↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : NUN023^2 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v6.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Oct  3 07:57:44 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 122.17s 122.43s
% Output   : Proof 122.58s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem    : NUN023^2 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v6.4.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Thu Oct  2 11:41:23 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 122.17/122.43  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 122.17/122.43  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 122.17/122.43  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq
% 122.17/122.43    (Not
% 122.17/122.43      (And
% 122.17/122.43          (And (∀ (X100 : Prop) (U V : Iota), X100 → Eq (ite X100 U V) U)
% 122.17/122.43            (∀ (X100 : Prop) (U V : Iota), Not X100 → Eq (ite X100 U V) V))
% 122.17/122.43          (∀ (X : Iota), Eq (h X) (ite (Eq X zero) (s zero) zero)) →
% 122.17/122.43        Exists fun H => And (Eq (H zero) (s zero)) (Eq (H (s zero)) zero)))
% 122.17/122.43    True
% 122.17/122.43  Clause #1 (by clausification #[0]): Eq
% 122.17/122.43    (And
% 122.17/122.43        (And (∀ (X100 : Prop) (U V : Iota), X100 → Eq (ite X100 U V) U)
% 122.17/122.43          (∀ (X100 : Prop) (U V : Iota), Not X100 → Eq (ite X100 U V) V))
% 122.17/122.43        (∀ (X : Iota), Eq (h X) (ite (Eq X zero) (s zero) zero)) →
% 122.17/122.43      Exists fun H => And (Eq (H zero) (s zero)) (Eq (H (s zero)) zero))
% 122.17/122.43    False
% 122.17/122.43  Clause #2 (by clausification #[1]): Eq
% 122.17/122.43    (And
% 122.17/122.43      (And (∀ (X100 : Prop) (U V : Iota), X100 → Eq (ite X100 U V) U)
% 122.17/122.43        (∀ (X100 : Prop) (U V : Iota), Not X100 → Eq (ite X100 U V) V))
% 122.17/122.43      (∀ (X : Iota), Eq (h X) (ite (Eq X zero) (s zero) zero)))
% 122.17/122.43    True
% 122.17/122.43  Clause #3 (by clausification #[1]): Eq (Exists fun H => And (Eq (H zero) (s zero)) (Eq (H (s zero)) zero)) False
% 122.17/122.43  Clause #4 (by clausification #[2]): Eq (∀ (X : Iota), Eq (h X) (ite (Eq X zero) (s zero) zero)) True
% 122.17/122.43  Clause #5 (by clausification #[2]): Eq
% 122.17/122.43    (And (∀ (X100 : Prop) (U V : Iota), X100 → Eq (ite X100 U V) U)
% 122.17/122.43      (∀ (X100 : Prop) (U V : Iota), Not X100 → Eq (ite X100 U V) V))
% 122.17/122.43    True
% 122.17/122.43  Clause #6 (by clausification #[4]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (Eq (h a) (ite (Eq a zero) (s zero) zero)) True
% 122.17/122.43  Clause #7 (by clausification #[6]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (h a) (ite (Eq a zero) (s zero) zero)
% 122.17/122.43  Clause #8 (by identity loobHoist #[7]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (h a) (ite True (s zero) zero)) (Eq (Eq a zero) False)
% 122.17/122.43  Clause #9 (by identity boolHoist #[7]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (h a) (ite False (s zero) zero)) (Eq (Eq a zero) True)
% 122.17/122.43  Clause #10 (by clausification #[8]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (h a) (ite True (s zero) zero)) (Ne a zero)
% 122.17/122.43  Clause #11 (by destructive equality resolution #[10]): Eq (h zero) (ite True (s zero) zero)
% 122.17/122.43  Clause #12 (by clausification #[9]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (h a) (ite False (s zero) zero)) (Eq a zero)
% 122.17/122.43  Clause #13 (by superposition #[12, 12]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq a zero) (Or (Eq (h a_1) (h a)) (Eq a_1 zero))
% 122.17/122.43  Clause #48 (by clausification #[3]): ∀ (a : Iota → Iota), Eq (And (Eq (a zero) (s zero)) (Eq (a (s zero)) zero)) False
% 122.17/122.43  Clause #49 (by clausification #[48]): ∀ (a : Iota → Iota), Or (Eq (Eq (a zero) (s zero)) False) (Eq (Eq (a (s zero)) zero) False)
% 122.17/122.43  Clause #50 (by clausification #[49]): ∀ (a : Iota → Iota), Or (Eq (Eq (a (s zero)) zero) False) (Ne (a zero) (s zero))
% 122.17/122.43  Clause #51 (by clausification #[50]): ∀ (a : Iota → Iota), Or (Ne (a zero) (s zero)) (Ne (a (s zero)) zero)
% 122.17/122.43  Clause #52 (by equality resolution #[51]): Ne ((fun x => s zero) (s zero)) zero
% 122.17/122.43  Clause #61 (by betaEtaReduce #[52]): Ne (s zero) zero
% 122.17/122.43  Clause #63 (by superposition #[61, 13]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq a zero) (Or (Eq (h (s zero)) (h a)) (Ne zero zero))
% 122.17/122.43  Clause #79 (by clausification #[5]): Eq (∀ (X100 : Prop) (U V : Iota), Not X100 → Eq (ite X100 U V) V) True
