↑ Up

LEO-II---2.3.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : LEO-II---2.3.1
% Problem  : NUM767^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : leo --cores 7 --timeout 300 --proofoutput 1 --foatp e --atp e=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Oct  7 10:35:10 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.08s 0.24s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.08s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   42 (  29 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  175 (  47 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  271 (  26   ~;  31   |;   0   &; 206   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    9 (   6 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   76 (   0   ^;  76   !;   0   ?;  76   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(tp_frac,type,
    frac: $tType ).

thf(tp_eq,type,
    eq: frac > frac > $o ).

thf(tp_pf,type,
    pf: frac > frac > frac ).

thf(tp_v,type,
    v: frac ).

thf(tp_w,type,
    w: frac ).

thf(tp_x,type,
    x: frac ).

thf(tp_y,type,
    y: frac ).

thf(1,axiom,
    ! [Xx: frac,Xy: frac] :
      ( ( eq @ Xx @ Xy )
     => ( eq @ Xy @ Xx ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz38) ).

thf(2,axiom,
    ! [Xx: frac,Xy: frac,Xz: frac] :
      ( ( eq @ Xx @ Xy )
     => ( ( eq @ Xy @ Xz )
       => ( eq @ Xx @ Xz ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz39) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ! [Xx: frac,Xy: frac,Xz: frac] :
      ( ( eq @ ( pf @ Xz @ Xx ) @ ( pf @ Xz @ Xy ) )
     => ( eq @ Xx @ Xy ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz63e) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    eq @ ( pf @ y @ w ) @ x,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    eq @ ( pf @ y @ v ) @ x,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',e) ).

thf(6,conjecture,
    eq @ v @ w,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz67b) ).

thf(7,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( eq @ v @ w )
    = $false ),
    inference(negate_conjecture,[status(cth)],[6]) ).

thf(8,plain,
    ( ( eq @ v @ w )
    = $false ),
    inference(unfold_def,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(9,plain,
    ( ( ! [Xx: frac,Xy: frac] :
          ( ( eq @ Xx @ Xy )
         => ( eq @ Xy @ Xx ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(unfold_def,[status(thm)],[1]) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ( ( ! [Xx: frac,Xy: frac,Xz: frac] :
          ( ( eq @ Xx @ Xy )
         => ( ( eq @ Xy @ Xz )
           => ( eq @ Xx @ Xz ) ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(unfold_def,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(11,plain,
    ( ( ! [Xx: frac,Xy: frac,Xz: frac] :
          ( ( eq @ ( pf @ Xz @ Xx ) @ ( pf @ Xz @ Xy ) )
         => ( eq @ Xx @ Xy ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(unfold_def,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(12,plain,
    ( ( eq @ ( pf @ y @ w ) @ x )
    = $true ),
    inference(unfold_def,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(13,plain,
    ( ( eq @ ( pf @ y @ v ) @ x )
    = $true ),
    inference(unfold_def,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(14,plain,
    ( ( ~ ( eq @ v @ w ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(polarity_switch,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(15,plain,
    ( ( ! [Xx: frac,Xy: frac] :
          ( ~ ( eq @ Xx @ Xy )
          | ( eq @ Xy @ Xx ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(extcnf_combined,[status(esa)],[9]) ).

thf(16,plain,
    ( ( ! [Xx: frac,Xy: frac] :
          ( ~ ( eq @ Xx @ Xy )
          | ! [Xz: frac] :
              ( ~ ( eq @ Xy @ Xz )
              | ( eq @ Xx @ Xz ) ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(extcnf_combined,[status(esa)],[10]) ).

thf(17,plain,
    ( ( ! [Xx: frac,Xy: frac] :
          ( ! [Xz: frac] :
              ~ ( eq @ ( pf @ Xz @ Xx ) @ ( pf @ Xz @ Xy ) )
          | ( eq @ Xx @ Xy ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(extcnf_combined,[status(esa)],[11]) ).

thf(18,plain,
    ( ( eq @ ( pf @ y @ v ) @ x )
    = $true ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

thf(19,plain,
    ( ( eq @ ( pf @ y @ w ) @ x )
    = $true ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(20,plain,
    ( ( ! [Xx: frac,Xy: frac] :
          ( ! [Xz: frac] :
              ~ ( eq @ ( pf @ Xz @ Xx ) @ ( pf @ Xz @ Xy ) )
          | ( eq @ Xx @ Xy ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[17]) ).

