↑ Up

Princess---230619.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : NUM847+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 11:50:22 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 9.89s 2.11s
% Output   : Proof 12.95s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : NUM847+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Fri Aug 25 08:13:56 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.60  ________       _____
% 0.19/0.60  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.19/0.60  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.19/0.60  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.19/0.60  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.19/0.60  
% 0.19/0.60  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.19/0.60  (2023-06-19)
% 0.19/0.60  
% 0.19/0.60  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.19/0.60  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.19/0.60                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.19/0.60  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.19/0.60  
% 0.19/0.60  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.19/0.60  
% 0.19/0.60  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.19/0.61  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.19/0.63  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.19/0.63  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.19/0.63  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.19/0.63  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.19/0.63  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.19/0.63  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.19/0.63  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 3.10/1.14  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 3.10/1.14  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 3.48/1.18  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 3.48/1.18  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 3.48/1.18  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 3.48/1.18  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 3.48/1.18  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 8.04/1.83  Prover 1: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 8.04/1.83  Prover 3: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 8.50/1.86  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 8.60/1.88  Prover 6: Proving ...
% 8.60/1.88  Prover 4: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 8.60/1.89  Prover 5: Proving ...
% 8.60/1.89  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 8.98/1.94  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 9.25/1.98  Prover 2: Proving ...
% 9.25/2.00  Prover 0: Proving ...
% 9.89/2.11  Prover 3: proved (1482ms)
% 9.89/2.11  
% 9.89/2.11  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 9.89/2.11  
% 9.89/2.11  Prover 6: stopped
% 9.89/2.12  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 9.89/2.12  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 9.89/2.13  Prover 5: stopped
% 9.89/2.14  Prover 2: stopped
% 9.89/2.15  Prover 0: stopped
% 9.89/2.15  Prover 11: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 9.89/2.15  Prover 10: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 9.89/2.15  Prover 13: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 9.89/2.21  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 9.89/2.21  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 10.59/2.23  Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 10.59/2.24  Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 10.59/2.25  Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 11.79/2.34  Prover 1: Found proof (size 80)
% 11.79/2.34  Prover 1: proved (1715ms)
% 11.79/2.34  Prover 4: stopped
% 11.79/2.35  Prover 11: stopped
% 11.79/2.37  Prover 10: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 11.79/2.38  Prover 7: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 11.79/2.38  Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 11.79/2.39  Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 11.79/2.39  Prover 10: stopped
% 11.79/2.40  Prover 13: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 11.79/2.40  Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 11.79/2.40  Prover 7: stopped
% 12.52/2.42  Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ...
% 12.52/2.42  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 12.52/2.43  Prover 13: stopped
% 12.52/2.43  Prover 8: stopped
% 12.52/2.43  
% 12.52/2.43  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 12.52/2.43  
