↑ Up

Vampire---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---5.0.1
% Problem  : NUM755^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:18:46 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.28s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   14
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   50 (  16 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  296 (  88 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  452 (  80   ~;  30   |;   6   &; 302   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  34  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   11 (   8 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   65 (   0   ^;  65   !;   0   ?;  65   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    frac: $tType ).

thf(type_def_6,type,
    sTfun: ( $tType * $tType ) > $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    x: frac ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    y: frac ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    z: frac ).

thf(func_def_3,type,
    moref: frac > frac > $o ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    pf: frac > frac > frac ).

thf(func_def_6,type,
    eq: frac > frac > $o ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    lessf: frac > frac > $o ).

thf(f1,axiom,
    moref @ ( pf @ x @ z ) @ ( pf @ y @ z ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m) ).

thf(f3,axiom,
    ! [X1: frac,X0: frac] :
      ~ ( ( ( eq @ X0 @ X1 )
         => ~ ( moref @ X0 @ X1 ) )
       => ~ ~ ( ( ( moref @ X0 @ X1 )
               => ~ ( lessf @ X0 @ X1 ) )
             => ~ ( ( lessf @ X0 @ X1 )
                 => ~ ( eq @ X0 @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz41b) ).

thf(f4,axiom,
    ! [X2: frac,X1: frac,X0: frac] :
      ( ( eq @ X0 @ X1 )
     => ( eq @ ( pf @ X0 @ X2 ) @ ( pf @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz62b) ).

thf(f5,axiom,
    ! [X0: frac,X2: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( ( lessf @ X0 @ X1 )
     => ( lessf @ ( pf @ X0 @ X2 ) @ ( pf @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz62c) ).

thf(f6,axiom,
    ! [X1: frac,X0: frac] :
      ( ~ ( eq @ X0 @ X1 )
     => ( ~ ( moref @ X0 @ X1 )
       => ( lessf @ X0 @ X1 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz41a) ).

thf(f7,conjecture,
    moref @ x @ y,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz63a) ).

thf(f8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( moref @ x @ y ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f7]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ~ ( moref @ x @ y ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f8]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( ( moref @ x @ y )
   != $true ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f9]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( ~ ( eq @ X1 @ X0 )
     => ( ~ ( moref @ X1 @ X0 )
       => ( lessf @ X1 @ X0 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f6]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( ( ( eq @ X1 @ X0 )
       != $true )
     => ( ( ( moref @ X1 @ X0 )
         != $true )
       => ( ( lessf @ X1 @ X0 )
          = $true ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f13]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    moref @ ( pf @ x @ z ) @ ( pf @ y @ z ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f1]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ( ( moref @ ( pf @ x @ z ) @ ( pf @ y @ z ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f15]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac,X2: frac] :
      ( ( eq @ X2 @ X1 )
     => ( eq @ ( pf @ X2 @ X0 ) @ ( pf @ X1 @ X0 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f4]) ).

thf(f18,plain,
    ! [X2: frac,X1: frac,X0: frac] :
      ( ( ( eq @ X2 @ X1 )
        = $true )
     => ( $true
        = ( eq @ ( pf @ X2 @ X0 ) @ ( pf @ X1 @ X0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f17]) ).

thf(f19,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac,X2: frac] :
      ( ( lessf @ X0 @ X2 )
     => ( lessf @ ( pf @ X0 @ X1 ) @ ( pf @ X2 @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f5]) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    ! [X1: frac,X0: frac,X2: frac] :
      ( ( ( lessf @ X0 @ X2 )
        = $true )
     => ( $true
        = ( lessf @ ( pf @ X0 @ X1 ) @ ( pf @ X2 @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f19]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ~ ( ( ( eq @ X1 @ X0 )
         => ~ ( moref @ X1 @ X0 ) )
       => ~ ~ ( ( ( moref @ X1 @ X0 )
               => ~ ( lessf @ X1 @ X0 ) )
             => ~ ( ( lessf @ X1 @ X0 )
                 => ~ ( eq @ X1 @ X0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f3]) ).

