%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Nitpick---2016 % Problem : NUM807^5 : TPTP v7.0.0. Released v4.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s % Computer : n177.star.cs.uiowa.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz % Memory : 32218.625MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jan 8 14:49:03 EST 2018 % Result : CounterSatisfiable 51.43s % Output : FiniteModel 51.43s % Verified : % SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails) % Syntax : Number of formulae : 0 % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.03 % Problem : NUM807^5 : TPTP v7.0.0. Released v4.0.0. % 0.00/0.04 % Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s % 0.02/0.23 % Computer : n177.star.cs.uiowa.edu % 0.02/0.23 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.02/0.23 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz % 0.02/0.23 % Memory : 32218.625MB % 0.02/0.23 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64 % 0.02/0.23 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.02/0.23 % DateTime : Fri Jan 5 14:25:50 CST 2018 % 0.02/0.23 % CPUTime : % 13.83/4.36 Building HOL-TPTP ... % 42.66/20.75 Finished HOL-TPTP (0:00:15 elapsed time, 0:00:27 cpu time, factor 1.72) % 42.67/20.77 0:00:19 elapsed time, 0:00:27 cpu time, factor 1.40 % 51.43/25.92 Nitpicking formula... % 51.43/25.92 Timestamp: 14:26:15 % 51.43/25.92 Using SAT solver "Lingeling_JNI" The following solvers are configured: % 51.43/25.92 "Lingeling_JNI", "CryptoMiniSat_JNI", "MiniSat_JNI", "SAT4J", "SAT4J_Light" % 51.43/25.92 Batch 1 of 20: Trying 5 scopes: % 51.43/25.92 card bnd_n = 1 % 51.43/25.92 card bnd_n = 2 % 51.43/25.92 card bnd_n = 3 % 51.43/25.92 card bnd_n = 4 % 51.43/25.92 card bnd_n = 5 % 51.43/25.92 % SZS status CounterSatisfiable % SZS output start FiniteModel % 51.43/25.92 Nitpick found a counterexample for card bnd_n = 2: % 51.43/25.92 % 51.43/25.92 Skolem constants: % 51.43/25.92 Xp = (\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := b2, b2 := b1) % 51.43/25.92 Xq = (\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := b1, b2 := b1) % 51.43/25.92 Xx = b1 % 51.43/25.92 Constants: % 51.43/25.92 bnd_c0 = b2 % 51.43/25.92 bnd_cS = (\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := b1, b2 := b2) % 51.43/25.92 % SZS output end FiniteModel % 51.43/25.92 Total time: 516 ms %------------------------------------------------------------------------------