↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : NUM848+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:18:12 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.17s 0.46s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   24 (  22 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   26 (  25 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   10 (   8   ~;   0   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   17 (   0 sgn   6   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof('qu(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 32), and(holds(definiens(249), 399, 0), holds(definiens(249), 398, 0)))',axiom,
    ! [Vd396,Vd397] :
      ( vmul(Vd396,v1) = Vd396
      & vmul(Vd396,vsucc(Vd397)) = vplus(vmul(Vd396,Vd397),Vd396) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p','qu(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 32), and(holds(definiens(249), 399, 0), holds(definiens(249), 398, 0)))') ).

fof('ass(cond(61, 0), 0)',axiom,
    ! [Vd78,Vd79] : vplus(Vd79,Vd78) = vplus(Vd78,Vd79),
    file('theBenchmark.p','ass(cond(61, 0), 0)') ).

fof('qu(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 3), and(holds(definiens(29), 45, 0), holds(definiens(29), 44, 0)))',axiom,
    ! [Vd42,Vd43] :
      ( vplus(Vd42,v1) = vsucc(Vd42)
      & vplus(Vd42,vsucc(Vd43)) = vsucc(vplus(Vd42,Vd43)) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p','qu(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 3), and(holds(definiens(29), 45, 0), holds(definiens(29), 44, 0)))') ).

fof('holds(286, 441, 4)',conjecture,
    vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(vmul(vd436,vd439),vd436)) = vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vsucc(vd439))),
    file('theBenchmark.p','holds(286, 441, 4)') ).

fof('holds(286, 441, 4)_neg',negated_conjecture,
    vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(vmul(vd436,vd439),vd436)) != vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vsucc(vd439))),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],['holds(286, 441, 4)']) ).

cnf(c_10,negated_conjecture,
    vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(vmul(vd436,vd439),vd436)) != vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vsucc(vd439))),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],['holds(286, 441, 4)_neg']) ).

cnf(c_11,negated_conjecture,
    vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vsucc(vd439))) != vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(vmul(vd436,vd439),vd436)),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_10]) ).

cnf(c_14,plain,
    vsucc(A) = vplus(A,v1),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],['qu(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 3), and(holds(definiens(29), 45, 0), holds(definiens(29), 44, 0)))']) ).

cnf(c_22,plain,
    vplus(A,B) = vplus(B,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],['ass(cond(61, 0), 0)']) ).

cnf(c_24,plain,
    vplus(vmul(A,B),A) = vmul(A,vsucc(B)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],['qu(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 32), and(holds(definiens(249), 399, 0), holds(definiens(249), 398, 0)))']) ).

cnf(c_37,plain,
    vplus(A,vmul(A,B)) = vmul(A,vsucc(B)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_22,c_24]) ).

cnf(c_38,plain,
    vplus(A,vmul(A,B)) = vmul(A,vplus(B,v1)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_14,c_37]) ).

cnf(c_25,plain,
    vmul(A,vplus(B,v1)) = vplus(A,vmul(A,B)),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_38]) ).

fof('holds(286, 441, 3)',axiom,
    vplus(vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vd439)),vd436) = vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(vmul(vd436,vd439),vd436)),
    file('theBenchmark.p','holds(286, 441, 3)') ).

cnf(c_33,plain,
    vplus(vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vd439)),vd436) = vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(vmul(vd436,vd439),vd436)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],['holds(286, 441, 3)']) ).

cnf(c_39,plain,
    vplus(vd436,vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vd439))) = vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(vmul(vd436,vd439),vd436)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_22,c_33]) ).

cnf(c_40,plain,
    vplus(vd436,vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vd439))) = vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(vd436,vmul(vd436,vd439))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_22,c_39]) ).

cnf(c_34,plain,
    vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(vd436,vmul(vd436,vd439))) = vplus(vd436,vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vd439))),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_40]) ).

cnf(c_41,negated_conjecture,
    vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vplus(vd439,v1))) != vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(vmul(vd436,vd439),vd436)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_14,c_11]) ).

cnf(c_42,negated_conjecture,
    vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(vd436,vmul(vd436,vd439))) != vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(vmul(vd436,vd439),vd436)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_25,c_41]) ).

cnf(c_43,negated_conjecture,
    vplus(vd436,vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vd439))) != vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(vmul(vd436,vd439),vd436)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_34,c_42]) ).

cnf(c_44,negated_conjecture,
    vplus(vd436,vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vd439))) != vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(vd436,vmul(vd436,vd439))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_22,c_43]) ).

cnf(c_45,negated_conjecture,
    vplus(vd436,vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vd439))) != vplus(vd436,vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vd439))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_34,c_44]) ).

cnf(c_36,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_45]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : NUM848+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.44  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.44  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.44  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.44  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.17/0.44  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.17/0.44  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.44  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.44  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 04:12:47 UTC 2026
% 0.17/0.45  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.45  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.17/0.45  % Process 1171006 was started by sandbox on n005,
% 0.17/0.45  % Sat Sep 26 04:12:47 2026
% 0.17/0.45  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.17/0.45  
% 0.17/0.45  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.17/0.46  
% 0.17/0.46  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.17/0.46  
% 0.17/0.46  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.17/0.46  % Length of proof is 13.
% 0.17/0.46  % Level of proof is 3.
% 0.17/0.46  % Maximum clause weight is 19.000.
% 0.17/0.46  % Given clauses 0.
% 0.17/0.46  
% 0.17/0.46  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------