↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : NUM925_3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:56:57 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.77s 0.64s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.77s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   36 (  32 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   40 (  31 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   17 (  13   ~;   2   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    7 (   6 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   17 (  17 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   28 (   0 sgn  28   !;   0   ?;  28   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_sort1,type,
    fun_int_bool: $tType ).

tff(decl_sort2,type,
    int: $tType ).

tff(decl_sort3,type,
    nat: $tType ).

tff(decl_sort4,type,
    bool: $tType ).

tff(decl_sort5,type,
    fun_nat_int: $tType ).

tff(decl_sort6,type,
    fun_int_fun_int_bool: $tType ).

tff(decl_28,type,
    one_one_int: int ).

tff(decl_29,type,
    one_one_nat: nat ).

tff(decl_31,type,
    plus_plus_int: ( int * int ) > int ).

tff(decl_32,type,
    plus_plus_nat: ( nat * nat ) > nat ).

tff(decl_37,type,
    zero_zero_int: int ).

tff(decl_44,type,
    bit0: int > int ).

tff(decl_45,type,
    bit1: int > int ).

tff(decl_47,type,
    pls: int ).

tff(decl_49,type,
    number_number_of_int: int > int ).

tff(decl_50,type,
    number_number_of_nat: int > nat ).

tff(decl_53,type,
    semiri1621563631at_int: fun_nat_int ).

tff(decl_56,type,
    ord_less_int: fun_int_fun_int_bool ).

tff(decl_62,type,
    power_power_int: int > fun_nat_int ).

tff(decl_72,type,
    hAPP_int_bool: ( int * fun_int_bool ) > bool ).

tff(decl_73,type,
    hAPP_i1948725293t_bool: ( int * fun_int_fun_int_bool ) > fun_int_bool ).

tff(decl_75,type,
    hAPP_nat_int: ( nat * fun_nat_int ) > int ).

tff(decl_81,type,
    hBOOL: bool > $o ).

tff(decl_84,type,
    n: nat ).

tff(fact_177_number__of__is__id,axiom,
    ! [X22: int] : ( number_number_of_int(X22) = X22 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_177_number__of__is__id) ).

tff(conj_0,conjecture,
    hAPP_nat_int(power_power_int(plus_plus_int(one_one_int,hAPP_nat_int(semiri1621563631at_int,n))),number_number_of_nat(bit0(bit1(pls)))) != zero_zero_int,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_0) ).

tff(fact_25_semiring__norm_I110_J,axiom,
    one_one_int = number_number_of_int(bit1(pls)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_25_semiring__norm_I110_J) ).

tff(fact_98_Pls__def,axiom,
    pls = zero_zero_int,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_98_Pls__def) ).

tff(fact_103_Bit0__def,axiom,
    ! [X22: int] : ( bit0(X22) = plus_plus_int(X22,X22) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_103_Bit0__def) ).

tff(fact_231_field__power__not__zero,axiom,
    ! [X132: nat,X133: int] :
      ( ( X133 != zero_zero_int )
     => ( hAPP_nat_int(power_power_int(X133),X132) != zero_zero_int ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_231_field__power__not__zero) ).

tff(fact_19_semiring__one__add__one__is__two,axiom,
    plus_plus_nat(one_one_nat,one_one_nat) = number_number_of_nat(bit0(bit1(pls))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_19_semiring__one__add__one__is__two) ).

tff(fact_269_less__add__one,axiom,
    ! [X160: int] : hBOOL(hAPP_int_bool(hAPP_i1948725293t_bool(ord_less_int,X160),plus_plus_int(X160,one_one_int))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_269_less__add__one) ).

tff(fact_67_zadd__commute,axiom,
    ! [X18: int,X15: int] : ( plus_plus_int(X18,X15) = plus_plus_int(X15,X18) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_67_zadd__commute) ).

tff(fact_83_int__less__0__conv,axiom,
    ! [X35: nat] : ~ hBOOL(hAPP_int_bool(hAPP_i1948725293t_bool(ord_less_int,hAPP_nat_int(semiri1621563631at_int,X35)),zero_zero_int)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_83_int__less__0__conv) ).

tff(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X2584: int] : ( number_number_of_int(X2584) = X2584 ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_177_number__of__is__id]) ).

