↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : NUM848+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:10:10 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 4.44s 2.60s
% Output   : Refutation 4.44s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   34 (  26 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   42 (  37 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  307 (   4   ~;   0   |;   4   &; 295   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   12 (  10 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   30 (   0   ^;  30   !;   0   ?;  30   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(vplus_decl,type,
    vplus: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(vmul_decl,type,
    vmul: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(vd436_decl,type,
    vd436: $i ).

thf(vd437_decl,type,
    vd437: $i ).

thf(vd439_decl,type,
    vd439: $i ).

thf(vsucc_decl,type,
    vsucc: $i > $i ).

thf(less_decl,type,
    less: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(v1_decl,type,
    v1: $i ).

thf(leq_decl,type,
    leq: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(vskolem2_decl,type,
    vskolem2: $i > $i ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ( ( vd436 @ ( vd439 @ ( vd436 @ vmul ) @ ( vd437 @ ( vd436 @ vmul ) @ vplus ) @ vplus ) )
    = ( vd436 @ ( vd439 @ ( vd436 @ vmul ) @ vplus ) @ ( vd437 @ ( vd436 @ vmul ) @ vplus ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','holds(286, 441, 3)') ).

thf(25,plain,
    ( ( vd436 @ ( vd439 @ ( vd436 @ vmul ) @ ( vd437 @ ( vd436 @ vmul ) @ vplus ) @ vplus ) )
    = ( vd436 @ ( vd439 @ ( vd436 @ vmul ) @ vplus ) @ ( vd437 @ ( vd436 @ vmul ) @ vplus ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(16,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ vsucc @ vplus ) )
      = ( B @ ( A @ vplus ) @ vsucc ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','ass(cond(52, 0), 0)') ).

thf(61,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ vsucc @ vplus ) )
      = ( B @ ( A @ vplus ) @ vsucc ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[16]) ).

thf(9,axiom,
    ( ( vd436 @ ( vd439 @ ( vd437 @ vplus ) @ ( vd436 @ vmul ) @ vplus ) )
    = ( vd436 @ ( vd439 @ ( vd436 @ vmul ) @ ( vd437 @ ( vd436 @ vmul ) @ vplus ) @ vplus ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','holds(286, 441, 2)') ).

thf(33,plain,
    ( ( vd436 @ ( vd439 @ ( vd437 @ vplus ) @ ( vd436 @ vmul ) @ vplus ) )
    = ( vd436 @ ( vd439 @ ( vd436 @ vmul ) @ ( vd437 @ ( vd436 @ vmul ) @ vplus ) @ vplus ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(17,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( v1 @ vplus ) )
      = ( A @ vsucc ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','ass(cond(43, 0), 0)') ).

thf(64,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( v1 @ vplus ) )
      = ( A @ vsucc ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[17]) ).

thf(10,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( v1 @ ( A @ vplus ) )
        = ( A @ vsucc ) )
      & ( ( B @ vsucc @ ( A @ vplus ) )
        = ( B @ ( A @ vplus ) @ vsucc ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','qu(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 3), and(holds(definiens(29), 45, 0), holds(definiens(29), 44, 0)))') ).

thf(35,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( v1 @ ( A @ vplus ) )
        = ( A @ vsucc ) )
      & ( ( B @ vsucc @ ( A @ vplus ) )
        = ( B @ ( A @ vplus ) @ vsucc ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(8,axiom,
    ( ( vd439 @ vsucc @ ( vd437 @ vplus ) @ ( vd436 @ vmul ) )
    = ( vd439 @ ( vd437 @ vplus ) @ vsucc @ ( vd436 @ vmul ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','holds(286, 441, 0)') ).

thf(31,plain,
    ( ( vd439 @ vsucc @ ( vd437 @ vplus ) @ ( vd436 @ vmul ) )
    = ( vd439 @ ( vd437 @ vplus ) @ vsucc @ ( vd436 @ vmul ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(11,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ vplus ) @ vplus ) )
      = ( C @ ( B @ vplus ) @ ( A @ vplus ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','ass(cond(33, 0), 0)') ).

thf(43,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ vplus ) @ vplus ) )
      = ( C @ ( B @ vplus ) @ ( A @ vplus ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( v1 @ ( B @ vplus ) @ ( A @ less ) )
     => ( B @ ( A @ leq ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','ass(cond(241, 0), 0)') ).

thf(23,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( v1 @ ( B @ vplus ) @ ( A @ less ) )
     => ( B @ ( A @ leq ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(14,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( v1 @ ( A @ vmul ) )
        = A )
      & ( ( B @ vsucc @ ( A @ vmul ) )
        = ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ vmul ) @ vplus ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','qu(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 32), and(holds(definiens(249), 399, 0), holds(definiens(249), 398, 0)))') ).

thf(51,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( v1 @ ( A @ vmul ) )
        = A )
      & ( ( B @ vsucc @ ( A @ vmul ) )
        = ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ vmul ) @ vplus ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[14]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( B @ vplus ) )
      = ( B @ ( A @ vplus ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','ass(cond(61, 0), 0)') ).