% 12.52/2.45  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 12.52/2.46  Assumptions after simplification:
% 12.52/2.46  ---------------------------------
% 12.52/2.46  
% 12.52/2.46    (ass(cond(33, 0), 0))
% 12.52/2.49     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: $i] : ( ~
% 12.52/2.49      (vplus(v3, v2) = v4) |  ~ (vplus(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~
% 12.52/2.49      $i(v0) |  ? [v5: $i] : (vplus(v1, v2) = v5 & vplus(v0, v5) = v4 & $i(v5) &
% 12.52/2.49        $i(v4)))
% 12.52/2.49  
% 12.52/2.49    (holds(284, 438, 1))
% 12.52/2.49    $i(vd437) & $i(vd436) &  ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :
% 12.52/2.49    (vsucc(vd437) = v0 & vmul(vd436, v0) = v1 & vmul(vd436, vd437) = v2 &
% 12.52/2.49      vplus(v2, vd436) = v1 & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 12.52/2.49  
% 12.52/2.49    (holds(284, 438, 2))
% 12.52/2.49    $i(v1) & $i(vd437) & $i(vd436) &  ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :
% 12.52/2.49    (vmul(vd436, v1) = v2 & vmul(vd436, vd437) = v0 & vplus(v0, v2) = v1 &
% 12.52/2.49      vplus(v0, vd436) = v1 & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 12.52/2.49  
% 12.52/2.49    (holds(285, 440, 0))
% 12.95/2.49    $i(vd439) & $i(vd437) & $i(vd436) &  ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] : 
% 12.95/2.49    ? [v3: $i] : (vmul(vd436, v0) = v1 & vmul(vd436, vd439) = v3 & vmul(vd436,
% 12.95/2.49        vd437) = v2 & vplus(v2, v3) = v1 & vplus(vd437, vd439) = v0 & $i(v3) &
% 12.95/2.49      $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 12.95/2.49  
% 12.95/2.49    (holds(286, 441, 0))
% 12.95/2.50    $i(vd439) & $i(vd437) & $i(vd436) &  ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] : 
% 12.95/2.50    ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: $i] : (vsucc(v3) = v4 & vsucc(vd439) = v0 & vmul(vd436,
% 12.95/2.50        v4) = v2 & vmul(vd436, v1) = v2 & vplus(vd437, v0) = v1 & vplus(vd437,
% 12.95/2.50        vd439) = v3 & $i(v4) & $i(v3) & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 12.95/2.50  
% 12.95/2.50    (holds(286, 441, 1))
% 12.95/2.50    $i(vd439) & $i(vd437) & $i(vd436) &  ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] : 
% 12.95/2.50    ? [v3: $i] : (vsucc(v0) = v1 & vmul(vd436, v1) = v2 & vmul(vd436, v0) = v3 &
% 12.95/2.50      vplus(v3, vd436) = v2 & vplus(vd437, vd439) = v0 & $i(v3) & $i(v2) & $i(v1)
% 12.95/2.50      & $i(v0))
% 12.95/2.50  
% 12.95/2.50    (holds(286, 441, 2))
% 12.95/2.50    $i(vd439) & $i(vd437) & $i(vd436) &  ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] : 
% 12.95/2.50    ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: $i] :  ? [v5: $i] : (vmul(vd436, v0) = v1 & vmul(vd436,
% 12.95/2.50        vd439) = v4 & vmul(vd436, vd437) = v3 & vplus(v5, vd436) = v2 & vplus(v3,
% 12.95/2.50        v4) = v5 & vplus(v1, vd436) = v2 & vplus(vd437, vd439) = v0 & $i(v5) &
% 12.95/2.50      $i(v4) & $i(v3) & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 12.95/2.50  
% 12.95/2.50    (holds(286, 441, 3))
% 12.95/2.50    $i(vd439) & $i(vd437) & $i(vd436) &  ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] : 
% 12.95/2.50    ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: $i] :  ? [v5: $i] : ( ~ (v5 = v3) & vmul(vd436, vd439) =
% 12.95/2.50      v1 & vmul(vd436, vd437) = v0 & vplus(v2, vd436) = v3 & vplus(v1, vd436) = v4
% 12.95/2.50      & vplus(v0, v4) = v5 & vplus(v0, v1) = v2 & $i(v5) & $i(v4) & $i(v3) &
% 12.95/2.50      $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 12.95/2.50  
% 12.95/2.50    (function-axioms)
% 12.95/2.51     ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  !
% 12.95/2.51    [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (geq(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (geq(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0:
% 12.95/2.51      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i]
% 12.95/2.51    : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (greater(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (greater(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0:
% 12.95/2.51      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i]
% 12.95/2.51    : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (less(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (less(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0:
% 12.95/2.51      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i]
% 12.95/2.51    : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (leq(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (leq(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  !
