↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : NUM766^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:18:09 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 25.16s 7.89s
% Output   : Refutation 25.55s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   24 (  18 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   34 (   6 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  184 (  18   ~;   0   |;   0   &; 154   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  12  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   7 avg)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   2 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    2 (   2   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   13 (  11 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   49 (   2   ^;  47   !;   0   ?;  49   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(frac_type,type,
    frac: $tType ).

thf(nat_type,type,
    nat: $tType ).

thf(x_decl,type,
    x: frac ).

thf(y_decl,type,
    y: frac ).

thf(ts_decl,type,
    ts: nat > nat > nat ).

thf(num_decl,type,
    num: frac > nat ).

thf(den_decl,type,
    den: frac > nat ).

thf(pl_decl,type,
    pl: nat > nat > nat ).

thf(eq_decl,type,
    eq: frac > frac > $o ).

thf(pf_decl,type,
    pf: frac > frac > frac ).

thf(fr_decl,type,
    fr: nat > nat > frac ).

thf(ind_decl,type,
    ind: ( nat > $o ) > nat ).

thf(amone_decl,type,
    amone: ( nat > $o ) > $o ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ~ ! [A: frac] :
        ~ ( eq @ ( pf @ y @ A ) @ x ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz67a) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ~ ! [A: frac] :
          ~ ( eq @ ( pf @ y @ A ) @ x ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(13,plain,
    ~ ~ ! [A: frac] :
          ~ ( eq @ ( pf @ y @ A ) @ x ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(11,axiom,
    ! [A: nat > $o] :
      ( ~ ( ( amone @ A )
         => ~ ~ ! [B: nat] :
                  ~ ( A @ B ) )
     => ( A @ ( ind @ A ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',oneax) ).

thf(39,plain,
    ! [A: nat > $o] :
      ( ~ ( ( amone @ A )
         => ! [B: nat] :
              ~ ( A @ B ) )
     => ( A @ ( ind @ A ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(7,axiom,
    ! [A: frac,B: nat] : ( eq @ A @ ( fr @ ( ts @ ( num @ A ) @ B ) @ ( ts @ ( den @ A ) @ B ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz40) ).

thf(30,plain,
    ! [A: frac,B: nat] : ( eq @ A @ ( fr @ ( ts @ ( num @ A ) @ B ) @ ( ts @ ( den @ A ) @ B ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ! [A: frac,B: frac,C: frac] :
      ( ( eq @ A @ B )
     => ( ( eq @ B @ C )
       => ( eq @ A @ C ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz39) ).

thf(24,plain,
    ! [A: frac,B: frac,C: frac] :
      ( ( eq @ A @ B )
     => ( ( eq @ B @ C )
       => ( eq @ A @ C ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(10,axiom,
    ! [A: nat,B: nat,C: nat] : ( eq @ ( pf @ ( fr @ A @ C ) @ ( fr @ B @ C ) ) @ ( fr @ ( pl @ A @ B ) @ C ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz57) ).

thf(37,plain,
    ! [A: nat,B: nat,C: nat] : ( eq @ ( pf @ ( fr @ A @ C ) @ ( fr @ B @ C ) ) @ ( fr @ ( pl @ A @ B ) @ C ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(12,axiom,
    ! [A: frac,B: nat] : ( eq @ ( fr @ ( ts @ ( num @ A ) @ B ) @ ( ts @ ( den @ A ) @ B ) ) @ A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz40a) ).

thf(45,plain,
    ! [A: frac,B: nat] : ( eq @ ( fr @ ( ts @ ( num @ A ) @ B ) @ ( ts @ ( den @ A ) @ B ) ) @ A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ~ ! [A: nat] :
        ( ( ts @ ( num @ x ) @ ( den @ y ) )
       != ( pl @ ( ts @ ( num @ y ) @ ( den @ x ) ) @ A ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m) ).

thf(17,plain,
    ~ ! [A: nat] :
        ( ( ts @ ( num @ x ) @ ( den @ y ) )
       != ( pl @ ( ts @ ( num @ y ) @ ( den @ x ) ) @ A ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(8,axiom,
    ! [A: frac] : ( eq @ A @ A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz37) ).

thf(32,plain,
    ! [A: frac] : ( eq @ A @ A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(9,axiom,
    ! [A: nat,B: nat] :
      ( ( ts @ A @ B )
      = ( ts @ B @ A ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz29) ).

thf(34,plain,
    ! [A: nat,B: nat] :
      ( ( ts @ A @ B )
      = ( ts @ B @ A ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ! [A: nat,B: nat] :
      ( amone
      @ ^ [C: nat] :
          ( A
          = ( pl @ B @ C ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz8b) ).

thf(22,plain,
    ! [A: nat,B: nat] :
      ( amone
      @ ^ [C: nat] :
          ( A
          = ( pl @ B @ C ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ! [A: frac,B: frac,C: frac,D: frac] :
      ( ( eq @ A @ B )
     => ( ( eq @ C @ D )
       => ( eq @ ( pf @ A @ C ) @ ( pf @ B @ D ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz56) ).

thf(27,plain,
    ! [A: frac,B: frac,C: frac,D: frac] :
      ( ( eq @ A @ B )
     => ( ( eq @ C @ D )
       => ( eq @ ( pf @ A @ C ) @ ( pf @ B @ D ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(1993,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[13,39,30,24,37,45,17,32,34,22,27]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : NUM766^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.09/0.20  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.20  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.20  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.20  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.20  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.20  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.20  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.20  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 12:49:22 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.20  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.20  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.85/0.79  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.17/0.98  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (195ms). 
% 1.17/1.00  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.01/1.41  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.01/1.42  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.20/1.51  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 10 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.20/1.55  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 10 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.20/1.59  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 2.20/1.59  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.40/1.60  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 25.16/7.89  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 25.16/7.89  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 25.16/7.89  % Time passed: 7539ms (effective reasoning time: 6885ms)
% 25.16/7.89  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 25.16/7.89  % Axioms used in derivation (10): satz29, satz40a, satz39, m, oneax, satz56, satz40, satz57, satz8b, satz37
% 25.16/7.89  % No. of inferences in proof: 24
% 25.16/7.89  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 7539 ms resp. 6885 ms w/o parsing
% 25.55/7.93  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 25.55/7.93  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------