thf(21,plain,
    ( ( ! [Xx: frac,Xy: frac] :
          ( ~ ( eq @ Xx @ Xy )
          | ! [Xz: frac] :
              ( ~ ( eq @ Xy @ Xz )
              | ( eq @ Xx @ Xz ) ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[16]) ).

thf(22,plain,
    ( ( ! [Xx: frac,Xy: frac] :
          ( ~ ( eq @ Xx @ Xy )
          | ( eq @ Xy @ Xx ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

thf(23,plain,
    ( ( ~ ( eq @ v @ w ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[14]) ).

thf(24,plain,
    ! [SV1: frac] :
      ( ( ! [SY8: frac] :
            ( ! [SY9: frac] :
                ~ ( eq @ ( pf @ SY9 @ SV1 ) @ ( pf @ SY9 @ SY8 ) )
            | ( eq @ SV1 @ SY8 ) ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(extcnf_forall_pos,[status(thm)],[20]) ).

thf(25,plain,
    ! [SV2: frac] :
      ( ( ! [SY10: frac] :
            ( ~ ( eq @ SV2 @ SY10 )
            | ! [SY11: frac] :
                ( ~ ( eq @ SY10 @ SY11 )
                | ( eq @ SV2 @ SY11 ) ) ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(extcnf_forall_pos,[status(thm)],[21]) ).

thf(26,plain,
    ! [SV3: frac] :
      ( ( ! [SY12: frac] :
            ( ~ ( eq @ SV3 @ SY12 )
            | ( eq @ SY12 @ SV3 ) ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(extcnf_forall_pos,[status(thm)],[22]) ).

thf(27,plain,
    ( ( eq @ v @ w )
    = $false ),
    inference(extcnf_not_pos,[status(thm)],[23]) ).

thf(28,plain,
    ! [SV4: frac,SV1: frac] :
      ( ( ! [SY13: frac] :
            ~ ( eq @ ( pf @ SY13 @ SV1 ) @ ( pf @ SY13 @ SV4 ) )
        | ( eq @ SV1 @ SV4 ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(extcnf_forall_pos,[status(thm)],[24]) ).

thf(29,plain,
    ! [SV5: frac,SV2: frac] :
      ( ( ~ ( eq @ SV2 @ SV5 )
        | ! [SY14: frac] :
            ( ~ ( eq @ SV5 @ SY14 )
            | ( eq @ SV2 @ SY14 ) ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(extcnf_forall_pos,[status(thm)],[25]) ).

thf(30,plain,
    ! [SV6: frac,SV3: frac] :
      ( ( ~ ( eq @ SV3 @ SV6 )
        | ( eq @ SV6 @ SV3 ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(extcnf_forall_pos,[status(thm)],[26]) ).

thf(31,plain,
    ! [SV4: frac,SV1: frac] :
      ( ( ( ! [SY13: frac] :
              ~ ( eq @ ( pf @ SY13 @ SV1 ) @ ( pf @ SY13 @ SV4 ) ) )
        = $true )
      | ( ( eq @ SV1 @ SV4 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(extcnf_or_pos,[status(thm)],[28]) ).

thf(32,plain,
    ! [SV5: frac,SV2: frac] :
      ( ( ( ~ ( eq @ SV2 @ SV5 ) )
        = $true )
      | ( ( ! [SY14: frac] :
              ( ~ ( eq @ SV5 @ SY14 )
              | ( eq @ SV2 @ SY14 ) ) )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(extcnf_or_pos,[status(thm)],[29]) ).

thf(33,plain,
    ! [SV6: frac,SV3: frac] :
      ( ( ( ~ ( eq @ SV3 @ SV6 ) )
        = $true )
      | ( ( eq @ SV6 @ SV3 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(extcnf_or_pos,[status(thm)],[30]) ).

thf(34,plain,
    ! [SV4: frac,SV1: frac,SV7: frac] :
      ( ( ( ~ ( eq @ ( pf @ SV7 @ SV1 ) @ ( pf @ SV7 @ SV4 ) ) )
        = $true )
      | ( ( eq @ SV1 @ SV4 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(extcnf_forall_pos,[status(thm)],[31]) ).

