↑ Up

LisaST---0.9.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : LisaST---0.9
% Problem  : NUM837+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:13:55 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 10.29s 11.82s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 10.29s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : NUM837+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/10.38  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.09/10.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/10.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/10.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/10.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/10.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/10.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/10.38  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 04:11:27 UTC 2026
% 0.09/10.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/10.38  Running casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 10.29/11.82  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 10.29/11.82  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 10.29/11.82  fof(holds(conjunct1(170), 270, 0), axiom, less(vd268,vd269)).
% 10.29/11.82  fof(ass(cond(147, 0), 0), axiom, ! [X0] : ! [X1] : ((less(X0,X1) => greater(X1,X0)))).
% 10.29/11.82  fof(ass(cond(goal(130), 0), 1), axiom, ! [X0] : ! [X1] : ((X0 != X1 | ~less(X0,X1)))).
% 10.29/11.82  fof(ass(cond(goal(130), 0), 2), axiom, ! [X0] : ! [X1] : ((~greater(X0,X1) | ~less(X0,X1)))).
% 10.29/11.82  fof(def(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 12), 1), axiom, ! [X0] : ! [X1] : ((less(X1,X0) <=> ? [X2] : X0 = vplus(X1,X2)))).
% 10.29/11.82  fof(ass(cond(goal(88), 0), 0), axiom, ! [X0] : ! [X1] : ((X0 = X1 | (? [X2] : X0 = vplus(X1,X2) | ? [X3] : X1 = vplus(X0,X3))))).
% 10.29/11.82  fof(qe(171), conjecture, ? [X0] : vd269 = vplus(vd268,X0)).
% 10.29/11.82  fof(negated_conjecture, negated_conjecture, ~? [X0] : vd269 = vplus(vd268,X0), inference(negate_conjecture, [status(cth)], [qe(171)])).
% 10.29/11.82  cnf(c1, plain, less(vd268,vd269), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [holds(conjunct1(170), 270, 0)])).
% 10.29/11.82  cnf(c10, plain, ~less(X0,X1) | greater(X1,X0), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [ass(cond(147, 0), 0)])).
% 10.29/11.82  cnf(c13, plain, X0 != X1 | ~less(X0,X1), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [ass(cond(goal(130), 0), 1)])).
% 10.29/11.82  cnf(c14, plain, ~greater(X0,X1) | ~less(X0,X1), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [ass(cond(goal(130), 0), 2)])).
% 10.29/11.82  cnf(c17, plain, less(X0,X1) | X1 != vplus(X0,X2), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [def(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 12), 1)])).
% 10.29/11.82  cnf(c20, plain, X0 = X1 | X0 = vplus(X1,sK30(X0,X1)) | X1 = vplus(X0,sK31(X0,X1)), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [ass(cond(goal(88), 0), 0)])).
% 10.29/11.82  cnf(c28, plain, vd269 != vplus(vd268,X0), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [negated_conjecture])).
% 10.29/11.82  cnf(d0, plain, vd269 != X0 | vd268 = X0 | vd268 = vplus(X0,sK30(vd268,X0)), inference(superposition, [status(thm)], [c20,c28])).
% 10.29/11.82  cnf(d1, plain, vd268 = vd269 | vd268 = vplus(vd269,sK30(vd268,vd269)), inference(equality_resolution, [status(thm)], [d0])).
% 10.29/11.82  cnf(d2, plain, X0 != vd268 | less(vd269,X0) | vd268 = vd269, inference(superposition, [status(thm)], [d1,c17])).
% 10.29/11.82  cnf(d3, plain, vd268 = vd269 | less(vd269,vd268), inference(equality_resolution, [status(thm)], [d2])).
% 10.29/11.82  cnf(d4, plain, vd268 = vd269 | greater(vd268,vd269), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d3,c10])).
% 10.29/11.82  cnf(d5, plain, vd268 = vd269 | ~less(vd268,vd269), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d4,c14])).
% 10.29/11.82  cnf(d6, plain, vd268 = vd269, inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c1,d5])).
% 10.29/11.82  cnf(d7, plain, less(vd269,vd269), inference(demodulation, [status(thm)], [c1,d6])).
% 10.29/11.82  cnf(d8, plain, ~less(X0,X0), inference(equality_resolution, [status(thm)], [c13])).
% 10.29/11.82  cnf(d9, plain, $false, inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d8,d7])).
% 10.29/11.82  % SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------