% 12.95/2.51    [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (vmul(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~
% 12.95/2.51      (vmul(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i]
% 12.95/2.51    : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (vplus(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (vplus(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i]
% 12.95/2.51    :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (vskolem2(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 12.95/2.51      (vskolem2(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 | 
% 12.95/2.51      ~ (vsucc(v2) = v1) |  ~ (vsucc(v2) = v0))
% 12.95/2.51  
% 12.95/2.51  Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 12.95/2.51  --------------------------------------------
% 12.95/2.51  ass(cond(12, 0), 0), ass(cond(140, 0), 0), ass(cond(147, 0), 0), ass(cond(158,
% 12.95/2.51      0), 0), ass(cond(163, 0), 0), ass(cond(168, 0), 0), ass(cond(184, 0), 0),
% 12.95/2.51  ass(cond(189, 0), 0), ass(cond(20, 0), 0), ass(cond(209, 0), 0), ass(cond(223,
% 12.95/2.51      0), 0), ass(cond(228, 0), 0), ass(cond(234, 0), 0), ass(cond(241, 0), 0),
% 12.95/2.51  ass(cond(253, 0), 0), ass(cond(261, 0), 0), ass(cond(270, 0), 0), ass(cond(43,
% 12.95/2.51      0), 0), ass(cond(52, 0), 0), ass(cond(6, 0), 0), ass(cond(61, 0), 0),
% 12.95/2.51  ass(cond(73, 0), 0), ass(cond(81, 0), 0), ass(cond(goal(130), 0), 0),
% 12.95/2.51  ass(cond(goal(130), 0), 1), ass(cond(goal(130), 0), 2), ass(cond(goal(130), 0),
% 12.95/2.51    3), ass(cond(goal(177), 0), 0), ass(cond(goal(193), 0), 0),
% 12.95/2.51  ass(cond(goal(193), 0), 1), ass(cond(goal(193), 0), 2), ass(cond(goal(202), 0),
% 12.95/2.51    0), ass(cond(goal(202), 0), 1), ass(cond(goal(202), 0), 2),
% 12.95/2.51  ass(cond(goal(216), 0), 0), ass(cond(goal(88), 0), 0), ass(cond(goal(88), 0),
% 12.95/2.51    1), ass(cond(goal(88), 0), 2), ass(cond(goal(88), 0), 3),
% 12.95/2.51  def(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 11), 1), def(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 12), 1),
% 12.95/2.51  def(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 16), 1), def(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 17), 1),
% 12.95/2.51  holds(284, 438, 0), qu(antec(axiom(3)), imp(antec(axiom(3)))),
% 12.95/2.51  qu(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 3), and(holds(definiens(29), 45, 0),
% 12.95/2.51      holds(definiens(29), 44, 0))), qu(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 32),
% 12.95/2.51    and(holds(definiens(249), 399, 0), holds(definiens(249), 398, 0))),
% 12.95/2.51  qu(restrictor(axiom(1)), holds(scope(axiom(1)), 2, 0))
% 12.95/2.51  
% 12.95/2.51  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 12.95/2.51  ---------------------------------
% 12.95/2.51  
% 12.95/2.51  Begin of proof
% 12.95/2.51  | 
% 12.95/2.51  | ALPHA: (holds(286, 441, 2)) implies:
% 12.95/2.51  |   (1)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: $i] : 
% 12.95/2.51  |        ? [v5: $i] : (vmul(vd436, v0) = v1 & vmul(vd436, vd439) = v4 &
% 12.95/2.51  |          vmul(vd436, vd437) = v3 & vplus(v5, vd436) = v2 & vplus(v3, v4) = v5
% 12.95/2.51  |          & vplus(v1, vd436) = v2 & vplus(vd437, vd439) = v0 & $i(v5) & $i(v4)
% 12.95/2.51  |          & $i(v3) & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 12.95/2.51  | 
