @ ( den @ Z1 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ Z1 ) @ ( den @ Z0 ) ) @ Z2 ) ) )
           => ~ $true )
         => ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ Z0 ) @ ( den @ Z1 ) ) @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ Z1 ) @ ( den @ Z0 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_32]),c_0_41]),c_0_33]) ).

thf(c_0_49,plain,
    ! [X917: $i,X918: $i] :
      ( ( ( l_some @ nat
          @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X918 ) @ ( den @ X917 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X917 ) @ ( den @ X918 ) ) @ Z0 ) ) )
        | ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X917 ) @ ( den @ X918 ) ) @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X918 ) @ ( den @ X917 ) ) )
        | ( l_some @ nat
          @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X917 ) @ ( den @ X918 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X918 ) @ ( den @ X917 ) ) @ Z0 ) ) )
        | ~ ( in @ X918 @ frac )
        | ~ ( in @ X917 @ frac ) )
      & ( $true
        | ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X917 ) @ ( den @ X918 ) ) @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X918 ) @ ( den @ X917 ) ) )
        | ( l_some @ nat
          @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X917 ) @ ( den @ X918 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X918 ) @ ( den @ X917 ) ) @ Z0 ) ) )
        | ~ ( in @ X918 @ frac )
        | ~ ( in @ X917 @ frac ) )
      & ( ( l_some @ nat
          @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X918 ) @ ( den @ X917 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X917 ) @ ( den @ X918 ) ) @ Z0 ) ) )
        | ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X917 ) @ ( den @ X918 ) ) @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X918 ) @ ( den @ X917 ) ) )
        | $true
        | ~ ( in @ X918 @ frac )
        | ~ ( in @ X917 @ frac ) )
      & ( $true
        | ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X917 ) @ ( den @ X918 ) ) @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X918 ) @ ( den @ X917 ) ) )
        | $true
        | ~ ( in @ X918 @ frac )
        | ~ ( in @ X917 @ frac ) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_45])])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( in @ esk1_0 @ frac )
    & ( in @ esk2_0 @ frac )
    & ( in @ esk3_0 @ frac )
    & ( l_some @ nat
      @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ esk2_0 ) @ ( den @ esk1_0 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ esk1_0 ) @ ( den @ esk2_0 ) ) @ Z0 ) ) )
    & ( ( l_some @ nat
        @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ esk3_0 ) @ ( den @ esk2_0 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ esk2_0 ) @ ( den @ esk3_0 ) ) @ Z0 ) ) )
      | ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ esk2_0 ) @ ( den @ esk3_0 ) ) @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ esk3_0 ) @ ( den @ esk2_0 ) ) ) )
    & ( $true
      | ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ esk2_0 ) @ ( den @ esk3_0 ) ) @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ esk3_0 ) @ ( den @ esk2_0 ) ) ) )
    & ~ ( l_some @ nat
        @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ esk3_0 ) @ ( den @ esk1_0 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ esk1_0 ) @ ( den @ esk3_0 ) ) @ Z0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_46])])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_51,plain,
    ! [X1: $i,X5: $i,X4: $i] :
      ( ( l_some @ nat
        @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X5 ) @ ( den @ X4 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X4 ) @ ( den @ X5 ) ) @ Z0 ) ) )
      | ~ ( l_some @ nat
          @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X1 ) @ ( den @ X4 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X4 ) @ ( den @ X1 ) ) @ Z0 ) ) )
      | ~ $true
      | ~ ( l_some @ nat
          @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X5 ) @ ( den @ X1 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X1 ) @ ( den @ X5 ) ) @ Z0 ) ) )
      | ~ ( in @ X5 @ frac )
      | ~ ( in @ X1 @ frac )
      | ~ ( in @ X4 @ frac ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_47]) ).

thf(c_0_52,plain,
    ! [X871: $i] :
      ( ( in @ X871 @ frac )
     => ! [X870: $i] :
          ( ( in @ X870 @ frac )
         => ( ( ( ( l_some @ nat
                  @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X871 ) @ ( den @ X870 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X870 ) @ ( den @ X871 ) ) @ Z0 ) ) )
               => ~ $true )
             => ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X871 ) @ ( den @ X870 ) ) @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X870 ) @ ( den @ X871 ) ) ) )
           => ( ( l_some @ nat
                @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X870 ) @ ( den @ X871 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X871 ) @ ( den @ X870 ) ) @ Z0 ) ) )
             => ~ $true ) ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[satz41c]),c_0_26]),c_0_48]),c_0_34]),c_0_40]) ).

