↑ Up

Etableau---0.67.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : NUM848+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 09:46:08 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.12s 0.35s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (  14 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   22 (  21 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    9 (   5   ~;   0   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   21 (   0 sgn  12   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof('holds(286, 441, 4)',conjecture,
    vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(vmul(vd436,vd439),vd436)) = vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vsucc(vd439))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','holds(286, 441, 4)') ).

fof('qu(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 3), and(holds(definiens(29), 45, 0), holds(definiens(29), 44, 0)))',axiom,
    ! [X13,X14] :
      ( vplus(X13,vsucc(X14)) = vsucc(vplus(X13,X14))
      & vplus(X13,v1) = vsucc(X13) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','qu(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 3), and(holds(definiens(29), 45, 0), holds(definiens(29), 44, 0)))') ).

fof('qu(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 32), and(holds(definiens(249), 399, 0), holds(definiens(249), 398, 0)))',axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( vmul(X1,vsucc(X2)) = vplus(vmul(X1,X2),X1)
      & vmul(X1,v1) = X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','qu(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 32), and(holds(definiens(249), 399, 0), holds(definiens(249), 398, 0)))') ).

fof('ass(cond(61, 0), 0)',axiom,
    ! [X5,X6] : vplus(X6,X5) = vplus(X5,X6),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','ass(cond(61, 0), 0)') ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(vmul(vd436,vd439),vd436)) != vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vsucc(vd439))),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],['holds(286, 441, 4)']) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(vmul(vd436,vd439),vd436)) != vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vsucc(vd439))),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X28,X29] :
      ( vplus(X28,vsucc(X29)) = vsucc(vplus(X28,X29))
      & vplus(X28,v1) = vsucc(X28) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],['qu(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 3), and(holds(definiens(29), 45, 0), holds(definiens(29), 44, 0)))']) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X16,X17] :
      ( vmul(X16,vsucc(X17)) = vplus(vmul(X16,X17),X16)
      & vmul(X16,v1) = X16 ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],['qu(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 32), and(holds(definiens(249), 399, 0), holds(definiens(249), 398, 0)))']) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(vmul(vd436,vd439),vd436)) != vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vsucc(vd439))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    vplus(X1,v1) = vsucc(X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X20,X21] : vplus(X21,X20) = vplus(X20,X21),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],['ass(cond(61, 0), 0)']) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    vmul(X1,vsucc(X2)) = vplus(vmul(X1,X2),X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(vmul(vd436,vd439),vd436)) != vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vplus(vd439,v1))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    vplus(X1,X2) = vplus(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    vmul(X1,vplus(X2,v1)) = vplus(vmul(X1,X2),X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vplus(vd439,v1))) != vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(vd436,vmul(vd436,vd439))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    vmul(X1,vplus(X2,v1)) = vplus(X1,vmul(X1,X2)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : NUM848+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul  6 14:57:58 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.35  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.35  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.12/0.35  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.12/0.35  #
% 0.12/0.35  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  # Proof found!
% 0.12/0.35  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.12/0.35  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.35  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------