↑ Up

LEO-II---2.3.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : LEO-II---2.3.1
% Problem  : NUM769^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : leo --cores 7 --timeout 300 --proofoutput 1 --foatp e --atp e=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Oct  7 10:35:11 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.07s 0.21s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.07s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   27 (  21 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   95 (  26 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  164 (  10   ~;  10   |;   0   &; 138   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    9 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   32 (   0   ^;  32   !;   0   ?;  32   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(tp_frac,type,
    frac: $tType ).

thf(tp_eq,type,
    eq: frac > frac > $o ).

thf(tp_mf,type,
    mf: frac > frac > frac ).

thf(tp_moref,type,
    moref: frac > frac > $o ).

thf(tp_pf,type,
    pf: frac > frac > frac ).

thf(tp_x,type,
    x: frac ).

thf(tp_y,type,
    y: frac ).

thf(1,axiom,
    ! [Xx: frac,Xy: frac] :
      ( ( moref @ Xx @ Xy )
     => ( eq @ ( pf @ Xy @ ( mf @ Xx @ Xy ) ) @ Xx ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz67c) ).

thf(2,axiom,
    ! [Xx: frac,Xy: frac] :
      ( ( eq @ Xx @ Xy )
     => ( eq @ Xy @ Xx ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz38) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    moref @ x @ y,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m) ).

thf(4,conjecture,
    eq @ x @ ( pf @ y @ ( mf @ x @ y ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz67d) ).

thf(5,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( eq @ x @ ( pf @ y @ ( mf @ x @ y ) ) )
    = $false ),
    inference(negate_conjecture,[status(cth)],[4]) ).

thf(6,plain,
    ( ( eq @ x @ ( pf @ y @ ( mf @ x @ y ) ) )
    = $false ),
    inference(unfold_def,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(7,plain,
    ( ( ! [Xx: frac,Xy: frac] :
          ( ( moref @ Xx @ Xy )
         => ( eq @ ( pf @ Xy @ ( mf @ Xx @ Xy ) ) @ Xx ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(unfold_def,[status(thm)],[1]) ).

thf(8,plain,
    ( ( ! [Xx: frac,Xy: frac] :
          ( ( eq @ Xx @ Xy )
         => ( eq @ Xy @ Xx ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(unfold_def,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(9,plain,
    ( ( moref @ x @ y )
    = $true ),
    inference(unfold_def,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ( ( ~ ( eq @ x @ ( pf @ y @ ( mf @ x @ y ) ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(polarity_switch,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(11,plain,
    ( ( moref @ x @ y )
    = $true ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(12,plain,
    ( ( ! [Xx: frac,Xy: frac] :
          ( ( eq @ Xx @ Xy )
         => ( eq @ Xy @ Xx ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(13,plain,
    ( ( ! [Xx: frac,Xy: frac] :
          ( ( moref @ Xx @ Xy )
         => ( eq @ ( pf @ Xy @ ( mf @ Xx @ Xy ) ) @ Xx ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(14,plain,
    ( ( ~ ( eq @ x @ ( pf @ y @ ( mf @ x @ y ) ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(15,plain,
    ( ( ! [SX0: frac,SX1: frac] :
          ( ~ ( moref @ SX0 @ SX1 )
          | ( eq @ ( pf @ SX1 @ ( mf @ SX0 @ SX1 ) ) @ SX0 ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(unfold_def,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

thf(16,plain,
    ( ( ! [SX0: frac,SX1: frac] :
          ( ~ ( eq @ SX0 @ SX1 )
          | ( eq @ SX1 @ SX0 ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(unfold_def,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(17,plain,
    ( ( eq @ x @ ( pf @ y @ ( mf @ x @ y ) ) )
    = $false ),
    inference(extcnf_not_pos,[status(thm)],[14]) ).

thf(18,plain,
    ! [SV1: frac] :
      ( ( ! [SY4: frac] :
            ( ~ ( moref @ SV1 @ SY4 )
            | ( eq @ ( pf @ SY4 @ ( mf @ SV1 @ SY4 ) ) @ SV1 ) ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(extcnf_forall_pos,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

thf(19,plain,
    ! [SV2: frac] :
      ( ( ! [SY5: frac] :
            ( ~ ( eq @ SV2 @ SY5 )
            | ( eq @ SY5 @ SV2 ) ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(extcnf_forall_pos,[status(thm)],[16]) ).

