↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : NUM891_1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:27:10 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.40s 1.15s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.40s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   35 (  14 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   63 (  34 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   46 (  18   ~;  23   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   1 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number arithmetic     :  144 (  28 atm;  44 fun;  25 num;  47 var)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr;   1 ari;   0 dat;   0 cdt)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   1 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   47 (   0 sgn  45   !;   2   ?;  47   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(type_def_1,type,
    $bool: $tType ).

tff(func_def_4,type,
    sK0: $int ).

tff(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X0: $int] :
      ( ( X0 = $uminus(X0) )
    <=> ( X0 = 0 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',uminus_equal) ).

tff(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0: $int] :
        ( ( X0 = $uminus(X0) )
      <=> ( X0 = 0 ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

tff(f3,plain,
    ! [X0: $int,X1: $int] : ( $sum(X0,X1) = $sum(X1,X0) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[tha_commutativity]) ).

tff(f4,plain,
    ! [X2: $int,X0: $int,X1: $int] : ( $sum(X0,$sum(X1,X2)) = $sum($sum(X0,X1),X2) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[tha_associativity]) ).

tff(f5,plain,
    ! [X0: $int] : ( $sum(X0,0) = X0 ),
    introduced(definition,[],[tha_right_identity]) ).

tff(f6,plain,
    ! [X0: $int,X1: $int] : ( $uminus($sum(X0,X1)) = $sum($uminus(X1),$uminus(X0)) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[tha_inverse_op_op_inverses]) ).

tff(f7,plain,
    ! [X0: $int] : ( 0 = $sum(X0,$uminus(X0)) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[tha_inverse_op_unit]) ).

tff(f8,plain,
    ! [X0: $int] : ~ $less(X0,X0),
    introduced(definition,[],[tha_non-reflexivity]) ).

tff(f9,plain,
    ! [X2: $int,X0: $int,X1: $int] :
      ( $less(X0,X2)
      | ~ $less(X1,X2)
      | ~ $less(X0,X1) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[tha_transitivity]) ).

tff(f10,plain,
    ! [X0: $int,X1: $int] :
      ( ( X0 = X1 )
      | $less(X1,X0)
      | $less(X0,X1) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[tha_order_totality]) ).

tff(f11,plain,
    ! [X2: $int,X0: $int,X1: $int] :
      ( $less($sum(X0,X2),$sum(X1,X2))
      | ~ $less(X0,X1) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[tha_order_monotonicity]) ).

tff(f12,plain,
    ! [X0: $int,X1: $int] :
      ( $less(X1,$sum(X0,1))
      | $less(X0,X1) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[tha_order_plus_one_dichotomy]) ).

tff(f13,plain,
    ! [X0: $int] : ( $uminus($uminus(X0)) = X0 ),
    introduced(definition,[],[tha_minus_minus_x]) ).

tff(f14,plain,
    ! [X0: $int,X1: $int] :
      ( ~ $less(X1,$sum(X0,1))
      | ~ $less(X0,X1) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[tha_extra_integer_ordering]) ).

tff(f15,plain,
    ? [X0: $int] :
      ( ( X0 = $uminus(X0) )
    <~> ( X0 = 0 ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

tff(f16,plain,
    ? [X0: $int] :
      ( ( ( X0 = $uminus(X0) )
        | ( X0 = 0 ) )
      & ( ( $uminus(X0) != X0 )
        | ( 0 != X0 ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

tff(f17,plain,
    ( ( ( sK0 = $uminus(sK0) )
      | ( 0 = sK0 ) )
    & ( ( sK0 != $uminus(sK0) )
      | ( 0 != sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(X0,sK0)],[f16]) ).

