↑ Up

LisaST---0.9.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : LisaST---0.9
% Problem  : NUM843+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:13:56 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 9.01s 2.17s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 9.01s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : NUM843+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.35  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 04:12:20 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.35  Running casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 9.01/2.17  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 9.01/2.17  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 9.01/2.17  fof(holds(conjunct2(243), 393, 0), axiom, ~leq(vd390,vd391)).
% 9.01/2.17  fof(ass(cond(158, 0), 0), axiom, ! [X0] : ! [X1] : ((geq(X0,X1) => leq(X1,X0)))).
% 9.01/2.17  fof(def(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 17), 1), axiom, ! [X0] : ! [X1] : ((leq(X1,X0) <=> (less(X1,X0) | X1 = X0)))).
% 9.01/2.17  fof(def(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 16), 1), axiom, ! [X0] : ! [X1] : ((geq(X1,X0) <=> (greater(X1,X0) | X1 = X0)))).
% 9.01/2.17  fof(ass(cond(147, 0), 0), axiom, ! [X0] : ! [X1] : ((less(X0,X1) => greater(X1,X0)))).
% 9.01/2.17  fof(ass(cond(goal(130), 0), 0), axiom, ! [X0] : ! [X1] : ((X0 = X1 | (greater(X0,X1) | less(X0,X1))))).
% 9.01/2.17  fof(holds(244, 394, 0), conjecture, greater(vd390,vd391)).
% 9.01/2.17  fof(negated_conjecture, negated_conjecture, ~greater(vd390,vd391), inference(negate_conjecture, [status(cth)], [holds(244, 394, 0)])).
% 9.01/2.17  cnf(c0, plain, ~leq(vd390,vd391), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [holds(conjunct2(243), 393, 0)])).
% 9.01/2.17  cnf(c20, plain, ~geq(X0,X1) | leq(X1,X0), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [ass(cond(158, 0), 0)])).
% 9.01/2.17  cnf(c23, plain, leq(X0,X1) | X0 != X1, inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [def(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 17), 1)])).
% 9.01/2.17  cnf(c25, plain, geq(X0,X1) | ~greater(X0,X1), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [def(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 16), 1)])).
% 9.01/2.17  cnf(c27, plain, ~less(X0,X1) | greater(X1,X0), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [ass(cond(147, 0), 0)])).
% 9.01/2.17  cnf(c29, plain, X0 = X1 | greater(X0,X1) | less(X0,X1), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [ass(cond(goal(130), 0), 0)])).
% 9.01/2.17  cnf(c54, plain, ~greater(vd390,vd391), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [negated_conjecture])).
% 9.01/2.17  cnf(d0, plain, X0 = X1 | greater(X0,X1) | greater(X1,X0), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c29,c27])).
% 9.01/2.17  cnf(d1, plain, vd391 = vd390 | greater(vd391,vd390), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d0,c54])).
% 9.01/2.17  cnf(d2, plain, vd391 = vd390 | geq(vd391,vd390), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d1,c25])).
% 9.01/2.17  cnf(d3, plain, vd391 = vd390 | leq(vd390,vd391), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d2,c20])).
% 9.01/2.17  cnf(d4, plain, vd391 = vd390, inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c0,d3])).
% 9.01/2.17  cnf(d5, plain, ~leq(vd390,vd390), inference(demodulation, [status(thm)], [c0,d4])).
% 9.01/2.17  cnf(d6, plain, leq(X0,X0), inference(equality_resolution, [status(thm)], [c23])).
% 9.01/2.17  cnf(d7, plain, $false, inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d6,d5])).
% 9.01/2.17  % SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------