↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : NUM924+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:50:58 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.12s 0.43s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   30 (  30 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   30 (  19 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    6 (   6   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   13 (  13 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   18 (   1 sgn  12   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(conj_0,conjecture,
    ord_less_int(plus_plus_int(power_power_int(s,number_number_of_nat(bit0(bit1(pls)))),one_one_int),zero_zero_int),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_0) ).

fof(fact_24_number__of__is__id,axiom,
    ! [X11] : number_number_of_int(X11) = X11,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_24_number__of__is__id) ).

fof(fact_105_zero__is__num__zero,axiom,
    zero_zero_int = number_number_of_int(pls),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_105_zero__is__num__zero) ).

fof(fact_3_t,axiom,
    plus_plus_int(power_power_int(s,number_number_of_nat(bit0(bit1(pls)))),one_one_int) = times_times_int(plus_plus_int(times_times_int(number_number_of_int(bit0(bit0(bit1(pls)))),m),one_one_int),t),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_3_t) ).

fof(fact_25_zmult__commute,axiom,
    ! [X12,X10] : times_times_int(X12,X10) = times_times_int(X10,X12),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_25_zmult__commute) ).

fof(fact_104_zadd__commute,axiom,
    ! [X12,X10] : plus_plus_int(X12,X10) = plus_plus_int(X10,X12),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_104_zadd__commute) ).

fof(fact_2__096_I4_A_K_Am_A_L_A1_J_A_K_At_A_060_A_I4_A_K_Am_A_L_A1_J_A_K_A0_096,axiom,
    ord_less_int(times_times_int(plus_plus_int(times_times_int(number_number_of_int(bit0(bit0(bit1(pls)))),m),one_one_int),t),times_times_int(plus_plus_int(times_times_int(number_number_of_int(bit0(bit0(bit1(pls)))),m),one_one_int),zero_zero_int)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_2__096_I4_A_K_Am_A_L_A1_J_A_K_At_A_060_A_I4_A_K_Am_A_L_A1_J_A_K_A0_096) ).

fof(fact_66_mult__Pls,axiom,
    ! [X10] : times_times_int(pls,X10) = pls,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_66_mult__Pls) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ord_less_int(plus_plus_int(power_power_int(s,number_number_of_nat(bit0(bit1(pls)))),one_one_int),zero_zero_int),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0]) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ord_less_int(plus_plus_int(power_power_int(s,number_number_of_nat(bit0(bit1(pls)))),one_one_int),zero_zero_int),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X63] : number_number_of_int(X63) = X63,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_24_number__of__is__id]) ).

fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ord_less_int(plus_plus_int(power_power_int(s,number_number_of_nat(bit0(bit1(pls)))),one_one_int),zero_zero_int),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    zero_zero_int = number_number_of_int(pls),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_105_zero__is__num__zero]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    number_number_of_int(X1) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    plus_plus_int(power_power_int(s,number_number_of_nat(bit0(bit1(pls)))),one_one_int) = times_times_int(plus_plus_int(times_times_int(number_number_of_int(bit0(bit0(bit1(pls)))),m),one_one_int),t),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_3_t]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X64,X65] : times_times_int(X64,X65) = times_times_int(X65,X64),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_25_zmult__commute]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X208,X209] : plus_plus_int(X208,X209) = plus_plus_int(X209,X208),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_104_zadd__commute]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ord_less_int(plus_plus_int(power_power_int(s,number_number_of_nat(bit0(bit1(pls)))),one_one_int),zero_zero_int),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    pls = zero_zero_int,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ord_less_int(times_times_int(plus_plus_int(times_times_int(number_number_of_int(bit0(bit0(bit1(pls)))),m),one_one_int),t),times_times_int(plus_plus_int(times_times_int(number_number_of_int(bit0(bit0(bit1(pls)))),m),one_one_int),zero_zero_int)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_2__096_I4_A_K_Am_A_L_A1_J_A_K_At_A_060_A_I4_A_K_Am_A_L_A1_J_A_K_A0_096]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    plus_plus_int(power_power_int(s,number_number_of_nat(bit0(bit1(pls)))),one_one_int) = times_times_int(plus_plus_int(times_times_int(bit0(bit0(bit1(pls))),m),one_one_int),t),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    times_times_int(X1,X2) = times_times_int(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    plus_plus_int(X1,X2) = plus_plus_int(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

