↑ Up

Vampire-SAT---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---5.0.1
% Problem  : NUM843+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 12:25:53 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.18s 0.47s
% Output   : Refutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   41 (  20 unt;   1 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   67 (  10 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   49 (  23   ~;  21   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   2 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   34 (   0 sgn  34   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,conjecture,
    greater(vd390,vd391),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','holds(244, 394, 0)') ).

fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ greater(vd390,vd391),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ~ leq(vd390,vd391),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','holds(conjunct2(243), 393, 0)') ).

fof(f21,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( geq(X0,X1)
     => leq(X1,X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','ass(cond(158, 0), 0)') ).

fof(f22,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( leq(X1,X0)
    <=> ( less(X1,X0)
        | X1 = X0 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','def(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 17), 1)') ).

fof(f23,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( geq(X1,X0)
    <=> ( greater(X1,X0)
        | X1 = X0 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','def(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 16), 1)') ).

fof(f24,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( less(X0,X1)
     => greater(X1,X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','ass(cond(147, 0), 0)') ).

fof(f26,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( X0 = X1
      | greater(X0,X1)
      | less(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','ass(cond(goal(130), 0), 0)') ).

fof(f48,plain,
    ~ greater(vd390,vd391),
    inference(flattening,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f67,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( leq(X1,X0)
      | ~ geq(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).

fof(f68,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( greater(X1,X0)
      | ~ less(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).

fof(f77,plain,
    ~ greater(vd390,vd391),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f48]) ).

fof(f78,plain,
    ~ leq(vd390,vd391),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f98,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ geq(X0,X1)
      | leq(X1,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f67]) ).

fof(f100,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( X0 != X1
      | leq(X1,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).

fof(f104,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ greater(X1,X0)
      | geq(X1,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f23]) ).

fof(f105,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ less(X0,X1)
      | greater(X1,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f68]) ).

fof(f107,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( less(X0,X1)
      | greater(X0,X1)
      | X0 = X1 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f26]) ).

fof(f141,plain,
    ! [X1] : leq(X1,X1),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f100]) ).

fof(f150,plain,
    greater(vd390,vd391),
    inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f77]) ).

fof(f151,plain,
    leq(vd390,vd391),
    inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f78]) ).

fof(f169,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ leq(X1,X0)
      | geq(X0,X1) ),
    inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f98]) ).

fof(f171,plain,
    ! [X1] : ~ leq(X1,X1),
    inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f141]) ).

fof(f173,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ geq(X1,X0)
      | greater(X1,X0) ),
    inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f104]) ).

fof(f176,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ greater(X1,X0)
      | less(X0,X1) ),
    inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f105]) ).

fof(f178,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ less(X0,X1)
      | ~ greater(X0,X1)
      | X0 = X1 ),
    inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f107]) ).

fof(f186,plain,
    geq(vd391,vd390),
    inference(resolution,[],[f169,f151]) ).

fof(f189,plain,
    greater(vd391,vd390),
    inference(resolution,[],[f173,f186]) ).

fof(f190,plain,
    less(vd391,vd390),
    inference(resolution,[],[f176,f150]) ).

fof(f258,definition,
    ( spl4_2
  <=> vd390 = vd391 ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl4_2])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f260,plain,
    ( vd390 = vd391
    | ~ spl4_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f258]) ).

fof(f263,plain,
    ( leq(vd390,vd390)
    | ~ spl4_2 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f151,f260]) ).

fof(f271,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl4_2 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f263,f171]) ).

fof(f272,plain,
    ~ spl4_2,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f271]) ).

fof(f292,plain,
    ( ~ greater(vd391,vd390)
    | vd390 = vd391 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f178,f190]) ).

fof(f293,plain,
    vd390 = vd391,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f292,f189]) ).

fof(f295,plain,
    spl4_2,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f293,f258]) ).

cnf(s3,plain,
    ~ spl4_2,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f272]) ).

cnf(s6,plain,
    spl4_2,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f295]) ).

cnf(s8,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rat,[],[s3,s6]) ).

fof(f296,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[s8]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : NUM843+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.13/0.38  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.38  % DateTime : Sun Sep 27 21:25:20 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.39  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.39  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.13/0.42  Running first-order model finding
% 0.13/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc --intent sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.47  % (2953595)Will run a generic schedule for satisfiability detection.
% 0.18/0.47  % (2953606)ott-3_16_to=lpo:sil=16000:sp=arity:fd=off:rp=on:random_seed=4193914985:i=159:bs=unit_only:nicw=on:fsr=off:amm=off_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/159Mi)
% 0.18/0.47  % (2953601)% WARNING: option uhcvi not known.
% 0.18/0.47  % (2953602)dis+10_161_sil=256000:plsq=on:plsqr=61199697,1048576:gs=on:alpa=true:sac=on:slsq=on:cn=on:random_seed=1085199572:i=88024:add=on:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/88024Mi)
% 0.18/0.47  % (2953600)fmb+10_1_sas=cadical:bce=on:rp=on:random_seed=3854496135_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/0Mi)
% 0.18/0.47  % (2953601)dis+11_61:31_drc=ordering:lsd=5:bsr=unit_only:rp=on:newcnf=on:random_seed=1475758317:i=135531:add=off:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/135531Mi)
% 0.18/0.47  % (2953605)ott+1_1_to=lpo:sil=16000:sp=reverse_arity:erd=off:random_seed=2658408937:i=131_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/131Mi)
% 0.18/0.47  % (2953603)dis+10_1_sil=32000:sp=arity:random_seed=2916517743:i=103:fgj=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/103Mi)
% 0.18/0.47  % (2953604)ott+31_1_sil=16000:lcm=predicate:bce=on:newcnf=on:random_seed=1385906247:i=116_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/116Mi)
% 0.18/0.47  % TRYING [1]
% 0.18/0.47  % TRYING [2]
% 0.18/0.47  % (2953600) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-2953595-2953600"...
% 0.18/0.47  % (2953601) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-2953595-2953601"...
% 0.18/0.47  % (2953604) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-2953595-2953604"...
% 0.18/0.47  % (2953605) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-2953595-2953605"...
% 0.18/0.47  % (2953601)...printing done.
% 0.18/0.47  % (2953604)...printing done.
% 0.18/0.47  % (2953605)...printing done.
% 0.18/0.47  % (2953601)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.18/0.47  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.18/0.47  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.47  % (2953601)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.47  % (2953601)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.18/0.47  % (2953601)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.18/0.47  % (2953601)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.18/0.47  % (2953601)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.18/0.47  % (2953601)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.18/0.47  % (2953601)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.18/0.47  % (2953601)Instructions burned: 6 (million)
% 0.18/0.47  % (2953595)Success in time 0.041 s
% 0.18/0.47  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------