↑ Up

LisaST---0.9.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : LisaST---0.9
% Problem  : NUM848+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:13:57 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 14.54s 2.26s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 14.54s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : NUM848+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.34  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.34  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.34  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 04:13:15 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.34  Running casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 14.54/2.26  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 14.54/2.26  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 14.54/2.26  fof(qu(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 32), and(holds(definiens(249), 399, 0), holds(definiens(249), 398, 0))), axiom, ! [X0] : ! [X1] : ((vmul(X0,vsucc(X1)) = vplus(vmul(X0,X1),X0) & vmul(X0,v1) = X0))).
% 14.54/2.26  fof(ass(cond(61, 0), 0), axiom, ! [X0] : ! [X1] : vplus(X1,X0) = vplus(X0,X1)).
% 14.54/2.26  fof(holds(286, 441, 4), conjecture, vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(vmul(vd436,vd439),vd436)) = vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vsucc(vd439)))).
% 14.54/2.26  fof(negated_conjecture, negated_conjecture, vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(vmul(vd436,vd439),vd436)) != vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vsucc(vd439))), inference(negate_conjecture, [status(cth)], [holds(286, 441, 4)])).
% 14.54/2.26  cnf(c7, plain, vmul(X0,vsucc(X1)) = vplus(vmul(X0,X1),X0), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [qu(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 32), and(holds(definiens(249), 399, 0), holds(definiens(249), 398, 0)))])).
% 14.54/2.26  cnf(c10, plain, vplus(X0,X1) = vplus(X1,X0), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [ass(cond(61, 0), 0)])).
% 14.54/2.27  cnf(c17, plain, vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(vmul(vd436,vd439),vd436)) != vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vsucc(vd439))), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [negated_conjecture])).
% 14.54/2.27  cnf(d0, plain, vmul(X0,vsucc(X1)) = vplus(X0,vmul(X0,X1)), inference(demodulation, [status(thm)], [c7,c10])).
% 14.54/2.27  cnf(d1, plain, vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(vd436,vmul(vd436,vd439))) != vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vsucc(vd439))), inference(demodulation, [status(thm)], [c17,c10])).
% 14.54/2.27  cnf(d2, plain, vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vsucc(vd439))) != vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vsucc(vd439))), inference(demodulation, [status(thm)], [d1,d0])).
% 14.54/2.27  cnf(d3, plain, $false, inference(equality_resolution, [status(thm)], [d2])).
% 14.54/2.27  % SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------