↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : NUM752^1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Oct  3 07:57:14 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 3.63s 3.82s
% Output   : Proof 3.63s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : NUM752^1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Fri Oct  3 08:54:53 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 3.63/3.82  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.63/3.82  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.63/3.82  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (eq x y) True
% 3.63/3.82  Clause #1 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (Xx Xy Xz Xu : frac), eq Xx Xy → eq Xz Xu → eq (pf Xx Xz) (pf Xy Xu)) True
% 3.63/3.82  Clause #2 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (Xx : frac), eq Xx Xx) True
% 3.63/3.82  Clause #3 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (eq (pf z x) (pf z y))) True
% 3.63/3.82  Clause #4 (by clausification #[2]): ∀ (a : frac), Eq (eq a a) True
% 3.63/3.82  Clause #5 (by clausification #[3]): Eq (eq (pf z x) (pf z y)) False
% 3.63/3.82  Clause #6 (by clausification #[1]): ∀ (a : frac), Eq (∀ (Xy Xz Xu : frac), eq a Xy → eq Xz Xu → eq (pf a Xz) (pf Xy Xu)) True
% 3.63/3.82  Clause #7 (by clausification #[6]): ∀ (a a_1 : frac), Eq (∀ (Xz Xu : frac), eq a a_1 → eq Xz Xu → eq (pf a Xz) (pf a_1 Xu)) True
% 3.63/3.82  Clause #8 (by clausification #[7]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : frac), Eq (∀ (Xu : frac), eq a a_1 → eq a_2 Xu → eq (pf a a_2) (pf a_1 Xu)) True
% 3.63/3.82  Clause #9 (by clausification #[8]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 a_3 : frac), Eq (eq a a_1 → eq a_2 a_3 → eq (pf a a_2) (pf a_1 a_3)) True
% 3.63/3.82  Clause #10 (by clausification #[9]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 a_3 : frac), Or (Eq (eq a a_1) False) (Eq (eq a_2 a_3 → eq (pf a a_2) (pf a_1 a_3)) True)
% 3.63/3.82  Clause #11 (by clausification #[10]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 a_3 : frac), Or (Eq (eq a a_1) False) (Or (Eq (eq a_2 a_3) False) (Eq (eq (pf a a_2) (pf a_1 a_3)) True))
% 3.63/3.82  Clause #13 (by superposition #[11, 4]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : frac), Or (Eq (eq a a_1) False) (Or (Eq (eq (pf a_2 a) (pf a_2 a_1)) True) (Eq False True))
% 3.63/3.82  Clause #14 (by clausification #[13]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : frac), Or (Eq (eq a a_1) False) (Eq (eq (pf a_2 a) (pf a_2 a_1)) True)
% 3.63/3.82  Clause #15 (by superposition #[14, 0]): ∀ (a : frac), Or (Eq (eq (pf a x) (pf a y)) True) (Eq False True)
% 3.63/3.82  Clause #24 (by clausification #[15]): ∀ (a : frac), Eq (eq (pf a x) (pf a y)) True
% 3.63/3.82  Clause #25 (by superposition #[24, 5]): Eq True False
% 3.63/3.82  Clause #29 (by clausification #[25]): False
% 3.63/3.82  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------