↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : NUN069+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:19:21 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.10s 0.38s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.10s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   14 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   42 (  10 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   35 (   7   ~;   3   |;  25   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   0 con; 1-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   36 (   5 sgn   9   !;  18   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(axiom_2a,axiom,
    ! [X2,X9] :
    ? [Y2] :
      ( ? [Y6] :
          ( r4(X2,X9,Y6)
          & r3(Y6,X2,Y2) )
      & ? [Y3] :
          ( Y3 = Y2
          & ? [Y14] :
              ( r4(X2,Y14,Y3)
              & r2(X9,Y14) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_2a) ).

fof(axiom_5a,axiom,
    ! [X5] :
    ? [Y8] :
      ( ? [Y18] :
          ( Y8 = Y18
          & r1(Y18) )
      & ? [Y17] :
          ( r4(X5,Y17,Y8)
          & r1(Y17) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_5a) ).

fof(oneeqone,conjecture,
    ? [Y1] :
      ( ? [Y2] :
          ( r2(Y2,Y1)
          & r1(Y2) )
      & Y1 = Y1 ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',oneeqone) ).

fof(oneeqone_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [Y1] :
        ( ? [Y2] :
            ( r2(Y2,Y1)
            & r1(Y2) )
        & Y1 = Y1 ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[oneeqone]) ).

fof(nnf_9,plain,
    ! [X5] :
    ? [Y8] :
      ( ? [Y18] :
          ( Y18 = Y8
          & r1(Y18) )
      & ? [Y17] :
          ( r4(X5,Y17,Y8)
          & r1(Y17) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_5a]) ).

fof(sk_axiom_5a,plain,
    ! [X5] :
      ( sK0(X5) = sK3(X5)
      & r1(sK0(X5))
      & r4(X5,sK2(X5),sK3(X5))
      & r1(sK2(X5)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK2,sK3,sK0]),skolemize(Y8,sK3(X5)),skolemize(Y17,sK2(X5)),skolemize(Y18,sK0(X5))],[nnf_9]) ).

cnf(c_17,plain,
    r1(sK0(A)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_axiom_5a]) ).

cnf(c_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ r2(B,A)
    | ~ r1(B)
    | A != A ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[oneeqone_neg]) ).

cnf(c_44,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ r2(sK0(B),A)
    | A != A ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_21,c_17]) ).

cnf(c_45,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r2(sK0(A),B),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_44]) ).

fof(nnf_6,plain,
    ! [X2,X9] :
    ? [Y2] :
      ( ? [Y6] :
          ( r4(X2,X9,Y6)
          & r3(Y6,X2,Y2) )
      & ? [Y3] :
          ( Y2 = Y3
          & ? [Y14] :
              ( r4(X2,Y14,Y3)
              & r2(X9,Y14) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_2a]) ).

fof(sk_axiom_2a,plain,
    ! [X2,X9] :
      ( r4(X2,X9,sK6(X2,X9))
      & r3(sK6(X2,X9),X2,sK5(X2,X9))
      & sK5(X2,X9) = sK4(X2,X9)
      & r4(X2,sK1(X2,X9),sK4(X2,X9))
      & r2(X9,sK1(X2,X9)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1,sK4,sK5,sK6]),skolemize(Y2,sK5(X2,X9)),skolemize(Y3,sK4(X2,X9)),skolemize(Y14,sK1(X2,X9)),skolemize(Y6,sK6(X2,X9))],[nnf_6]) ).

cnf(c_81,plain,
    r2(A,sK1(B,A)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_axiom_2a]) ).

cnf(c_82,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_81,c_45]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : NUN069+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 04:32:26 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.36  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.10/0.36  % Process 73502 was started by sandbox on n026,
% 0.10/0.36  % Sat Sep 26 04:32:26 2026
% 0.10/0.36  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.10/0.37  
% 0.10/0.37  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.10/0.38  
% 0.10/0.38  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.10/0.38  
% 0.10/0.38  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.10/0.38  % Length of proof is 9.
% 0.10/0.38  % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.10/0.38  % Maximum clause weight is 5.000.
% 0.10/0.38  % Given clauses 0.
% 0.10/0.38  
% 0.10/0.38  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------