% 12.95/2.51  | ALPHA: (holds(286, 441, 1)) implies:
% 12.95/2.51  |   (2)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: $i] : (vsucc(v0) = v1
% 12.95/2.51  |          & vmul(vd436, v1) = v2 & vmul(vd436, v0) = v3 & vplus(v3, vd436) = v2
% 12.95/2.51  |          & vplus(vd437, vd439) = v0 & $i(v3) & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 12.95/2.51  | 
% 12.95/2.51  | ALPHA: (holds(286, 441, 0)) implies:
% 12.95/2.52  |   (3)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: $i] :
% 12.95/2.52  |        (vsucc(v3) = v4 & vsucc(vd439) = v0 & vmul(vd436, v4) = v2 &
% 12.95/2.52  |          vmul(vd436, v1) = v2 & vplus(vd437, v0) = v1 & vplus(vd437, vd439) =
% 12.95/2.52  |          v3 & $i(v4) & $i(v3) & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 12.95/2.52  | 
% 12.95/2.52  | ALPHA: (holds(285, 440, 0)) implies:
% 12.95/2.52  |   (4)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: $i] : (vmul(vd436,
% 12.95/2.52  |            v0) = v1 & vmul(vd436, vd439) = v3 & vmul(vd436, vd437) = v2 &
% 12.95/2.52  |          vplus(v2, v3) = v1 & vplus(vd437, vd439) = v0 & $i(v3) & $i(v2) &
% 12.95/2.52  |          $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 12.95/2.52  | 
% 12.95/2.52  | ALPHA: (holds(284, 438, 2)) implies:
% 12.95/2.52  |   (5)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] : (vmul(vd436, v1) = v2 &
% 12.95/2.52  |          vmul(vd436, vd437) = v0 & vplus(v0, v2) = v1 & vplus(v0, vd436) = v1
% 12.95/2.52  |          & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 12.95/2.52  | 
% 12.95/2.52  | ALPHA: (holds(284, 438, 1)) implies:
% 12.95/2.52  |   (6)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] : (vsucc(vd437) = v0 &
% 12.95/2.52  |          vmul(vd436, v0) = v1 & vmul(vd436, vd437) = v2 & vplus(v2, vd436) =
% 12.95/2.52  |          v1 & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 12.95/2.52  | 
% 12.95/2.52  | ALPHA: (holds(286, 441, 3)) implies:
% 12.95/2.52  |   (7)  $i(vd436)
% 12.95/2.52  |   (8)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: $i] : 
% 12.95/2.52  |        ? [v5: $i] : ( ~ (v5 = v3) & vmul(vd436, vd439) = v1 & vmul(vd436,
% 12.95/2.52  |            vd437) = v0 & vplus(v2, vd436) = v3 & vplus(v1, vd436) = v4 &
% 12.95/2.52  |          vplus(v0, v4) = v5 & vplus(v0, v1) = v2 & $i(v5) & $i(v4) & $i(v3) &
% 12.95/2.52  |          $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 12.95/2.52  | 
% 12.95/2.52  | ALPHA: (function-axioms) implies:
% 12.95/2.52  |   (9)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 12.95/2.52  |          (vplus(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (vplus(v3, v2) = v0))
% 12.95/2.52  |   (10)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 12.95/2.52  |           (vmul(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (vmul(v3, v2) = v0))
% 12.95/2.52  | 
% 12.95/2.52  | DELTA: instantiating (6) with fresh symbols all_53_0, all_53_1, all_53_2
% 12.95/2.52  |        gives:
% 12.95/2.52  |   (11)  vsucc(vd437) = all_53_2 & vmul(vd436, all_53_2) = all_53_1 &
% 12.95/2.52  |         vmul(vd436, vd437) = all_53_0 & vplus(all_53_0, vd436) = all_53_1 &
% 12.95/2.52  |         $i(all_53_0) & $i(all_53_1) & $i(all_53_2)
% 12.95/2.52  | 
% 12.95/2.52  | ALPHA: (11) implies:
% 12.95/2.52  |   (12)  vmul(vd436, vd437) = all_53_0
