↑ Up

Vampire---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---5.0.1
% Problem  : NUM816^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:18:58 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.29s
% Output   : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   25
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   37 (  19 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  207 (  79 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  347 (  38   ~;  18   |;  21   &; 222   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  32  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   22 (  22   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   18 (  14 usr;   4 con; 0-4 aty)
%                                         (  16  !!;   0  ??;   0 @@+;   0 @@-)
%            Number of variables   :   74 (  38   ^;  36   !;   0   ?;  74   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    sTfun: ( $tType * $tType ) > $tType ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    cS: $i > $i ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    cEVEN1: $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_3,type,
    cODD1: $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    vNOT: $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_8,type,
    db0: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_9,type,
    vLAM: 
      !>[X0: $tType,X1: $tType] : ( X1 > X0 > X1 ) ).

thf(func_def_10,type,
    vPI: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > $o ) > $o ) ).

thf(func_def_11,type,
    vIMP: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_12,type,
    vAND: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_13,type,
    db1: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_14,type,
    sK0: ( $i > $o ) > $i ).

thf(func_def_15,type,
    vEQ: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( X0 > X0 > $o ) ).

thf(f1,axiom,
    ( cEVEN1
    = ( ^ [X0: $i] :
        ! [X1: $i > $o] :
          ( ( ! [X2: $i] :
                ( ( X1 @ X2 )
               => ( X1 @ ( cS @ ( cS @ X2 ) ) ) )
            & ( X1 @ c0 ) )
         => ( X1 @ X0 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cEVEN1_def) ).

thf(f2,axiom,
    ( cODD1
    = ( ^ [X0: $i] :
          ~ ( cEVEN1 @ X0 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cODD1_def) ).

thf(f3,conjecture,
    ( ( ! [X0: $i] :
          ( ( cS @ X0 )
         != c0 )
      & ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
          ( ( ( cS @ X1 )
            = ( cS @ X2 ) )
         => ( X1 = X2 ) ) )
   => ( cODD1 @ ( cS @ c0 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cTHM406) ).

thf(f4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( ! [X0: $i] :
            ( ( cS @ X0 )
           != c0 )
        & ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
            ( ( ( cS @ X1 )
              = ( cS @ X2 ) )
           => ( X1 = X2 ) ) )
     => ( cODD1 @ ( cS @ c0 ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f3]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ~ ( ( ! [X0: $i] :
            ( ( cS @ X0 )
           != c0 )
        & ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
            ( ( ( cS @ X1 )
              = ( cS @ X2 ) )
           => ( X1 = X2 ) ) )
     => ( cODD1 @ ( cS @ c0 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f4]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ~ ( ( ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
            ( ( ( cS @ X2 )
              = ( cS @ X1 ) )
           => ( X1 = X2 ) )
        & ! [X0: $i] :
            ( c0
           != ( cS @ X0 ) ) )
     => ( ( cODD1 @ ( cS @ c0 ) )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f5]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ( cODD1
    = ( ^ [X0: $i] :
          ~ ( cEVEN1 @ X0 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ( cODD1
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ~ ( cEVEN1 @ Y0 ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f7]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ( cEVEN1
    = ( ^ [X0: $i] :
        ! [X1: $i > $o] :
          ( ( ! [X2: $i] :
                ( ( X1 @ X2 )
               => ( X1 @ ( cS @ ( cS @ X2 ) ) ) )
            & ( X1 @ c0 ) )
         => ( X1 @ X0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f1]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( cEVEN1
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( !! @ ( $i > $o )
          @ ^ [Y1: $i > $o] :
              ( ( ( Y1 @ c0 )
                & ( !! @ $i
                  @ ^ [Y2: $i] :
                      ( ( Y1 @ Y2 )
                     => ( Y1 @ ( cS @ ( cS @ Y2 ) ) ) ) ) )
             => ( Y1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f9]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ( ( ( cODD1 @ ( cS @ c0 ) )
     != $true )
    & ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
        ( ( X1 = X2 )
        | ( ( cS @ X2 )
         != ( cS @ X1 ) ) )
    & ! [X0: $i] :
        ( c0
       != ( cS @ X0 ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ( ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
        ( ( X1 = X2 )
        | ( ( cS @ X2 )
         != ( cS @ X1 ) ) )
    & ( ( cODD1 @ ( cS @ c0 ) )
     != $true )
    & ! [X0: $i] :
        ( c0
       != ( cS @ X0 ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f11]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ( ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
        ( ( X0 = X1 )
        | ( ( cS @ X0 )
         != ( cS @ X1 ) ) )
    & ( ( cODD1 @ ( cS @ c0 ) )
     != $true )
    & ! [X2: $i] :
        ( c0
       != ( cS @ X2 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f12]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ! [X2: $i] :
      ( c0
     != ( cS @ X2 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ( ( cODD1 @ ( cS @ c0 ) )
   != $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( cS @ X0 )
       != ( cS @ X1 ) )
      | ( X0 = X1 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ( cODD1
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ~ ( cEVEN1 @ Y0 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