thf(c_0_53,plain,
    ! [X1: $i,X4: $i] :
      ( ( l_some @ nat
        @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X1 ) @ ( den @ X4 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X4 ) @ ( den @ X1 ) ) @ Z0 ) ) )
      | ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X4 ) @ ( den @ X1 ) ) @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X1 ) @ ( den @ X4 ) ) )
      | ( l_some @ nat
        @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X4 ) @ ( den @ X1 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X1 ) @ ( den @ X4 ) ) @ Z0 ) ) )
      | ~ ( in @ X1 @ frac )
      | ~ ( in @ X4 @ frac ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_49]) ).

thf(c_0_54,negated_conjecture,
    in @ esk3_0 @ frac,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_50]) ).

thf(c_0_55,plain,
    ! [X638: $i] :
      ( ( in @ X638 @ frac )
     => ! [X637: $i] :
          ( ( in @ X637 @ frac )
         => ( ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X638 ) @ ( den @ X637 ) ) @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X637 ) @ ( den @ X638 ) ) )
           => ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X637 ) @ ( den @ X638 ) ) @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X638 ) @ ( den @ X637 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[satz38]),c_0_33]),c_0_40]) ).

thf(c_0_56,plain,
    ! [X5: $i,X4: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( l_some @ nat
        @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X5 ) @ ( den @ X4 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X4 ) @ ( den @ X5 ) ) @ Z0 ) ) )
      | ~ ( in @ X5 @ frac )
      | ~ ( in @ X4 @ frac )
      | ~ ( in @ X1 @ frac )
      | ~ ( l_some @ nat
          @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X5 ) @ ( den @ X1 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X1 ) @ ( den @ X5 ) ) @ Z0 ) ) )
      | ~ ( l_some @ nat
          @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X1 ) @ ( den @ X4 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X4 ) @ ( den @ X1 ) ) @ Z0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_51]) ).

thf(c_0_57,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( l_some @ nat
      @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ esk3_0 ) @ ( den @ esk2_0 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ esk2_0 ) @ ( den @ esk3_0 ) ) @ Z0 ) ) )
    | ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ esk2_0 ) @ ( den @ esk3_0 ) ) @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ esk3_0 ) @ ( den @ esk2_0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_50]) ).

thf(c_0_58,negated_conjecture,
    in @ esk2_0 @ frac,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_50]) ).

thf(c_0_59,plain,
    ! [X1268: $i,X1269: $i] :
      ( ( ~ ( l_some @ nat
            @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X1268 ) @ ( den @ X1269 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X1269 ) @ ( den @ X1268 ) ) @ Z0 ) ) )
        | ~ $true
        | ~ ( l_some @ nat
            @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X1269 ) @ ( den @ X1268 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X1268 ) @ ( den @ X1269 ) ) @ Z0 ) ) )
        | ~ $true
        | ~ ( in @ X1269 @ frac )
        | ~ ( in @ X1268 @ frac ) )
      & ( ~ ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X1268 ) @ ( den @ X1269 ) ) @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X1269 ) @ ( den @ X1268 ) ) )
        | ~ ( l_some @ nat
            @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X1269 ) @ ( den @ X1268 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X1268 ) @ ( den @ X1269 ) ) @ Z0 ) ) )
        | ~ $true
        | ~ ( in @ X1269 @ frac )
        | ~ ( in @ X1268 @ frac ) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_52])])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_60,negated_conjecture,
    ( l_some @ nat
    @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ esk2_0 ) @ ( den @ esk1_0 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ esk1_0 ) @ ( den @ esk2_0 ) ) @ Z0 ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_50]) ).

thf(c_0_61,negated_conjecture,
    in @ esk1_0 @ frac,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_50]) ).

