↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : NUM847+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 12:26:44 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.11s 0.48s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.11s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.08  % Problem    : NUM847+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.07/0.26  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.26  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.26  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.26  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.07/0.26  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.07/0.26  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.07/0.26  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.07/0.26  % DateTime   : Sun Jun 23 04:03:08 EDT 2024
% 0.07/0.26  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.11/0.45  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.11/0.48  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.48  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.11/0.48  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.11/0.48  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.11/0.48  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.11/0.48  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.11/0.48  
% 0.11/0.48  % Result      :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.11/0.48  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.11/0.48  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.48  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.48  % File     : NUM847+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.11/0.48  % Domain   : Number Theory
% 0.11/0.48  % Problem  : holds(286,441,3)
% 0.11/0.48  % Version  : Especial: Reduced > Especial.
% 0.11/0.48  % English  :
% 0.11/0.48  
% 0.11/0.48  % Refs     : [Lan30] Landau (1930), Grundlagen der Analysis
% 0.11/0.48  %          : [Kue09] Kuehlwein (2009), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.11/0.48  %          : [KC+10] Kuehlwein et al. (2010), Premise Selection in the Napr
% 0.11/0.48  % Source   : [Kue09]
% 0.11/0.48  % Names    :
% 0.11/0.48  
% 0.11/0.48  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.11/0.48  % Rating   : 0.11 v8.1.0, 0.17 v7.5.0, 0.19 v7.4.0, 0.17 v7.1.0, 0.26 v7.0.0, 0.17 v6.4.0, 0.23 v6.3.0, 0.25 v6.2.0, 0.28 v6.1.0, 0.40 v6.0.0, 0.35 v5.5.0, 0.22 v5.4.0, 0.25 v5.3.0, 0.33 v5.2.0, 0.20 v5.1.0, 0.19 v5.0.0, 0.17 v4.1.0
% 0.11/0.48  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   19 (  14 unt;   0 def)
% 0.11/0.48  %            Number of atoms       :   24 (  20 equ)
% 0.11/0.48  %            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.11/0.48  %            Number of connectives :    7 (   2   ~;   0   |;   2   &)
% 0.11/0.48  %                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.11/0.48  %            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
% 0.11/0.48  %            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
% 0.11/0.48  %            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 0.11/0.48  %            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.11/0.48  %            Number of variables   :   19 (  19   !;   0   ?)
% 0.11/0.48  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ
% 0.11/0.48  
% 0.11/0.48  % Comments : From the Landau in Naproche 0.45 collection.
% 0.11/0.48  %          : This version uses a filtered set of axioms.
% 0.11/0.48  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.48  fof('holds(286, 441, 3)',conjecture,
% 0.11/0.48      vplus(vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vd439)),vd436) = vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(vmul(vd436,vd439),vd436)) ).
% 0.11/0.48  
% 0.11/0.48  fof('holds(286, 441, 2)',axiom,
% 0.11/0.48      vplus(vmul(vd436,vplus(vd437,vd439)),vd436) = vplus(vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vd439)),vd436) ).
% 0.11/0.48  
% 0.11/0.48  fof('holds(286, 441, 1)',axiom,
% 0.11/0.48      vmul(vd436,vsucc(vplus(vd437,vd439))) = vplus(vmul(vd436,vplus(vd437,vd439)),vd436) ).
% 0.11/0.48  
% 0.11/0.48  fof('holds(286, 441, 0)',axiom,
% 0.11/0.48      vmul(vd436,vplus(vd437,vsucc(vd439))) = vmul(vd436,vsucc(vplus(vd437,vd439))) ).
% 0.11/0.48  
% 0.11/0.48  fof('holds(285, 440, 0)',axiom,
% 0.11/0.48      vmul(vd436,vplus(vd437,vd439)) = vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vd439)) ).
% 0.11/0.48  
% 0.11/0.48  fof('holds(284, 438, 2)',axiom,
% 0.11/0.48      vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vd436) = vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,v1)) ).
