↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : NUN060+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:57:37 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 0.43s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   32 (  11 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  101 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  118 (  49   ~;  38   |;  31   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   16 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   0 con; 1-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   94 (  10 sgn  28   !;  24   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(greq4id,conjecture,
    ? [X63,X46,X47] :
      ( ? [X40] :
          ( ? [X41] :
              ( ? [X49] :
                  ( ? [X43] :
                      ( ? [X58] :
                          ( r2(X58,X43)
                          & r1(X58) )
                      & r2(X43,X49) )
                  & r2(X49,X41) )
              & r2(X41,X40) )
          & r3(X46,X40,X47) )
      & id(X47,X63) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',greq4id) ).

fof(axiom_6,axiom,
    ! [X15,X16] :
      ( id(X16,X15)
      | ~ id(X15,X16) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM009+0.ax',axiom_6) ).

fof(axiom_1a,axiom,
    ! [X38,X39] :
    ? [X40] :
      ( ? [X43] :
          ( r3(X38,X39,X43)
          & r2(X43,X40) )
      & ? [X41] :
          ( ? [X42] :
              ( r3(X38,X42,X41)
              & r2(X39,X42) )
          & id(X41,X40) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM009+0.ax',axiom_1a) ).

fof(axiom_4a,axiom,
    ! [X54] :
    ? [X55] :
      ( ? [X56] :
          ( r3(X54,X56,X55)
          & r1(X56) )
      & id(X55,X54) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM009+0.ax',axiom_4a) ).

fof(axiom_2,axiom,
    ! [X3] :
    ? [X4] :
    ! [X5] :
      ( ( ~ id(X5,X4)
        & ~ r2(X3,X5) )
      | ( r2(X3,X5)
        & id(X5,X4) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM009+0.ax',axiom_2) ).

fof(axiom_5,axiom,
    ! [X14] : id(X14,X14),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM009+0.ax',axiom_5) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X63,X46,X47] :
        ( ? [X40] :
            ( ? [X41] :
                ( ? [X49] :
                    ( ? [X43] :
                        ( ? [X58] :
                            ( r2(X58,X43)
                            & r1(X58) )
                        & r2(X43,X49) )
                    & r2(X49,X41) )
                & r2(X41,X40) )
            & r3(X46,X40,X47) )
        & id(X47,X63) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[greq4id]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X15,X16] :
      ( id(X16,X15)
      | ~ id(X15,X16) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_6]) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X135,X136,X137,X138,X139,X140,X141,X142] :
      ( ~ r2(X142,X141)
      | ~ r1(X142)
      | ~ r2(X141,X140)
      | ~ r2(X140,X139)
      | ~ r2(X139,X138)
      | ~ r3(X136,X138,X137)
      | ~ id(X137,X135) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X105,X106] :
      ( r3(X105,X106,esk8_2(X105,X106))
      & r2(esk8_2(X105,X106),esk5_2(X105,X106))
      & r3(X105,esk7_2(X105,X106),esk6_2(X105,X106))
      & r2(X106,esk7_2(X105,X106))
      & id(esk6_2(X105,X106),esk5_2(X105,X106)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[axiom_1a])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X82,X83] :
      ( id(X83,X82)
      | ~ id(X82,X83) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X121] :
      ( r3(X121,esk14_1(X121),esk13_1(X121))
      & r1(esk14_1(X121))
      & id(esk13_1(X121),X121) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[axiom_4a])]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X3] :
    ? [X4] :
    ! [X5] :
      ( ( ~ id(X5,X4)
        & ~ r2(X3,X5) )
      | ( r2(X3,X5)
        & id(X5,X4) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ r2(X8,X7)
    | ~ r1(X8)
    | ~ r2(X7,X6)
    | ~ r2(X6,X5)
    | ~ r2(X5,X4)
    | ~ r3(X3,X4,X1)
    | ~ id(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    r3(X1,X2,esk8_2(X1,X2)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ id(X1,X2)
    | id(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    id(esk13_1(X1),X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

