↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : NUM758^1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Oct  3 07:57:16 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 5.35s 5.60s
% Output   : Proof 5.35s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.01/0.11  % Problem    : NUM758^1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Fri Oct  3 07:50:23 EDT 2025
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 5.35/5.60  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 5.35/5.60  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 5.35/5.60  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (moref (pf z x) (pf z y)) True
% 5.35/5.60  Clause #1 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (Xx Xy Xz : frac), moref (pf Xx Xz) (pf Xy Xz) → moref Xx Xy) True
% 5.35/5.60  Clause #2 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (Xx Xy Xz Xu : frac), moref Xx Xy → eq Xx Xz → eq Xy Xu → moref Xz Xu) True
% 5.35/5.60  Clause #3 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (Xx Xy : frac), eq (pf Xx Xy) (pf Xy Xx)) True
% 5.35/5.60  Clause #4 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (moref x y)) True
% 5.35/5.60  Clause #5 (by clausification #[4]): Eq (moref x y) False
% 5.35/5.60  Clause #6 (by clausification #[1]): ∀ (a : frac), Eq (∀ (Xy Xz : frac), moref (pf a Xz) (pf Xy Xz) → moref a Xy) True
% 5.35/5.60  Clause #7 (by clausification #[6]): ∀ (a a_1 : frac), Eq (∀ (Xz : frac), moref (pf a Xz) (pf a_1 Xz) → moref a a_1) True
% 5.35/5.60  Clause #8 (by clausification #[7]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : frac), Eq (moref (pf a a_1) (pf a_2 a_1) → moref a a_2) True
% 5.35/5.60  Clause #9 (by clausification #[8]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : frac), Or (Eq (moref (pf a a_1) (pf a_2 a_1)) False) (Eq (moref a a_2) True)
% 5.35/5.60  Clause #10 (by clausification #[3]): ∀ (a : frac), Eq (∀ (Xy : frac), eq (pf a Xy) (pf Xy a)) True
% 5.35/5.60  Clause #11 (by clausification #[10]): ∀ (a a_1 : frac), Eq (eq (pf a a_1) (pf a_1 a)) True
% 5.35/5.60  Clause #12 (by clausification #[2]): ∀ (a : frac), Eq (∀ (Xy Xz Xu : frac), moref a Xy → eq a Xz → eq Xy Xu → moref Xz Xu) True
% 5.35/5.60  Clause #13 (by clausification #[12]): ∀ (a a_1 : frac), Eq (∀ (Xz Xu : frac), moref a a_1 → eq a Xz → eq a_1 Xu → moref Xz Xu) True
% 5.35/5.60  Clause #14 (by clausification #[13]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : frac), Eq (∀ (Xu : frac), moref a a_1 → eq a a_2 → eq a_1 Xu → moref a_2 Xu) True
% 5.35/5.60  Clause #15 (by clausification #[14]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 a_3 : frac), Eq (moref a a_1 → eq a a_2 → eq a_1 a_3 → moref a_2 a_3) True
% 5.35/5.60  Clause #16 (by clausification #[15]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 a_3 : frac), Or (Eq (moref a a_1) False) (Eq (eq a a_2 → eq a_1 a_3 → moref a_2 a_3) True)
% 5.35/5.60  Clause #17 (by clausification #[16]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 a_3 : frac), Or (Eq (moref a a_1) False) (Or (Eq (eq a a_2) False) (Eq (eq a_1 a_3 → moref a_2 a_3) True))
% 5.35/5.60  Clause #18 (by clausification #[17]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 a_3 : frac),
% 5.35/5.60    Or (Eq (moref a a_1) False) (Or (Eq (eq a a_2) False) (Or (Eq (eq a_1 a_3) False) (Eq (moref a_2 a_3) True)))
% 5.35/5.60  Clause #19 (by superposition #[18, 0]): ∀ (a a_1 : frac),
% 5.35/5.60    Or (Eq (eq (pf z x) a) False) (Or (Eq (eq (pf z y) a_1) False) (Or (Eq (moref a a_1) True) (Eq False True)))
% 5.35/5.60  Clause #20 (by clausification #[19]): ∀ (a a_1 : frac), Or (Eq (eq (pf z x) a) False) (Or (Eq (eq (pf z y) a_1) False) (Eq (moref a a_1) True))
% 5.35/5.60  Clause #21 (by superposition #[20, 11]): ∀ (a : frac), Or (Eq (eq (pf z y) a) False) (Or (Eq (moref (pf x z) a) True) (Eq False True))
% 5.35/5.60  Clause #22 (by clausification #[21]): ∀ (a : frac), Or (Eq (eq (pf z y) a) False) (Eq (moref (pf x z) a) True)
% 5.35/5.60  Clause #23 (by superposition #[22, 11]): Or (Eq (moref (pf x z) (pf y z)) True) (Eq False True)
% 5.35/5.60  Clause #24 (by clausification #[23]): Eq (moref (pf x z) (pf y z)) True
% 5.35/5.60  Clause #25 (by superposition #[24, 9]): Or (Eq True False) (Eq (moref x y) True)
% 5.35/5.60  Clause #27 (by clausification #[25]): Eq (moref x y) True
% 5.35/5.60  Clause #28 (by superposition #[27, 5]): Eq True False
% 5.35/5.60  Clause #30 (by clausification #[28]): False
% 5.35/5.60  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------