tff(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( hAPP_nat_int(power_power_int(plus_plus_int(one_one_int,hAPP_nat_int(semiri1621563631at_int,n))),number_number_of_nat(bit0(bit1(pls)))) != zero_zero_int ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0]) ).

tcf(c_0_12,plain,
    one_one_int = number_number_of_int(bit1(pls)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_25_semiring__norm_I110_J]) ).

tcf(c_0_13,plain,
    pls = zero_zero_int,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_98_Pls__def]) ).

tcf(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X1: int] : number_number_of_int(X1) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

tff(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X1772: int] : ( bit0(X1772) = plus_plus_int(X1772,X1772) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_103_Bit0__def]) ).

tff(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X132: nat,X133: int] :
      ( ( X133 != zero_zero_int )
     => ( hAPP_nat_int(power_power_int(X133),X132) != zero_zero_int ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_231_field__power__not__zero]) ).

tff(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    hAPP_nat_int(power_power_int(plus_plus_int(one_one_int,hAPP_nat_int(semiri1621563631at_int,n))),number_number_of_nat(bit0(bit1(pls)))) = zero_zero_int,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

tcf(c_0_18,plain,
    plus_plus_nat(one_one_nat,one_one_nat) = number_number_of_nat(bit0(bit1(pls))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_19_semiring__one__add__one__is__two]) ).

tcf(c_0_19,plain,
    bit1(zero_zero_int) = one_one_int,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]) ).

tcf(c_0_20,plain,
    ! [X1: int] : bit0(X1) = plus_plus_int(X1,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

tff(c_0_21,plain,
    ! [X1901: int] : hBOOL(hAPP_int_bool(hAPP_i1948725293t_bool(ord_less_int,X1901),plus_plus_int(X1901,one_one_int))),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_269_less__add__one]) ).

tff(c_0_22,plain,
    ! [X1891: int,X1892: int] : ( plus_plus_int(X1891,X1892) = plus_plus_int(X1892,X1891) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_67_zadd__commute]) ).

tff(c_0_23,plain,
    ! [X1830: nat,X1831: int] :
      ( ( hAPP_nat_int(power_power_int(X1831),X1830) != zero_zero_int )
      | ( X1831 = zero_zero_int ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])])]) ).

tcf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    hAPP_nat_int(power_power_int(plus_plus_int(one_one_int,hAPP_nat_int(semiri1621563631at_int,n))),number_number_of_nat(bit0(bit1(pls)))) = zero_zero_int,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

tcf(c_0_25,plain,
    number_number_of_nat(plus_plus_int(one_one_int,one_one_int)) = plus_plus_nat(one_one_nat,one_one_nat),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_13]),c_0_19]),c_0_20]) ).

tff(c_0_26,plain,
    ! [X35: nat] : ~ hBOOL(hAPP_int_bool(hAPP_i1948725293t_bool(ord_less_int,hAPP_nat_int(semiri1621563631at_int,X35)),zero_zero_int)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_83_int__less__0__conv]) ).

tcf(c_0_27,plain,
    ! [X1: int] : hBOOL(hAPP_int_bool(hAPP_i1948725293t_bool(ord_less_int,X1),plus_plus_int(X1,one_one_int))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

tcf(c_0_28,plain,
    ! [X2: int,X1: int] : plus_plus_int(X1,X2) = plus_plus_int(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

tcf(c_0_29,plain,
    ! [X1: int,X16: nat] :
      ( ( hAPP_nat_int(power_power_int(X1),X16) != zero_zero_int )
      | ( X1 = zero_zero_int ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).

tcf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    hAPP_nat_int(power_power_int(plus_plus_int(one_one_int,hAPP_nat_int(semiri1621563631at_int,n))),plus_plus_nat(one_one_nat,one_one_nat)) = zero_zero_int,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_13]),c_0_19]),c_0_20]),c_0_25]) ).

tff(c_0_31,plain,
    ! [X2052: nat] : ~ hBOOL(hAPP_int_bool(hAPP_i1948725293t_bool(ord_less_int,hAPP_nat_int(semiri1621563631at_int,X2052)),zero_zero_int)),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_26])]) ).

