↑ Up

SNARK---20120808r022.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : NUN072+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 16:38:17 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.37s 0.62s
% Output   : Refutation 0.37s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   23
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   60 (  51 unt;   0 nHn;  11 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   77 (  32 equ;  18 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :   10 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   17 (  17 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  102 (  16 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ( ~ r1(X)
    | X = 'SKOLEMAAAW1' ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_1) ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    ( ~ r2(X,Y)
    | Y = 'SKOLEMAAAW2'(X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_2) ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    ( ~ r3(X,Y,Z)
    | Z = 'SKOLEMAAAW3'(X,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_3) ).

cnf(7,axiom,
    ( ~ r4(X,Y,Z)
    | Z = 'SKOLEMAAAW4'(X,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_4) ).

cnf(8,axiom,
    ( X != 'SKOLEMAAAW4'(Y,Z)
    | r4(Y,Z,X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_4) ).

cnf(9,axiom,
    r2(X,'SKOLEMAAAW7'(X,Y)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_1a) ).

cnf(10,axiom,
    r3(X,'SKOLEMAAAW7'(Y,X),'SKOLEMAAAW6'(Y,X)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_1a) ).

cnf(11,axiom,
    'SKOLEMAAAW6'(X,Y) = 'SKOLEMAAAW5'(X,Y),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_1a) ).

cnf(12,axiom,
    r2('SKOLEMAAAW8'(X,Y),'SKOLEMAAAW5'(X,Y)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_1a) ).

cnf(13,axiom,
    r3(X,Y,'SKOLEMAAAW8'(Y,X)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_1a) ).

cnf(14,axiom,
    r2(X,'SKOLEMAAAW11'(X,Y)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_2a) ).

cnf(15,axiom,
    r4(X,'SKOLEMAAAW11'(Y,X),'SKOLEMAAAW10'(Y,X)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_2a) ).

cnf(16,axiom,
    'SKOLEMAAAW10'(X,Y) = 'SKOLEMAAAW9'(X,Y),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_2a) ).

cnf(17,axiom,
    r3('SKOLEMAAAW12'(X,Y),X,'SKOLEMAAAW9'(Y,X)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_2a) ).

cnf(18,plain,
    r3('SKOLEMAAAW12'(X,Y),X,'SKOLEMAAAW10'(Y,X)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[17,16,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(19,axiom,
    r4(X,Y,'SKOLEMAAAW12'(X,Y)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_2a) ).

cnf(21,axiom,
    r1('SKOLEMAAAW14'(X)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_4a) ).

cnf(22,axiom,
    r3(X,'SKOLEMAAAW14'(X),'SKOLEMAAAW13'(X)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_4a) ).

cnf(23,axiom,
    'SKOLEMAAAW13'(X) = X,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_4a) ).

cnf(24,axiom,
    r1('SKOLEMAAAW16'(X)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_5a) ).

cnf(25,axiom,
    r4(X,'SKOLEMAAAW16'(X),'SKOLEMAAAW15'(X)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_5a) ).

cnf(26,axiom,
    r1('SKOLEMAAAW17'(X)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_5a) ).

cnf(27,axiom,
    'SKOLEMAAAW15'(X) = 'SKOLEMAAAW17'(X),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_5a) ).

cnf(33,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ r2(X,Y)
    | ~ r1(Z)
    | ~ r2(Z,X)
    | ~ r4(U,Y,V)
    | ~ r1(W)
    | ~ r2(W,U)
    | V != X1
    | ~ r2(Y1,X1)
    | ~ r1(Z1)
    | ~ r2(Z1,Y1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',onetimestwoeqtwo) ).

cnf(34,plain,
    r1('SKOLEMAAAW15'(X)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[26,27,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(35,plain,
    r3(X,'SKOLEMAAAW14'(X),X),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[22,23,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(36,plain,
    r3(X,'SKOLEMAAAW7'(Y,X),'SKOLEMAAAW5'(Y,X)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[10,11,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(37,plain,
    'SKOLEMAAAW16'(X) = 'SKOLEMAAAW1',
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[1,24]) ).

cnf(38,plain,
    r1('SKOLEMAAAW1'),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[24,37,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(39,plain,
    r4(X,'SKOLEMAAAW1','SKOLEMAAAW15'(X)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[25,37,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(40,plain,
    'SKOLEMAAAW15'(X) = 'SKOLEMAAAW1',
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[1,34]) ).

cnf(42,plain,
    r4(X,'SKOLEMAAAW1','SKOLEMAAAW1'),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[39,40,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(43,plain,
    'SKOLEMAAAW14'(X) = 'SKOLEMAAAW1',
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[1,21]) ).

