↑ Up

Vampire-SAT---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---5.0.1
% Problem  : NUM765_8 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 12:25:39 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.18s 0.49s
% Output   : Refutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   62 (   8 unt;   0 typ;   4 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  147 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  167 (  82   ~;  64   |;   5   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;  12  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   6 usr;   5 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   60 (   0 sgn  60   !;   0   ?;  60   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(type_def_5,type,
    frac: $tType ).

tff(func_def_0,type,
    x: frac ).

tff(func_def_1,type,
    y: frac ).

tff(func_def_2,type,
    z: frac ).

tff(func_def_3,type,
    u: frac ).

tff(func_def_4,type,
    pf: ( frac * frac ) > frac ).

tff(pred_def_1,type,
    moref: ( frac * frac ) > $o ).

tff(pred_def_2,type,
    eq: ( frac * frac ) > $o ).

tff(f1,axiom,
    ( ~ moref(x,y)
   => eq(x,y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m) ).

tff(f2,axiom,
    ( ~ moref(z,u)
   => eq(z,u) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',n) ).

tff(f4,axiom,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac,X2: frac,X3: frac] :
      ( eq(X0,X1)
     => ( eq(X2,X3)
       => eq(pf(X0,X2),pf(X1,X3)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz56) ).

tff(f5,axiom,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac,X2: frac,X3: frac] :
      ( moref(X0,X1)
     => ( ( ~ moref(X2,X3)
         => eq(X2,X3) )
       => moref(pf(X0,X2),pf(X1,X3)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz65b) ).

tff(f6,axiom,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac,X2: frac,X3: frac] :
      ( ( ~ moref(X0,X1)
       => eq(X0,X1) )
     => ( moref(X2,X3)
       => moref(pf(X0,X2),pf(X1,X3)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz65a) ).

tff(f7,conjecture,
    ( ~ moref(pf(x,z),pf(y,u))
   => eq(pf(x,z),pf(y,u)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz66) ).

tff(f8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ~ moref(pf(x,z),pf(y,u))
     => eq(pf(x,z),pf(y,u)) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f7]) ).

tff(f12,plain,
    ( eq(x,y)
    | moref(x,y) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

tff(f13,plain,
    ( eq(z,u)
    | moref(z,u) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

tff(f15,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac,X2: frac,X3: frac] :
      ( eq(pf(X0,X2),pf(X1,X3))
      | ~ eq(X2,X3)
      | ~ eq(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

tff(f16,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac,X2: frac,X3: frac] :
      ( eq(pf(X0,X2),pf(X1,X3))
      | ~ eq(X2,X3)
      | ~ eq(X0,X1) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f15]) ).

tff(f17,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac,X2: frac,X3: frac] :
      ( moref(pf(X0,X2),pf(X1,X3))
      | ( ~ eq(X2,X3)
        & ~ moref(X2,X3) )
      | ~ moref(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

tff(f18,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac,X2: frac,X3: frac] :
      ( moref(pf(X0,X2),pf(X1,X3))
      | ( ~ eq(X2,X3)
        & ~ moref(X2,X3) )
      | ~ moref(X0,X1) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f17]) ).

tff(f19,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac,X2: frac,X3: frac] :
      ( moref(pf(X0,X2),pf(X1,X3))
      | ~ moref(X2,X3)
      | ( ~ eq(X0,X1)
        & ~ moref(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

tff(f20,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac,X2: frac,X3: frac] :
      ( moref(pf(X0,X2),pf(X1,X3))
      | ~ moref(X2,X3)
      | ( ~ eq(X0,X1)
        & ~ moref(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f19]) ).

tff(f21,plain,
    ( ~ eq(pf(x,z),pf(y,u))
    & ~ moref(pf(x,z),pf(y,u)) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

tff(f22,plain,
    ( eq(x,y)
    | moref(x,y) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

tff(f23,plain,
    ( eq(z,u)
    | moref(z,u) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

tff(f25,plain,
    ! [X2: frac,X3: frac,X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( ~ eq(X2,X3)
      | eq(pf(X0,X2),pf(X1,X3))
      | ~ eq(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

tff(f27,plain,
    ! [X2: frac,X3: frac,X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( ~ eq(X2,X3)
      | moref(pf(X0,X2),pf(X1,X3))
      | ~ moref(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

tff(f28,plain,
    ! [X2: frac,X3: frac,X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( ~ moref(X2,X3)
      | moref(pf(X0,X2),pf(X1,X3))
      | ~ moref(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

tff(f29,plain,
    ! [X2: frac,X3: frac,X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( ~ eq(X0,X1)
      | ~ moref(X2,X3)
      | moref(pf(X0,X2),pf(X1,X3)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

tff(f30,plain,
    ~ moref(pf(x,z),pf(y,u)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).

tff(f31,plain,
    ~ eq(pf(x,z),pf(y,u)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).

