%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : NUM844+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:50:49 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.11s 0.43s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.11s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 18 ( 16 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 20 ( 19 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 7 ( 5 ~; 0 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 25 ( 0 sgn 14 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof('holds(266, 415, 3)',conjecture,
vplus(vmul(vd411,vd413),vplus(vd413,vsucc(vd411))) = vplus(vmul(vd411,vd413),vplus(vsucc(vd411),vd413)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','holds(266, 415, 3)') ).
fof('qu(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 3), and(holds(definiens(29), 45, 0), holds(definiens(29), 44, 0)))',axiom,
! [X16,X17] :
( vplus(X16,v1) = vsucc(X16)
& vplus(X16,vsucc(X17)) = vsucc(vplus(X16,X17)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','qu(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 3), and(holds(definiens(29), 45, 0), holds(definiens(29), 44, 0)))') ).
fof('ass(cond(61, 0), 0)',axiom,
! [X8,X9] : vplus(X9,X8) = vplus(X8,X9),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','ass(cond(61, 0), 0)') ).
fof('ass(cond(33, 0), 0)',axiom,
! [X13,X14,X15] : vplus(vplus(X13,X14),X15) = vplus(X13,vplus(X14,X15)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','ass(cond(33, 0), 0)') ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
vplus(vmul(vd411,vd413),vplus(vd413,vsucc(vd411))) != vplus(vmul(vd411,vd413),vplus(vsucc(vd411),vd413)),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],['holds(266, 415, 3)']) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
vplus(vmul(vd411,vd413),vplus(vd413,vsucc(vd411))) != vplus(vmul(vd411,vd413),vplus(vsucc(vd411),vd413)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
vplus(vmul(vd411,vd413),vplus(vd413,vsucc(vd411))) != vplus(vmul(vd411,vd413),vplus(vsucc(vd411),vd413)),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X37,X38] :
( vplus(X37,v1) = vsucc(X37)
& vplus(X37,vsucc(X38)) = vsucc(vplus(X37,X38)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],['qu(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 3), and(holds(definiens(29), 45, 0), holds(definiens(29), 44, 0)))']) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X29,X30] : vplus(X30,X29) = vplus(X29,X30),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],['ass(cond(61, 0), 0)']) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X34,X35,X36] : vplus(vplus(X34,X35),X36) = vplus(X34,vplus(X35,X36)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],['ass(cond(33, 0), 0)']) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
vplus(vmul(vd411,vd413),vplus(vd413,vsucc(vd411))) != vplus(vmul(vd411,vd413),vplus(vsucc(vd411),vd413)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
vplus(X1,v1) = vsucc(X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
vplus(X1,X2) = vplus(X2,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
vplus(vplus(X1,X2),X3) = vplus(X1,vplus(X2,X3)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
vplus(vmul(vd411,vd413),vplus(vd413,vplus(vd411,v1))) != vplus(vmul(vd411,vd413),vplus(vplus(vd411,v1),vd413)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
vplus(X1,X2) = vplus(X2,X1),
c_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
vplus(vplus(X1,X2),X3) = vplus(X1,vplus(X2,X3)),
c_0_13 ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(ar,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15,c_0_16]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : NUM844+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 03:13:24 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.43 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.11/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 4106249 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.11/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.11/0.43 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.11/0.43 % Search class: FGUSM-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.43 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 4106256 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.11/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.11/0.43 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.11/0.43 % Search class: FGUSM-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.43 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.43 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.11/0.43 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.11/0.43
% 0.11/0.43 % Proof found!
% 0.11/0.43 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.11/0.43 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.11/0.43 % Parsed axioms : 20
% 0.11/0.43 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Initial clauses : 22
% 0.11/0.43 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.11/0.43 % Initial clauses in saturation : 20
% 0.11/0.43 % Processed clauses : 5
% 0.11/0.43 % ...of these trivial : 2
% 0.11/0.43 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % ...remaining for further processing : 2
% 0.11/0.43 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Generated clauses : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % NegExts : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Total rewrite steps : 2
% 0.11/0.43 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.43 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.43 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.43 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.43 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.43 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.43 % Current number of processed clauses : 2
% 0.11/0.43 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.11/0.43 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 15
% 0.11/0.43 % ...number of literals in the above : 19
% 0.11/0.43 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.11/0.43 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.11/0.43 % Termbank termtop insertions : 978
% 0.11/0.43 % Search garbage collected termcells : 55
% 0.11/0.43
% 0.11/0.43 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.43 % User time : 0.003 s
% 0.11/0.43 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.11/0.43 % Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.11/0.43 % Maximum resident set size: 3344 pages
% 0.11/0.43
% 0.11/0.43 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.43 % User time : 0.009 s
% 0.11/0.43 % System time : 0.008 s
% 0.11/0.43 % Total time : 0.017 s
% 0.11/0.43 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.11/0.43 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------