thf(20,plain,
    ! [SV3: frac,SV1: frac] :
      ( ( ~ ( moref @ SV1 @ SV3 )
        | ( eq @ ( pf @ SV3 @ ( mf @ SV1 @ SV3 ) ) @ SV1 ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(extcnf_forall_pos,[status(thm)],[18]) ).

thf(21,plain,
    ! [SV4: frac,SV2: frac] :
      ( ( ~ ( eq @ SV2 @ SV4 )
        | ( eq @ SV4 @ SV2 ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(extcnf_forall_pos,[status(thm)],[19]) ).

thf(22,plain,
    ! [SV3: frac,SV1: frac] :
      ( ( ( ~ ( moref @ SV1 @ SV3 ) )
        = $true )
      | ( ( eq @ ( pf @ SV3 @ ( mf @ SV1 @ SV3 ) ) @ SV1 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(extcnf_or_pos,[status(thm)],[20]) ).

thf(23,plain,
    ! [SV4: frac,SV2: frac] :
      ( ( ( ~ ( eq @ SV2 @ SV4 ) )
        = $true )
      | ( ( eq @ SV4 @ SV2 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(extcnf_or_pos,[status(thm)],[21]) ).

thf(24,plain,
    ! [SV3: frac,SV1: frac] :
      ( ( ( moref @ SV1 @ SV3 )
        = $false )
      | ( ( eq @ ( pf @ SV3 @ ( mf @ SV1 @ SV3 ) ) @ SV1 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(extcnf_not_pos,[status(thm)],[22]) ).

thf(25,plain,
    ! [SV4: frac,SV2: frac] :
      ( ( ( eq @ SV2 @ SV4 )
        = $false )
      | ( ( eq @ SV4 @ SV2 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(extcnf_not_pos,[status(thm)],[23]) ).

thf(26,plain,
    $false = $true,
    inference(fo_atp_e,[status(thm)],[11,25,24,17]) ).

thf(27,plain,
    $false,
    inference(solved_all_splits,[solved_all_splits(join,[])],[26]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : NUM769^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : leo --cores 7 --timeout 300 --proofoutput 1 --foatp e --atp e=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.18  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.18  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.18  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.18  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.07/0.18  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.07/0.18  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.18  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.07/0.18  % DateTime : Tue Oct  6 13:39:06 UTC 2026
% 0.07/0.18  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.07/0.18  Running leo --cores 7 --timeout 300 --proofoutput 1 --foatp e --atp e=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.21  
% 0.07/0.21   No.of.Axioms: 3
% 0.07/0.21  
% 0.07/0.21   Length.of.Defs: 0
% 0.07/0.21  
% 0.07/0.21   Contains.Choice.Funs: false
% 0.07/0.21  
% 0.07/0.21  ********************************
% 0.07/0.21  *   All subproblems solved!    *
% 0.07/0.21  ********************************
% 0.07/0.21  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : (rf:0,axioms:3,ps:3,u:6,ude:true,rLeibEQ:true,rAndEQ:true,use_choice:true,use_extuni:true,use_extcnf_combined:false,expand_extuni:false,foatp:e,atp_timeout:25,atp_calls_frequency:5,ordering:none,proof_output:1,protocol_output:false,clause_count:26,loop_count:0,foatp_calls:1,translation:fof_full)
% 0.07/0.21  
% 0.07/0.21  %**** Beginning of derivation protocol ****
% 0.07/0.21  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.07/0.21  
% 0.07/0.21  %**** End of derivation protocol ****
% 0.07/0.21  %**** no. of clauses in derivation: 27 ****
% 0.07/0.21  %**** clause counter: 26 ****
% 0.07/0.21  
% 0.07/0.21  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : (rf:0,axioms:3,ps:3,u:6,ude:true,rLeibEQ:true,rAndEQ:true,use_choice:true,use_extuni:true,use_extcnf_combined:false,expand_extuni:false,foatp:e,atp_timeout:25,atp_calls_frequency:5,ordering:none,proof_output:1,protocol_output:false,clause_count:26,loop_count:0,foatp_calls:1,translation:fof_full)
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------