↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : NUM788^1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Oct  3 07:57:20 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 4.26s 4.46s
% Output   : Proof 4.26s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : NUM788^1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime   : Fri Oct  3 07:48:23 EDT 2025
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 4.26/4.46  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 4.26/4.46  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 4.26/4.46  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (more x0 y0) True
% 4.26/4.46  Clause #2 (by assumption #[]): Eq
% 4.26/4.46    (∀ (Xx0 Xy0 : rat),
% 4.26/4.46      Not
% 4.26/4.46        ((is Xx0 Xy0 → Not (more Xx0 Xy0)) →
% 4.26/4.46          Not (Not ((more Xx0 Xy0 → Not (less Xx0 Xy0)) → Not (less Xx0 Xy0 → Not (is Xx0 Xy0))))))
% 4.26/4.46    True
% 4.26/4.46  Clause #3 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (Not (Not (less x0 y0) → is x0 y0))) True
% 4.26/4.46  Clause #8 (by clausification #[3]): Eq (Not (Not (less x0 y0) → is x0 y0)) False
% 4.26/4.46  Clause #9 (by clausification #[8]): Eq (Not (less x0 y0) → is x0 y0) True
% 4.26/4.46  Clause #10 (by clausification #[9]): Or (Eq (Not (less x0 y0)) False) (Eq (is x0 y0) True)
% 4.26/4.46  Clause #11 (by clausification #[10]): Or (Eq (is x0 y0) True) (Eq (less x0 y0) True)
% 4.26/4.46  Clause #12 (by clausification #[2]): ∀ (a : rat),
% 4.26/4.46    Eq
% 4.26/4.46      (∀ (Xy0 : rat),
% 4.26/4.46        Not
% 4.26/4.46          ((is a Xy0 → Not (more a Xy0)) →
% 4.26/4.46            Not (Not ((more a Xy0 → Not (less a Xy0)) → Not (less a Xy0 → Not (is a Xy0))))))
% 4.26/4.46      True
% 4.26/4.46  Clause #13 (by clausification #[12]): ∀ (a a_1 : rat),
% 4.26/4.46    Eq
% 4.26/4.46      (Not
% 4.26/4.46        ((is a a_1 → Not (more a a_1)) → Not (Not ((more a a_1 → Not (less a a_1)) → Not (less a a_1 → Not (is a a_1))))))
% 4.26/4.46      True
% 4.26/4.46  Clause #14 (by clausification #[13]): ∀ (a a_1 : rat),
% 4.26/4.46    Eq ((is a a_1 → Not (more a a_1)) → Not (Not ((more a a_1 → Not (less a a_1)) → Not (less a a_1 → Not (is a a_1)))))
% 4.26/4.46      False
% 4.26/4.46  Clause #15 (by clausification #[14]): ∀ (a a_1 : rat), Eq (is a a_1 → Not (more a a_1)) True
% 4.26/4.46  Clause #16 (by clausification #[14]): ∀ (a a_1 : rat), Eq (Not (Not ((more a a_1 → Not (less a a_1)) → Not (less a a_1 → Not (is a a_1))))) False
% 4.26/4.46  Clause #17 (by clausification #[15]): ∀ (a a_1 : rat), Or (Eq (is a a_1) False) (Eq (Not (more a a_1)) True)
% 4.26/4.46  Clause #18 (by clausification #[17]): ∀ (a a_1 : rat), Or (Eq (is a a_1) False) (Eq (more a a_1) False)
% 4.26/4.46  Clause #19 (by clausification #[16]): ∀ (a a_1 : rat), Eq (Not ((more a a_1 → Not (less a a_1)) → Not (less a a_1 → Not (is a a_1)))) True
% 4.26/4.46  Clause #20 (by clausification #[19]): ∀ (a a_1 : rat), Eq ((more a a_1 → Not (less a a_1)) → Not (less a a_1 → Not (is a a_1))) False
% 4.26/4.46  Clause #21 (by clausification #[20]): ∀ (a a_1 : rat), Eq (more a a_1 → Not (less a a_1)) True
% 4.26/4.46  Clause #23 (by clausification #[21]): ∀ (a a_1 : rat), Or (Eq (more a a_1) False) (Eq (Not (less a a_1)) True)
% 4.26/4.46  Clause #24 (by clausification #[23]): ∀ (a a_1 : rat), Or (Eq (more a a_1) False) (Eq (less a a_1) False)
% 4.26/4.46  Clause #25 (by superposition #[24, 0]): Or (Eq (less x0 y0) False) (Eq False True)
% 4.26/4.46  Clause #30 (by clausification #[25]): Eq (less x0 y0) False
% 4.26/4.46  Clause #31 (by superposition #[30, 11]): Or (Eq (is x0 y0) True) (Eq False True)
% 4.26/4.46  Clause #32 (by clausification #[31]): Eq (is x0 y0) True
% 4.26/4.46  Clause #34 (by superposition #[32, 18]): Or (Eq True False) (Eq (more x0 y0) False)
% 4.26/4.46  Clause #35 (by clausification #[34]): Eq (more x0 y0) False
% 4.26/4.46  Clause #36 (by superposition #[35, 0]): Eq False True
% 4.26/4.46  Clause #37 (by clausification #[36]): False
% 4.26/4.46  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------