tff(f18,plain,
    ( ( sK0 = $uminus(sK0) )
    | ( 0 = sK0 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

tcf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0_int: $int,X1_int: $int] :
      ( ~ $less(X1_int,X0_int)
      | ~ $less(X0_int,$sum(X1_int,1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

tcf(c_50,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0_int: $int] : $uminus($uminus(X0_int)) = X0_int,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

tcf(c_51,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0_int: $int,X1_int: $int] :
      ( $less(X1_int,X0_int)
      | $less(X0_int,$sum(X1_int,1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

tcf(c_53,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0_int: $int,X1_int: $int] :
      ( $less(X1_int,X0_int)
      | $less(X0_int,X1_int)
      | ( X0_int = X1_int ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

tcf(c_55,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0_int: $int] : ~ $less(X0_int,X0_int),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

tcf(c_56,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0_int: $int] : $sum(X0_int,$uminus(X0_int)) = 0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

tcf(c_58,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0_int: $int] : $sum(X0_int,0) = X0_int,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

tcf(c_60,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0_int: $int,X1_int: $int] : $sum(X0_int,X1_int) = $sum(X1_int,X0_int),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

tcf(c_62,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( sK0 = 0 )
    | ( $uminus(sK0) = sK0 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

tcf(c_63,plain,
    $less(0,1),
    theory(arith) ).

tcf(c_73,plain,
    ! [X0_int: $int,X1_int: $int] :
      ( ~ $less(X0_int,$sum(X1_int,1))
      | ~ $less(X1_int,X0_int) ),
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_49]) ).

tcf(c_74,plain,
    ! [X0_int: $int,X1_int: $int] :
      ( ~ $less(X1_int,X0_int)
      | ~ $less(X0_int,$sum(X1_int,1)) ),
    inference(renaming,[status(thm)],[c_73]) ).

tcf(c_75,plain,
    ! [X0_int: $int,X1_int: $int] :
      ( $less(X0_int,$sum(X1_int,1))
      | $less(X1_int,X0_int) ),
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_51]) ).

tcf(c_76,plain,
    ! [X0_int: $int,X1_int: $int] :
      ( $less(X1_int,X0_int)
      | $less(X0_int,$sum(X1_int,1)) ),
    inference(renaming,[status(thm)],[c_75]) ).

tcf(c_79,plain,
    ( ( $uminus(sK0) = sK0 )
    | ( sK0 = 0 ) ),
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_62]) ).

tcf(c_80,plain,
    ( ( sK0 = 0 )
    | ( $uminus(sK0) = sK0 ) ),
    inference(renaming,[status(thm)],[c_79]) ).

tcf(c_168,plain,
    $false,
    inference(smt_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_63,c_80,c_60,c_58,c_56,c_55,c_53,c_76,c_50,c_74]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : NUM891_1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.35  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 05:42:59 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.36  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.39  Running TFA theorem proving
% 0.09/0.39  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s tfa_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.40  
% 0.09/0.40  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.09/0.40  
% 0.09/0.40  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.09/0.41  % Proving...
% 0.40/1.15  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/1.15  ERROR - "ProverProcess:heur/schedule_none:304.99997901916504" ran with exit code 2 and error: iprover.ml: Unexpected exception: Failure("undefined enum value")
% 0.40/1.15  Fatal error: exception Failure("undefined enum value")
% 0.40/1.15  ERROR - cmd was:  ulimit -v 4023281; ./res/iproveropt --schedule none --sub_typing false --suppress_sat_res true --tptp_safe_out true --stats_out none --out_options none --proof_out true --sat_out_model pos --clausifier res/vclausify_rel --clausifier_options "--mode tclausify   -t 101.67 --show_fool true" --time_out_real 305.00 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 1>> /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/iprover_out_4u96i2u_/choq2n9t 2>> /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/iprover_out_4u96i2u_/choq2n9t_error
% 0.40/1.15  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/1.15  
% 0.40/1.15  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 0.40/1.15  
% 0.40/1.15  % ------  iProver source info
% 0.40/1.15  
% 0.40/1.15  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 0.40/1.15  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 0.40/1.15  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.40/1.15  
% 0.40/1.15  % ------ Parsing...
% 0.40/1.15  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 0.40/1.15  
% 0.40/1.15  % ------ Preprocessing...% 
% 0.40/1.15  
% 0.40/1.15  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/1.15  
% 0.40/1.15  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.40/1.15  
% 0.40/1.15  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------