thf(20,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( B @ vplus ) )
      = ( B @ ( A @ vplus ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(12,axiom,
    ( ( vd436 @ ( vd437 @ ( vd436 @ vmul ) @ vplus ) )
    = ( v1 @ ( vd436 @ vmul ) @ ( vd437 @ ( vd436 @ vmul ) @ vplus ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','holds(284, 438, 2)') ).

thf(46,plain,
    ( ( vd436 @ ( vd437 @ ( vd436 @ vmul ) @ vplus ) )
    = ( v1 @ ( vd436 @ vmul ) @ ( vd437 @ ( vd436 @ vmul ) @ vplus ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(7,axiom,
    ( ( vd437 @ vsucc @ ( vd436 @ vmul ) )
    = ( vd436 @ ( vd437 @ ( vd436 @ vmul ) @ vplus ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','holds(284, 438, 1)') ).

thf(29,plain,
    ( ( vd437 @ vsucc @ ( vd436 @ vmul ) )
    = ( vd436 @ ( vd437 @ ( vd436 @ vmul ) @ vplus ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(15,axiom,
    ( ( vd439 @ ( vd437 @ vplus ) @ vsucc @ ( vd436 @ vmul ) )
    = ( vd436 @ ( vd439 @ ( vd437 @ vplus ) @ ( vd436 @ vmul ) @ vplus ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','holds(286, 441, 1)') ).

thf(59,plain,
    ( ( vd439 @ ( vd437 @ vplus ) @ vsucc @ ( vd436 @ vmul ) )
    = ( vd436 @ ( vd439 @ ( vd437 @ vplus ) @ ( vd436 @ vmul ) @ vplus ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ( ( vd439 @ ( vd437 @ vplus ) @ ( vd436 @ vmul ) )
    = ( vd439 @ ( vd436 @ vmul ) @ ( vd437 @ ( vd436 @ vmul ) @ vplus ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','holds(285, 440, 0)') ).

thf(27,plain,
    ( ( vd439 @ ( vd437 @ vplus ) @ ( vd436 @ vmul ) )
    = ( vd439 @ ( vd436 @ vmul ) @ ( vd437 @ ( vd436 @ vmul ) @ vplus ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(13,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A != v1 )
     => ( A
        = ( A @ vskolem2 @ vsucc ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','ass(cond(20, 0), 0)') ).

thf(48,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A != v1 )
     => ( A
        = ( A @ vskolem2 @ vsucc ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ( ( vd436 @ ( vd439 @ ( vd436 @ vmul ) @ vplus ) @ ( vd437 @ ( vd436 @ vmul ) @ vplus ) )
    = ( vd439 @ vsucc @ ( vd436 @ vmul ) @ ( vd437 @ ( vd436 @ vmul ) @ vplus ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','holds(286, 441, 4)') ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( vd436 @ ( vd439 @ ( vd436 @ vmul ) @ vplus ) @ ( vd437 @ ( vd436 @ vmul ) @ vplus ) )
   != ( vd439 @ vsucc @ ( vd436 @ vmul ) @ ( vd437 @ ( vd436 @ vmul ) @ vplus ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(18,plain,
    ( ( vd436 @ ( vd439 @ ( vd436 @ vmul ) @ vplus ) @ ( vd437 @ ( vd436 @ vmul ) @ vplus ) )
   != ( vd439 @ vsucc @ ( vd436 @ vmul ) @ ( vd437 @ ( vd436 @ vmul ) @ vplus ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(73,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[25,61,33,64,35,31,43,23,51,20,46,29,59,27,48,18]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : NUM848+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.13/0.40  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.40  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.40  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.40  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.40  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.40  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.40  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.40  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 04:12:59 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.41  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.41  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.86/0.98  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.29/1.18  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (201ms). 
% 1.45/1.20  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.12/1.60  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.12/1.61  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.30/1.71  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 15 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.30/1.78  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 15 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.49/1.82  % [INFO] 	 Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF). 
% 2.49/1.82  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.49/1.83  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 4.09/2.60  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 4.09/2.60  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 4.44/2.60  % Time passed: 2052ms (effective reasoning time: 1391ms)
% 4.44/2.60  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 4.44/2.60  % Axioms used in derivation (15): qu(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 32), and(holds(definiens(249), 399, 0), holds(definiens(249), 398, 0))), holds(286, 441, 1), qu(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 3), and(holds(definiens(29), 45, 0), holds(definiens(29), 44, 0))), ass(cond(20, 0), 0), holds(285, 440, 0), ass(cond(33, 0), 0), ass(cond(61, 0), 0), ass(cond(241, 0), 0), ass(cond(43, 0), 0), holds(284, 438, 1), holds(286, 441, 3), holds(286, 441, 2), holds(284, 438, 2), holds(286, 441, 0), ass(cond(52, 0), 0)
% 4.44/2.60  % No. of inferences in proof: 34
% 4.44/2.60  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2052 ms resp. 1391 ms w/o parsing
% 4.44/2.66  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.44/2.66  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------