↑ Up

SNARK---20120808r022.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : NUM925+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 14:15:16 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.78s 1.00s
% Output   : Refutation 0.78s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   22 (  19 unt;   0 nHn;  14 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   25 (  21 equ;   5 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   17 (  17 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   15 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(6,axiom,
    hBOOL(hAPP_int_bool(hAPP_i1948725293t_bool(ord_less_int,zero_zero_int),hAPP_int_int(plus_plus_int(one_one_int),hAPP_nat_int(semiri1621563631at_int,n)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_0_n1pos) ).

cnf(80,axiom,
    hAPP_int_int(plus_plus_int(X),Y) = hAPP_int_int(plus_plus_int(Y),X),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_67_zadd__commute) ).

cnf(130,axiom,
    pls = zero_zero_int,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_98_Pls__def) ).

cnf(137,axiom,
    number_number_of_int(pls) = zero_zero_int,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_106_semiring__numeral__0__eq__0) ).

cnf(138,plain,
    number_number_of_int(pls) = pls,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[137,130,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(161,axiom,
    bit1(X) = hAPP_int_int(plus_plus_int(hAPP_int_int(plus_plus_int(one_one_int),X)),X),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_128_Bit1__def) ).

cnf(162,plain,
    bit1(X) = hAPP_int_int(plus_plus_int(X),hAPP_int_int(plus_plus_int(one_one_int),X)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[161,80,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(187,axiom,
    number_number_of_int(bit1(X)) = hAPP_int_int(plus_plus_int(hAPP_int_int(plus_plus_int(one_one_int),number_number_of_int(X))),number_number_of_int(X)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_143_number__of__Bit1) ).

cnf(188,plain,
    number_number_of_int(bit1(X)) = bit1(number_number_of_int(X)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[187,162,80,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(191,axiom,
    number_number_of_int(bit1(pls)) = one_one_int,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_145_semiring__numeral__1__eq__1) ).

cnf(192,plain,
    bit1(pls) = one_one_int,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[191,138,188,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(253,axiom,
    number_number_of_int(X) = X,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_176_number__of__is__id) ).

cnf(310,axiom,
    ( X = zero_zero_int
    | hAPP_nat_int(power_power_int(X),Y) != zero_zero_int ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_231_field__power__not__zero) ).

cnf(311,plain,
    ( X = pls
    | hAPP_nat_int(power_power_int(X),Y) != pls ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[310,130,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(491,axiom,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP_int_bool(hAPP_i1948725293t_bool(ord_less_int,X),Y))
    | X != Y ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_447_zless__le) ).

cnf(677,axiom,
    number_number_of_int(succ(X)) = hAPP_int_int(plus_plus_int(one_one_int),number_number_of_int(X)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_583_number__of__succ) ).

cnf(678,plain,
    hAPP_int_int(plus_plus_int(one_one_int),X) = succ(X),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[677,253,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(816,negated_conjecture,
    hAPP_nat_int(power_power_int(hAPP_int_int(plus_plus_int(one_one_int),hAPP_nat_int(semiri1621563631at_int,n))),number_number_of_nat(bit0(bit1(pls)))) = zero_zero_int,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_0) ).

cnf(817,plain,
    hAPP_nat_int(power_power_int(succ(hAPP_nat_int(semiri1621563631at_int,n))),number_number_of_nat(bit0(one_one_int))) = pls,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[816,130,192,678,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(867,plain,
    hBOOL(hAPP_int_bool(hAPP_i1948725293t_bool(ord_less_int,pls),succ(hAPP_nat_int(semiri1621563631at_int,n)))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[6,678,130,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1003,plain,
    pls != succ(hAPP_nat_int(semiri1621563631at_int,n)),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[491,867]) ).

