↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : NUM758^1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.C0jjMuYon3 true

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct  2 04:48:15 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 0.52s 0.76s
% Output   : Refutation 0.52s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   17 (  11 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   28 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  114 (   9   ~;   7   |;   0   &;  94   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   7 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    7 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   25 (   0   ^;  25   !;   0   ?;  25   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(frac_type,type,
    frac: $tType ).

thf(moref_type,type,
    moref: frac > frac > $o ).

thf(y_type,type,
    y: frac ).

thf(eq_type,type,
    eq: frac > frac > $o ).

thf(pf_type,type,
    pf: frac > frac > frac ).

thf(z_type,type,
    z: frac ).

thf(x_type,type,
    x: frac ).

thf(satz63d,conjecture,
    moref @ x @ y ).

thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( moref @ x @ y ),
    inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[satz63d]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl4,plain,
    ~ ( moref @ x @ y ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).

thf(m,axiom,
    moref @ ( pf @ z @ x ) @ ( pf @ z @ y ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl0,plain,
    moref @ ( pf @ z @ x ) @ ( pf @ z @ y ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[m]) ).

thf(satz58,axiom,
    ! [Xx: frac,Xy: frac] : ( eq @ ( pf @ Xx @ Xy ) @ ( pf @ Xy @ Xx ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl3,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac] : ( eq @ ( pf @ X0 @ X1 ) @ ( pf @ X1 @ X0 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[satz58]) ).

thf(satz44,axiom,
    ! [Xx: frac,Xy: frac,Xz: frac,Xu: frac] :
      ( ( moref @ Xx @ Xy )
     => ( ( eq @ Xx @ Xz )
       => ( ( eq @ Xy @ Xu )
         => ( moref @ Xz @ Xu ) ) ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl2,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac,X2: frac,X3: frac] :
      ( ~ ( eq @ X0 @ X1 )
      | ~ ( moref @ X0 @ X2 )
      | ~ ( eq @ X2 @ X3 )
      | ( moref @ X1 @ X3 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[satz44]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl5,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac,X2: frac,X3: frac] :
      ( ( moref @ ( pf @ X1 @ X0 ) @ X2 )
      | ~ ( eq @ X3 @ X2 )
      | ~ ( moref @ ( pf @ X0 @ X1 ) @ X3 ) ),
    inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl3,zip_derived_cl2]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl11,plain,
    ! [X0: frac] :
      ( ~ ( eq @ ( pf @ z @ y ) @ X0 )
      | ( moref @ ( pf @ x @ z ) @ X0 ) ),
    inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl0,zip_derived_cl5]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl3_001,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac] : ( eq @ ( pf @ X0 @ X1 ) @ ( pf @ X1 @ X0 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[satz58]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl15,plain,
    moref @ ( pf @ x @ z ) @ ( pf @ y @ z ),
    inference('sup+',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl11,zip_derived_cl3]) ).

thf(satz63a,axiom,
    ! [Xx: frac,Xy: frac,Xz: frac] :
      ( ( moref @ ( pf @ Xx @ Xz ) @ ( pf @ Xy @ Xz ) )
     => ( moref @ Xx @ Xy ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl1,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac,X2: frac] :
      ( ( moref @ X0 @ X1 )
      | ~ ( moref @ ( pf @ X0 @ X2 ) @ ( pf @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[satz63a]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl19,plain,
    moref @ x @ y,
    inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl15,zip_derived_cl1]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl23,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl4,zip_derived_cl19]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : NUM758^1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.C0jjMuYon3 true
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Wed Oct  1 16:31:38 EDT 2025
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.35  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.35  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.36  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.14/0.36  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.14/0.36  % Running in HO mode
% 0.52/0.66  % Total configuration time : 828
% 0.52/0.66  % Estimated wc time : 1656
% 0.52/0.66  % Estimated cpu time (8 cpus) : 207.0
% 0.52/0.72  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_c.s.sh running for 80s
% 0.52/0.73  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/35_full_unif4.sh running for 80s
% 0.52/0.73  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_c_ic.sh running for 80s
% 0.52/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/15_e_short1.sh running for 30s
% 0.52/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_noforms.sh running for 90s
% 0.52/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_b.comb.sh running for 70s
% 0.52/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/20_acsne_simpl.sh running for 40s
% 0.52/0.75  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/30_sp5.sh running for 60s
% 0.52/0.76  % Solved by lams/40_c.s.sh.
% 0.52/0.76  % done 10 iterations in 0.020s
% 0.52/0.76  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.52/0.76  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.52/0.76  
% 0.52/0.76  
% 0.52/0.76  % Terminating...
% 0.58/0.86  % Runner terminated.
% 1.93/0.87  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------