fof(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X70,X72] :
      ( ( r2(X70,X72)
        | ~ id(X72,esk2_1(X70)) )
      & ( r2(X70,X72)
        | ~ r2(X70,X72) )
      & ( id(X72,esk2_1(X70))
        | ~ id(X72,esk2_1(X70)) )
      & ( id(X72,esk2_1(X70))
        | ~ r2(X70,X72) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X81] : id(X81,X81),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[axiom_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ id(esk8_2(X6,X5),X7)
    | ~ r1(X1)
    | ~ r2(X4,X5)
    | ~ r2(X3,X4)
    | ~ r2(X2,X3)
    | ~ r2(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    id(X1,esk13_1(X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ id(X1,esk2_1(X2))
    | r2(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    id(X1,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ r1(X1)
    | ~ r2(X4,X5)
    | ~ r2(X3,X4)
    | ~ r2(X2,X3)
    | ~ r2(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    r2(X1,esk2_1(X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ r1(X1)
    | ~ r2(X3,X4)
    | ~ r2(X2,X3)
    | ~ r2(esk2_1(X1),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ r1(X1)
    | ~ r2(X2,X3)
    | ~ r2(esk2_1(esk2_1(X1)),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ r1(X1)
    | ~ r2(esk2_1(esk2_1(esk2_1(X1))),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    r2(X1,esk13_1(esk2_1(X1))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    r1(esk14_1(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r1(X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : NUN060+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 03:21:35 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.36  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.43  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.14/0.43  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.43  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.43  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.43  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 64556 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.43  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.14/0.43  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.43  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.43  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.43  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.14/0.43  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.43  % Search class: FGHNM-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.43  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/0.43  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43  % Starting G-E--_110_C45_F1_PI_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4S with 231s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43  % Starting new_bool_3 with 211s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43  % Starting G-E--_107_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S4S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43  % G-E--_110_C45_F1_PI_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4S with pid 64564 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.43  % Result found by G-E--_110_C45_F1_PI_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4S
% 0.14/0.43  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.43  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.43  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.43  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.14/0.43  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.43  % Search class: FGHNM-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.43  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/0.43  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43  % Starting G-E--_110_C45_F1_PI_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4S with 231s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.14/0.43  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.14/0.43  
% 0.14/0.43  % Proof found!
% 0.14/0.43  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.14/0.43  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.43  % Parsed axioms                        : 19
% 0.14/0.43  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.14/0.43  % Initial clauses                      : 59
% 0.14/0.43  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 16
% 0.14/0.43  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 43
% 0.14/0.43  % Processed clauses                    : 182
% 0.14/0.43  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.14/0.43  % ...subsumed                          : 26
% 0.14/0.43  % ...remaining for further processing  : 156
% 0.14/0.43  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.14/0.43  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.14/0.43  % Backward-subsumed                    : 35
% 0.14/0.43  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.14/0.43  % Generated clauses                    : 477
% 0.14/0.43  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 391
% 0.14/0.43  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.14/0.43  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.14/0.43  % Paramodulations                      : 467
% 0.14/0.43  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.14/0.43  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.14/0.43  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.14/0.43  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.14/0.43  % Total rewrite steps                  : 100
% 0.14/0.43  % ...of those cached                   : 69
% 0.14/0.43  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.14/0.43  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.14/0.43  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.43  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.14/0.43  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.43  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.14/0.43  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.14/0.43  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.14/0.43  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.14/0.43  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.14/0.43  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.14/0.43  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.14/0.43  % Current number of processed clauses  : 68
% 0.14/0.43  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 41
% 0.14/0.43  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.43  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.14/0.43  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 26
% 0.14/0.43  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 293
% 0.14/0.43  % ...number of literals in the above   : 722
% 0.14/0.43  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.14/0.43  % Current number of archived clauses   : 88
% 0.14/0.43  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 399
% 0.14/0.43  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 246
% 0.14/0.43  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 11
% 0.14/0.43  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 196
% 0.14/0.43  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.14/0.43  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 19
% 0.14/0.43  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.14/0.43  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.14/0.43  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.14/0.43  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 7864
% 0.14/0.43  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 442
% 0.14/0.43  
% 0.14/0.43  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.43  % User time                : 0.017 s
% 0.14/0.43  % System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.14/0.43  % Total time               : 0.021 s
% 0.14/0.43  % Maximum resident set size: 3696 pages
% 0.14/0.43  
% 0.14/0.43  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.43  % User time                : 0.076 s
% 0.14/0.43  % System time              : 0.014 s
% 0.14/0.43  % Total time               : 0.090 s
% 0.14/0.43  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.14/0.43  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------