% 0.11/0.48  
% 0.11/0.48  fof('holds(284, 438, 1)',axiom,
% 0.11/0.48      vmul(vd436,vsucc(vd437)) = vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vd436) ).
% 0.11/0.48  
% 0.11/0.48  fof('holds(284, 438, 0)',axiom,
% 0.11/0.48      vmul(vd436,vplus(vd437,v1)) = vmul(vd436,vsucc(vd437)) ).
% 0.11/0.48  
% 0.11/0.48  fof('ass(cond(253, 0), 0)',axiom,
% 0.11/0.48      ! [Vd400] : vmul(v1,Vd400) = Vd400 ).
% 0.11/0.48  
% 0.11/0.48  fof('qu(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 32), and(holds(definiens(249), 399, 0), holds(definiens(249), 398, 0)))',axiom,
% 0.11/0.48      ! [Vd396,Vd397] :
% 0.11/0.48        ( vmul(Vd396,vsucc(Vd397)) = vplus(vmul(Vd396,Vd397),Vd396)
% 0.11/0.48        & vmul(Vd396,v1) = Vd396 ) ).
% 0.11/0.48  
% 0.11/0.48  fof('ass(cond(241, 0), 0)',axiom,
% 0.11/0.48      ! [Vd386,Vd387] :
% 0.11/0.48        ( less(Vd386,vplus(Vd387,v1))
% 0.11/0.48       => leq(Vd386,Vd387) ) ).
% 0.11/0.48  
% 0.11/0.48  fof('ass(cond(234, 0), 0)',axiom,
% 0.11/0.48      ! [Vd375,Vd376] :
% 0.11/0.48        ( greater(Vd375,Vd376)
% 0.11/0.48       => geq(Vd375,vplus(Vd376,v1)) ) ).
% 0.11/0.48  
% 0.11/0.48  fof('ass(cond(61, 0), 0)',axiom,
% 0.11/0.48      ! [Vd78,Vd79] : vplus(Vd79,Vd78) = vplus(Vd78,Vd79) ).
% 0.11/0.48  
% 0.11/0.48  fof('ass(cond(52, 0), 0)',axiom,
% 0.11/0.48      ! [Vd68,Vd69] : vplus(vsucc(Vd68),Vd69) = vsucc(vplus(Vd68,Vd69)) ).
% 0.11/0.48  
% 0.11/0.48  fof('ass(cond(43, 0), 0)',axiom,
% 0.11/0.48      ! [Vd59] : vplus(v1,Vd59) = vsucc(Vd59) ).
% 0.11/0.48  
% 0.11/0.48  fof('ass(cond(33, 0), 0)',axiom,
% 0.11/0.48      ! [Vd46,Vd47,Vd48] : vplus(vplus(Vd46,Vd47),Vd48) = vplus(Vd46,vplus(Vd47,Vd48)) ).
% 0.11/0.48  
% 0.11/0.48  fof('qu(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 3), and(holds(definiens(29), 45, 0), holds(definiens(29), 44, 0)))',axiom,
% 0.11/0.48      ! [Vd42,Vd43] :
% 0.11/0.48        ( vplus(Vd42,vsucc(Vd43)) = vsucc(vplus(Vd42,Vd43))
% 0.11/0.48        & vplus(Vd42,v1) = vsucc(Vd42) ) ).
% 0.11/0.48  
% 0.11/0.48  fof('ass(cond(20, 0), 0)',axiom,
% 0.11/0.48      ! [Vd24] :
% 0.11/0.48        ( Vd24 != v1
% 0.11/0.48       => Vd24 = vsucc(vskolem2(Vd24)) ) ).
% 0.11/0.48  
% 0.11/0.48  fof('ass(cond(12, 0), 0)',axiom,
% 0.11/0.48      ! [Vd16] : vsucc(Vd16) != Vd16 ).