% 122.17/122.43  Clause #80 (by clausification #[5]): Eq (∀ (X100 : Prop) (U V : Iota), X100 → Eq (ite X100 U V) U) True
% 122.17/122.43  Clause #81 (by clausification #[79]): ∀ (a : Prop), Eq (∀ (U V : Iota), Not a → Eq (ite a U V) V) True
% 122.17/122.43  Clause #82 (by clausification #[81]): ∀ (a : Prop) (a_1 : Iota), Eq (∀ (V : Iota), Not a → Eq (ite a a_1 V) V) True
% 122.17/122.43  Clause #83 (by clausification #[82]): ∀ (a : Prop) (a_1 a_2 : Iota), Eq (Not a → Eq (ite a a_1 a_2) a_2) True
% 122.17/122.43  Clause #84 (by clausification #[83]): ∀ (a : Prop) (a_1 a_2 : Iota), Or (Eq (Not a) False) (Eq (Eq (ite a a_1 a_2) a_2) True)
% 122.17/122.43  Clause #85 (by clausification #[84]): ∀ (a : Prop) (a_1 a_2 : Iota), Or (Eq (Eq (ite a a_1 a_2) a_2) True) (Eq a True)
% 122.17/122.43  Clause #86 (by clausification #[85]): ∀ (a : Prop) (a_1 a_2 : Iota), Or (Eq a True) (Eq (ite a a_1 a_2) a_2)
% 122.17/122.43  Clause #88 (by identity boolHoist #[86]): ∀ (a : Prop) (a_1 a_2 : Iota), Or (Eq a True) (Or (Eq (ite False a_1 a_2) a_2) (Eq a True))
% 122.58/122.79  Clause #89 (by eliminate duplicate literals #[88]): ∀ (a : Prop) (a_1 a_2 : Iota), Or (Eq a True) (Eq (ite False a_1 a_2) a_2)
% 122.58/122.79  Clause #91 (by falseElim #[89]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (ite False a a_1) a_1
% 122.58/122.79  Clause #92 (by backward demodulation #[91, 12]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (h a) zero) (Eq a zero)
% 122.58/122.79  Clause #243 (by eliminate resolved literals #[63]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq a zero) (Eq (h (s zero)) (h a))
% 122.58/122.79  Clause #274 (by superposition #[243, 92]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq a zero) (Or (Eq (h (s zero)) zero) (Eq a zero))
% 122.58/122.79  Clause #291 (by eliminate duplicate literals #[274]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq a zero) (Eq (h (s zero)) zero)
% 122.58/122.79  Clause #331 (by equality factoring #[291]): Or (Ne zero zero) (Eq (h (s zero)) zero)
% 122.58/122.79  Clause #333 (by eliminate resolved literals #[331]): Eq (h (s zero)) zero
% 122.58/122.79  Clause #4342 (by clausification #[80]): ∀ (a : Prop), Eq (∀ (U V : Iota), a → Eq (ite a U V) U) True
% 122.58/122.79  Clause #4343 (by clausification #[4342]): ∀ (a : Prop) (a_1 : Iota), Eq (∀ (V : Iota), a → Eq (ite a a_1 V) a_1) True
% 122.58/122.79  Clause #4344 (by clausification #[4343]): ∀ (a : Prop) (a_1 a_2 : Iota), Eq (a → Eq (ite a a_1 a_2) a_1) True
% 122.58/122.79  Clause #4345 (by clausification #[4344]): ∀ (a : Prop) (a_1 a_2 : Iota), Or (Eq a False) (Eq (Eq (ite a a_1 a_2) a_1) True)
% 122.58/122.79  Clause #4346 (by clausification #[4345]): ∀ (a : Prop) (a_1 a_2 : Iota), Or (Eq a False) (Eq (ite a a_1 a_2) a_1)
% 122.58/122.79  Clause #4347 (by identity loobHoist #[4346]): ∀ (a : Prop) (a_1 a_2 : Iota), Or (Eq a False) (Or (Eq (ite True a_1 a_2) a_1) (Eq a False))
% 122.58/122.79  Clause #4349 (by eliminate duplicate literals #[4347]): ∀ (a : Prop) (a_1 a_2 : Iota), Or (Eq a False) (Eq (ite True a_1 a_2) a_1)
% 122.58/122.79  Clause #4350 (by falseElim #[4349]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (ite True a a_1) a
% 122.58/122.79  Clause #4351 (by superposition #[4350, 11]): Eq (h zero) (s zero)
% 122.58/122.79  Clause #4355 (by backward demodulation #[4351, 51]): ∀ (a : Iota → Iota), Or (Ne (a zero) (h zero)) (Ne (a (s zero)) zero)
% 122.58/122.79  Clause #4356 (by backward demodulation #[4351, 61]): Ne (h zero) zero
% 122.58/122.79  Clause #4358 (by backward demodulation #[4351, 333]): Eq (h (h zero)) zero
% 122.58/122.79  Clause #5246 (by forward demodulation #[4355, 4351]): ∀ (a : Iota → Iota), Or (Ne (a zero) (h zero)) (Ne (a (h zero)) zero)
% 122.58/122.79  Clause #5250 (by superposition #[5246, 92]): ∀ (a : Iota) (a_1 : Iota → Iota), Or (Eq (h a) zero) (Or (Ne (a_1 zero) (h a)) (Ne (a_1 (h zero)) a))
% 122.58/122.79  Clause #29957 (by equality resolution #[5250]): ∀ (a : Iota → Iota), Or (Eq (h (a zero)) zero) (Ne ((fun x => h (a x)) (h zero)) (a zero))
% 122.58/122.79  Clause #44655 (by betaEtaReduce #[29957]): ∀ (a : Iota → Iota), Or (Eq (h (a zero)) zero) (Ne (h (a (h zero))) (a zero))
% 122.58/122.79  Clause #44661 (by superposition #[44655, 4358]): Or (Eq (h zero) zero) (Ne zero zero)
% 122.58/122.79  Clause #45354 (by eliminate resolved literals #[44661]): Eq (h zero) zero
% 122.58/122.79  Clause #45355 (by forward contextual literal cutting #[45354, 4356]): False
% 122.58/122.79  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------