tcf(c_0_32,plain,
    ! [X1: int] : hBOOL(hAPP_int_bool(hAPP_i1948725293t_bool(ord_less_int,X1),plus_plus_int(one_one_int,X1))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

tcf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    plus_plus_int(one_one_int,hAPP_nat_int(semiri1621563631at_int,n)) = zero_zero_int,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

tcf(c_0_34,plain,
    ! [X16: nat] : ~ hBOOL(hAPP_int_bool(hAPP_i1948725293t_bool(ord_less_int,hAPP_nat_int(semiri1621563631at_int,X16)),zero_zero_int)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_34]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : NUM925_3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 03:23:00 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.77/0.64  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.77/0.64  % Preprocessing class: FMLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.77/0.64  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.77/0.64  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 900s (3) cores
% 0.77/0.64  % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.77/0.64  % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.77/0.64  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.77/0.64  % new_bool_3 with pid 2077453 completed with status 0
% 0.77/0.64  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.77/0.64  % Preprocessing class: FMLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.77/0.64  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.77/0.64  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 900s (3) cores
% 0.77/0.64  % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.77/0.64  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.77/0.64  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.77/0.64  % Search class: FGHSM-SSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.77/0.64  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.77/0.64  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 55s (1) cores
% 0.77/0.64  % Starting new_bool_3 with 61s (1) cores
% 0.77/0.64  % SubtermCWHack with pid 2077456 completed with status 0
% 0.77/0.64  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.77/0.64  % Preprocessing class: FMLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.77/0.64  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.77/0.64  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 900s (3) cores
% 0.77/0.64  % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.77/0.64  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.77/0.64  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.77/0.64  % Search class: FGHSM-SSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.77/0.64  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.77/0.64  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 55s (1) cores
% 0.77/0.64  % Preprocessing time       : 0.011 s
% 0.77/0.64  
% 0.77/0.64  % Proof found!
% 0.77/0.64  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.77/0.64  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.77/0.64  % Parsed axioms                        : 1286
% 0.77/0.64  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 428
% 0.77/0.64  % Initial clauses                      : 1265
% 0.77/0.64  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 98
% 0.77/0.64  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 1167
% 0.77/0.64  % Processed clauses                    : 3015
% 0.77/0.64  % ...of these trivial                  : 235
% 0.77/0.64  % ...subsumed                          : 2139
% 0.77/0.64  % ...remaining for further processing  : 641
% 0.77/0.64  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 230
% 0.77/0.64  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.77/0.64  % Backward-subsumed                    : 16
% 0.77/0.64  % Backward-rewritten                   : 52
% 0.77/0.64  % Generated clauses                    : 7585
% 0.77/0.64  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 6317
% 0.77/0.64  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.77/0.64  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.77/0.64  % Paramodulations                      : 7344
% 0.77/0.64  % Factorizations                       : 9
% 0.77/0.64  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.77/0.64  % Equation resolutions                 : 241
% 0.77/0.64  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.77/0.64  % Total rewrite steps                  : 5148
% 0.77/0.64  % ...of those cached                   : 4097
% 0.77/0.64  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.77/0.64  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.77/0.64  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.77/0.64  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.77/0.64  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.77/0.64  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.77/0.64  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.77/0.64  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.77/0.64  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.77/0.64  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.77/0.64  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.77/0.64  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.77/0.64  % Current number of processed clauses  : 479
% 0.77/0.64  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 190
% 0.77/0.64  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 13
% 0.77/0.64  %    Negative unit clauses             : 169
% 0.77/0.64  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 107
% 0.77/0.64  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4370
% 0.77/0.64  % ...number of literals in the above   : 7124
% 0.77/0.64  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.77/0.64  % Current number of archived clauses   : 68
% 0.77/0.64  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 11217
% 0.77/0.64  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10338
% 0.77/0.64  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 129
% 0.77/0.64  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 25776
% 0.77/0.64  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.77/0.64  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 286
% 0.77/0.64  % BW rewrite match successes           : 98
% 0.77/0.64  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.77/0.64  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.77/0.64  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 162274
% 0.77/0.64  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 16912
% 0.77/0.64  
% 0.77/0.64  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.77/0.64  % User time                : 0.131 s
% 0.77/0.64  % System time              : 0.023 s
% 0.77/0.64  % Total time               : 0.155 s
% 0.77/0.64  % Maximum resident set size: 9324 pages
% 0.77/0.64  
% 0.77/0.64  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.77/0.64  % User time                : 0.244 s
% 0.77/0.64  % System time              : 0.043 s
% 0.77/0.64  % Total time               : 0.287 s
% 0.77/0.64  % Maximum resident set size: 6912 pages
% 0.77/0.64  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------