↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : NUM852+2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 04:58:44 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.15s 1.64s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   24 (  15 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   35 (  14 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   22 (  11   ~;   8   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   43 (   3 sgn  21   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof('def(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 11), 1)',axiom,
    ! [X24,X25] :
      ( greater(X25,X24)
    <=> ? [X26] : X25 = vplus(X24,X26) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','def(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 11), 1)') ).

fof('ass(cond(281, 0), 0)',axiom,
    ! [X8,X9,X10] : vmul(X8,vplus(X9,X10)) = vplus(vmul(X8,X9),vmul(X8,X10)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','ass(cond(281, 0), 0)') ).

fof('ass(cond(302, 0), 2)',axiom,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( greater(X3,X4)
     => vmul(X3,vd469) = vmul(vplus(X4,vskolem9(X3,X4)),vd469) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','ass(cond(302, 0), 2)') ).

fof('ass(cond(270, 0), 0)',axiom,
    ! [X11,X12] : vmul(X11,X12) = vmul(X12,X11),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','ass(cond(270, 0), 0)') ).

fof('holds(conseq_conjunct1(conseq_conjunct2(conseq(304))), 484, 0)',conjecture,
    greater(vmul(vd481,vd469),vmul(vd480,vd469)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','holds(conseq_conjunct1(conseq_conjunct2(conseq(304))), 484, 0)') ).

fof('holds(conseq_conjunct1(conseq(304)), 483, 0)',axiom,
    greater(vd481,vd480),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','holds(conseq_conjunct1(conseq(304)), 483, 0)') ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X103,X104,X106,X107,X108] :
      ( ( ~ greater(X104,X103)
        | X104 = vplus(X103,esk2_2(X103,X104)) )
      & ( X107 != vplus(X106,X108)
        | greater(X107,X106) ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],['def(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 11), 1)'])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( greater(X1,X2)
    | X1 != vplus(X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X78,X79,X80] : vmul(X78,vplus(X79,X80)) = vplus(vmul(X78,X79),vmul(X78,X80)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],['ass(cond(281, 0), 0)']) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X71,X72] :
      ( ~ greater(X71,X72)
      | vmul(X71,vd469) = vmul(vplus(X72,vskolem9(X71,X72)),vd469) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],['ass(cond(302, 0), 2)'])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X81,X82] : vmul(X81,X82) = vmul(X82,X81),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],['ass(cond(270, 0), 0)']) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    greater(vplus(X1,X2),X1),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    vmul(X1,vplus(X2,X3)) = vplus(vmul(X1,X2),vmul(X1,X3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( vmul(X1,vd469) = vmul(vplus(X2,vskolem9(X1,X2)),vd469)
    | ~ greater(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    vmul(X1,X2) = vmul(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

fof(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ~ greater(vmul(vd481,vd469),vmul(vd480,vd469)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],['holds(conseq_conjunct1(conseq_conjunct2(conseq(304))), 484, 0)'])]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    greater(vmul(X1,vplus(X2,X3)),vmul(X1,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( vmul(vd469,vplus(X1,vskolem9(X2,X1))) = vmul(X2,vd469)
    | ~ greater(X2,X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ~ greater(vmul(vd481,vd469),vmul(vd480,vd469)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( greater(vmul(X1,vd469),vmul(vd469,X2))
    | ~ greater(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ~ greater(vmul(vd469,vd481),vmul(vd469,vd480)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_14]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( greater(vmul(vd469,X1),vmul(vd469,X2))
    | ~ greater(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    greater(vd481,vd480),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['holds(conseq_conjunct1(conseq(304)), 483, 0)']) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.07  % Problem    : NUM852+2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.05/0.26  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.05/0.26  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.05/0.26  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.05/0.26  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.05/0.26  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.05/0.26  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.05/0.26  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.05/0.26  % DateTime   : Mon May  4 20:15:57 EDT 2026
% 0.05/0.26  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.05/0.26  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.15/1.64  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.15/1.64  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.15/1.64  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.15/1.64  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.15/1.64  % Total time : 1.361s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------