↑ Up

Nitpick---2016.CSA-FMo.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Nitpick---2016
% Problem  : NUM806^5 : TPTP v7.0.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s

% Computer : n080.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory   : 32218.625MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jan  8 14:49:03 EST 2018

% Result   : CounterSatisfiable 52.02s
% Output   : FiniteModel 52.02s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : NUM806^5 : TPTP v7.0.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s
% 0.03/0.24  % Computer : n080.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.03/0.24  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.24  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.03/0.24  % Memory   : 32218.625MB
% 0.03/0.24  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64
% 0.03/0.24  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.24  % DateTime : Fri Jan  5 14:23:52 CST 2018
% 0.03/0.24  % CPUTime  : 
% 13.85/4.31  Building HOL-TPTP ...
% 42.81/20.72  Finished HOL-TPTP (0:00:15 elapsed time, 0:00:27 cpu time, factor 1.72)
% 42.86/20.78  0:00:19 elapsed time, 0:00:27 cpu time, factor 1.41
% 52.02/26.05  Nitpicking formula...
% 52.02/26.05  Timestamp: 14:24:17
% 52.02/26.05  The type bnd_n passed the monotonicity test; Nitpick might be able to skip
% 52.02/26.05  some scopes
% 52.02/26.05  Using SAT solver "Lingeling_JNI" The following solvers are configured:
% 52.02/26.05  "Lingeling_JNI", "CryptoMiniSat_JNI", "MiniSat_JNI", "SAT4J", "SAT4J_Light"
% 52.02/26.05  Batch 1 of 20: Trying 5 scopes:
% 52.02/26.05    card bnd_n = 1
% 52.02/26.05    card bnd_n = 2
% 52.02/26.05    card bnd_n = 3
% 52.02/26.05    card bnd_n = 4
% 52.02/26.05    card bnd_n = 5
% 52.02/26.05  % SZS status CounterSatisfiable % SZS output start FiniteModel
% 52.02/26.05  Nitpick found a counterexample for card bnd_n = 2:
% 52.02/26.05  
% 52.02/26.05    Skolem constants:
% 52.02/26.05      Xx = b1
% 52.02/26.05      Xy = b1
% 52.02/26.05    Constants:
% 52.02/26.05      bnd_cS = (\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := b1, b2 := b2)
% 52.02/26.05      bnd_c_plus =
% 52.02/26.05        (\<lambda>x. _)
% 52.02/26.05        (b1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := b2, b2 := b2),
% 52.02/26.05         b2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := b1, b2 := b2))
% 52.02/26.05      bnd_c_star =
% 52.02/26.05        (\<lambda>x. _)
% 52.02/26.05        (b1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := b2, b2 := b2),
% 52.02/26.05         b2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := b2, b2 := b2))
% 52.02/26.05  % SZS output end FiniteModel
% 52.02/26.05  Total time: 516 ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------