%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Princess---230619 % Problem : NUM866_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % Computer : n031.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Thu Aug 31 11:50:31 EDT 2023 % Result : Theorem 2.06s 1.01s % Output : Proof 2.06s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.11/0.12 % Problem : NUM866_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0. % 0.11/0.13 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n031.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Fri Aug 25 11:25:52 EDT 2023 % 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.19/0.61 ________ _____ % 0.19/0.61 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________ % 0.19/0.61 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/ % 0.19/0.61 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ ) % 0.19/0.61 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/ % 0.19/0.61 % 0.19/0.61 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic % 0.19/0.61 (2023-06-19) % 0.19/0.61 % 0.19/0.61 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023 % 0.19/0.61 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen, % 0.19/0.61 Amanda Stjerna. % 0.19/0.61 Free software under BSD-3-Clause. % 0.19/0.61 % 0.19/0.61 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml % 0.19/0.61 % 0.19/0.61 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... % 0.19/0.62 Running up to 7 provers in parallel. % 0.19/0.64 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893 % 0.19/0.64 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994 % 0.19/0.64 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996 % 0.19/0.64 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696 % 0.19/0.64 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423 % 0.19/0.64 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288 % 0.19/0.64 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365 % 1.77/0.94 Prover 4: Preprocessing ... % 1.77/0.94 Prover 1: Preprocessing ... % 2.06/0.97 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ... % 2.06/0.97 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ... % 2.06/0.99 Prover 3: Preprocessing ... % 2.06/0.99 Prover 6: Preprocessing ... % 2.06/0.99 Prover 5: Preprocessing ... % 2.06/0.99 Prover 0: Preprocessing ... % 2.06/0.99 Prover 2: Preprocessing ... % 2.06/1.00 Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ... % 2.06/1.00 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ... % 2.06/1.00 Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ... % 2.06/1.00 Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ... % 2.06/1.00 Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ... % 2.06/1.01 Prover 2: proved (378ms) % 2.06/1.01 Prover 0: proved (378ms) % 2.06/1.01 % 2.06/1.01 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 2.06/1.01 % 2.06/1.01 Prover 6: proved (366ms) % 2.06/1.01 % 2.06/1.01 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 2.06/1.01 % 2.06/1.01 Prover 3: proved (377ms) % 2.06/1.01 % 2.06/1.01 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 2.06/1.01 % 2.06/1.01 % 2.06/1.01 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 2.06/1.01 % 2.06/1.01 Prover 5: proved (367ms) % 2.06/1.01 % 2.06/1.01 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 2.06/1.01 % 2.06/1.01 Prover 1: Found proof (size 1) % 2.06/1.01 Prover 4: Found proof (size 1) % 2.06/1.01 Prover 1: proved (372ms) % 2.06/1.01 Prover 4: proved (374ms) % 2.06/1.01 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470 % 2.06/1.01 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089 % 2.06/1.01 Prover 11: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984 % 2.06/1.02 Prover 13: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443 % 2.06/1.02 Prover 10: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125 % 2.06/1.02 Prover 7: Preprocessing ... % 2.06/1.02 Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ... % 2.06/1.02 Prover 7: stopped % 2.06/1.03 Prover 8: Preprocessing ... % 2.06/1.03 Prover 11: Preprocessing ... % 2.06/1.03 Prover 10: Preprocessing ... % 2.06/1.03 Prover 13: Preprocessing ... % 2.06/1.03 Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ... % 2.06/1.03 Prover 8: stopped % 2.06/1.03 Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ... % 2.06/1.03 Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ... % 2.06/1.03 Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ... % 2.06/1.03 Prover 10: stopped % 2.06/1.03 Prover 13: stopped % 2.06/1.03 Prover 11: stopped % 2.06/1.03 % 2.06/1.03 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 2.06/1.03 % 2.06/1.03 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark % 2.06/1.04 Assumptions after simplification: % 2.06/1.04 --------------------------------- % 2.06/1.04 % 2.06/1.04 (prove_sum_0_identity) % 2.06/1.04 $false % 2.06/1.04 % 2.06/1.04 Those formulas are unsatisfiable: % 2.06/1.04 --------------------------------- % 2.06/1.04 % 2.06/1.04 Begin of proof % 2.06/1.04 | % 2.06/1.04 | CLOSE: (prove_sum_0_identity) is inconsistent. % 2.06/1.04 | % 2.06/1.04 End of proof % 2.06/1.04 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark % 2.06/1.04 % 2.06/1.04 432ms %------------------------------------------------------------------------------