thf(c_0_62,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( l_some @ nat
        @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X1 ) @ ( den @ esk3_0 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ esk3_0 ) @ ( den @ X1 ) ) @ Z0 ) ) )
      | ( l_some @ nat
        @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ esk3_0 ) @ ( den @ X1 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X1 ) @ ( den @ esk3_0 ) ) @ Z0 ) ) )
      | ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ esk3_0 ) @ ( den @ X1 ) ) @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X1 ) @ ( den @ esk3_0 ) ) )
      | ~ ( in @ X1 @ frac ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_53,c_0_54]) ).

thf(c_0_63,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( l_some @ nat
      @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ esk3_0 ) @ ( den @ esk1_0 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ esk1_0 ) @ ( den @ esk3_0 ) ) @ Z0 ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_50]) ).

thf(c_0_64,plain,
    ! [X1015: $i,X1016: $i] :
      ( ~ ( in @ X1015 @ frac )
      | ~ ( in @ X1016 @ frac )
      | ~ ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X1015 ) @ ( den @ X1016 ) ) @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X1016 ) @ ( den @ X1015 ) ) )
      | ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X1016 ) @ ( den @ X1015 ) ) @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X1015 ) @ ( den @ X1016 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_55])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_65,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( l_some @ nat
        @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ esk3_0 ) @ ( den @ X1 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X1 ) @ ( den @ esk3_0 ) ) @ Z0 ) ) )
      | ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ esk2_0 ) @ ( den @ esk3_0 ) ) @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ esk3_0 ) @ ( den @ esk2_0 ) ) )
      | ~ ( l_some @ nat
          @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ esk2_0 ) @ ( den @ X1 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X1 ) @ ( den @ esk2_0 ) ) @ Z0 ) ) )
      | ~ ( in @ X1 @ frac ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_56,c_0_57]),c_0_54]),c_0_58])]) ).

thf(c_0_66,plain,
    ! [X4: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X1 ) @ ( den @ X4 ) ) @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X4 ) @ ( den @ X1 ) ) )
      | ~ ( l_some @ nat
          @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X4 ) @ ( den @ X1 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X1 ) @ ( den @ X4 ) ) @ Z0 ) ) )
      | ~ $true
      | ~ ( in @ X4 @ frac )
      | ~ ( in @ X1 @ frac ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_59]) ).

thf(c_0_67,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( l_some @ nat
        @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ esk2_0 ) @ ( den @ X1 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X1 ) @ ( den @ esk2_0 ) ) @ Z0 ) ) )
      | ~ ( l_some @ nat
          @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ esk1_0 ) @ ( den @ X1 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X1 ) @ ( den @ esk1_0 ) ) @ Z0 ) ) )
      | ~ ( in @ X1 @ frac ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_56,c_0_60]),c_0_58]),c_0_61])]) ).

thf(c_0_68,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( l_some @ nat
      @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ esk1_0 ) @ ( den @ esk3_0 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ esk3_0 ) @ ( den @ esk1_0 ) ) @ Z0 ) ) )
    | ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ esk3_0 ) @ ( den @ esk1_0 ) ) @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ esk1_0 ) @ ( den @ esk3_0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_62,c_0_61]),c_0_63]) ).

thf(c_0_69,plain,
    ! [X4: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X4 ) @ ( den @ X1 ) ) @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X1 ) @ ( den @ X4 ) ) )
      | ~ ( in @ X1 @ frac )
      | ~ ( in @ X4 @ frac )
      | ~ ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X1 ) @ ( den @ X4 ) ) @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X4 ) @ ( den @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_64]) ).

thf(c_0_70,negated_conjecture,
    e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ esk2_0 ) @ ( den @ esk3_0 ) ) @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ esk3_0 ) @ ( den @ esk2_0 ) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_65,c_0_60]),c_0_61])]),c_0_63]) ).

thf(c_0_71,plain,
    ! [X5: $i,X4: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( l_some @ nat
        @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X5 ) @ ( den @ X1 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X1 ) @ ( den @ X5 ) ) @ Z0 ) ) )
      | ~ ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X1 ) @ ( den @ X4 ) ) @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X4 ) @ ( den @ X1 ) ) )
      | ~ ( l_some @ nat
          @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X5 ) @ ( den @ X4 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X4 ) @ ( den @ X5 ) ) @ Z0 ) ) )
      | ~ ( in @ X5 @ frac )
      | ~ ( in @ X4 @ frac )
      | ~ ( in @ X1 @ frac ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_47]) ).