tff(f35,definition,
    ( spl0_1
  <=> moref(z,u) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl0_1])],[avatar_definition]) ).

tff(f37,plain,
    ( moref(z,u)
    | ~ spl0_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f35]) ).

tff(f39,definition,
    ( spl0_2
  <=> eq(z,u) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl0_2])],[avatar_definition]) ).

tff(f41,plain,
    ( eq(z,u)
    | ~ spl0_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f39]) ).

tff(f42,plain,
    ( spl0_1
    | spl0_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f23,f39,f35]) ).

tff(f44,definition,
    ( spl0_3
  <=> moref(x,y) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl0_3])],[avatar_definition]) ).

tff(f46,plain,
    ( moref(x,y)
    | ~ spl0_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f44]) ).

tff(f48,definition,
    ( spl0_4
  <=> eq(x,y) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl0_4])],[avatar_definition]) ).

tff(f50,plain,
    ( eq(x,y)
    | ~ spl0_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f48]) ).

tff(f51,plain,
    ( spl0_3
    | spl0_4 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f22,f48,f44]) ).

tff(f87,plain,
    ( ! [X0: frac,X1: frac] :
        ( ~ moref(X0,X1)
        | moref(pf(X0,z),pf(X1,u)) )
    | ~ spl0_2 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f27,f41]) ).

tff(f92,plain,
    ( moref(pf(x,z),pf(y,u))
    | ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_3 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f87,f46]) ).

tff(f93,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_3 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f92,f30]) ).

tff(f94,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_3 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f93]) ).

tff(f95,plain,
    ( ! [X0: frac,X1: frac] :
        ( ~ moref(X0,X1)
        | moref(pf(X0,z),pf(X1,u)) )
    | ~ spl0_1 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f37,f28]) ).

tff(f98,plain,
    ( moref(pf(x,z),pf(y,u))
    | ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_3 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f95,f46]) ).

tff(f100,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_3 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f98,f30]) ).

tff(f101,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_3 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f100]) ).

tff(f104,plain,
    ( ! [X0: frac,X1: frac] :
        ( ~ eq(X0,X1)
        | eq(pf(X0,z),pf(X1,u)) )
    | ~ spl0_2 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f41,f25]) ).

tff(f105,plain,
    ( ! [X0: frac,X1: frac] :
        ( ~ moref(X0,X1)
        | moref(pf(x,X0),pf(y,X1)) )
    | ~ spl0_4 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f50,f29]) ).

tff(f109,plain,
    ( eq(pf(x,z),pf(y,u))
    | ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_4 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f104,f50]) ).

tff(f110,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_4 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f109,f31]) ).

tff(f111,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_4 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f110]) ).

tff(f113,plain,
    ( moref(pf(x,z),pf(y,u))
    | ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_4 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f105,f37]) ).

tff(f114,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_4 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f113,f30]) ).

tff(f115,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_4 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f114]) ).

cnf(s1,plain,
    ( spl0_1
    | spl0_2 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f42]) ).

cnf(s2,plain,
    ( spl0_3
    | spl0_4 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f51]) ).

cnf(s3,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_3 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f94]) ).

cnf(s4,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_3 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f101]) ).

cnf(s5,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_4 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f111]) ).

cnf(s6,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_4 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f115]) ).

cnf(s7,plain,
    ~ spl0_2,
    inference(rat,[],[s2,s3,s5]) ).

cnf(s8,plain,
    spl0_1,
    inference(rat,[],[s1,s7]) ).

cnf(s9,plain,
    ~ spl0_4,
    inference(rat,[],[s6,s8]) ).

cnf(s10,plain,
    ~ spl0_3,
    inference(rat,[],[s4,s8]) ).

cnf(s11,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rat,[],[s2,s9,s10]) ).

tff(f116,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[s11]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : NUM765_8 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.0.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.13/0.41  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.41  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.41  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.41  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.41  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.41  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.41  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.41  % DateTime : Sun Sep 27 21:18:10 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.42  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.42  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.13/0.45  Running first-order model finding
% 0.13/0.45  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc --intent sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.49  % (1789623)Will run a generic schedule for satisfiability detection.
% 0.18/0.49  % (1789633)ott+1_1_to=lpo:sil=16000:sp=reverse_arity:erd=off:random_seed=387513866:i=131_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/131Mi)
% 0.18/0.49  % (1789633) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-1789623-1789633"...
% 0.18/0.49  % (1789633)...printing done.
% 0.18/0.49  % (1789629)% WARNING: option uhcvi not known.
% 0.18/0.49  % (1789633)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.18/0.49  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.18/0.49  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.49  % (1789633)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.49  % (1789633)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.18/0.49  % (1789633)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.18/0.49  % (1789633)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.18/0.49  % (1789633)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.18/0.49  % (1789633)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.18/0.49  % (1789633)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.18/0.49  % (1789633)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.18/0.49  % (1789623)Success in time 0.028 s
% 0.18/0.49  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------