fof(c_0_23,plain,
    ! [X135] : times_times_int(pls,X135) = pls,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_66_mult__Pls]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ord_less_int(plus_plus_int(power_power_int(s,number_number_of_nat(bit0(bit1(pls)))),one_one_int),pls),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ord_less_int(times_times_int(plus_plus_int(times_times_int(bit0(bit0(bit1(pls))),m),one_one_int),t),times_times_int(plus_plus_int(times_times_int(bit0(bit0(bit1(pls))),m),one_one_int),zero_zero_int)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_13]),c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    times_times_int(t,plus_plus_int(one_one_int,times_times_int(m,bit0(bit0(bit1(pls)))))) = plus_plus_int(one_one_int,power_power_int(s,number_number_of_nat(bit0(bit1(pls))))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22]),c_0_21]),c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    times_times_int(pls,X1) = pls,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ord_less_int(plus_plus_int(one_one_int,power_power_int(s,number_number_of_nat(bit0(bit1(pls))))),pls),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_21]),c_0_22]),c_0_21]),c_0_26]),c_0_21]),c_0_22]),c_0_18]),c_0_21]),c_0_27]),c_0_28]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : NUM924+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.35  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 03:16:40 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.35  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.43  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.12/0.43  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.43  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.43  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.43  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43  % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 845387 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.12/0.43  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.43  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.43  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.43  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.12/0.43  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.43  % Search class: FGHSM-FFMM21-DFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.43  % partial match(1): FGHSM-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.43  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.12/0.43  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43  % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43  % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43  % Starting G-E--_208_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43  % G-E--_208_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S04AN with pid 845398 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Result found by G-E--_208_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S04AN
% 0.12/0.43  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.43  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.43  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.43  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.12/0.43  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.43  % Search class: FGHSM-FFMM21-DFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.43  % partial match(1): FGHSM-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.43  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.12/0.43  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43  % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43  % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43  % Starting G-E--_208_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.12/0.43  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.12/0.43  
% 0.12/0.43  % Proof found!
% 0.12/0.43  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.12/0.43  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.43  % Parsed axioms                        : 107
% 0.12/0.43  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Initial clauses                      : 159
% 0.12/0.43  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 22
% 0.12/0.43  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 137
% 0.12/0.43  % Processed clauses                    : 145
% 0.12/0.43  % ...of these trivial                  : 9
% 0.12/0.43  % ...subsumed                          : 15
% 0.12/0.43  % ...remaining for further processing  : 120
% 0.12/0.43  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 11
% 0.12/0.43  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Backward-rewritten                   : 5
% 0.12/0.43  % Generated clauses                    : 7
% 0.12/0.43  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 8
% 0.12/0.43  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.12/0.43  % Paramodulations                      : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Equation resolutions                 : 11
% 0.12/0.43  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Total rewrite steps                  : 103
% 0.12/0.43  % ...of those cached                   : 83
% 0.12/0.43  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.12/0.43  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.12/0.43  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.12/0.43  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.12/0.43  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.12/0.43  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.12/0.43  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.12/0.43  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.12/0.43  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.12/0.43  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.12/0.43  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.12/0.43  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.12/0.43  % Current number of processed clauses  : 108
% 0.12/0.43  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 32
% 0.12/0.43  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% 0.12/0.43  %    Negative unit clauses             : 5
% 0.12/0.43  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 68
% 0.12/0.43  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.12/0.43  % ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Current number of archived clauses   : 6
% 0.12/0.43  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 644
% 0.12/0.43  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 615
% 0.12/0.43  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 14
% 0.12/0.43  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 22
% 0.12/0.43  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 33
% 0.12/0.43  % BW rewrite match successes           : 26
% 0.12/0.43  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 9502
% 0.12/0.43  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 1150
% 0.12/0.43  
% 0.12/0.43  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.43  % User time                : 0.008 s
% 0.12/0.43  % System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.12/0.43  % Total time               : 0.012 s
% 0.12/0.43  % Maximum resident set size: 4020 pages
% 0.12/0.43  
% 0.12/0.43  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.43  % User time                : 0.028 s
% 0.12/0.43  % System time              : 0.023 s
% 0.12/0.43  % Total time               : 0.051 s
% 0.12/0.43  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.12/0.43  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------