thf(f22,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ~ ( ( ( ( eq @ X1 @ X0 )
            = $true )
         => ( ( moref @ X1 @ X0 )
           != $true ) )
       => ~ ~ ( ( ( ( moref @ X1 @ X0 )
                  = $true )
               => ( ( lessf @ X1 @ X0 )
                 != $true ) )
             => ~ ( ( ( lessf @ X1 @ X0 )
                    = $true )
                 => ( ( eq @ X1 @ X0 )
                   != $true ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f21]) ).

thf(f23,plain,
    ( ( moref @ x @ y )
   != $true ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f10]) ).

thf(f25,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( ( ( eq @ X1 @ X0 )
       != $true )
     => ( ( ( moref @ X1 @ X0 )
         != $true )
       => ( ( lessf @ X1 @ X0 )
          = $true ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f14]) ).

thf(f26,plain,
    ! [X1: frac,X0: frac] :
      ~ ( ( ( ( eq @ X1 @ X0 )
            = $true )
         => ( ( moref @ X1 @ X0 )
           != $true ) )
       => ( ( ( ( moref @ X1 @ X0 )
              = $true )
           => ( ( lessf @ X1 @ X0 )
             != $true ) )
         => ~ ( ( ( lessf @ X1 @ X0 )
                = $true )
             => ( ( eq @ X1 @ X0 )
               != $true ) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f22]) ).

thf(f27,plain,
    ! [X1: frac,X0: frac] :
      ( ( ( ( eq @ X1 @ X0 )
         != $true )
        | ( ( lessf @ X1 @ X0 )
         != $true ) )
      & ( ( ( moref @ X1 @ X0 )
         != $true )
        | ( ( lessf @ X1 @ X0 )
         != $true ) )
      & ( ( ( eq @ X1 @ X0 )
         != $true )
        | ( ( moref @ X1 @ X0 )
         != $true ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f26]) ).

thf(f28,plain,
    ! [X1: frac,X0: frac] :
      ( ( ( ( eq @ X1 @ X0 )
         != $true )
        | ( ( lessf @ X1 @ X0 )
         != $true ) )
      & ( ( ( moref @ X1 @ X0 )
         != $true )
        | ( ( lessf @ X1 @ X0 )
         != $true ) )
      & ( ( ( eq @ X1 @ X0 )
         != $true )
        | ( ( moref @ X1 @ X0 )
         != $true ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f27]) ).

thf(f29,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( ( ( lessf @ X1 @ X0 )
        = $true )
      | ( ( moref @ X1 @ X0 )
        = $true )
      | ( ( eq @ X1 @ X0 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f25]) ).

thf(f30,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( ( ( eq @ X1 @ X0 )
        = $true )
      | ( ( moref @ X1 @ X0 )
        = $true )
      | ( ( lessf @ X1 @ X0 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f29]) ).

thf(f31,plain,
    ! [X1: frac,X0: frac,X2: frac] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( lessf @ ( pf @ X0 @ X1 ) @ ( pf @ X2 @ X1 ) ) )
      | ( ( lessf @ X0 @ X2 )
       != $true ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

thf(f33,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac,X2: frac] :
      ( ( ( eq @ X2 @ X1 )
       != $true )
      | ( $true
        = ( eq @ ( pf @ X2 @ X0 ) @ ( pf @ X1 @ X0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

thf(f34,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac,X2: frac] :
      ( ( ( lessf @ ( pf @ X1 @ X0 ) @ ( pf @ X2 @ X0 ) )
        = $true )
      | ( $true
       != ( lessf @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f31]) ).

thf(f35,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( ( ( ( eq @ X0 @ X1 )
         != $true )
        | ( ( lessf @ X0 @ X1 )
         != $true ) )
      & ( ( ( moref @ X0 @ X1 )
         != $true )
        | ( ( lessf @ X0 @ X1 )
         != $true ) )
      & ( ( ( eq @ X0 @ X1 )
         != $true )
        | ( ( moref @ X0 @ X1 )
         != $true ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f28]) ).

