%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : cocATP---0.2.0 % Problem : NUM789^1 : TPTP v7.0.0. Released v3.7.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : python CASC.py /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % Computer : n157.star.cs.uiowa.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz % Memory : 32218.625MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jan 8 13:11:45 EST 2018 % Result : Theorem 1.51s % Output : Proof 1.60s % Verified : % SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails) % Syntax : Number of formulae : 0 % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.03 % Problem : NUM789^1 : TPTP v7.0.0. Released v3.7.0. % 0.00/0.04 % Command : python CASC.py /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.03/0.23 % Computer : n157.star.cs.uiowa.edu % 0.03/0.23 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.03/0.23 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz % 0.03/0.23 % Memory : 32218.625MB % 0.03/0.23 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64 % 0.03/0.23 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.03/0.23 % DateTime : Fri Jan 5 14:20:05 CST 2018 % 0.03/0.23 % CPUTime : % 0.03/0.25 Python 2.7.13 % 1.51/1.76 Using paths ['/home/cristobal/cocATP/CASC/TPTP/', '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/', '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/'] % 1.51/1.76 FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x2b0154d4f290>, <kernel.Type object at 0x2b0154d4f7e8>) of role type named rat_type % 1.51/1.76 Using role type % 1.51/1.76 Declaring rat:Type % 1.51/1.76 FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x2b0154d4c830>, <kernel.Constant object at 0x2b0154d4f128>) of role type named x0 % 1.51/1.76 Using role type % 1.51/1.76 Declaring x0:rat % 1.51/1.76 FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x2b0154d4f4d0>, <kernel.Constant object at 0x2b0154d4f128>) of role type named y0 % 1.51/1.76 Using role type % 1.51/1.76 Declaring y0:rat % 1.51/1.76 FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x2b0154d4f290>, <kernel.DependentProduct object at 0x2b0155117290>) of role type named less % 1.51/1.76 Using role type % 1.51/1.76 Declaring less:(rat->(rat->Prop)) % 1.51/1.76 FOF formula ((less x0) y0) of role axiom named l % 1.51/1.76 A new axiom: ((less x0) y0) % 1.51/1.76 FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x2b0154d4f560>, <kernel.DependentProduct object at 0x2b01551170e0>) of role type named more % 1.51/1.76 Using role type % 1.51/1.76 Declaring more:(rat->(rat->Prop)) % 1.51/1.76 FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x2b0154d4f248>, <kernel.DependentProduct object at 0x2b0155117128>) of role type named is % 1.51/1.76 Using role type % 1.51/1.76 Declaring is:(rat->(rat->Prop)) % 1.51/1.76 FOF formula (forall (Xa:Prop), (((Xa->False)->False)->Xa)) of role axiom named et % 1.51/1.76 A new axiom: (forall (Xa:Prop), (((Xa->False)->False)->Xa)) % 1.51/1.76 FOF formula (forall (Xx0:rat) (Xy0:rat), (((((is Xx0) Xy0)->(((more Xx0) Xy0)->False))->((((((more Xx0) Xy0)->(((less Xx0) Xy0)->False))->((((less Xx0) Xy0)->(((is Xx0) Xy0)->False))->False))->False)->False))->False)) of role axiom named satz81b % 1.51/1.76 A new axiom: (forall (Xx0:rat) (Xy0:rat), (((((is Xx0) Xy0)->(((more Xx0) Xy0)->False))->((((((more Xx0) Xy0)->(((less Xx0) Xy0)->False))->((((less Xx0) Xy0)->(((is Xx0) Xy0)->False))->False))->False)->False))->False)) % 1.51/1.76 FOF formula (((((more x0) y0)->False)->((is x0) y0))->False) of role conjecture named satz81h % 