thf(f18,plain,
    ( cEVEN1
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( !! @ ( $i > $o )
          @ ^ [Y1: $i > $o] :
              ( ( ( Y1 @ c0 )
                & ( !! @ $i
                  @ ^ [Y2: $i] :
                      ( ( Y1 @ Y2 )
                     => ( Y1 @ ( cS @ ( cS @ Y2 ) ) ) ) ) )
             => ( Y1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ( cODD1
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ~ ( ^ [Y1: $i] :
                ( !! @ ( $i > $o )
                @ ^ [Y2: $i > $o] :
                    ( ( ( Y2 @ c0 )
                      & ( !! @ $i
                        @ ^ [Y3: $i] :
                            ( ( Y2 @ Y3 )
                           => ( Y2 @ ( cS @ ( cS @ Y3 ) ) ) ) ) )
                   => ( Y2 @ Y1 ) ) )
            @ Y0 ) ) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f17,f18]) ).

thf(f22,plain,
    ( $true
   != ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ~ ( ^ [Y1: $i] :
                ( !! @ ( $i > $o )
                @ ^ [Y2: $i > $o] :
                    ( ( ( Y2 @ c0 )
                      & ( !! @ $i
                        @ ^ [Y3: $i] :
                            ( ( Y2 @ Y3 )
                           => ( Y2 @ ( cS @ ( cS @ Y3 ) ) ) ) ) )
                   => ( Y2 @ Y1 ) ) )
            @ Y0 )
      @ ( cS @ c0 ) ) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f15,f21]) ).

thf(f23,plain,
    ( $true
   != ( ~ ( !! @ ( $i > $o )
          @ ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
              ( ( ( Y0 @ c0 )
                & ( !! @ $i
                  @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                      ( ( Y0 @ Y1 )
                     => ( Y0 @ ( cS @ ( cS @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ) )
             => ( Y0 @ ( cS @ c0 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f22]) ).

thf(f24,plain,
    ( ( !! @ ( $i > $o )
      @ ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
          ( ( ( Y0 @ c0 )
            & ( !! @ $i
              @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                  ( ( Y0 @ Y1 )
                 => ( Y0 @ ( cS @ ( cS @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ) )
         => ( Y0 @ ( cS @ c0 ) ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f23]) ).

thf(f25,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $o] :
      ( $true
      = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
            ( ( ( Y0 @ c0 )
              & ( !! @ $i
                @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                    ( ( Y0 @ Y1 )
                   => ( Y0 @ ( cS @ ( cS @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ) )
           => ( Y0 @ ( cS @ c0 ) ) )
        @ X1 ) ),
    inference(pi_proxy_clausification,[],[f24]) ).

thf(f26,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( ( X1 @ c0 )
          & ( !! @ $i
            @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
                ( ( X1 @ Y0 )
               => ( X1 @ ( cS @ ( cS @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ) )
       => ( X1 @ ( cS @ c0 ) ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f25]) ).

thf(f27,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( X1 @ ( cS @ c0 ) )
        = $true )
      | ( ( ( X1 @ c0 )
          & ( !! @ $i
            @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
                ( ( X1 @ Y0 )
               => ( X1 @ ( cS @ ( cS @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ) )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f26]) ).

thf(f28,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( X1 @ c0 )
        = $false )
      | ( ( X1 @ ( cS @ c0 ) )
        = $true )
      | ( $false
        = ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
              ( ( X1 @ Y0 )
             => ( X1 @ ( cS @ ( cS @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f27]) ).

thf(f29,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
              ( ( X1 @ Y0 )
             => ( X1 @ ( cS @ ( cS @ Y0 ) ) ) )
          @ ( sK0 @ X1 ) )
        = $false )
      | ( ( X1 @ c0 )
        = $false )
      | ( ( X1 @ ( cS @ c0 ) )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(sigma_proxy_clausification,[],[f28]) ).

thf(f30,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( X1 @ ( cS @ c0 ) )
        = $true )
      | ( $false
        = ( ( X1 @ ( sK0 @ X1 ) )
         => ( X1 @ ( cS @ ( cS @ ( sK0 @ X1 ) ) ) ) ) )
      | ( ( X1 @ c0 )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f29]) ).

thf(f31,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $o] :
      ( ( $false
        = ( X1 @ ( cS @ ( cS @ ( sK0 @ X1 ) ) ) ) )
      | ( ( X1 @ c0 )
        = $false )
      | ( ( X1 @ ( cS @ c0 ) )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f30]) ).