cnf(1134,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[311,817]),1003]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : NUM925+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Wed Jul  6 19:01:28 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.47  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.48   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.20/0.48   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.20/0.48   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  "."
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-06T19:01:29
% 0.20/0.48  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n007.cluster.edu at 2022-07-06T19:01:29
% 0.78/1.00  
% 0.78/1.00  
% 0.78/1.00  #||
% 0.78/1.00  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.78/1.00  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.78/1.00  ||#
% 0.78/1.00  
% 0.78/1.00  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.78/1.00  ;      6295 formulas have been input or derived (from 173 formulas).
% 0.78/1.00  ;      1134 (18%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.78/1.00  ;          326 (29%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.78/1.00  ;          808 (71%) are still being kept.
% 0.78/1.00  ; 
% 0.78/1.00  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.78/1.00  ;     0.146  28%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.78/1.00  ;     0.013   3%   Assert                       (708 calls)
% 0.78/1.00  ;     0.069  13%   Process new row              (4,553 calls)
% 0.78/1.00  ;     0.048   9%   Resolution                   (344 calls)
% 0.78/1.00  ;     0.007   1%   Paramodulation               (172 calls)
% 0.78/1.00  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (4 calls)
% 0.78/1.00  ;     0.012   2%   Condensing                   (918 calls)
% 0.78/1.00  ;     0.034   7%   Forward subsumption          (918 calls)
% 0.78/1.00  ;     0.025   5%   Backward subsumption         (624 calls)
% 0.78/1.00  ;     0.003   1%   Clause clause subsumption    (741 calls)
% 0.78/1.00  ;     0.080  16%   Forward simplification       (4,553 calls)
% 0.78/1.00  ;     0.022   4%   Backward simplification      (954 calls)
% 0.78/1.00  ;     0.016   3%   Ordering                     (4,405 calls)
% 0.78/1.00  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.78/1.00  ;     0.001   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.78/1.00  ;     0.037   7%   Other
% 0.78/1.00  ;     0.513        Total
% 0.78/1.00  ;     0.514        Real time
% 0.78/1.00  ; 
% 0.78/1.00  ; Term-hash-array has 2,048 terms in all.
% 0.78/1.00  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 526 entries (526 at peak, 624 added, 98 deleted).
% 0.78/1.00  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 5,376 nodes (5,376 at peak, 6,579 added, 1,203 deleted).
% 0.78/1.00  ;  Retrieved 722 possibly forward subsuming rows in 918 calls.
% 0.78/1.00  ;  Retrieved 191 possibly backward subsumed rows in 624 calls.
% 0.78/1.00  ; Path-index has 1,836 entries (1,836 at peak, 2,145 added, 309 deleted).
% 0.78/1.00  ; Path-index has 3,650 nodes (3,650 at peak, 3,962 added, 312 deleted).
% 0.78/1.00  ; Trie-index has 1,836 entries (1,836 at peak, 2,145 added, 309 deleted).
% 0.78/1.00  ; Trie-index has 5,022 nodes (5,022 at peak, 6,063 added, 1,041 deleted).
% 0.78/1.00  ; Retrieved 11,808 generalization terms in 19,339 calls.
% 0.78/1.01  ; Retrieved 859 instance terms in 391 calls.
% 0.78/1.01  ; Retrieved 37,106 unifiable terms in 1,915 calls.
% 0.78/1.01  ; 
% 0.78/1.01  ; The agenda of rows to process has 53 entries:
% 0.78/1.01  ;     1 with value 10              1 with value 19               4 with value 23
% 0.78/1.01  ;     1 with value 13              6 with value 20               6 with value 24
% 0.78/1.01  ;     1 with value 14             11 with value 21              10 with value 25
% 0.78/1.01  ;     1 with value 15             11 with value 22
% 0.78/1.01  ; The agenda of input rows to give has 377 entries:
% 0.78/1.01  ;     2 with value 16              7 with value 24              12 with value 32
% 0.78/1.01  ;    14 with value 17             10 with value 25               7 with value 34
% 0.78/1.01  ;    19 with value 18             46 with value 26              39 with value 35
% 0.78/1.01  ;    33 with value 19              6 with value 27               3 with value 39
% 0.78/1.01  ;    42 with value 20              1 with value 28               4 with value 40
% 0.78/1.01  ;    28 with value 21              5 with value 29               3 with value 43
% 0.78/1.01  ;    36 with value 22             15 with value 30               7 with value 44
% 0.78/1.01  ;    13 with value 23             25 with value 31
% 0.78/1.01  ; The agenda of rows to give has 259 entries:
% 0.78/1.01  ;     3 with value (4 5)           8 with value (4 12)          35 with value (4 18)
% 0.78/1.01  ;     5 with value (4 7)          24 with value (4 13)          21 with value (4 19)
% 0.78/1.01  ;     7 with value (4 8)          16 with value (4 14)          18 with value (4 20)
% 0.78/1.01  ;     7 with value (4 9)          16 with value (4 15)          19 with value (4 21)
% 0.78/1.01  ;    12 with value (4 10)         24 with value (4 16)          19 with value (4 22)
% 0.78/1.01  ;    11 with value (4 11)         13 with value (4 17)           1 with value (4 25)
% 0.78/1.01  Evaluation took:
% 0.78/1.01    0.526 seconds of real time
% 0.78/1.01    0.485815 seconds of user run time
% 0.78/1.01    0.040194 seconds of system run time
% 0.78/1.01    [Run times include 0.034 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.78/1.01    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.78/1.01    0 page faults and
% 0.78/1.01    37,616,496 bytes consed.
% 0.78/1.01  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.78/1.01  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-06T19:01:29
% 0.78/1.01  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.78/1.01  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------