thf(c_0_72,plain,
    ! [X1: $i,X4: $i] :
      ( ~ ( in @ X4 @ frac )
      | ~ ( in @ X1 @ frac )
      | ~ ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X1 ) @ ( den @ X4 ) ) @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X4 ) @ ( den @ X1 ) ) )
      | ~ ( l_some @ nat
          @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X4 ) @ ( den @ X1 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X1 ) @ ( den @ X4 ) ) @ Z0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_66]) ).

thf(c_0_73,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( l_some @ nat
      @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ esk2_0 ) @ ( den @ esk3_0 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ esk3_0 ) @ ( den @ esk2_0 ) ) @ Z0 ) ) )
    | ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ esk3_0 ) @ ( den @ esk1_0 ) ) @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ esk1_0 ) @ ( den @ esk3_0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_67,c_0_68]),c_0_54])]) ).

thf(c_0_74,negated_conjecture,
    e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ esk3_0 ) @ ( den @ esk2_0 ) ) @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ esk2_0 ) @ ( den @ esk3_0 ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_69,c_0_70]),c_0_54]),c_0_58])]) ).

thf(c_0_75,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( l_some @ nat
        @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ esk2_0 ) @ ( den @ X1 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X1 ) @ ( den @ esk2_0 ) ) @ Z0 ) ) )
      | ~ ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ X1 ) @ ( den @ esk1_0 ) ) @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ esk1_0 ) @ ( den @ X1 ) ) )
      | ~ ( in @ X1 @ frac ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_71,c_0_60]),c_0_58]),c_0_61])]) ).

thf(c_0_76,negated_conjecture,
    e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ esk3_0 ) @ ( den @ esk1_0 ) ) @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ esk1_0 ) @ ( den @ esk3_0 ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_72,c_0_73]),c_0_74]),c_0_58]),c_0_54])]) ).

thf(c_0_77,negated_conjecture,
    ( l_some @ nat
    @ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( e_is @ nat @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ esk2_0 ) @ ( den @ esk3_0 ) ) @ ( n_pl @ ( n_ts @ ( num @ esk3_0 ) @ ( den @ esk2_0 ) ) @ Z0 ) ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_75,c_0_76]),c_0_54])]) ).