thf(f52,plain,
    ( ( ( cS @ c0 )
      = ( cS
        @ ( cS
          @ ( sK0
            @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
                ( Y0
               != ( cS @ c0 ) ) ) ) ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( Y0
           != ( cS @ c0 ) )
        @ c0 ) ) ),
    inference(leibniz_equality_elimination,[],[f31]) ).

thf(f61,plain,
    ( ( ( cS @ c0 )
      = ( cS
        @ ( cS
          @ ( sK0
            @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
                ( Y0
               != ( cS @ c0 ) ) ) ) ) )
    | ( ( c0
       != ( cS @ c0 ) )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f52]) ).

thf(f62,plain,
    ( ( ( cS @ c0 )
      = ( cS
        @ ( cS
          @ ( sK0
            @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
                ( Y0
               != ( cS @ c0 ) ) ) ) ) )
    | ( ( c0
        = ( cS @ c0 ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f61]) ).

thf(f63,plain,
    ( ( c0
      = ( cS @ c0 ) )
    | ( ( cS @ c0 )
      = ( cS
        @ ( cS
          @ ( sK0
            @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
                ( Y0
               != ( cS @ c0 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f62]) ).

thf(f72,plain,
    ( ( cS @ c0 )
    = ( cS
      @ ( cS
        @ ( sK0
          @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
              ( Y0
             != ( cS @ c0 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f63,f14]) ).

thf(f99,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( ( cS @ X0 )
       != ( cS @ c0 ) )
      | ( ( cS
          @ ( sK0
            @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
                ( Y0
               != ( cS @ c0 ) ) ) )
        = X0 ) ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f16,f72]) ).

thf(f103,plain,
    ( c0
    = ( cS
      @ ( sK0
        @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( Y0
           != ( cS @ c0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f99]) ).

thf(f104,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f103,f14]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : NUM816^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.19  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.19  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.19  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.19  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.19  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.19  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.19  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.19  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 13:02:42 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.20  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.20  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.23  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.08/0.24  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.29  % (724060)Detected a higher-order problem, will run a greedy HOL sequence.
% 0.21/0.29  % (724067)lrs+10_1_cnfonf=off:si=on:uwa=one_side_interpreted:random_seed=2470581113:i=3:rtra=on:inj=on:ntd=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.21/0.29  % (724067)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.21/0.29  % (724067)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.29  % (724067)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.21/0.29  % (724067)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.21/0.29  % (724067)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.21/0.29  % (724067)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.21/0.29  % (724067)Time elapsed: 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.29  % (724067)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.21/0.29  % (724067)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.21/0.29  % (724067)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.29  % (724067)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.29  % (724069)dis+21_4_fde=none:e2e=on:si=on:uwa=off:foolp=on:random_seed=1022751860:i=24:av=off:rtra=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/24Mi)
% 0.21/0.29  % (724065)lrs+10_40_drc=off:e2e=on:si=on:uwa=one_side_interpreted:random_seed=1074393360:s2a=on:i=87:rtra=on:ntd=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/87Mi)
% 0.21/0.29  % (724066)lrs+10_16_si=on:nwc=1.5:random_seed=4164362900:i=18:kws=arity_squared:rtra=on:fe=abstraction:ntd=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 0.21/0.29  % (724068)dis+1002_4:1_sfv=off:to=lpo:plsq=on:fde=none:e2e=on:si=on:spb=non_intro:acc=on:uwa=off:fd=preordered:foolp=on:s2agt=32:slsqc=1:slsq=on:random_seed=807748528:hsq=on:hsqr=16,1:s2a=on:i=634:add=on:nm=16:nicw=on:rtra=on:gtg=position:ss=included:ixr=off:c=on:inj=on:ntd=on:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/634Mi)
% 0.21/0.29  % (724065) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-724060-724065"...
% 0.21/0.29  % (724071)WARNING Broken Constraint: if ho_split_queue_ratios(1,8) has been set then ho_split_queue(off) is equal to on
% 0.21/0.29  % (724071)WARNING Broken Constraint: if sine_to_age_tolerance(5) has been set then sine_to_age(off) is equal to on or sine_to_pred_levels(off) is not equal to off or sine_level_split_queue(off) is equal to on
% 0.21/0.29  % (724073)dis+10_1024_sil=128000:si=on:sp=unary_first:urr=on:uwa=all:fd=off:random_seed=1792976315:i=2:hud=10:rtra=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.21/0.29  % (724065)...printing done.
% 0.21/0.29  % (724066) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-724060-724066"...
% 0.21/0.29  % (724065)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.21/0.29  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.29  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.29  % (724065)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.29  % (724065)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.21/0.29  % (724065)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.21/0.29  % (724065)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.21/0.29  % (724065)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.21/0.29  % (724065)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.21/0.29  % (724065)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.21/0.29  % (724065)Instructions burned: 6 (million)
% 0.21/0.29  % (724060)Success in time 0.038 s
% 0.21/0.29  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------