↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : NUM761^1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.xibFKzn6FJ true

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct  2 04:48:16 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 0.56s 0.74s
% Output   : Refutation 0.56s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (  10 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   30 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  115 (  13   ~;   7   |;   0   &;  90   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    8 (   7 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   16 (   0   ^;  16   !;   0   ?;  16   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(frac_type,type,
    frac: $tType ).

thf(u_type,type,
    u: frac ).

thf(y_type,type,
    y: frac ).

thf(eq_type,type,
    eq: frac > frac > $o ).

thf(pf_type,type,
    pf: frac > frac > frac ).

thf(moref_type,type,
    moref: frac > frac > $o ).

thf(z_type,type,
    z: frac ).

thf(x_type,type,
    x: frac ).

thf(satz64,axiom,
    ! [Xx: frac,Xy: frac,Xz: frac,Xu: frac] :
      ( ( moref @ Xx @ Xy )
     => ( ( moref @ Xz @ Xu )
       => ( moref @ ( pf @ Xx @ Xz ) @ ( pf @ Xy @ Xu ) ) ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl4,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac,X2: frac,X3: frac] :
      ( ~ ( moref @ X0 @ X1 )
      | ( moref @ ( pf @ X0 @ X2 ) @ ( pf @ X1 @ X3 ) )
      | ~ ( moref @ X2 @ X3 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[satz64]) ).

thf(satz65a,conjecture,
    moref @ ( pf @ x @ z ) @ ( pf @ y @ u ) ).

thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( moref @ ( pf @ x @ z ) @ ( pf @ y @ u ) ),
    inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[satz65a]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl5,plain,
    ~ ( moref @ ( pf @ x @ z ) @ ( pf @ y @ u ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl12,plain,
    ( ~ ( moref @ z @ u )
    | ~ ( moref @ x @ y ) ),
    inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl4,zip_derived_cl5]) ).

thf(n,axiom,
    moref @ z @ u ).

thf(zip_derived_cl1,plain,
    moref @ z @ u,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[n]) ).

thf(m,axiom,
    ( ~ ( moref @ x @ y )
   => ( eq @ x @ y ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl0,plain,
    ( ( eq @ x @ y )
    | ( moref @ x @ y ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[m]) ).

thf(satz62g,axiom,
    ! [Xx: frac,Xy: frac,Xz: frac,Xu: frac] :
      ( ( eq @ Xx @ Xy )
     => ( ( moref @ Xz @ Xu )
       => ( moref @ ( pf @ Xx @ Xz ) @ ( pf @ Xy @ Xu ) ) ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl3,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac,X2: frac,X3: frac] :
      ( ~ ( eq @ X0 @ X1 )
      | ( moref @ ( pf @ X0 @ X2 ) @ ( pf @ X1 @ X3 ) )
      | ~ ( moref @ X2 @ X3 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[satz62g]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl5_001,plain,
    ~ ( moref @ ( pf @ x @ z ) @ ( pf @ y @ u ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl6,plain,
    ( ~ ( moref @ z @ u )
    | ~ ( eq @ x @ y ) ),
    inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl3,zip_derived_cl5]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl1_002,plain,
    moref @ z @ u,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[n]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl8,plain,
    ~ ( eq @ x @ y ),
    inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl6,zip_derived_cl1]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl10,plain,
    moref @ x @ y,
    inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl0,zip_derived_cl8]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl14,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl12,zip_derived_cl1,zip_derived_cl10]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : NUM761^1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.xibFKzn6FJ true
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Oct  1 16:52:53 EDT 2025
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.34  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.12/0.34  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.34  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.12/0.34  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.12/0.34  % Running in HO mode
% 0.53/0.65  % Total configuration time : 828
% 0.53/0.65  % Estimated wc time : 1656
% 0.53/0.65  % Estimated cpu time (8 cpus) : 207.0
% 0.54/0.71  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/40_c.s.sh running for 80s
% 0.54/0.71  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/35_full_unif4.sh running for 80s
% 0.54/0.72  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/40_c_ic.sh running for 80s
% 0.54/0.73  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/15_e_short1.sh running for 30s
% 0.54/0.73  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/40_noforms.sh running for 90s
% 0.56/0.74  % Solved by lams/40_c.s.sh.
% 0.56/0.74  % done 8 iterations in 0.008s
% 0.56/0.74  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.56/0.74  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.56/0.74  
% 0.56/0.74  
% 0.56/0.74  % Terminating...
% 1.75/0.83  % Runner terminated.
% 1.75/0.84  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------