1.51/1.76 Conjecture to prove = (((((more x0) y0)->False)->((is x0) y0))->False):Prop % 1.51/1.76 We need to prove ['(((((more x0) y0)->False)->((is x0) y0))->False)'] % 1.51/1.76 Parameter rat:Type. % 1.51/1.76 Parameter x0:rat. % 1.51/1.76 Parameter y0:rat. % 1.51/1.76 Parameter less:(rat->(rat->Prop)). % 1.51/1.76 Axiom l:((less x0) y0). % 1.51/1.76 Parameter more:(rat->(rat->Prop)). % 1.51/1.76 Parameter is:(rat->(rat->Prop)). % 1.51/1.76 Axiom et:(forall (Xa:Prop), (((Xa->False)->False)->Xa)). % 1.51/1.76 Axiom satz81b:(forall (Xx0:rat) (Xy0:rat), (((((is Xx0) Xy0)->(((more Xx0) Xy0)->False))->((((((more Xx0) Xy0)->(((less Xx0) Xy0)->False))->((((less Xx0) Xy0)->(((is Xx0) Xy0)->False))->False))->False)->False))->False)). % 1.51/1.76 Trying to prove (((((more x0) y0)->False)->((is x0) y0))->False) % 1.51/1.76 Found l:((less x0) y0) % 1.51/1.76 Instantiate: Xy0:=y0:rat;Xx0:=x0:rat % 1.51/1.76 Found l as proof of ((less Xx0) Xy0) % 1.51/1.76 Found l:((less x0) y0) % 1.51/1.76 Instantiate: Xy0:=y0:rat;Xx0:=x0:rat % 1.51/1.76 Found l as proof of ((less Xx0) Xy0) % 1.51/1.76 Found x30:=(fun (x5:((more Xx0) Xy0))=> ((x3 x5) l)):(((more Xx0) Xy0)->False) % 1.51/1.76 Found (fun (x5:((more Xx0) Xy0))=> ((x3 x5) l)) as proof of (((more x0) y0)->False) % 1.51/1.76 Found (fun (x5:((more Xx0) Xy0))=> ((x3 x5) l)) as proof of (((more x0) y0)->False) % 1.51/1.76 Found (x (fun (x5:((more Xx0) Xy0))=> ((x3 x5) l))) as proof of ((is Xx0) Xy0) % 1.51/1.76 Found (x (fun (x5:((more Xx0) Xy0))=> ((x3 x5) l))) as proof of ((is Xx0) Xy0) % 1.51/1.76 Found ((x4 l) (x (fun (x5:((more Xx0) Xy0))=> ((x3 x5) l)))) as proof of False % 1.51/1.76 Found (fun (x4:(((less Xx0) Xy0)->(((is Xx0) Xy0)->False)))=> ((x4 l) (x (fun (x5:((more Xx0) Xy0))=> ((x3 x5) l))))) as proof of False % 1.51/1.76 Found (fun (x3:(((more Xx0) Xy0)->(((less Xx0) Xy0)->False))) (x4:(((less Xx0) Xy0)->(((is Xx0) Xy0)->False)))=> ((x4 l) (x (fun (x5:((more Xx0) Xy0))=> ((x3 x5) l))))) as proof of ((((less Xx0) Xy0)->(((is Xx0) Xy0)->False))->False) % 1.51/1.76 Found (fun (x3:(((more Xx0) Xy0)->(((less Xx0) Xy0)->False))) (x4:(((less Xx0) Xy0)->(((is Xx0) Xy0)->False)))=> ((x4 l) (x (fun (x5:((more Xx0) Xy0))=> ((x3 x5) l))))) as proof of ((((more Xx0) Xy0)->(((less Xx0) Xy0)->False))->((((less Xx0) Xy0)->(((is Xx0) Xy0)->False))->False)) % 1.51/1.76 Found (x2 (fun (x3:(((more Xx0) Xy0)->(((less Xx0) Xy0)->False))) (x4:(((less Xx0) Xy0)->(((is Xx0) Xy0)->False)))=> ((x4 l) (x (fun (x5:((more Xx0) Xy0))=> ((x3 x5) l)))))) as proof of False % 1.51/1.76 Found (fun (x2:(((((more Xx0) Xy0)->(((less Xx0) Xy0)->False))->((((less Xx0) Xy0)->(((is Xx0) Xy0)->False))->False))->False))=> (x2 (fun (x3:(((more Xx0) Xy0)->(((less Xx0) Xy0)->False))) (x4:(((less Xx0) Xy0)->(((is Xx0) Xy0)->False)))=> ((x4 l) (x (fun (x5:((more Xx0) Xy0))=> ((x3 x5) l))))))) as proof of False % 1.51/1.76 Found (fun (x1:(((is Xx0) Xy0)->(((more Xx0) Xy0)->False))) (x2:(((((more Xx0) Xy0)->(((less Xx0) Xy0)->False))->((((less Xx0) Xy0)->(((is Xx0) Xy0)->False))->False))->False))=> (x2 (fun (x3:(((more Xx0) Xy0)->(((less Xx0) Xy0)->False))) (x4:(((less Xx0) Xy0)->(((is Xx0) Xy0)->False)))=> ((x4 l) (x (fun (x5:((more Xx0) Xy0))=> ((x3 x5) l))))))) as proof of ((((((more Xx0) Xy0)->(((less Xx0) Xy0)->False))->((((less Xx0) Xy0)->(((is Xx0) Xy0)->False))->False))->False)->False) % 1.51/1.76 Found (fun (x1:(((is Xx0) Xy0)->(((more Xx0) Xy0)->False))) (x2:(((((more Xx0) Xy0)->(((less Xx0) Xy0)->False))->((((less Xx0) Xy0)->(((is Xx0) Xy0)->False))->False))->False))=> (x2 (fun (x3:(((more Xx0) Xy0)->(((less