↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : NUM767^1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ty2V09d5Vb true

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct  2 04:48:17 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 0.54s 0.82s
% Output   : Refutation 0.54s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   30 (  10 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   72 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  216 (   9   ~;   7   |;   0   &; 165   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  20  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   7 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    8 (   6 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%                                         (  15  !!;   0  ??;   0 @@+;   0 @@-)
%            Number of variables   :   51 (  15   ^;  36   !;   0   ?;  51   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(frac_type,type,
    frac: $tType ).

thf(w_type,type,
    w: frac ).

thf(y_type,type,
    y: frac ).

thf(pf_type,type,
    pf: frac > frac > frac ).

thf(eq_type,type,
    eq: frac > frac > $o ).

thf(v_type,type,
    v: frac ).

thf(x_type,type,
    x: frac ).

thf(satz67b,conjecture,
    eq @ v @ w ).

thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( eq @ v @ w ),
    inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[satz67b]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl5,plain,
    ~ ( eq @ v @ w ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).

thf(f,axiom,
    eq @ ( pf @ y @ w ) @ x ).

thf(zip_derived_cl1,plain,
    eq @ ( pf @ y @ w ) @ x,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[f]) ).

thf(satz38,axiom,
    ! [Xx: frac,Xy: frac] :
      ( ( eq @ Xx @ Xy )
     => ( eq @ Xy @ Xx ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl4,plain,
    ( !!
    @ ^ [Y0: frac] :
        ( !!
        @ ^ [Y1: frac] :
            ( ( eq @ Y0 @ Y1 )
           => ( eq @ Y1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[satz38]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl6,plain,
    ! [X2: frac] :
      ( !!
      @ ^ [Y0: frac] :
          ( ( eq @ X2 @ Y0 )
         => ( eq @ Y0 @ X2 ) ) ),
    inference(lazy_cnf_forall,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl4]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl7,plain,
    ! [X2: frac,X4: frac] :
      ( ( eq @ X2 @ X4 )
     => ( eq @ X4 @ X2 ) ),
    inference(lazy_cnf_forall,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl6]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl8,plain,
    ! [X2: frac,X4: frac] :
      ( ~ ( eq @ X2 @ X4 )
      | ( eq @ X4 @ X2 ) ),
    inference(lazy_cnf_imply,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl7]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl9,plain,
    eq @ x @ ( pf @ y @ w ),
    inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl1,zip_derived_cl8]) ).

thf(satz39,axiom,
    ! [Xx: frac,Xy: frac,Xz: frac] :
      ( ( eq @ Xx @ Xy )
     => ( ( eq @ Xy @ Xz )
       => ( eq @ Xx @ Xz ) ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl3,plain,
    ( !!
    @ ^ [Y0: frac] :
        ( !!
        @ ^ [Y1: frac] :
            ( !!
            @ ^ [Y2: frac] :
                ( ( eq @ Y0 @ Y1 )
               => ( ( eq @ Y1 @ Y2 )
                 => ( eq @ Y0 @ Y2 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[satz39]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl19,plain,
    ! [X2: frac] :
      ( !!
      @ ^ [Y0: frac] :
          ( !!
          @ ^ [Y1: frac] :
              ( ( eq @ X2 @ Y0 )
             => ( ( eq @ Y0 @ Y1 )
               => ( eq @ X2 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(lazy_cnf_forall,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl3]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl20,plain,
    ! [X2: frac,X4: frac] :
      ( !!
      @ ^ [Y0: frac] :
          ( ( eq @ X2 @ X4 )
         => ( ( eq @ X4 @ Y0 )
           => ( eq @ X2 @ Y0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(lazy_cnf_forall,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl19]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl21,plain,
    ! [X2: frac,X4: frac,X6: frac] :
      ( ( eq @ X2 @ X4 )
     => ( ( eq @ X4 @ X6 )
       => ( eq @ X2 @ X6 ) ) ),
    inference(lazy_cnf_forall,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl20]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl22,plain,
    ! [X2: frac,X4: frac,X6: frac] :
      ( ~ ( eq @ X2 @ X4 )
      | ( ( eq @ X4 @ X6 )
       => ( eq @ X2 @ X6 ) ) ),
    inference(lazy_cnf_imply,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl21]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl23,plain,
    ! [X2: frac,X4: frac,X6: frac] :
      ( ~ ( eq @ X4 @ X6 )
      | ( eq @ X2 @ X6 )
      | ~ ( eq @ X2 @ X4 ) ),
    inference(lazy_cnf_imply,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl22]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl32,plain,
    ! [X0: frac] :
      ( ~ ( eq @ X0 @ x )
      | ( eq @ X0 @ ( pf @ y @ w ) ) ),
    inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl9,zip_derived_cl23]) ).