cnf(44,plain,
    r3(X,'SKOLEMAAAW1',X),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[35,43,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(45,plain,
    'SKOLEMAAAW11'(X,Y) = 'SKOLEMAAAW2'(X),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[3,14]) ).

cnf(46,plain,
    r4(X,'SKOLEMAAAW2'(Y),'SKOLEMAAAW10'(Y,X)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[15,45,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(47,plain,
    r2(X,'SKOLEMAAAW2'(X)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[14,45,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(48,plain,
    'SKOLEMAAAW7'(X,Y) = 'SKOLEMAAAW2'(X),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[3,9]) ).

cnf(49,plain,
    r3(X,'SKOLEMAAAW2'(Y),'SKOLEMAAAW5'(Y,X)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[36,48,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(50,plain,
    'SKOLEMAAAW5'(X,Y) = 'SKOLEMAAAW2'('SKOLEMAAAW8'(X,Y)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[3,12]) ).

cnf(57,plain,
    X = 'SKOLEMAAAW3'(X,'SKOLEMAAAW1'),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[5,44]) ).

cnf(58,plain,
    'SKOLEMAAAW8'(X,Y) = 'SKOLEMAAAW3'(Y,X),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[5,13]) ).

cnf(61,plain,
    'SKOLEMAAAW5'(X,Y) = 'SKOLEMAAAW2'('SKOLEMAAAW3'(Y,X)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[50,58,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(62,plain,
    r3(X,'SKOLEMAAAW2'(Y),'SKOLEMAAAW2'('SKOLEMAAAW3'(X,Y))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[49,61,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(64,plain,
    'SKOLEMAAAW10'(X,Y) = 'SKOLEMAAAW3'('SKOLEMAAAW12'(Y,X),Y),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[5,18]) ).

cnf(65,plain,
    'SKOLEMAAAW2'('SKOLEMAAAW3'(X,Y)) = 'SKOLEMAAAW3'(X,'SKOLEMAAAW2'(Y)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[5,62]) ).

cnf(66,plain,
    'SKOLEMAAAW1' = 'SKOLEMAAAW4'(X,'SKOLEMAAAW1'),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[7,42]) ).

cnf(67,plain,
    'SKOLEMAAAW12'(X,Y) = 'SKOLEMAAAW4'(X,Y),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[7,19]) ).

cnf(68,plain,
    ( X != 'SKOLEMAAAW12'(Y,Z)
    | r4(Y,Z,X) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[8,67,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(69,plain,
    ( ~ r4(X,Y,Z)
    | Z = 'SKOLEMAAAW12'(X,Y) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[7,67,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(70,plain,
    'SKOLEMAAAW1' = 'SKOLEMAAAW12'(X,'SKOLEMAAAW1'),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[66,67,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(79,plain,
    'SKOLEMAAAW10'(X,Y) = 'SKOLEMAAAW12'(Y,'SKOLEMAAAW2'(X)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[69,46]) ).

cnf(95,plain,
    r3('SKOLEMAAAW1',X,'SKOLEMAAAW10'('SKOLEMAAAW1',X)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[18,70,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(96,plain,
    ( X != 'SKOLEMAAAW1'
    | r4(Y,'SKOLEMAAAW1',X) ),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[68,70,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(97,plain,
    'SKOLEMAAAW10'('SKOLEMAAAW1',X) = 'SKOLEMAAAW3'('SKOLEMAAAW1',X),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[5,95]) ).

