↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : NUM926+5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:51:05 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.17s 0.51s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   32 (  19 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   53 (  33 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   40 (  19   ~;  13   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   16 (  16 usr;   9 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   37 (   4 sgn  18   !;   8   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(conj_0,conjecture,
    ? [X4,X5] : plus_plus(int,power_power(int,X4,number_number_of(nat,bit0(bit1(pls)))),power_power(int,X5,number_number_of(nat,bit0(bit1(pls))))) = plus_plus(int,times_times(int,number_number_of(int,bit0(bit0(bit1(pls)))),m),one_one(int)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_0) ).

fof(fact_22_zless__le,axiom,
    ! [X16,X17] :
      ( ord_less(int,X16,X17)
    <=> ( X16 != X17
        & ord_less_eq(int,X16,X17) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_22_zless__le) ).

fof(fact_86_number__of__is__id,axiom,
    ! [X18] : number_number_of(int,X18) = X18,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_86_number__of__is__id) ).

fof(fact_85_zmult__commute,axiom,
    ! [X15,X11] : times_times(int,X15,X11) = times_times(int,X11,X15),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_85_zmult__commute) ).

fof(fact_89_zadd__commute,axiom,
    ! [X15,X11] : plus_plus(int,X15,X11) = plus_plus(int,X11,X15),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_89_zadd__commute) ).

fof(fact_1__096t_A_061_A1_A_061_061_062_AEX_Ax_Ay_O_Ax_A_094_A2_A_L_Ay_A_094_A2_A_06,axiom,
    ( t = one_one(int)
   => ? [X4,X5] : plus_plus(int,power_power(int,X4,number_number_of(nat,bit0(bit1(pls)))),power_power(int,X5,number_number_of(nat,bit0(bit1(pls))))) = plus_plus(int,times_times(int,number_number_of(int,bit0(bit0(bit1(pls)))),m),one_one(int)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_1__096t_A_061_A1_A_061_061_062_AEX_Ax_Ay_O_Ax_A_094_A2_A_L_Ay_A_094_A2_A_06) ).

fof(fact_2__0961_A_060_At_A_061_061_062_AEX_Ax_Ay_O_Ax_A_094_A2_A_L_Ay_A_094_A2_A_06,axiom,
    ( ord_less(int,one_one(int),t)
   => ? [X4,X5] : plus_plus(int,power_power(int,X4,number_number_of(nat,bit0(bit1(pls)))),power_power(int,X5,number_number_of(nat,bit0(bit1(pls))))) = plus_plus(int,times_times(int,number_number_of(int,bit0(bit0(bit1(pls)))),m),one_one(int)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_2__0961_A_060_At_A_061_061_062_AEX_Ax_Ay_O_Ax_A_094_A2_A_L_Ay_A_094_A2_A_06) ).

fof(fact_0_tpos,axiom,
    ord_less_eq(int,one_one(int),t),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_0_tpos) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X4,X5] : plus_plus(int,power_power(int,X4,number_number_of(nat,bit0(bit1(pls)))),power_power(int,X5,number_number_of(nat,bit0(bit1(pls))))) = plus_plus(int,times_times(int,number_number_of(int,bit0(bit0(bit1(pls)))),m),one_one(int)),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X16,X17] :
      ( ord_less(int,X16,X17)
    <=> ( X16 != X17
        & ord_less_eq(int,X16,X17) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_22_zless__le]) ).

fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X48,X49] : plus_plus(int,power_power(int,X48,number_number_of(nat,bit0(bit1(pls)))),power_power(int,X49,number_number_of(nat,bit0(bit1(pls))))) != plus_plus(int,times_times(int,number_number_of(int,bit0(bit0(bit1(pls)))),m),one_one(int)),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X180] : number_number_of(int,X180) = X180,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_86_number__of__is__id]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X174,X175] : times_times(int,X174,X175) = times_times(int,X175,X174),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_85_zmult__commute]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X129,X130] : plus_plus(int,X129,X130) = plus_plus(int,X130,X129),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_89_zadd__commute]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ( plus_plus(int,power_power(int,esk1_0,number_number_of(nat,bit0(bit1(pls)))),power_power(int,esk2_0,number_number_of(nat,bit0(bit1(pls))))) = plus_plus(int,times_times(int,number_number_of(int,bit0(bit0(bit1(pls)))),m),one_one(int))
    | t != one_one(int) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_1__096t_A_061_A1_A_061_061_062_AEX_Ax_Ay_O_Ax_A_094_A2_A_L_Ay_A_094_A2_A_06])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ( plus_plus(int,power_power(int,esk3_0,number_number_of(nat,bit0(bit1(pls)))),power_power(int,esk4_0,number_number_of(nat,bit0(bit1(pls))))) = plus_plus(int,times_times(int,number_number_of(int,bit0(bit0(bit1(pls)))),m),one_one(int))
    | ~ ord_less(int,one_one(int),t) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_2__0961_A_060_At_A_061_061_062_AEX_Ax_Ay_O_Ax_A_094_A2_A_L_Ay_A_094_A2_A_06])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X205,X206] :
      ( ( ord_less(int,X205,X206)
        | X205 = X206
        | ~ ord_less_eq(int,X205,X206) )
      & ( ~ ord_less(int,X205,X206)
        | X205 != X206 )
      & ( ~ ord_less(int,X205,X206)
        | ord_less_eq(int,X205,X206) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    plus_plus(int,power_power(int,X1,number_number_of(nat,bit0(bit1(pls)))),power_power(int,X2,number_number_of(nat,bit0(bit1(pls))))) != plus_plus(int,times_times(int,number_number_of(int,bit0(bit0(bit1(pls)))),m),one_one(int)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    number_number_of(int,X1) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    times_times(int,X1,X2) = times_times(int,X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    plus_plus(int,X1,X2) = plus_plus(int,X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( t != one_one(int)
    | plus_plus(int,power_power(int,esk1_0,number_number_of(nat,bit0(bit1(pls)))),power_power(int,esk2_0,number_number_of(nat,bit0(bit1(pls))))) = plus_plus(int,times_times(int,number_number_of(int,bit0(bit0(bit1(pls)))),m),one_one(int)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ ord_less(int,one_one(int),t)
    | plus_plus(int,power_power(int,esk3_0,number_number_of(nat,bit0(bit1(pls)))),power_power(int,esk4_0,number_number_of(nat,bit0(bit1(pls))))) = plus_plus(int,times_times(int,number_number_of(int,bit0(bit0(bit1(pls)))),m),one_one(int)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ ord_less_eq(int,X1,X2)
    | ord_less(int,X1,X2)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ord_less_eq(int,one_one(int),t),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_0_tpos]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    plus_plus(int,power_power(int,X1,number_number_of(nat,bit0(bit1(pls)))),power_power(int,X2,number_number_of(nat,bit0(bit1(pls))))) != plus_plus(int,one_one(int),times_times(int,m,bit0(bit0(bit1(pls))))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]),c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( one_one(int) != t
    | plus_plus(int,power_power(int,esk1_0,number_number_of(nat,bit0(bit1(pls)))),power_power(int,esk2_0,number_number_of(nat,bit0(bit1(pls))))) = plus_plus(int,one_one(int),times_times(int,m,bit0(bit0(bit1(pls))))) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_18]),c_0_19]),c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( ~ ord_less(int,one_one(int),t)
    | plus_plus(int,power_power(int,esk3_0,number_number_of(nat,bit0(bit1(pls)))),power_power(int,esk4_0,number_number_of(nat,bit0(bit1(pls))))) = plus_plus(int,one_one(int),times_times(int,m,bit0(bit0(bit1(pls))))) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_18]),c_0_19]),c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( ord_less(int,one_one(int),t)
    | one_one(int) = t ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    one_one(int) != t,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ord_less(int,one_one(int),t),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_30]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : NUM926+5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.38  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.38  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 03:18:50 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.38  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.43  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.43  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.51  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.17/0.51  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.51  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.51  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.51  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.51  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.51  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.51  % new_bool_3 with pid 1576553 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.51  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.17/0.51  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.51  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.51  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.51  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.51  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.17/0.51  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.17/0.51  % Search class: FGHSM-FFLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.51  % Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.17/0.51  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.51  % SubtermCWHack with pid 1576557 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.51  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.17/0.51  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.51  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.51  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.51  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.51  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.17/0.51  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.17/0.51  % Search class: FGHSM-FFLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.51  % Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.17/0.51  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.51  % Preprocessing time       : 0.003 s
% 0.17/0.51  
% 0.17/0.51  % Proof found!
% 0.17/0.51  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.17/0.51  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.51  % Parsed axioms                        : 142
% 0.17/0.51  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 48
% 0.17/0.51  % Initial clauses                      : 126
% 0.17/0.51  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
% 0.17/0.51  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 124
% 0.17/0.51  % Processed clauses                    : 553
% 0.17/0.51  % ...of these trivial                  : 31
% 0.17/0.51  % ...subsumed                          : 244
% 0.17/0.51  % ...remaining for further processing  : 277
% 0.17/0.51  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1
% 0.17/0.51  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.17/0.51  % Backward-subsumed                    : 6
% 0.17/0.51  % Backward-rewritten                   : 9
% 0.17/0.51  % Generated clauses                    : 2190
% 0.17/0.51  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1940
% 0.17/0.51  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.17/0.51  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.17/0.51  % Paramodulations                      : 2177
% 0.17/0.51  % Factorizations                       : 8
% 0.17/0.51  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.17/0.51  % Equation resolutions                 : 4
% 0.17/0.51  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.17/0.51  % Total rewrite steps                  : 1099
% 0.17/0.51  % ...of those cached                   : 892
% 0.17/0.51  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.17/0.51  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.17/0.51  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/0.51  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.17/0.51  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/0.51  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.17/0.51  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.17/0.51  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.17/0.51  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.17/0.51  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.17/0.51  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.17/0.51  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.17/0.51  % Current number of processed clauses  : 260
% 0.17/0.51  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 47
% 0.17/0.51  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 7
% 0.17/0.51  %    Negative unit clauses             : 26
% 0.17/0.51  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 180
% 0.17/0.51  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1460
% 0.17/0.51  % ...number of literals in the above   : 3047
% 0.17/0.51  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.17/0.51  % Current number of archived clauses   : 16
% 0.17/0.51  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 5443
% 0.17/0.51  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5387
% 0.17/0.51  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 171
% 0.17/0.51  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 129
% 0.17/0.51  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.17/0.51  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 553
% 0.17/0.51  % BW rewrite match successes           : 13
% 0.17/0.51  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.17/0.51  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.17/0.51  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 37721
% 0.17/0.51  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 1344
% 0.17/0.51  
% 0.17/0.51  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.51  % User time                : 0.045 s
% 0.17/0.51  % System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.17/0.51  % Total time               : 0.049 s
% 0.17/0.51  % Maximum resident set size: 4056 pages
% 0.17/0.51  
% 0.17/0.51  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.51  % User time                : 0.048 s
% 0.17/0.51  % System time              : 0.011 s
% 0.17/0.51  % Total time               : 0.059 s
% 0.17/0.51  % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages
% 0.17/0.51  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------