↑ Up

hopCoP---0.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : hopCoP---0.1
% Problem  : NUM850+2 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/execute.py 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 25 12:29:18 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 0.07s 0.26s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.07s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.07  % Problem  : NUM850+2 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.02/0.07  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/execute.py 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.25  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.25  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.25  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.25  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.07/0.25  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.07/0.25  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.25  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.07/0.25  % DateTime : Mon Jul 21 14:15:04 EDT 2025
% 0.07/0.26  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.07/0.26  % launching worker at depth: 6
% 0.07/0.26  % launching worker at depth: 1
% 0.07/0.26  % launching worker at depth: 7
% 0.07/0.26  % launching worker at depth: 2
% 0.07/0.26  % launching worker at depth: 4
% 0.07/0.26  % launching worker at depth: 8
% 0.07/0.26  % launching worker at depth: 3
% 0.07/0.26  % launching worker at depth: 5
% 0.07/0.26  % launching worker at depth: 9
% 0.07/0.26  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.07/0.26  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.07/0.26  fof('qe(conseq_conjunct1(conseq(302)))', plain, ?[Vd473]:vd470=vplus(vd471,Vd473), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', 'qe(conseq_conjunct1(conseq(302)))')).
% 0.07/0.26  fof('qe(conseq_conjunct1(conseq(302)))'_negated, plain, ~(?[Vd473]:vd470=vplus(vd471,Vd473)), inference(negate_conjecture, [status(cth)], ['qe(conseq_conjunct1(conseq(302)))'])).
% 0.07/0.26  cnf(0, plain, vd470 != vplus(vd471,X0), inference(cnf, [status(esa)], ['qe(conseq_conjunct1(conseq(302)))'_negated])).
% 0.07/0.26  cnf(l0, plain, vd470 != vplus(vd471,sK3(vd471,vd470)), inference(instantiation, [status(thm)], [0])).
% 0.07/0.26  fof('def(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 11), 1)', plain, ![Vd193,Vd194]:(greater(Vd194,Vd193)<=>?[Vd196]:Vd194=vplus(Vd193,Vd196)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', 'def(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 11), 1)')).
% 0.07/0.26  cnf(42, plain, ~greater(X0,X1) | X0 = vplus(X1,sK3(X1,X0)), inference(cnf, [status(esa)], ['def(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 11), 1)'])).
% 0.07/0.26  cnf(l1, plain, ~greater(vd470,vd471) | vd470 = vplus(vd471,sK3(vd471,vd470)), inference(instantiation, [status(thm)], [42])).
% 0.07/0.26  fof('holds(antec(302), 472, 0)', plain, greater(vd470,vd471), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', 'holds(antec(302), 472, 0)')).
% 0.07/0.26  cnf(1, plain, greater(vd470,vd471), inference(cnf, [status(esa)], ['holds(antec(302), 472, 0)'])).
% 0.07/0.26  cnf(l2, plain, greater(vd470,vd471), inference(instantiation, [status(thm)], [1])).
% 0.07/0.26  cnf(final, plain, $false, inference(ground_refutation, [status(thm)], [l0, l1, l2])).
% 0.07/0.26  % SZS output end CNFRefutation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------