↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : NUN015_5 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v6.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Oct  3 07:57:43 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 9.55s 9.81s
% Output   : Proof 9.55s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem    : NUN015_5 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v6.0.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime   : Thu Oct  2 11:31:08 EDT 2025
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 9.55/9.81  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 9.55/9.81  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 9.55/9.81  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Ne v (zero_zero int)) True
% 9.55/9.81  Clause #1 (by assumption #[]): Eq
% 9.55/9.81    (∀ (A : Type),
% 9.55/9.81      linordered_idom A →
% 9.55/9.81        ∀ (A1 : A),
% 9.55/9.81          Iff (ord_less A (zero_zero A) (power_power A A1 (number_number_of nat (bit0 (bit1 pls)))))
% 9.55/9.81            (Ne A1 (zero_zero A)))
% 9.55/9.81    True
% 9.55/9.81  Clause #37 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Eq pls (zero_zero int)) True
% 9.55/9.81  Clause #97 (by assumption #[]): Eq (linordered_idom int) True
% 9.55/9.81  Clause #120 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (ord_less int (zero_zero int) (power_power int v (number_number_of nat (bit0 (bit1 pls)))))) True
% 9.55/9.81  Clause #121 (by clausification #[0]): Ne v (zero_zero int)
% 9.55/9.81  Clause #122 (by clausification #[1]): ∀ (a : Type),
% 9.55/9.81    Eq
% 9.55/9.81      (linordered_idom a →
% 9.55/9.81        ∀ (A1 : a),
% 9.55/9.81          Iff (ord_less a (zero_zero a) (power_power a A1 (number_number_of nat (bit0 (bit1 pls)))))
% 9.55/9.81            (Ne A1 (zero_zero a)))
% 9.55/9.81      True
% 9.55/9.81  Clause #123 (by clausification #[122]): ∀ (a : Type),
% 9.55/9.81    Or (Eq (linordered_idom a) False)
% 9.55/9.81      (Eq
% 9.55/9.81        (∀ (A1 : a),
% 9.55/9.81          Iff (ord_less a (zero_zero a) (power_power a A1 (number_number_of nat (bit0 (bit1 pls)))))
% 9.55/9.81            (Ne A1 (zero_zero a)))
% 9.55/9.81        True)
% 9.55/9.81  Clause #124 (by clausification #[123]): ∀ (a : Type) (a_1 : a),
% 9.55/9.81    Or (Eq (linordered_idom a) False)
% 9.55/9.81      (Eq
% 9.55/9.81        (Iff (ord_less a (zero_zero a) (power_power a a_1 (number_number_of nat (bit0 (bit1 pls)))))
% 9.55/9.81          (Ne a_1 (zero_zero a)))
% 9.55/9.81        True)
% 9.55/9.81  Clause #125 (by clausification #[124]): ∀ (a : Type) (a_1 : a),
% 9.55/9.81    Or (Eq (linordered_idom a) False)
% 9.55/9.81      (Or (Eq (ord_less a (zero_zero a) (power_power a a_1 (number_number_of nat (bit0 (bit1 pls))))) True)
% 9.55/9.81        (Eq (Ne a_1 (zero_zero a)) False))
% 9.55/9.81  Clause #127 (by clausification #[125]): ∀ (a : Type) (a_1 : a),
% 9.55/9.81    Or (Eq (linordered_idom a) False)
% 9.55/9.81      (Or (Eq (ord_less a (zero_zero a) (power_power a a_1 (number_number_of nat (bit0 (bit1 pls))))) True)
% 9.55/9.81        (Eq a_1 (zero_zero a)))
% 9.55/9.81  Clause #132 (by superposition #[97, 127]): ∀ (a : int),
% 9.55/9.81    Or (Eq (ord_less int (zero_zero int) (power_power int a (number_number_of nat (bit0 (bit1 pls))))) True)
% 9.55/9.81      (Or (Eq a (zero_zero int)) (Eq False True))
% 9.55/9.81  Clause #150 (by clausification #[37]): Eq pls (zero_zero int)
% 9.55/9.81  Clause #151 (by backward demodulation #[150, 121]): Ne v pls
% 9.55/9.81  Clause #981 (by clausification #[120]): Eq (ord_less int (zero_zero int) (power_power int v (number_number_of nat (bit0 (bit1 pls))))) False
% 9.55/9.81  Clause #982 (by forward demodulation #[981, 150]): Eq (ord_less int pls (power_power int v (number_number_of nat (bit0 (bit1 pls))))) False
% 9.55/9.81  Clause #1973 (by clausification #[132]): ∀ (a : int),
% 9.55/9.81    Or (Eq (ord_less int (zero_zero int) (power_power int a (number_number_of nat (bit0 (bit1 pls))))) True)
% 9.55/9.81      (Eq a (zero_zero int))
% 9.55/9.81  Clause #1974 (by forward demodulation #[1973, 150]): ∀ (a : int),
% 9.55/9.81    Or (Eq (ord_less int pls (power_power int a (number_number_of nat (bit0 (bit1 pls))))) True) (Eq a (zero_zero int))
% 9.55/9.81  Clause #1975 (by forward demodulation #[1974, 150]): ∀ (a : int), Or (Eq (ord_less int pls (power_power int a (number_number_of nat (bit0 (bit1 pls))))) True) (Eq a pls)
% 9.55/9.81  Clause #1976 (by superposition #[1975, 982]): Or (Eq v pls) (Eq True False)
% 9.55/9.81  Clause #2077 (by clausification #[1976]): Eq v pls
% 9.55/9.81  Clause #2078 (by forward contextual literal cutting #[2077, 151]): False
% 9.55/9.81  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------