% 12.95/2.52  | 
% 12.95/2.52  | DELTA: instantiating (5) with fresh symbols all_55_0, all_55_1, all_55_2
% 12.95/2.52  |        gives:
% 12.95/2.52  |   (13)  vmul(vd436, v1) = all_55_0 & vmul(vd436, vd437) = all_55_2 &
% 12.95/2.52  |         vplus(all_55_2, all_55_0) = all_55_1 & vplus(all_55_2, vd436) =
% 12.95/2.52  |         all_55_1 & $i(all_55_0) & $i(all_55_1) & $i(all_55_2)
% 12.95/2.52  | 
% 12.95/2.52  | ALPHA: (13) implies:
% 12.95/2.52  |   (14)  $i(all_55_2)
% 12.95/2.52  |   (15)  vmul(vd436, vd437) = all_55_2
% 12.95/2.52  | 
% 12.95/2.52  | DELTA: instantiating (4) with fresh symbols all_61_0, all_61_1, all_61_2,
% 12.95/2.52  |        all_61_3 gives:
% 12.95/2.53  |   (16)  vmul(vd436, all_61_3) = all_61_2 & vmul(vd436, vd439) = all_61_0 &
% 12.95/2.53  |         vmul(vd436, vd437) = all_61_1 & vplus(all_61_1, all_61_0) = all_61_2 &
% 12.95/2.53  |         vplus(vd437, vd439) = all_61_3 & $i(all_61_0) & $i(all_61_1) &
% 12.95/2.53  |         $i(all_61_2) & $i(all_61_3)
% 12.95/2.53  | 
% 12.95/2.53  | ALPHA: (16) implies:
% 12.95/2.53  |   (17)  vplus(vd437, vd439) = all_61_3
% 12.95/2.53  |   (18)  vplus(all_61_1, all_61_0) = all_61_2
% 12.95/2.53  |   (19)  vmul(vd436, vd437) = all_61_1
% 12.95/2.53  |   (20)  vmul(vd436, vd439) = all_61_0
% 12.95/2.53  |   (21)  vmul(vd436, all_61_3) = all_61_2
% 12.95/2.53  | 
% 12.95/2.53  | DELTA: instantiating (2) with fresh symbols all_63_0, all_63_1, all_63_2,
% 12.95/2.53  |        all_63_3 gives:
% 12.95/2.53  |   (22)  vsucc(all_63_3) = all_63_2 & vmul(vd436, all_63_2) = all_63_1 &
% 12.95/2.53  |         vmul(vd436, all_63_3) = all_63_0 & vplus(all_63_0, vd436) = all_63_1 &
% 12.95/2.53  |         vplus(vd437, vd439) = all_63_3 & $i(all_63_0) & $i(all_63_1) &
% 12.95/2.53  |         $i(all_63_2) & $i(all_63_3)
% 12.95/2.53  | 
% 12.95/2.53  | ALPHA: (22) implies:
% 12.95/2.53  |   (23)  vplus(vd437, vd439) = all_63_3
% 12.95/2.53  |   (24)  vplus(all_63_0, vd436) = all_63_1
% 12.95/2.53  |   (25)  vmul(vd436, all_63_3) = all_63_0
% 12.95/2.53  | 
% 12.95/2.53  | DELTA: instantiating (3) with fresh symbols all_65_0, all_65_1, all_65_2,
% 12.95/2.53  |        all_65_3, all_65_4 gives:
% 12.95/2.53  |   (26)  vsucc(all_65_1) = all_65_0 & vsucc(vd439) = all_65_4 & vmul(vd436,
% 12.95/2.53  |           all_65_0) = all_65_2 & vmul(vd436, all_65_3) = all_65_2 &
% 12.95/2.53  |         vplus(vd437, all_65_4) = all_65_3 & vplus(vd437, vd439) = all_65_1 &
% 12.95/2.53  |         $i(all_65_0) & $i(all_65_1) & $i(all_65_2) & $i(all_65_3) &
% 12.95/2.53  |         $i(all_65_4)
% 12.95/2.53  | 
% 12.95/2.53  | ALPHA: (26) implies:
% 12.95/2.53  |   (27)  vplus(vd437, vd439) = all_65_1
% 12.95/2.53  | 
% 12.95/2.53  | DELTA: instantiating (8) with fresh symbols all_67_0, all_67_1, all_67_2,
% 12.95/2.53  |        all_67_3, all_67_4, all_67_5 gives:
% 12.95/2.53  |   (28)   ~ (all_67_0 = all_67_2) & vmul(vd436, vd439) = all_67_4 & vmul(vd436,
% 12.95/2.53  |           vd437) = all_67_5 & vplus(all_67_3, vd436) = all_67_2 &
% 12.95/2.53  |         vplus(all_67_4, vd436) = all_67_1 & vplus(all_67_5, all_67_1) =
% 12.95/2.53  |         all_67_0 & vplus(all_67_5, all_67_4) = all_67_3 & $i(all_67_0) &
% 12.95/2.53  |         $i(all_67_1) & $i(all_67_2) & $i(all_67_3) & $i(all_67_4) &
% 12.95/2.53  |         $i(all_67_5)
% 12.95/2.53  | 