cnf(103,plain,
    r4(X,'SKOLEMAAAW1','SKOLEMAAAW10'('SKOLEMAAAW1','SKOLEMAAAW1')),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[96,57]),97,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(104,plain,
    'SKOLEMAAAW10'('SKOLEMAAAW1','SKOLEMAAAW1') = 'SKOLEMAAAW1',
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[69,103]),70,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(122,plain,
    'SKOLEMAAAW10'('SKOLEMAAAW2'(X),Y) = 'SKOLEMAAAW3'('SKOLEMAAAW10'(X,Y),Y),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[64,79,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(128,plain,
    'SKOLEMAAAW10'('SKOLEMAAAW1','SKOLEMAAAW2'(X)) = 'SKOLEMAAAW2'('SKOLEMAAAW10'('SKOLEMAAAW1',X)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[97,65,theory(equality)]),97,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(151,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[33,122,47,38,47,46,38,47,38,47]),47,57,65,104,128,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13  % Problem  : NUN072+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Jun  2 10:12:29 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.48  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.50  * 
% 0.21/0.50  * 
% 0.21/0.50  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.21/0.50  * 
% 0.21/0.50  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.21/0.50  * 
% 0.21/0.50  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.21/0.50   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.21/0.50   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.21/0.50   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.50   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.50   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.21/0.50   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.21/0.50   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.21/0.50   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.21/0.50   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.21/0.50   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.21/0.50   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.21/0.50   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.21/0.50  * 
% 0.21/0.50  "."
% 0.21/0.50  * 
% 0.21/0.50  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-02T10:12:29
% 0.21/0.50  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n025.cluster.edu at 2022-06-02T10:12:29
% 0.21/0.52  
% 0.37/0.62  ; Recognized relation function assertion (|r4| ?X ?Y (SKOLEMAAAW12 ?X ?Y)).
% 0.37/0.62  
% 0.37/0.62  #||
% 0.37/0.62  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/0.62  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.37/0.63  ||#
% 0.37/0.63  
% 0.37/0.63  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.37/0.63  ;       772 formulas have been input or derived (from 83 formulas).
% 0.37/0.63  ;       151 (20%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.37/0.63  ;           31 (21%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.37/0.63  ;          120 (79%) are still being kept.
% 0.37/0.63  ; 
% 0.37/0.63  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.37/0.63  ;     0.005   4%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.37/0.63  ;     0.002   2%   Assert                       (12 calls)
% 0.37/0.63  ;     0.014  12%   Process new row              (634 calls)
% 0.37/0.63  ;     0.034  29%   Resolution                   (164 calls)
% 0.37/0.63  ;     0.005   4%   Paramodulation               (82 calls)
% 0.37/0.63  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (7 calls)
% 0.37/0.63  ;     0.002   2%   Condensing                   (130 calls)
% 0.37/0.63  ;     0.004   3%   Forward subsumption          (130 calls)
% 0.37/0.63  ;     0.000   0%   Backward subsumption         (63 calls)
% 0.37/0.63  ;     0.005   4%   Clause clause subsumption    (166 calls)
% 0.37/0.63  ;     0.014  12%   Forward simplification       (627 calls)
% 0.37/0.63  ;     0.003   3%   Backward simplification      (150 calls)
% 0.37/0.63  ;     0.000   0%   Ordering                     (339 calls)
% 0.37/0.63  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.37/0.63  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.37/0.63  ;     0.030  25%   Other
% 0.37/0.63  ;     0.118        Total
% 0.37/0.63  ;     0.122        Real time
% 0.37/0.63  ; 
% 0.37/0.63  ; Term-hash-array has 254 terms in all.
% 0.37/0.63  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 57 entries (57 at peak, 63 added, 6 deleted).
% 0.37/0.63  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 217 nodes (217 at peak, 239 added, 22 deleted).
% 0.37/0.63  ;  Retrieved 449 possibly forward subsuming rows in 130 calls.
% 0.37/0.63  ;  Retrieved 14 possibly backward subsumed rows in 63 calls.
% 0.37/0.63  ; Path-index has 218 entries (218 at peak, 265 added, 47 deleted).
% 0.37/0.63  ; Path-index has 569 nodes (569 at peak, 631 added, 62 deleted).
% 0.37/0.63  ; Trie-index has 218 entries (218 at peak, 265 added, 47 deleted).
% 0.37/0.63  ; Trie-index has 617 nodes (617 at peak, 734 added, 117 deleted).
% 0.37/0.63  ; Retrieved 956 generalization terms in 2,697 calls.
% 0.37/0.63  ; Retrieved 93 instance terms in 86 calls.
% 0.37/0.63  ; Retrieved 14,138 unifiable terms in 4,784 calls.
% 0.37/0.63  ; 
% 0.37/0.63  ; The agenda of rows to process has 5 entries:
% 0.37/0.63  ;     1 with value 18              1 with value 20               1 with value 49
% 0.37/0.63  ;     1 with value 19              1 with value 21
% 0.37/0.63  ; The agenda of rows to give has 48 entries:
% 0.37/0.63  ;     2 with value (4 15)          2 with value (4 22)           2 with value (4 31)
% 0.37/0.63  ;    13 with value (4 16)          1 with value (4 23)           2 with value (4 32)
% 0.37/0.63  ;     4 with value (4 17)          1 with value (4 24)           1 with value (4 33)
% 0.37/0.63  ;     6 with value (4 18)          2 with value (4 25)           1 with value (4 38)
% 0.37/0.63  ;     3 with value (4 19)          1 with value (4 26)           2 with value (4 39)
% 0.37/0.63  ;     1 with value (4 20)          1 with value (4 28)           1 with value (4 40)
% 0.37/0.63  ;     2 with value (4 21)
% 0.37/0.63  Evaluation took:
% 0.37/0.63    0.123 seconds of real time
% 0.37/0.63    0.104414 seconds of user run time
% 0.37/0.63    0.018662 seconds of system run time
% 0.37/0.63    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.37/0.63    0 page faults and
% 0.37/0.63    9,990,744 bytes consed.
% 0.37/0.63  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.37/0.63  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-02T10:12:30
% 0.37/0.63  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.37/0.63  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------