↑ Up

cocATP---0.2.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : cocATP---0.2.0
% Problem  : NUM752^1 : TPTP v7.0.0. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python CASC.py /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n172.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory   : 32218.625MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jan  8 13:11:38 EST 2018

% Result   : Theorem 0.36s
% Output   : Proof 0.36s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : NUM752^1 : TPTP v7.0.0. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : python CASC.py /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.03/0.24  % Computer : n172.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.03/0.24  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.24  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.03/0.24  % Memory   : 32218.625MB
% 0.03/0.24  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64
% 0.03/0.24  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.24  % DateTime : Fri Jan  5 13:41:34 CST 2018
% 0.03/0.24  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.03/0.27  Python 2.7.13
% 0.36/0.86  Using paths ['/home/cristobal/cocATP/CASC/TPTP/', '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/', '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/']
% 0.36/0.86  FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x2b4748b4a878>, <kernel.Type object at 0x2b4748b4a4d0>) of role type named frac_type
% 0.36/0.86  Using role type
% 0.36/0.86  Declaring frac:Type
% 0.36/0.86  FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x2b4748b3f050>, <kernel.Constant object at 0x2b4748b4ab48>) of role type named x
% 0.36/0.86  Using role type
% 0.36/0.86  Declaring x:frac
% 0.36/0.86  FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x2b4748b4ae18>, <kernel.Constant object at 0x2b4748b4ab48>) of role type named y
% 0.36/0.86  Using role type
% 0.36/0.86  Declaring y:frac
% 0.36/0.86  FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x2b4748b4a878>, <kernel.Constant object at 0x2b4748b4ab48>) of role type named z
% 0.36/0.86  Using role type
% 0.36/0.86  Declaring z:frac
% 0.36/0.86  FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x2b4748b4a3f8>, <kernel.DependentProduct object at 0x2b4748b4a5f0>) of role type named eq
% 0.36/0.86  Using role type
% 0.36/0.86  Declaring _TPTP_eq:(frac->(frac->Prop))
% 0.36/0.86  FOF formula ((_TPTP_eq x) y) of role axiom named e
% 0.36/0.86  A new axiom: ((_TPTP_eq x) y)
% 0.36/0.86  FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x2b4748b4ab48>, <kernel.DependentProduct object at 0x2b4748b4a878>) of role type named pf
% 0.36/0.86  Using role type
% 0.36/0.86  Declaring pf:(frac->(frac->frac))
% 0.36/0.86  FOF formula (forall (Xx:frac) (Xy:frac) (Xz:frac) (Xu:frac), (((_TPTP_eq Xx) Xy)->(((_TPTP_eq Xz) Xu)->((_TPTP_eq ((pf Xx) Xz)) ((pf Xy) Xu))))) of role axiom named satz56
% 0.36/0.86  A new axiom: (forall (Xx:frac) (Xy:frac) (Xz:frac) (Xu:frac), (((_TPTP_eq Xx) Xy)->(((_TPTP_eq Xz) Xu)->((_TPTP_eq ((pf Xx) Xz)) ((pf Xy) Xu)))))
% 0.36/0.86  FOF formula (forall (Xx:frac), ((_TPTP_eq Xx) Xx)) of role axiom named satz37
% 0.36/0.86  A new axiom: (forall (Xx:frac), ((_TPTP_eq Xx) Xx))
% 0.36/0.86  FOF formula ((_TPTP_eq ((pf z) x)) ((pf z) y)) of role conjecture named satz62e
% 0.36/0.86  Conjecture to prove = ((_TPTP_eq ((pf z) x)) ((pf z) y)):Prop
% 0.36/0.86  We need to prove ['((_TPTP_eq ((pf z) x)) ((pf z) y))']
% 0.36/0.86  Parameter frac:Type.
% 0.36/0.86  Parameter x:frac.
% 0.36/0.86  Parameter y:frac.
% 0.36/0.86  Parameter z:frac.
% 0.36/0.86  Parameter _TPTP_eq:(frac->(frac->Prop)).
% 0.36/0.86  Axiom e:((_TPTP_eq x) y).
% 0.36/0.86  Parameter pf:(frac->(frac->frac)).
% 0.36/0.86  Axiom satz56:(forall (Xx:frac) (Xy:frac) (Xz:frac) (Xu:frac), (((_TPTP_eq Xx) Xy)->(((_TPTP_eq Xz) Xu)->((_TPTP_eq ((pf Xx) Xz)) ((pf Xy) Xu))))).
% 0.36/0.86  Axiom satz37:(forall (Xx:frac), ((_TPTP_eq Xx) Xx)).
% 0.36/0.86  Trying to prove ((_TPTP_eq ((pf z) x)) ((pf z) y))
% 0.36/0.86  Found satz370:=(satz37 z):((_TPTP_eq z) z)
% 0.36/0.86  Found (satz37 z) as proof of ((_TPTP_eq z) z)
% 0.36/0.86  Found (satz37 z) as proof of ((_TPTP_eq z) z)
% 0.36/0.86  Found (satz5600000 (satz37 z)) as proof of ((_TPTP_eq ((pf z) x)) ((pf z) y))
% 0.36/0.86  Found ((fun (x0:((_TPTP_eq z) z))=> ((satz560000 x0) e)) (satz37 z)) as proof of ((_TPTP_eq ((pf z) x)) ((pf z) y))
% 0.36/0.86  Found ((fun (x0:((_TPTP_eq z) z))=> (((satz56000 y) x0) e)) (satz37 z)) as proof of ((_TPTP_eq ((pf z) x)) ((pf z) y))
% 0.36/0.86  Found ((fun (x0:((_TPTP_eq z) z))=> ((((satz5600 x) y) x0) e)) (satz37 z)) as proof of ((_TPTP_eq ((pf z) x)) ((pf z) y))
% 0.36/0.86  Found ((fun (x0:((_TPTP_eq z) z))=> (((((satz560 z) x) y) x0) e)) (satz37 z)) as proof of ((_TPTP_eq ((pf z) x)) ((pf z) y))
% 0.36/0.86  Found ((fun (x0:((_TPTP_eq z) z))=> ((((((satz56 z) z) x) y) x0) e)) (satz37 z)) as proof of ((_TPTP_eq ((pf z) x)) ((pf z) y))
% 0.36/0.86  Found ((fun (x0:((_TPTP_eq z) z))=> ((((((satz56 z) z) x) y) x0) e)) (satz37 z)) as proof of ((_TPTP_eq ((pf z) x)) ((pf z) y))
% 0.36/0.86  Got proof ((fun (x0:((_TPTP_eq z) z))=> ((((((satz56 z) z) x) y) x0) e)) (satz37 z))
% 0.36/0.86  Time elapsed = 0.045374s
% 0.36/0.86  node=9 cost=9.000000 depth=8
% 0.36/0.86::::::::::::::::::::::
% 0.36/0.86  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.36/0.86  % SZS output start Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.36/0.86  ((fun (x0:((_TPTP_eq z) z))=> ((((((satz56 z) z) x) y) x0) e)) (satz37 z))
% 0.36/0.86  % SZS output end Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------