↑ Up

G4Plus---1.5.2.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : G4Plus---1.5.2
% Problem  : NUM854+2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : g4plus.sh /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 12 07:08:11 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.46s 1.37s
% Output   : Proof 0.46s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : NUM854+2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.12/0.12  % Command  : g4plus.sh /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.16/0.33  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.34  % DateTime : Mon May 11 13:23:59 EDT 2026
% 0.16/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.46/1.37  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.46/1.37  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.46/1.37  
% 0.46/1.37  ===============================================================
% 0.46/1.37  TPTP Problem: holds(conjunct1(315), 514, 0) (conjecture with 26 axiom(s))
% 0.46/1.37    Axioms: [holds(conjunct2(314), 513, 0),holds(conjunct1(314), 510, 0),ass(cond(conjunct2(conjunct2(307)), 0), 0),ass(cond(conjunct1(conjunct2(307)), 0), 0),ass(cond(conjunct1(307), 0), 0),ass(cond(299, 0), 0),ass(cond(299, 0), 1),ass(cond(299, 0), 2),ass(cond(290, 0), 0),ass(cond(281, 0), 0),ass(cond(270, 0), 0),ass(cond(261, 0), 0),ass(cond(253, 0), 0),qu(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 32), and(holds(definiens(249), 399, 0), holds(definiens(249), 398, 0))),ass(cond(147, 0), 0),ass(cond(140, 0), 0),ass(cond(goal(130), 0), 0),ass(cond(goal(130), 0), 1),ass(cond(goal(130), 0), 2),ass(cond(goal(130), 0), 3),def(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 12), 1),def(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 11), 1),ass(cond(goal(88), 0), 0),ass(cond(goal(88), 0), 1),ass(cond(goal(88), 0), 2),ass(cond(goal(88), 0), 3)]
% 0.46/1.37  ===============================================================
% 0.46/1.37  
% 0.46/1.37  Combined formula: 26 axiom(s) => conjecture
% 0.46/1.37  
% 0.46/1.37  % Equality/functions detected -> nanoCoP oracle mode
% 0.46/1.37  nanoCoP : 
% 0.46/1.37  % 18,260 inferences, 0.005 CPU in 0.005 seconds (100% CPU, 3643975 Lips)
% 0.46/1.37  
% 0.46/1.37  % nanoCoP proof (equality/functions)
% 0.46/1.37  % nanoCoP proof is given at https://g4-mic.vidal-rosset.net/wasm/tinker via nanocop_proves(Your_Formula).
% 0.46/1.37  
% 0.46/1.37  % SZS output end Proof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------