thf(f37,plain,
    ! [X2: frac,X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( ( ( lessf @ ( pf @ X1 @ X0 ) @ ( pf @ X2 @ X0 ) )
        = $true )
      | ( $true
       != ( lessf @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).

thf(f38,plain,
    ( ( moref @ x @ y )
   != $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f23]) ).

thf(f39,plain,
    ! [X2: frac,X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( eq @ ( pf @ X2 @ X0 ) @ ( pf @ X1 @ X0 ) ) )
      | ( ( eq @ X2 @ X1 )
       != $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f33]) ).

thf(f40,plain,
    ( ( moref @ ( pf @ x @ z ) @ ( pf @ y @ z ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

thf(f41,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( ( ( moref @ X0 @ X1 )
       != $true )
      | ( ( eq @ X0 @ X1 )
       != $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f35]) ).

thf(f42,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( ( ( moref @ X0 @ X1 )
       != $true )
      | ( ( lessf @ X0 @ X1 )
       != $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f35]) ).

thf(f44,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( ( ( moref @ X1 @ X0 )
        = $true )
      | ( ( lessf @ X1 @ X0 )
        = $true )
      | ( ( eq @ X1 @ X0 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f30]) ).

thf(f47,plain,
    ( ( $true != $true )
    | ( $true
     != ( lessf @ ( pf @ x @ z ) @ ( pf @ y @ z ) ) ) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f42,f40]) ).

thf(f48,plain,
    ( ( ( eq @ ( pf @ x @ z ) @ ( pf @ y @ z ) )
     != $true )
    | ( $true != $true ) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f41,f40]) ).

thf(f49,plain,
    ( $true
   != ( lessf @ ( pf @ x @ z ) @ ( pf @ y @ z ) ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f47]) ).

thf(f50,plain,
    ( ( eq @ ( pf @ x @ z ) @ ( pf @ y @ z ) )
   != $true ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f48]) ).

thf(f51,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( eq @ x @ y ) )
    | ( $true != $true )
    | ( $true
      = ( lessf @ x @ y ) ) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f38,f44]) ).

thf(f54,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( lessf @ x @ y ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( eq @ x @ y ) ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f51]) ).

thf(f56,plain,
    ( ( $true
     != ( lessf @ x @ y ) )
    | ( $true != $true ) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f49,f37]) ).

thf(f58,plain,
    ( $true
   != ( lessf @ x @ y ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f56]) ).

thf(f60,plain,
    ( ( $true
     != ( eq @ x @ y ) )
    | ( $true != $true ) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f50,f39]) ).

thf(f61,plain,
    ( $true
   != ( eq @ x @ y ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f60]) ).

thf(f62,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( eq @ x @ y ) )
    | ( $true != $true ) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f58,f54]) ).

thf(f63,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( eq @ x @ y ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f62]) ).

thf(f64,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f61,f63]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : NUM755^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.19  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.19  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.19  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.19  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.19  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.19  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.19  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.19  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 12:51:10 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.19  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.20  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.23  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.08/0.24  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.28  % (666395)Detected a higher-order problem, will run a greedy HOL sequence.
% 0.20/0.28  % (666404)dis+21_4_fde=none:e2e=on:si=on:uwa=off:foolp=on:random_seed=8131722:i=24:av=off:rtra=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/24Mi)
% 0.20/0.28  % (666404) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-666395-666404"...
% 0.20/0.28  % (666404)...printing done.
% 0.20/0.28  % (666404)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.28  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.28  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.28  % (666404)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.28  % (666404)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.20/0.28  % (666404)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.20/0.28  % (666404)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.20/0.28  % (666404)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.28  % (666404)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.28  % (666404)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.20/0.28  % (666404)Instructions burned: 6 (million)
% 0.20/0.28  % (666395)Success in time 0.032 s
% 0.20/0.28  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------