% 0.11/0.48  
% 0.11/0.48  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.48  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.48  % Proof found
% 0.11/0.48  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.11/0.48  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.11/0.48  %ClaNum:35(EqnAxiom:16)
% 0.11/0.48  %VarNum:36(SingletonVarNum:17)
% 0.11/0.48  %MaxLitNum:2
% 0.11/0.48  %MaxfuncDepth:3
% 0.11/0.48  %SharedTerms:30
% 0.11/0.48  %goalClause: 32
% 0.11/0.48  %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 0.11/0.48  [26]E(f6(f2(a3,a4),f2(a3,a5)),f2(a3,f6(a4,a5)))
% 0.11/0.48  [27]E(f6(f2(a3,a4),f2(a3,a1)),f6(f2(a3,a4),a3))
% 0.11/0.48  [28]E(f2(a3,f6(f6(a4,a5),a1)),f2(a3,f6(a4,f6(a5,a1))))
% 0.11/0.48  [30]E(f6(f6(f2(a3,a4),f2(a3,a5)),a3),f6(f2(a3,f6(a4,a5)),a3))
% 0.11/0.48  [32]~E(f6(f6(f2(a3,a4),f2(a3,a5)),a3),f6(f2(a3,a4),f6(f2(a3,a5),a3)))
% 0.11/0.48  [17]E(f2(x171,a1),x171)
% 0.11/0.48  [18]E(f2(a1,x181),x181)
% 0.11/0.48  [31]~E(f6(x311,a1),x311)
% 0.11/0.48  [20]E(f6(x201,x202),f6(x202,x201))
% 0.11/0.48  [23]E(f6(f6(x231,a1),x232),f6(f6(x231,x232),a1))
% 0.11/0.48  [24]E(f6(f2(x241,x242),x241),f2(x241,f6(x242,a1)))
% 0.11/0.48  [25]E(f6(f6(x251,x252),x253),f6(x251,f6(x252,x253)))
% 0.11/0.48  [33]E(x331,a1)+E(f6(f7(x331),a1),x331)
% 0.11/0.48  [34]~P2(x341,x342)+P1(x341,f6(x342,a1))
% 0.11/0.48  [35]P3(x351,x352)+~P4(x351,f6(x352,a1))
% 0.11/0.48  %EqnAxiom
% 0.11/0.48  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.11/0.48  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.11/0.48  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.11/0.48  [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f2(x41,x43),f2(x42,x43))
% 0.11/0.48  [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f2(x53,x51),f2(x53,x52))
% 0.11/0.48  [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f6(x61,x63),f6(x62,x63))
% 0.11/0.48  [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f6(x73,x71),f6(x73,x72))
% 0.11/0.48  [8]~E(x81,x82)+E(f7(x81),f7(x82))
% 0.11/0.48  [9]P1(x92,x93)+~E(x91,x92)+~P1(x91,x93)
% 0.11/0.48  [10]P1(x103,x102)+~E(x101,x102)+~P1(x103,x101)
% 0.11/0.48  [11]P2(x112,x113)+~E(x111,x112)+~P2(x111,x113)
% 0.11/0.48  [12]P2(x123,x122)+~E(x121,x122)+~P2(x123,x121)
% 0.11/0.48  [13]P3(x132,x133)+~E(x131,x132)+~P3(x131,x133)
% 0.11/0.48  [14]P3(x143,x142)+~E(x141,x142)+~P3(x143,x141)
% 0.11/0.48  [15]P4(x152,x153)+~E(x151,x152)+~P4(x151,x153)
% 0.11/0.48  [16]P4(x163,x162)+~E(x161,x162)+~P4(x163,x161)
% 0.11/0.48  
% 0.11/0.48  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.48  cnf(36,plain,
% 0.11/0.48     ($false),
% 0.11/0.48     inference(scs_inference,[],[32,25]),
% 0.11/0.48     ['proof']).
% 0.11/0.48  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.11/0.48  % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------