% 12.95/2.53  | ALPHA: (28) implies:
% 12.95/2.53  |   (29)   ~ (all_67_0 = all_67_2)
% 12.95/2.53  |   (30)  $i(all_67_4)
% 12.95/2.53  |   (31)  vplus(all_67_5, all_67_4) = all_67_3
% 12.95/2.53  |   (32)  vplus(all_67_5, all_67_1) = all_67_0
% 12.95/2.53  |   (33)  vplus(all_67_4, vd436) = all_67_1
% 12.95/2.53  |   (34)  vplus(all_67_3, vd436) = all_67_2
% 12.95/2.53  |   (35)  vmul(vd436, vd437) = all_67_5
% 12.95/2.53  |   (36)  vmul(vd436, vd439) = all_67_4
% 12.95/2.53  | 
% 12.95/2.53  | DELTA: instantiating (1) with fresh symbols all_69_0, all_69_1, all_69_2,
% 12.95/2.53  |        all_69_3, all_69_4, all_69_5 gives:
% 12.95/2.53  |   (37)  vmul(vd436, all_69_5) = all_69_4 & vmul(vd436, vd439) = all_69_1 &
% 12.95/2.53  |         vmul(vd436, vd437) = all_69_2 & vplus(all_69_0, vd436) = all_69_3 &
% 12.95/2.53  |         vplus(all_69_2, all_69_1) = all_69_0 & vplus(all_69_4, vd436) =
% 12.95/2.53  |         all_69_3 & vplus(vd437, vd439) = all_69_5 & $i(all_69_0) &
% 12.95/2.53  |         $i(all_69_1) & $i(all_69_2) & $i(all_69_3) & $i(all_69_4) &
% 12.95/2.53  |         $i(all_69_5)
% 12.95/2.53  | 
% 12.95/2.53  | ALPHA: (37) implies:
% 12.95/2.53  |   (38)  vplus(vd437, vd439) = all_69_5
% 12.95/2.53  |   (39)  vplus(all_69_4, vd436) = all_69_3
% 12.95/2.53  |   (40)  vplus(all_69_2, all_69_1) = all_69_0
% 12.95/2.53  |   (41)  vmul(vd436, vd437) = all_69_2
% 12.95/2.53  |   (42)  vmul(vd436, vd439) = all_69_1
% 12.95/2.53  |   (43)  vmul(vd436, all_69_5) = all_69_4
% 12.95/2.53  | 
% 12.95/2.53  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (9) with all_61_3, all_65_1, vd439, vd437,
% 12.95/2.53  |              simplifying with (17), (27) gives:
% 12.95/2.53  |   (44)  all_65_1 = all_61_3
% 12.95/2.53  | 
% 12.95/2.53  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (9) with all_65_1, all_69_5, vd439, vd437,
% 12.95/2.53  |              simplifying with (27), (38) gives:
% 12.95/2.54  |   (45)  all_69_5 = all_65_1
% 12.95/2.54  | 
% 12.95/2.54  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (9) with all_63_3, all_69_5, vd439, vd437,
% 12.95/2.54  |              simplifying with (23), (38) gives:
% 12.95/2.54  |   (46)  all_69_5 = all_63_3
% 12.95/2.54  | 
% 12.95/2.54  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (10) with all_53_0, all_61_1, vd437, vd436,
% 12.95/2.54  |              simplifying with (12), (19) gives:
% 12.95/2.54  |   (47)  all_61_1 = all_53_0
% 12.95/2.54  | 
% 12.95/2.54  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (10) with all_61_1, all_67_5, vd437, vd436,
% 12.95/2.54  |              simplifying with (19), (35) gives:
% 12.95/2.54  |   (48)  all_67_5 = all_61_1
% 12.95/2.54  | 
% 12.95/2.54  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (10) with all_67_5, all_69_2, vd437, vd436,
% 12.95/2.54  |              simplifying with (35), (41) gives:
% 12.95/2.54  |   (49)  all_69_2 = all_67_5
% 12.95/2.54  | 
% 12.95/2.54  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (10) with all_55_2, all_69_2, vd437, vd436,
% 12.95/2.54  |              simplifying with (15), (41) gives:
% 12.95/2.54  |   (50)  all_69_2 = all_55_2
% 12.95/2.54  | 
% 12.95/2.54  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (10) with all_67_4, all_69_1, vd439, vd436,
% 12.95/2.54  |              simplifying with (36), (42) gives:
% 12.95/2.54  |   (51)  all_69_1 = all_67_4
