↑ Up

Lash---1.13.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Lash---1.13
% Problem  : NUM759^1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : lash -P picomus -M modes -p tstp -t %d %s

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct  9 02:09:51 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 2.18s 2.38s
% Output   : Proof 2.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(ty_frac,type,
    frac: $tType ).

thf(ty_x,type,
    x: frac ).

thf(ty_eq,type,
    eq: frac > frac > $o ).

thf(ty_pf,type,
    pf: frac > frac > frac ).

thf(ty_y,type,
    y: frac ).

thf(ty_z,type,
    z: frac ).

thf(sP1,plain,
    ( sP1
  <=> ! [X1: frac,X2: frac,X3: frac] :
        ( ( eq @ ( pf @ X1 @ X3 ) @ ( pf @ X2 @ X3 ) )
       => ( eq @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP1])]) ).

thf(sP2,plain,
    ( sP2
  <=> ! [X1: frac] :
        ( ( eq @ ( pf @ x @ z ) @ ( pf @ z @ y ) )
       => ( ( eq @ ( pf @ z @ y ) @ X1 )
         => ( eq @ ( pf @ x @ z ) @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP2])]) ).

thf(sP3,plain,
    ( sP3
  <=> ! [X1: frac] : ( eq @ ( pf @ z @ X1 ) @ ( pf @ X1 @ z ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP3])]) ).

thf(sP4,plain,
    ( sP4
  <=> ( eq @ ( pf @ x @ z ) @ ( pf @ z @ x ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP4])]) ).

thf(sP5,plain,
    ( sP5
  <=> ( eq @ x @ y ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP5])]) ).

thf(sP6,plain,
    ( sP6
  <=> ( eq @ ( pf @ x @ z ) @ ( pf @ y @ z ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP6])]) ).

thf(sP7,plain,
    ( sP7
  <=> ( ( eq @ ( pf @ z @ x ) @ ( pf @ z @ y ) )
     => ( eq @ ( pf @ x @ z ) @ ( pf @ z @ y ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP7])]) ).

thf(sP8,plain,
    ( sP8
  <=> ! [X1: frac] : ( eq @ ( pf @ x @ X1 ) @ ( pf @ X1 @ x ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP8])]) ).

thf(sP9,plain,
    ( sP9
  <=> ( sP6
     => sP5 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP9])]) ).

thf(sP10,plain,
    ( sP10
  <=> ! [X1: frac] :
        ( ( eq @ ( pf @ x @ X1 ) @ ( pf @ y @ X1 ) )
       => sP5 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP10])]) ).

thf(sP11,plain,
    ( sP11
  <=> ( ( eq @ ( pf @ z @ y ) @ ( pf @ y @ z ) )
     => sP6 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP11])]) ).

thf(sP12,plain,
    ( sP12
  <=> ! [X1: frac,X2: frac] :
        ( ( eq @ ( pf @ x @ z ) @ X1 )
       => ( ( eq @ X1 @ X2 )
         => ( eq @ ( pf @ x @ z ) @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP12])]) ).

thf(sP13,plain,
    ( sP13
  <=> ! [X1: frac,X2: frac] :
        ( ( eq @ ( pf @ x @ X2 ) @ ( pf @ X1 @ X2 ) )
       => ( eq @ x @ X1 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP13])]) ).

thf(sP14,plain,
    ( sP14
  <=> ( eq @ ( pf @ z @ y ) @ ( pf @ y @ z ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP14])]) ).

thf(sP15,plain,
    ( sP15
  <=> ( sP4
     => sP7 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP15])]) ).

thf(sP16,plain,
    ( sP16
  <=> ! [X1: frac,X2: frac,X3: frac] :
        ( ( eq @ X1 @ X2 )
       => ( ( eq @ X2 @ X3 )
         => ( eq @ X1 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP16])]) ).

thf(sP17,plain,
    ( sP17
  <=> ( eq @ ( pf @ z @ x ) @ ( pf @ z @ y ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP17])]) ).

thf(sP18,plain,
    ( sP18
  <=> ( ( eq @ ( pf @ x @ z ) @ ( pf @ z @ y ) )
     => sP11 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP18])]) ).

thf(sP19,plain,
    ( sP19
  <=> ! [X1: frac,X2: frac] : ( eq @ ( pf @ X1 @ X2 ) @ ( pf @ X2 @ X1 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP19])]) ).

thf(sP20,plain,
    ( sP20
  <=> ( eq @ ( pf @ x @ z ) @ ( pf @ z @ y ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP20])]) ).

thf(sP21,plain,
    ( sP21
  <=> ! [X1: frac] :
        ( sP4
       => ( ( eq @ ( pf @ z @ x ) @ X1 )
         => ( eq @ ( pf @ x @ z ) @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP21])]) ).

thf(satz63e,conjecture,
    sP5 ).

thf(h0,negated_conjecture,
    ~ sP5,
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[satz63e]) ).

thf(1,plain,
    ( ~ sP11
    | ~ sP14
    | sP6 ),
    inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[]) ).

thf(2,plain,
    ( ~ sP18
    | ~ sP20
    | sP11 ),
    inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[]) ).

thf(3,plain,
    ( ~ sP2
    | sP18 ),
    inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[]) ).

thf(4,plain,
    ( ~ sP7
    | ~ sP17
    | sP20 ),
    inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[]) ).

thf(5,plain,
    ( ~ sP15
    | ~ sP4
    | sP7 ),
    inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[]) ).

thf(6,plain,
    ( ~ sP21
    | sP15 ),
    inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[]) ).

thf(7,plain,
    ( ~ sP12
    | sP21 ),
    inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[]) ).

thf(8,plain,
    ( ~ sP12
    | sP2 ),
    inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[]) ).

thf(9,plain,
    ( ~ sP16
    | sP12 ),
    inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[]) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ( ~ sP9
    | ~ sP6
    | sP5 ),
    inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[]) ).

thf(11,plain,
    ( ~ sP10
    | sP9 ),
    inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[]) ).

thf(12,plain,
    ( ~ sP3
    | sP14 ),
    inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[]) ).

thf(13,plain,
    ( ~ sP13
    | sP10 ),
    inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[]) ).

thf(14,plain,
    ( ~ sP8
    | sP4 ),
    inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[]) ).

thf(15,plain,
    ( ~ sP19
    | sP8 ),
    inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[]) ).

thf(16,plain,
    ( ~ sP1
    | sP13 ),
    inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[]) ).

thf(17,plain,
    ( ~ sP19
    | sP3 ),
    inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[]) ).

thf(satz58,axiom,
    sP19 ).

thf(satz39,axiom,
    sP16 ).

thf(satz63b,axiom,
    sP1 ).

thf(e,axiom,
    sP17 ).

thf(18,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_unsat,[status(thm),assumptions([h0])],[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,h0,satz58,satz39,satz63b,e]) ).

thf(0,theorem,
    sP5,
    inference(contra,[status(thm),contra(discharge,[h0])],[18,h0]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : NUM759^1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : lash -P picomus -M modes -p tstp -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Oct  8 22:21:23 EDT 2025
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.18/2.38  % SZS status Theorem
% 2.18/2.38  % Mode: cade22grackle2xfee4
% 2.18/2.38  % Steps: 14743
% 2.18/2.38  % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------