↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : NUM847+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:50:49 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 0.43s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (  18 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   18 (  17 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    4 (   4   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   28 (   0 sgn  14   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof('holds(286, 441, 3)',conjecture,
    vplus(vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vd439)),vd436) = vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(vmul(vd436,vd439),vd436)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','holds(286, 441, 3)') ).

fof('ass(cond(270, 0), 0)',axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : vmul(X1,X2) = vmul(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','ass(cond(270, 0), 0)') ).

fof('ass(cond(61, 0), 0)',axiom,
    ! [X71,X72] : vplus(X72,X71) = vplus(X71,X72),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','ass(cond(61, 0), 0)') ).

fof('ass(cond(33, 0), 0)',axiom,
    ! [X76,X77,X78] : vplus(vplus(X76,X77),X78) = vplus(X76,vplus(X77,X78)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','ass(cond(33, 0), 0)') ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    vplus(vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vd439)),vd436) != vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(vmul(vd436,vd439),vd436)),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],['holds(286, 441, 3)']) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    vplus(vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vd439)),vd436) != vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(vmul(vd436,vd439),vd436)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X88,X89] : vmul(X88,X89) = vmul(X89,X88),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],['ass(cond(270, 0), 0)']) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X192,X193] : vplus(X193,X192) = vplus(X192,X193),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],['ass(cond(61, 0), 0)']) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X197,X198,X199] : vplus(vplus(X197,X198),X199) = vplus(X197,vplus(X198,X199)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],['ass(cond(33, 0), 0)']) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    vplus(vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vd439)),vd436) != vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(vmul(vd436,vd439),vd436)),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    vmul(X1,X2) = vmul(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    vplus(X1,X2) = vplus(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    vplus(vplus(X1,X2),X3) = vplus(X1,vplus(X2,X3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    vplus(vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vd439)),vd436) != vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(vmul(vd436,vd439),vd436)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    vmul(X1,X2) = vmul(X2,X1),
    c_0_10 ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    vplus(X1,X2) = vplus(X2,X1),
    c_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    vplus(vplus(X1,X2),X3) = vplus(X1,vplus(X2,X3)),
    c_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(ar,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14,c_0_15,c_0_16]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : NUM847+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 03:13:54 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.43  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.14/0.43  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.43  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.43  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.43  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 22167 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.43  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.14/0.43  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.43  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.43  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.43  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.14/0.43  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.43  % Search class: FGHSM-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.43  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/0.43  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43  % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43  % new_bool_3 with pid 22178 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.43  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.14/0.43  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.43  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.43  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.43  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.14/0.43  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.43  % Search class: FGHSM-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.43  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/0.43  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43  % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.14/0.43  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.14/0.43  
% 0.14/0.43  % Proof found!
% 0.14/0.43  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.14/0.43  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.43  % Parsed axioms                        : 56
% 0.14/0.43  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.14/0.43  % Initial clauses                      : 66
% 0.14/0.43  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 3
% 0.14/0.43  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 63
% 0.14/0.43  % Processed clauses                    : 2
% 0.14/0.43  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.14/0.43  % ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.14/0.43  % ...remaining for further processing  : 1
% 0.14/0.43  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.14/0.43  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.14/0.43  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.14/0.43  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.14/0.43  % Generated clauses                    : 0
% 0.14/0.43  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.14/0.43  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.14/0.43  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.14/0.43  % Paramodulations                      : 0
% 0.14/0.43  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.14/0.43  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.14/0.43  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.14/0.43  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.14/0.43  % Total rewrite steps                  : 0
% 0.14/0.43  % ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.14/0.43  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.14/0.43  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.14/0.43  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.43  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.14/0.43  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.43  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.14/0.43  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.14/0.43  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.14/0.43  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.14/0.43  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.14/0.43  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.14/0.43  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.14/0.43  % Current number of processed clauses  : 1
% 0.14/0.43  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1
% 0.14/0.43  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.43  %    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.14/0.43  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.14/0.43  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 61
% 0.14/0.43  % ...number of literals in the above   : 114
% 0.14/0.43  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.14/0.43  % Current number of archived clauses   : 1
% 0.14/0.43  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.14/0.43  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.14/0.43  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.14/0.43  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.14/0.43  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.14/0.43  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.14/0.43  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.14/0.43  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.14/0.43  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.14/0.43  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 3698
% 0.14/0.43  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 667
% 0.14/0.43  
% 0.14/0.43  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.43  % User time                : 0.004 s
% 0.14/0.43  % System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.14/0.43  % Total time               : 0.006 s
% 0.14/0.43  % Maximum resident set size: 3668 pages
% 0.14/0.43  
% 0.14/0.43  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.43  % User time                : 0.012 s
% 0.14/0.43  % System time              : 0.013 s
% 0.14/0.43  % Total time               : 0.025 s
% 0.14/0.43  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.14/0.43  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------