thf(35,plain,
    ! [SV5: frac,SV2: frac] :
      ( ( ( eq @ SV2 @ SV5 )
        = $false )
      | ( ( ! [SY14: frac] :
              ( ~ ( eq @ SV5 @ SY14 )
              | ( eq @ SV2 @ SY14 ) ) )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(extcnf_not_pos,[status(thm)],[32]) ).

thf(36,plain,
    ! [SV6: frac,SV3: frac] :
      ( ( ( eq @ SV3 @ SV6 )
        = $false )
      | ( ( eq @ SV6 @ SV3 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(extcnf_not_pos,[status(thm)],[33]) ).

thf(37,plain,
    ! [SV4: frac,SV1: frac,SV7: frac] :
      ( ( ( eq @ ( pf @ SV7 @ SV1 ) @ ( pf @ SV7 @ SV4 ) )
        = $false )
      | ( ( eq @ SV1 @ SV4 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(extcnf_not_pos,[status(thm)],[34]) ).

thf(38,plain,
    ! [SV2: frac,SV8: frac,SV5: frac] :
      ( ( ( ~ ( eq @ SV5 @ SV8 )
          | ( eq @ SV2 @ SV8 ) )
        = $true )
      | ( ( eq @ SV2 @ SV5 )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(extcnf_forall_pos,[status(thm)],[35]) ).

thf(39,plain,
    ! [SV2: frac,SV8: frac,SV5: frac] :
      ( ( ( ~ ( eq @ SV5 @ SV8 ) )
        = $true )
      | ( ( eq @ SV2 @ SV8 )
        = $true )
      | ( ( eq @ SV2 @ SV5 )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(extcnf_or_pos,[status(thm)],[38]) ).

thf(40,plain,
    ! [SV2: frac,SV8: frac,SV5: frac] :
      ( ( ( eq @ SV5 @ SV8 )
        = $false )
      | ( ( eq @ SV2 @ SV8 )
        = $true )
      | ( ( eq @ SV2 @ SV5 )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(extcnf_not_pos,[status(thm)],[39]) ).

thf(41,plain,
    $false = $true,
    inference(fo_atp_e,[status(thm)],[18,40,37,36,27,19]) ).

thf(42,plain,
    $false,
    inference(solved_all_splits,[solved_all_splits(join,[])],[41]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : NUM767^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : leo --cores 7 --timeout 300 --proofoutput 1 --foatp e --atp e=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.19  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.19  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.19  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.19  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.19  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.19  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.19  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.19  % DateTime : Tue Oct  6 13:40:36 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.20  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.20  Running leo --cores 7 --timeout 300 --proofoutput 1 --foatp e --atp e=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.24  
% 0.08/0.24   No.of.Axioms: 5
% 0.08/0.24  
% 0.08/0.24   Length.of.Defs: 0
% 0.08/0.24  
% 0.08/0.24   Contains.Choice.Funs: false
% 0.08/0.24  .
% 0.08/0.24  
% 0.08/0.24  ********************************
% 0.08/0.24  *   All subproblems solved!    *
% 0.08/0.24  ********************************
% 0.08/0.24  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : (rf:0,axioms:5,ps:3,u:6,ude:true,rLeibEQ:true,rAndEQ:true,use_choice:true,use_extuni:true,use_extcnf_combined:true,expand_extuni:false,foatp:e,atp_timeout:15,atp_calls_frequency:5,ordering:none,proof_output:1,protocol_output:false,clause_count:41,loop_count:0,foatp_calls:1,translation:fof_experiment)
% 0.08/0.24  
% 0.08/0.24  %**** Beginning of derivation protocol ****
% 0.08/0.24  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.08/0.24  
% 0.08/0.24  %**** End of derivation protocol ****
% 0.08/0.24  %**** no. of clauses in derivation: 42 ****
% 0.08/0.24  %**** clause counter: 41 ****
% 0.08/0.24  
% 0.08/0.24  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : (rf:0,axioms:5,ps:3,u:6,ude:true,rLeibEQ:true,rAndEQ:true,use_choice:true,use_extuni:true,use_extcnf_combined:true,expand_extuni:false,foatp:e,atp_timeout:15,atp_calls_frequency:5,ordering:none,proof_output:1,protocol_output:false,clause_count:41,loop_count:0,foatp_calls:1,translation:fof_experiment)
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------