% 12.95/2.54  | 
% 12.95/2.54  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (10) with all_61_0, all_69_1, vd439, vd436,
% 12.95/2.54  |              simplifying with (20), (42) gives:
% 12.95/2.54  |   (52)  all_69_1 = all_61_0
% 12.95/2.54  | 
% 12.95/2.54  | COMBINE_EQS: (51), (52) imply:
% 12.95/2.54  |   (53)  all_67_4 = all_61_0
% 12.95/2.54  | 
% 12.95/2.54  | COMBINE_EQS: (49), (50) imply:
% 12.95/2.54  |   (54)  all_67_5 = all_55_2
% 12.95/2.54  | 
% 12.95/2.54  | SIMP: (54) implies:
% 12.95/2.54  |   (55)  all_67_5 = all_55_2
% 12.95/2.54  | 
% 12.95/2.54  | COMBINE_EQS: (45), (46) imply:
% 12.95/2.54  |   (56)  all_65_1 = all_63_3
% 12.95/2.54  | 
% 12.95/2.54  | SIMP: (56) implies:
% 12.95/2.54  |   (57)  all_65_1 = all_63_3
% 12.95/2.54  | 
% 12.95/2.54  | COMBINE_EQS: (48), (55) imply:
% 12.95/2.54  |   (58)  all_61_1 = all_55_2
% 12.95/2.54  | 
% 12.95/2.54  | SIMP: (58) implies:
% 12.95/2.54  |   (59)  all_61_1 = all_55_2
% 12.95/2.54  | 
% 12.95/2.54  | COMBINE_EQS: (44), (57) imply:
% 12.95/2.54  |   (60)  all_63_3 = all_61_3
% 12.95/2.54  | 
% 12.95/2.54  | COMBINE_EQS: (47), (59) imply:
% 12.95/2.54  |   (61)  all_55_2 = all_53_0
% 12.95/2.54  | 
% 12.95/2.54  | COMBINE_EQS: (55), (61) imply:
% 12.95/2.54  |   (62)  all_67_5 = all_53_0
% 12.95/2.54  | 
% 12.95/2.54  | COMBINE_EQS: (46), (60) imply:
% 12.95/2.54  |   (63)  all_69_5 = all_61_3
% 12.95/2.54  | 
% 12.95/2.54  | COMBINE_EQS: (50), (61) imply:
% 12.95/2.54  |   (64)  all_69_2 = all_53_0
% 12.95/2.54  | 
% 12.95/2.54  | REDUCE: (43), (63) imply:
% 12.95/2.54  |   (65)  vmul(vd436, all_61_3) = all_69_4
% 12.95/2.54  | 
% 12.95/2.54  | REDUCE: (25), (60) imply:
% 12.95/2.54  |   (66)  vmul(vd436, all_61_3) = all_63_0
% 12.95/2.54  | 
% 12.95/2.54  | REDUCE: (40), (52), (64) imply:
% 12.95/2.54  |   (67)  vplus(all_53_0, all_61_0) = all_69_0
% 12.95/2.54  | 
% 12.95/2.54  | REDUCE: (33), (53) imply:
% 12.95/2.54  |   (68)  vplus(all_61_0, vd436) = all_67_1
% 12.95/2.54  | 
% 12.95/2.54  | REDUCE: (32), (62) imply:
% 12.95/2.54  |   (69)  vplus(all_53_0, all_67_1) = all_67_0
% 12.95/2.54  | 
% 12.95/2.54  | REDUCE: (31), (53), (62) imply:
% 12.95/2.54  |   (70)  vplus(all_53_0, all_61_0) = all_67_3
% 12.95/2.54  | 
% 12.95/2.54  | REDUCE: (18), (47) imply:
% 12.95/2.54  |   (71)  vplus(all_53_0, all_61_0) = all_61_2
% 12.95/2.54  | 
% 12.95/2.54  | REDUCE: (30), (53) imply:
% 12.95/2.54  |   (72)  $i(all_61_0)
% 12.95/2.54  | 
% 12.95/2.54  | REDUCE: (14), (61) imply:
% 12.95/2.54  |   (73)  $i(all_53_0)
% 12.95/2.54  | 
% 12.95/2.54  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (9) with all_67_3, all_69_0, all_61_0, all_53_0,
% 12.95/2.54  |              simplifying with (67), (70) gives:
% 12.95/2.54  |   (74)  all_69_0 = all_67_3
% 12.95/2.54  | 
% 12.95/2.54  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (9) with all_61_2, all_69_0, all_61_0, all_53_0,
% 12.95/2.54  |              simplifying with (67), (71) gives:
% 12.95/2.54  |   (75)  all_69_0 = all_61_2
% 12.95/2.54  | 
% 12.95/2.54  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (10) with all_61_2, all_69_4, all_61_3, vd436,
% 12.95/2.54  |              simplifying with (21), (65) gives:
% 12.95/2.54  |   (76)  all_69_4 = all_61_2
% 12.95/2.54  | 
% 12.95/2.54  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (10) with all_63_0, all_69_4, all_61_3, vd436,