thf(c_0_78,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_72,c_0_77]),c_0_74]),c_0_58]),c_0_54])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : NUM743^4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.18  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.18  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.18  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.18  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.18  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.18  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.18  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.18  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 12:49:01 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.18  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.18  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.22  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.23/0.28  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.BKpGnnHkjg/E---3.1_708140.p
% 8.82/1.64  % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 8.82/1.64  % Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSMLLLCHSA.
% 8.82/1.64  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 8.82/1.64  % Starting pre_casc_4 with 1200s (4) cores
% 8.82/1.64  % Starting full_lambda_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 8.82/1.64  % Starting sh10 with 300s (1) cores
% 8.82/1.64  % Starting post_as_ho9 with 300s (1) cores
% 8.82/1.64  % Starting post_as_ho8 with 300s (1) cores
% 8.82/1.64  % pre_casc_4 with pid 708153 completed with status 0
% 8.82/1.64  % Result found by pre_casc_4
% 8.82/1.64  % Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSMLLLCHSA.
% 8.82/1.64  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 8.82/1.64  % Starting pre_casc_4 with 1200s (4) cores
% 8.82/1.64  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,,true,1.5,0,3,20000,1.0,true))
% 8.82/1.64  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,true,1.5,0,3,20000,1.0,true)
% 8.82/1.64  % Search class: HGHSM-FSLM31-DHSMMFBN
% 8.82/1.64  % partial match(2): HGHSM-FSLM31-DHSFFFBN
% 8.82/1.64  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 4 cores with 1200 seconds (1200 total)
% 8.82/1.64  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 109s (1) cores
% 8.82/1.64  % Starting pre_casc_4 with 121s (1) cores
% 8.82/1.64  % Starting full_lambda_10 with 211s (1) cores
% 8.82/1.64  % Starting new_bool_8 with 210s (1) cores
% 8.82/1.64  % full_lambda_10 with pid 708160 completed with status 0
% 8.82/1.64  % Result found by full_lambda_10
% 8.82/1.64  % Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSMLLLCHSA.
% 8.82/1.64  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 8.82/1.64  % Starting pre_casc_4 with 1200s (4) cores
% 8.82/1.64  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,,true,1.5,0,3,20000,1.0,true))
% 8.82/1.64  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,true,1.5,0,3,20000,1.0,true)
% 8.82/1.64  % Search class: HGHSM-FSLM31-DHSMMFBN
% 8.82/1.64  % partial match(2): HGHSM-FSLM31-DHSFFFBN
% 8.82/1.64  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 4 cores with 1200 seconds (1200 total)
% 8.82/1.64  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 109s (1) cores
% 8.82/1.64  % Starting pre_casc_4 with 121s (1) cores
% 8.82/1.64  % Starting full_lambda_10 with 211s (1) cores
% 8.82/1.64  % Preprocessing time       : 0.012 s
% 8.82/1.64  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.82/1.64  
% 8.82/1.64  % Proof found!
% 8.82/1.64  % SZS status Theorem
% 8.82/1.64  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.82/1.64  % Parsed axioms                        : 566
% 8.82/1.64  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 379
% 8.82/1.64  % Initial clauses                      : 318
% 8.82/1.64  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 87
% 8.82/1.64  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 231
% 8.82/1.64  % Processed clauses                    : 1414
% 8.82/1.64  % ...of these trivial                  : 25
% 8.82/1.64  % ...subsumed                          : 297
% 8.82/1.64  % ...remaining for further processing  : 1092
% 8.82/1.64  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 15
% 8.82/1.64  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 8.82/1.64  % Backward-subsumed                    : 22
% 8.82/1.64  % Backward-rewritten                   : 44
% 8.82/1.64  % Generated clauses                    : 13406
% 8.82/1.64  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 13042
% 8.82/1.64  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 8.82/1.64  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 21
% 8.82/1.64  % Paramodulations                      : 9560
% 8.82/1.64  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 8.82/1.64  % NegExts                              : 272
% 8.82/1.64  % Equation resolutions                 : 70
% 8.82/1.64  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 8.82/1.64  % Total rewrite steps                  : 2378
% 8.82/1.64  % ...of those cached                   : 2308
% 8.82/1.64  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 8.82/1.64  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 8.82/1.64  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 8.82/1.64  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 8.82/1.64  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 8.82/1.64  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 8.82/1.64  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 8.82/1.64  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 8.82/1.64  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 8.82/1.64  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 8.82/1.64  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 8.82/1.64  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 8.82/1.64  % Current number of processed clauses  : 794
% 8.82/1.64  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 62
% 8.82/1.64  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 8
% 8.82/1.64  %    Negative unit clauses             : 14
% 8.82/1.64  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 710
% 8.82/1.64  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 11922
% 8.82/1.64  % ...number of literals in the above   : 88968
% 8.82/1.64  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 8.82/1.64  % Current number of archived clauses   : 298
% 8.82/1.64  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 247131
% 8.82/1.64  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 21870
% 8.82/1.64  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 289
% 8.82/1.64  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 856
% 8.82/1.64  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 8.82/1.64  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 643
% 8.82/1.64  % BW rewrite match successes           : 144
% 8.82/1.64  % Condensation attempts                : 1414
% 8.82/1.64  % Condensation successes               : 5
% 8.82/1.64  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 3506296
% 8.82/1.64  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 29207
% 8.82/1.64  
% 8.82/1.64  % -------------------------------------------------
% 8.82/1.64  % User time                : 1.191 s
% 8.82/1.64  % System time              : 0.033 s
% 8.82/1.64  % Total time               : 1.224 s
% 8.82/1.64  % Maximum resident set size: 8760 pages
% 8.82/1.64  
% 8.82/1.64  % -------------------------------------------------
% 8.82/1.64  % User time                : 4.839 s
% 8.82/1.64  % System time              : 0.133 s
% 8.82/1.64  % Total time               : 4.972 s
% 8.82/1.64  % Maximum resident set size: 5888 pages
% 8.82/1.64  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------