Xx0) Xy0)->False))) (x4:(((less Xx0) Xy0)->(((is Xx0) Xy0)->False)))=> ((x4 l) (x (fun (x5:((more Xx0) Xy0))=> ((x3 x5) l))))))) as proof of ((((is Xx0) Xy0)->(((more Xx0) Xy0)->False))->((((((more Xx0) Xy0)->(((less Xx0) Xy0)->False))->((((less Xx0) Xy0)->(((is Xx0) Xy0)->False))->False))->False)->False)) % 1.51/1.76 Found (satz81b00 (fun (x1:(((is Xx0) Xy0)->(((more Xx0) Xy0)->False))) (x2:(((((more Xx0) Xy0)->(((less Xx0) Xy0)->False))->((((less Xx0) Xy0)->(((is Xx0) Xy0)->False))->False))->False))=> (x2 (fun (x3:(((more Xx0) Xy0)->(((less Xx0) Xy0)->False))) (x4:(((less Xx0) Xy0)->(((is Xx0) Xy0)->False)))=> ((x4 l) (x (fun (x5:((more Xx0) Xy0))=> ((x3 x5) l)))))))) as proof of False % 1.51/1.76 Found ((satz81b0 y0) (fun (x1:(((is Xx0) y0)->(((more Xx0) y0)->False))) (x2:(((((more Xx0) y0)->(((less Xx0) y0)->False))->((((less Xx0) y0)->(((is Xx0) y0)->False))->False))->False))=> (x2 (fun (x3:(((more Xx0) y0)->(((less Xx0) y0)->False))) (x4:(((less Xx0) y0)->(((is Xx0) y0)->False)))=> ((x4 l) (x (fun (x5:((more Xx0) y0))=> ((x3 x5) l)))))))) as proof of False % 1.51/1.76 Found (((satz81b x0) y0) (fun (x1:(((is x0) y0)->(((more x0) y0)->False))) (x2:(((((more x0) y0)->(((less x0) y0)->False))->((((less x0) y0)->(((is x0) y0)->False))->False))->False))=> (x2 (fun (x3:(((more x0) y0)->(((less x0) y0)->False))) (x4:(((less x0) y0)->(((is x0) y0)->False)))=> ((x4 l) (x (fun (x5:((more x0) y0))=> ((x3 x5) l)))))))) as proof of False % 1.51/1.76 Found (fun (x:((((more x0) y0)->False)->((is x0) y0)))=> (((satz81b x0) y0) (fun (x1:(((is x0) y0)->(((more x0) y0)->False))) (x2:(((((more x0) y0)->(((less x0) y0)->False))->((((less x0) y0)->(((is x0) y0)->False))->False))->False))=> (x2 (fun (x3:(((more x0) y0)->(((less x0) y0)->False))) (x4:(((less x0) y0)->(((is x0) y0)->False)))=> ((x4 l) (x (fun (x5:((more x0) y0))=> ((x3 x5) l))))))))) as proof of False % 1.51/1.76 Found (fun (x:((((more x0) y0)->False)->((is x0) y0)))=> (((satz81b x0) y0) (fun (x1:(((is x0) y0)->(((more x0) y0)->False))) (x2:(((((more x0) y0)->(((less x0) y0)->False))->((((less x0) y0)->(((is x0) y0)->False))->False))->False))=> (x2 (fun (x3:(((more x0) y0)->(((less x0) y0)->False))) (x4:(((less x0) y0)->(((is x0) y0)->False)))=> ((x4 l) (x (fun (x5:((more x0) y0))=> ((x3 x5) l))))))))) as proof of (((((more x0) y0)->False)->((is x0) y0))->False) % 1.51/1.76 Got proof (fun (x:((((more x0) y0)->False)->((is x0) y0)))=> (((satz81b x0) y0) (fun (x1:(((is x0) y0)->(((more x0) y0)->False))) (x2:(((((more x0) y0)->(((less x0) y0)->False))->((((less x0) y0)->(((is x0) y0)->False))->False))->False))=> (x2 (fun (x3:(((more x0) y0)->(((less x0) y0)->False))) (x4:(((less x0) y0)->(((is x0) y0)->False)))=> ((x4 l) (x (fun (x5:((more x0) y0))=> ((x3 x5) l))))))))) % 1.51/1.76 Time elapsed = 1.233936s % 1.51/1.76 node=400 cost=925.000000 depth=16 % 1.51/1.76:::::::::::::::::::::: % 1.51/1.76 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 1.51/1.76 % SZS output start Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 1.51/1.76 (fun (x:((((more x0) y0)->False)->((is x0) y0)))=> (((satz81b x0) y0) (fun (x1:(((is x0) y0)->(((more x0) y0)->False))) (x2:(((((more x0) y0)->(((less x0) y0)->False))->((((less x0) y0)->(((is x0) y0)->False))->False))->False))=> (x2 (fun (x3:(((more x0) y0)->(((less x0) y0)->False))) (x4:(((less x0) y0)->(((is x0) y0)->False)))=> ((x4 l) (x (fun (x5:((more x0) y0))=> ((x3 x5) l))))))))) % 1.60/1.78 % SZS output end Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p %------------------------------------------------------------------------------