% 12.95/2.54  |              simplifying with (65), (66) gives:
% 12.95/2.54  |   (77)  all_69_4 = all_63_0
% 12.95/2.55  | 
% 12.95/2.55  | COMBINE_EQS: (74), (75) imply:
% 12.95/2.55  |   (78)  all_67_3 = all_61_2
% 12.95/2.55  | 
% 12.95/2.55  | SIMP: (78) implies:
% 12.95/2.55  |   (79)  all_67_3 = all_61_2
% 12.95/2.55  | 
% 12.95/2.55  | COMBINE_EQS: (76), (77) imply:
% 12.95/2.55  |   (80)  all_63_0 = all_61_2
% 12.95/2.55  | 
% 12.95/2.55  | REDUCE: (39), (76) imply:
% 12.95/2.55  |   (81)  vplus(all_61_2, vd436) = all_69_3
% 12.95/2.55  | 
% 12.95/2.55  | REDUCE: (34), (79) imply:
% 12.95/2.55  |   (82)  vplus(all_61_2, vd436) = all_67_2
% 12.95/2.55  | 
% 12.95/2.55  | REDUCE: (24), (80) imply:
% 12.95/2.55  |   (83)  vplus(all_61_2, vd436) = all_63_1
% 12.95/2.55  | 
% 12.95/2.55  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (9) with all_67_2, all_69_3, vd436, all_61_2,
% 12.95/2.55  |              simplifying with (81), (82) gives:
% 12.95/2.55  |   (84)  all_69_3 = all_67_2
% 12.95/2.55  | 
% 12.95/2.55  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (9) with all_63_1, all_69_3, vd436, all_61_2,
% 12.95/2.55  |              simplifying with (81), (83) gives:
% 12.95/2.55  |   (85)  all_69_3 = all_63_1
% 12.95/2.55  | 
% 12.95/2.55  | COMBINE_EQS: (84), (85) imply:
% 12.95/2.55  |   (86)  all_67_2 = all_63_1
% 12.95/2.55  | 
% 12.95/2.55  | SIMP: (86) implies:
% 12.95/2.55  |   (87)  all_67_2 = all_63_1
% 12.95/2.55  | 
% 12.95/2.55  | REDUCE: (29), (87) imply:
% 12.95/2.55  |   (88)   ~ (all_67_0 = all_63_1)
% 12.95/2.55  | 
% 12.95/2.55  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (ass(cond(33, 0), 0)) with all_53_0, all_61_0,
% 12.95/2.55  |              vd436, all_61_2, all_63_1, simplifying with (7), (71), (72),
% 12.95/2.55  |              (73), (83) gives:
% 12.95/2.55  |   (89)   ? [v0: $i] : (vplus(all_61_0, vd436) = v0 & vplus(all_53_0, v0) =
% 12.95/2.55  |           all_63_1 & $i(v0) & $i(all_63_1))
% 12.95/2.55  | 
% 12.95/2.55  | DELTA: instantiating (89) with fresh symbol all_91_0 gives:
% 12.95/2.55  |   (90)  vplus(all_61_0, vd436) = all_91_0 & vplus(all_53_0, all_91_0) =
% 12.95/2.55  |         all_63_1 & $i(all_91_0) & $i(all_63_1)
% 12.95/2.55  | 
% 12.95/2.55  | ALPHA: (90) implies:
% 12.95/2.55  |   (91)  vplus(all_53_0, all_91_0) = all_63_1
% 12.95/2.55  |   (92)  vplus(all_61_0, vd436) = all_91_0
% 12.95/2.55  | 
% 12.95/2.55  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (9) with all_67_1, all_91_0, vd436, all_61_0,
% 12.95/2.55  |              simplifying with (68), (92) gives:
% 12.95/2.55  |   (93)  all_91_0 = all_67_1
% 12.95/2.55  | 
% 12.95/2.55  | REDUCE: (91), (93) imply:
% 12.95/2.55  |   (94)  vplus(all_53_0, all_67_1) = all_63_1
% 12.95/2.55  | 
% 12.95/2.55  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (9) with all_67_0, all_63_1, all_67_1, all_53_0,
% 12.95/2.55  |              simplifying with (69), (94) gives:
% 12.95/2.55  |   (95)  all_67_0 = all_63_1
% 12.95/2.55  | 
% 12.95/2.55  | REDUCE: (88), (95) imply:
% 12.95/2.55  |   (96)  $false
% 12.95/2.55  | 
% 12.95/2.55  | CLOSE: (96) is inconsistent.
% 12.95/2.55  | 
% 12.95/2.55  End of proof
% 12.95/2.55  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 12.95/2.55  
% 12.95/2.55  1952ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------