thf(satz63e,axiom,
    ! [Xx: frac,Xy: frac,Xz: frac] :
      ( ( eq @ ( pf @ Xz @ Xx ) @ ( pf @ Xz @ Xy ) )
     => ( eq @ Xx @ Xy ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl2,plain,
    ( !!
    @ ^ [Y0: frac] :
        ( !!
        @ ^ [Y1: frac] :
            ( !!
            @ ^ [Y2: frac] :
                ( ( eq @ ( pf @ Y2 @ Y0 ) @ ( pf @ Y2 @ Y1 ) )
               => ( eq @ Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[satz63e]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl15,plain,
    ! [X2: frac] :
      ( !!
      @ ^ [Y0: frac] :
          ( !!
          @ ^ [Y1: frac] :
              ( ( eq @ ( pf @ Y1 @ X2 ) @ ( pf @ Y1 @ Y0 ) )
             => ( eq @ X2 @ Y0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(lazy_cnf_forall,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl2]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl16,plain,
    ! [X2: frac,X4: frac] :
      ( !!
      @ ^ [Y0: frac] :
          ( ( eq @ ( pf @ Y0 @ X2 ) @ ( pf @ Y0 @ X4 ) )
         => ( eq @ X2 @ X4 ) ) ),
    inference(lazy_cnf_forall,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl15]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl17,plain,
    ! [X2: frac,X4: frac,X6: frac] :
      ( ( eq @ ( pf @ X6 @ X2 ) @ ( pf @ X6 @ X4 ) )
     => ( eq @ X2 @ X4 ) ),
    inference(lazy_cnf_forall,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl16]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl18,plain,
    ! [X2: frac,X4: frac,X6: frac] :
      ( ~ ( eq @ ( pf @ X6 @ X2 ) @ ( pf @ X6 @ X4 ) )
      | ( eq @ X2 @ X4 ) ),
    inference(lazy_cnf_imply,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl17]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl52,plain,
    ! [X0: frac] :
      ( ~ ( eq @ ( pf @ y @ X0 ) @ x )
      | ( eq @ X0 @ w ) ),
    inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl32,zip_derived_cl18]) ).

thf(e,axiom,
    eq @ ( pf @ y @ v ) @ x ).

thf(zip_derived_cl0,plain,
    eq @ ( pf @ y @ v ) @ x,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[e]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl77,plain,
    eq @ v @ w,
    inference('sup+',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl52,zip_derived_cl0]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl88,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl5,zip_derived_cl77]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem  : NUM767^1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ty2V09d5Vb true
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Oct  1 16:18:53 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.33  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.33  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.33  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.13/0.33  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.13/0.33  % Running in HO mode
% 0.53/0.65  % Total configuration time : 828
% 0.53/0.65  % Estimated wc time : 1656
% 0.53/0.65  % Estimated cpu time (8 cpus) : 207.0
% 0.53/0.75  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/40_c.s.sh running for 80s
% 0.53/0.75  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/35_full_unif4.sh running for 80s
% 0.53/0.75  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/40_c_ic.sh running for 80s
% 0.54/0.76  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/15_e_short1.sh running for 30s
% 0.54/0.79  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/40_b.comb.sh running for 70s
% 0.54/0.79  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/40_noforms.sh running for 90s
% 0.54/0.79  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/20_acsne_simpl.sh running for 40s
% 0.54/0.79  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/30_sp5.sh running for 60s
% 0.54/0.82  % Solved by lams/35_full_unif4.sh.
% 0.54/0.82  % done 34 iterations in 0.034s
% 0.54/0.82  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.54/0.82  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.54/0.82  
% 0.54/0.82  
% 0.54/0.82  % Terminating...
% 1.82/0.89  % Runner terminated.
% 1.82/0.90  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------